Home on April 26th.
_May_.--Dr. Watson said, dining at the Literary Club, that he had been present at the death of Lord Palmerston. He retained his usual courtesy and cheerfulness in his last illness, and when Lady Palmerston came into the room he kissed his hand to her. The immediate cause of his death was his taking a walk on the terrace at Brocket without his hat. The apothecary remonstrated--upon which he said: "Oh! it"s only what the bathers call taking a "header."" As the hour of dissolution approached he lost his consciousness, but still spoke occasionally. His last words were (apparently as if his mind was at work on a treaty) "That"s article ninety-eight; now go on to the next." Very characteristic end.
_From M. Guizot_
_Val Richer, June 9th_.--I had little doubt of the war, and I now consider it as begun. With the exception of the Italians and M. de Bismarck, everyone is entering on it with regret and uneasiness. I have never known France so unanimous in the desire for peace; but notwithstanding the injury to our interests and the shock to our opinions, the country has no confidence in its right to resist, and has lost the habit of it. There will be grumblings and prophecies of misfortune, but there will be no opposition; and if there should be any military success, followed by territorial aggrandis.e.m.e.nt, people will forget their ill humour, and will even applaud a little, but always without confidence. It is impossible to stray with impunity from the path of sound policy; as soon as we leave it, we enter on the wrong path and advance by that. In this life it is not possible to remain stationary.
I understand your political att.i.tude. There is no reason why you should take part in the struggle; but what I do not understand, what I regret, is the manifest uncertainty of your opinions. Not only do you do nothing, but you seem as if you did not know what to believe. As lookers-on you are undecided, as actors you are inert. In the state of trouble and weakness in which the intelligence of Europe is now plunged, you, simply by letting your opinions be clearly seen, by the directness of your language, might have an enormous influence on the course of events. But in England, as everywhere else, the idea of moral force seems lost. It is true that such idea requires a knowledge of what one thinks, and of what one desires. It is possible not to give material support to a cause, but it is necessary to have one.
In any case, I am extremely glad that Lord Clarendon remains at the Foreign Office. He will, perhaps, see more clearly, will act with less want of foresight than others. Is it true that, on account of the state of affairs on the Continent, there is in England a tacit suspension of hostilities between the two parties, and that the Cabinet is no longer seriously attacked?...
Je suis charme que le second volume de mes "Meditations" vous ait interesse. Je ne sais pas le nom de la personne qui fait, dans "l"Edinburgh Review," un article sur le premier volume. Dites-moi si elle aurait quelque envie de parler du second, et si vous voulez que je vous en fa.s.se envoyer, pour elle, un exemplaire. Most cordially yours,
GUIZOT.
War broke out between Prussia and Austria in June.
_June 9th_.--Party down to Gravesend by water to see the Hudson"s Bay Company"s ships. Dinner at Gravesend.
_July 13th_.--To Aix-la-Chapelle by way of Paris. Heard Mignet read his notice of Tocqueville at the Inst.i.tute. Spent a fortnight at Aix, and visited Bruges in our way home.
_August 11th_.--Went to Novar, by Perth. Thence to Braban, to Ardross, and to Foss, where Lord Kingsdown had taken a moor. Then to Dunnichen; called at Glamis and Kinnaird Castle. Then to Eaith, and to Lord Belhaven"s at Wishaw; the Warwicks and Sir A. Alison there. Home on September 17th.
_To Mr. Dempster_
_Dunnichen, September 10th_.--Your kind letter from Paris reached me at Novar, at the precise moment when I was about to take the field with the new laird on August 13th. It gave me real pleasure to have something of your company on that day; and when we had reached the back of Fyrish, and could command the Dornoch Firth and the hills beyond it, even to Dunrobin, I looked with affectionate eyes to the woods of Skibo.
The season has been favourable. Raith and I--neither of us a first-cla.s.s walker--killed seventy brace on the Monday, and I got thirty brace alone on several succeeding days. From Novar we went to Brahan, where everything is as lively as usual, and Seaforth in great force,... I then joined Lord Kingsdown at Foss, on Loch Tummel, a delightful place in the centre of the Perthshire Highlands, where you see all Scotland at your feet, from Ben Nevis to Lochnagar. By this time the grouse were becoming wild, and we had descended to fifteen or sixteen brace a day, but we had a splendid drive of blue hares, and slew 367 of them. I then came on here, where I find a most comfortable house, a most kind reception, and a most sociable neighbourhood.... All in short is extremely pleasant, and it is most agreeable to see George so perfectly in his place, and at the head of a well-managed estate....
_From Lord Westbury_
_September 5th_.--I am anxious, before I leave for the Continent, to know if I can be of any service at the sittings of the Judicial Committee. My present purpose is to go to Biarritz, and thence to Italy. But if I can be of utility, and am really wanted, I would return from Biarritz by November 1st, and could devote the whole of November to diligent attendance on the Judicial Committee. I am sorry that I cannot offer to attend during December, as matters of a pressing nature will then require my presence in Italy.
It is, I think, very desirable that the sittings of the Judicial Committee should be certain and continuous at and during a considerable portion of the year; and I should be glad to see the practice adopted of its beginning to sit on November 1st in every year, and continuing its sittings until Christmas if required. You will know whether the state of business at present renders this desirable....
Lord Justice Knight Bruce is a great invalid, and it is hardly fair to expect that, after a laborious term, the Lords Justices should at once commence sitting at the Privy Council. These considerations induce me to write to you. But you will fully understand that, if it is possible to do without further aid, I shall be much obliged to you not to accept my offer.
I shall not write to the President or the Lord Chancellor until I have heard from you.
_To Lord Westbury_
_C. O., September 28th_.--Under the peculiar circ.u.mstances of the present year and the state of business in the Court, the Lord Chancellor thinks it right to acquiesce in your lordship"s suggestion that the Judicial Committee should sit one month earlier than usual in order to dispose of the existing arrear of causes. The Lord Chancellor is, however, of opinion that this sitting in Michaelmas term should be regarded as exceptional and not to be drawn into a precedent, and that it will be expedient hereafter to adhere to the established practice and to the order in Council which directs the sittings to be held after each term. For many years the sittings have been invariably so held in December, February, and June and July; and at each sitting the whole of the business ready for hearing has been disposed of. The only exception to this order occurred last summer in consequence of the illness of Sir James Colvile; and the consequence is that (for the first time for many years) there is now an arrear to be disposed of. Your lordship"s timely a.s.sistance will, however, enable the court to clear off this arrear by this extraordinary sitting; and it is not to be antic.i.p.ated that the same necessity will occur again, although it undoubtedly exists at the present time. When November 1st approaches, I shall have the honour to send the printed cases and the usual summons to your lordship"s residence in London, and I shall give ample notice to the parties that the Judicial Committee will meet for the despatch of business on that day.
_From Lord Chelmsford_[Footnote: At this time Lord Chancellor.]
7 Eaton Square, October 3rd.
Dear Reeve,--Lord Westbury"s letter is satisfactory. Your communication to him, which was highly judicious, has contributed mainly to put things on the right footing.
Knight Bruce"s state of health, following upon what I should think must have been for some time his felt incapacity for work, ought to be a warning to him to terminate a life of useful labour by an honourable retirement. If the hint is lost upon him, he will be a great impediment to the efficiency of the Judicial Committee.
I suppose the temporary a.s.sistance of Lord Westbury will not dispense with the necessity of providing some permanent addition to the strength of the tribunal. Your suggestion as to Vice-Chancellor Kindersley quite met my views, and I suppose might still be carried out with advantage. Of course I can do nothing of this sort without Lord Derby"s sanction, and therefore I should like to have your confirmation of my opinion that this is the best plan that can be resorted to for the present, before I communicate with him on the subject. A letter sent to my house will be forwarded in my box which I receive daily. Yours sincerely, CHELMSFORD.
The Journal notes:--
Visits to Sparrow"s Herne and to Shendish (Charles Longman"s), Parnborough and Torry Hill. The Judicial Committee sat early-November 1st.
_November 8th_.--Lord Westbury, Froude, Lecky, Mrs. Norton, Bayleys, Simpson, and Longman dined with us. It was very amusing. [Mrs. Reeve wrote of it as "brilliant;" and of Lord Westbury as resembling Falstaff and Lord Bacon rolled into one.]
The earliest critical notice of the battle of Lissa, fought on July 20th, appeared in the "Revue des deux Mondes" of November 15th. It was at the time, and has been ever since, generally attributed to the Prince de Joinville; an error which gives the following letter a more especial interest, though it may be thought doubtful whether the suggestion offered by the Prince was correct:--
_From the Prince de Joinville_
Woodnorton, 22 novembre.
Mon cher Monsieur Reeve,--Mon frere Aumale vient de me communiquer votre aimable lettre, a laquelle je m"empresse de repondre. Les eloges que vous donnez a l"auteur de l"article sur Lissa sont tres-merites, car le travail est tres-interessant; mais ils ne sont pas pour moi, car je suis _completement_ etranger a la paternite de ce remarquable morceau, auquel je ne reproche qu"une chose--la severite de ses jugements sur un homme dans la position de Persano.
J"ignore absolument le nom de l"auteur; mais le style elegant, la precision des informations et quelques details d"opinion que je ne partage pas m"avaient fait supposer que nous devions attribuer a Jurien de la Graviere le travail en question. En tous cas, quelque soit l"auteur, je demande a tous mes amis de lui renvoyer le merite et la responsabilite qui lui appartiennent.
Croyez toujours, Monsieur, a mes sentiments d"amitie.
FR. D"ORLeANS.
_To Lord Westbury_
_G. O., November 28th_.--I received the revised judgements yesterday, and have sent them to the printers for correction. I will take care that your emendations are carefully made, and I will again look them all carefully over. Unless I hear again from you to the contrary, I do not understand that you wish to see another revise of them (as it is termed) before they are issued.
In spite of your own preference for the "wild freshness of morning" and all the dewdrops hanging on the roses, I must be allowed to a.s.sure you that, in my poor judgement, they are improved by this severe revision, and that the judicial style is, like Musidora, when "unadorned adorned the most." Of that style I think these judgements will be quoted hereafter as masterly specimens.
_From Lord Kingsdown_
Torry Hill, Sittingbourne: January 7th, 1867.
My dear Reeve,--I have read your paper, and have no hesitation in saying that I think the smallness of your salary quite a scandal and a disgrace to the Court of which you are so important an officer. Knowing as I do the past services which, during a period of more than twenty years, you have rendered to the board, whilst its position has been gradually settling, I should say that 2,000 . a year would be not at all more than a fair remuneration to you during the remainder of your term of office. If the country could be certain, by the same salary, of securing an equally efficient successor, I should think it money well laid out. Your duties are of a very peculiar character; and often require, in addition to the qualities required for the discharge of the ordinary routine duties of a registrar, others of a much rarer description. The correspondence with the different tribunals whose decisions are reviewed, and with the different departments of the Government, which are sometimes disposed to shift to the Judicial Committee the determination of matters not properly belonging to it, demand not unfrequently the exercise of great tact, discretion, and delicacy. But unfortunately a large salary does not always secure services of corresponding value, and sometimes, I am afraid, rather has an opposite tendency, and operates as a temptation to jobbery. On the whole, I should say that 1,500 . a year would be a fair offer to a new man; but I think that the Treasury should have the power to increase it to any amount not exceeding 2,000 . after ten or fifteen years" service, on the recommendation of the committee.
The next letter, from Lord Wensleydale, is interesting as a piece of verbal criticism; showing, also, how a pilot in avoiding Scylla may easily run his bark into Charybdis, or how a writer, whilst objecting to a harmless "firstly," may perpetrate an atrocious "differ with."
Ampthill Park, January 31st.
My dear Reeve,--I was much pleased to hear that "firstly" was an error. I hope you will take some course to indicate your judgement--"a very best authority"--and to prevent the "Edinburgh Review" giving the word its high authority. I have taken every opportunity to amend Acts of Parliament when I find the error in Dom. Proc. I have a sort of mania on the subject.
I have not had an opportunity of looking at the Bishop of Oxford"s case.
I differ with him entirely about the Banns case, and, between ourselves, think he is oily and saponaceous.--Yours ever sincerely,
WENSLEYDALE.
The following, from Professor--afterwards Sir Richard--Owen, seems to refer to a proposed review of the Duke of Argyll"s "Reign of Law," and possibly, also, of the Rev. Edwin Sidney"s "Conversations on the Bible and Science."
Whether Owen was too drastic in his methods or not does not certainly appear; but, for some reason, the article was either not written or not published, though the friendly relations between Owen and Reeve remained unaffected.
Sheen Lodge, Richmond Park, March 9th.