Himself greatly delighted with the beauties of the scenery in the midst of which they lived, and, as he was wont to say in laughter, having received many large doses of Wordsworth from Sh.e.l.ley, Lord Byron wrote several stanzas in which the same enthusiasm may be met with, recorded in terms almost of adoration.
It was only a poetical form, however, a poetical illusion, which was succeeded by stanzas in which G.o.d himself as our creator, was loudly proclaimed. If in the seventy-second and following stanzas of the third canto, opinions were expressed which savored of pantheistic tendencies, they were at once followed by some such as these:--
"All heaven and earth are still--though not in sleep, But breathless, as we grow when feeling most; And silent, as we stand in thought too deep:-- All heaven and earth are still: from the high host Of stars to the lull"d lake and mountain-coast, All is concentred in a life intense, Where not a beam, nor air, nor leaf is lost, But hath a part of being, and a sense Of that which is of all _Creator_ and _Defense_."
And again, on viewing the Alps, he writes the poem of "Manfred," in which his belief in a One G.o.d, and Creator, is expressed in sublime lines. His repugnance to atheism and to materialism is testified not only in his poetry, but also by his own actions.
On reaching Montauvert with his friend Hobhouse, and on the point of ascending Mont Blanc with him, he found Sh.e.l.ley"s name in the register of the travellers, and under it the qualification of "atheist" written in Sh.e.l.ley"s own hand. Lord Byron at once scratched it out. But on reading, a little below, a remark by another traveller, who had justly rebuked Sh.e.l.ley"s folly, Byron added the words, "The appellation is well deserved."
He soon after left the Alps, and came to Italy, without his views, either philosophical or religious, being in the least altered by the seductions of "that serpent," as he jokingly denominated Sh.e.l.ley.
We shall now follow him, step by step, until the end of his life, and we shall see whether he will not show himself stanch in his adherence to great principles. Lord Byron had enough of systems, and was disgusted with their absurdity, their proud dogmatical views, and their intolerant spirit. Whenever the great questions of life and the dictates of the soul occupy his thoughts, either in the silence of the night or in the absence of pa.s.sion, we shall see him set himself resolutely to the examination of his own conscience, for the purpose of arriving at truth and justice. The answers which his powerful reasoning suggested to him served to determine and confirm his faith in G.o.d.
On leaving Geneva, Lord Byron proceeded to Milan. "One day," says Mr.
Stendhall, who knew Lord Byron at Milan, in 1817, and saw a great deal of him there, "some people alluded to a couplet from the "Aminta" of Ta.s.so, in which the poet appears to take credit to himself for being an unbeliever, and expresses it in the lines which may thus be translated:--
"Listen, oh my son, to the thunder as it rolls.
But what is it to us what Jupiter does up there?
Let us rejoice down here if betroubled above; Let the common herd of mortals dread his blows: And let the world go to ruin, I will only think Of what pleases me; and if I become dust again, I shall only be what I have already been."
Lord Byron says that these lines were written under the influence of spleen. A belief in the existence of a superior Being was a necessity for the fiery and tender nature of Ta.s.so. He was, besides, far too Platonic to try to reconcile such contrary opinions. When he wrote those lines, he probably was in want of a piece of bread and a mistress."
Lord Byron reached Venice, and there his most agreeable hours and days were spent with Padre Pasquale, in the convent of the Armenian priests.
He also wrote, at this time, the sublimely moral poem ent.i.tled "Manfred," in which he renders justice to the existence of G.o.d, to the free will of man, the abuse of which has resulted in the loss of "Manfred," and retraces, in splendid lines, all the duties inc.u.mbent upon man, together with the limits which he is not allowed to pa.s.s. The apparition of his lovely and young victim, the uncertainty of her happiness, which causes Manfred"s greatest grief, and finally his supplication to her that he may know whether she is enjoying eternal bliss,
... "That I do bear This punishment for both--that thou wilt be One of the blessed--...."
the whole bears the impress of a truly religious spirit.
He shortly afterward visited Rome, and finding himself in presence of St. Peter"s, he again gave expression to his religious sentiments, in the admirable fourth canto of "Childe Harold," which Englishmen do not hesitate to acknowledge as the finest poem which ever came from mortal hands.
TO ST. PETER.
_Stanza_ 153.
"Christ"s mighty shrine above his martyr"s tomb!"
_Stanza_ 154.
"But thou, of temples old, or altars new, Standest alone, with nothing like to thee.
Power, glory, strength, and beauty all are aisled In this eternal ark of worship undefiled."
From Venice he went on to Ravenna. The persecution to which he was subjected, on the ground of religion and morality, on account of the publication of the two first cantos of "Don Juan," was then at its height, and he was tormented in every possible way. It was useless for him to protest, in verse, in prose, by letter, or by words, against the accusation of his being an atheist and a skeptic. It was a.s.serted that "Manfred" was the expression of his doubts upon the dispensation of Providence, and that his other poems, all more or less imbued with pa.s.sion, had tendencies of an irreverent nature in respect to the Divinity. His two famous stanzas in "Childe Harold" were always held up to him by the innumerable army of hypocrites and wicked people who a.s.sailed him.
All were not hypocrites, however; some were his enemies in good faith, but were blinded by sectarian prejudices. Among these was an Irishman of the name of Mulock, author of a work ent.i.tled "Atheism Answered." Lord Byron one day at Ravenna received a paper from the editor of the "Bologna Telegraph," with extracts from this work, in which "there is a long eulogium of" his "poetry, and a great _compatimento_ for" his "misery" on account of his being a skeptic and an unbeliever in Christ; "although," says Mr. Mulock, "his bold skepticism is far preferable to the pharisaical parodists of the religion of the Gospel, who preach and persecute with an equally intolerant spirit."
Lord Byron, writing that day to Murray, says:--
"I never could understand what they mean by accusing me of irreligion.
They may, however, have it their own way. This gentleman seems to be my great admirer, so I take what he says in good part, as he evidently intends kindness, to which I can"t accuse myself of being insensible."
In the evening he talked to and laughed a good deal with the Countess Guiccioli about this great _compatimento_,[17] treating it as a great oddity. A few months later, Moore having written to him about this same Mr. Mulock, and told him that that gentleman was giving lectures upon religion, Lord Byron, while riding with the young Count G---- in the forest of Ravenna, made his profession of faith, and finding his youthful companion not quite orthodox, said to him: "The nature of cla.s.sical and philosophical studies generally paralyzes all logical minds, and that is why many young heads leave college unbelievers: you are even still more so, because you mix up your religious views with your political antipathies. As for me, in my early youth, when I left college, where I had to bow to very superior and stronger minds who themselves were under various evil influences of college and of youth, I was more than heterodox. Time and reflection have changed my mind upon these subjects, and I consider Atheism as a folly. As for Catholicism, so little is it objectionable to me, that I wish my daughter to be brought up in that religion, and some day to marry a Catholic. If Catholicism, after all, suggests difficulties of a nature which it is difficult for reason to get over, are these less great than those which Protestantism creates? Are not all the mysteries common to both creeds?
Catholicism at least offers the consolation of Purgatory, of the Sacraments, of absolution and forgiveness; whereas Protestantism is barren of consolation for the soul."
This open profession of faith, expressed by such a man as Lord Byron, in a calm and dispa.s.sionate tone, produced a great impression upon the young count. It had been so much the fashion to consider him as irreligious, that one would say that even his friends were of the same opinion. Some time had elapsed since Byron had sent a translation from the Armenian of one of the Epistles of St. Paul, which Murray delayed in publishing. Rather annoyed by this delay, Byron wrote to him on the 9th of October, 1821, from Ravenna:--
"The Epistle of St. Paul, which I translated from the Armenian, for what reason have you kept it back, though you published that stuff which gave rise to the "Vampire?" Is it because you are afraid to print any thing in opposition to the cant of the "Quarterly" about Manicheism? Let me have a proof of that Epistle directly. I am a better Christian than those parsons of yours, though not paid for being so."
If Byron hated fanatical and persecuting clergymen, he, on the other hand, entertained great regard for priests of every denomination, when he knew that they exercised their functions without fanaticism and in a tolerant spirit. Among his dearest and earliest friends he placed two young clergymen,[18] both distinguished in their profession by their piety and their attainments. At Ravenna, his alms in favor of churches and monasteries were very liberal. If the organ were not in order, if the steeple wanted repairs, Lord Byron"s pecuniary a.s.sistance was asked for, and he ever gave liberally though it was for the benefit of the Catholic community. He was always indignant at his writings, especially if connected with religion, being sent back to him by Murray with alterations to which he was no party. On one occasion he reproached him in the following terms:--
"In referring to the mistake in stanza 132, I take the opportunity to desire that in future, in all parts of my writings referring to religion, you will be more careful, and not forget that it is possible that in addressing the Deity a blunder may become a blasphemy: and I do not choose to suffer such infamous perversions of my words or of my intentions. I saw the canto by accident."
His dearest paternal care was the religious education to be given to his natural daughter, Allegra, who was with him at Ravenna. In writing to Mr. and Mrs. Hoppner, to give them tidings of his dear Allegra, whom he had sent to a convent in Romagna to be educated there, he declares that in presence of the political disquietude which reigned in the Romagna, he thought he could not do better than send his child to that convent.
Here "she would receive a little instruction, and some notions of morality and the principles of religion."
Moore adds to this letter a note, which runs thus:--
"With such anxiety did he look to this essential part of his daughter"s education, that notwithstanding the many advantages she was sure to derive from the kind and feminine superintendence of Mrs. Sh.e.l.ley, his apprehensions lest her feelings upon religious subjects might be disturbed by the conversation of Sh.e.l.ley himself prevented him from allowing her to remain under his friend"s roof."
The Bible, as is well known, const.i.tuted his favorite reading. Often did he find in the magnificent poetry of the Bible matter for inspiration.
His "Hebrew Melodies" prove it, and as for the Book of Job, he used to say that it was far too sublime for him even to attempt to translate it, as he would have wished. Toward the end of his stay at Ravenna, when his genius was most fertile and almost superhuman--(he wrote five dramas and many other admirable poems in fifteen months, that is to say, in less time than it requires to copy them)--two biblical subjects inspired his muse: "Cain," and "Heaven and Earth." Both were admirably suited to his pen. He naturally treated them as a philosopher, but without any preconceived notion of making any religious converts. His enemies nevertheless seized hold of these pieces, to incriminate him and impugn his religious belief. I have spoken elsewhere[19] of that truly scandalous persecution. I will only add here that Moore, timid as he usually was when he had to face an unpopularity which came from high quarters, and alarmed by all the cries proceeding from party spirit, wrote to approve the beauty of the poem in enthusiastic terms, but disapproved of the harm which some doubts expressed therein might produce. Byron replied:--
"There is nothing against the immortality of the soul in "Cain," that I recollect. I hold no such opinions; but in a drama the first rebel and the first murderer must be made to talk according to his character."
And in another letter he says, with regard to the same subject:--
"With respect to religion, can I never convince you that I have no such opinions as the characters in that drama, which seem to have frightened every body? Yet they are nothing to the expressions in Goethe"s "Faust"
(which are ten times hardier), and not a whit more bold than those of Milton"s "Satan." My ideas of character may run away with me: like all imaginative men, I, of course, embody myself with the character while I draw it, but not a moment after the pen is from off the paper.
"I am no enemy to religion, but the contrary. As a proof, I am educating my natural daughter a strict Catholic in a convent of Romagna, for I think people can never have enough of religion, if they are to have any.
I incline myself very much to the Catholic doctrines; but if I am to write a drama, I must make my characters speak as I conceive them likely to argue."
The sympathy of persons sincerely religious was extremely agreeable to him. A short time after he had left Ravenna for Pisa, a Mr. John Sheppard sent him a prayer he had found among the papers belonging to his young wife, whom he had lost some two years before. Lord Byron thanked him in a beautiful letter, in which he consoled the distressed husband by a.s.suring him of his belief in immortality, and of his confidence that he would again see the worthy person whom himself he could not but admire, for her virtues and her pure and simple piety.
"I am obliged to you," he added, "for your good wishes, and more than obliged by the extract from the papers of the beloved object whose qualities you have so well described in a few words. I can a.s.sure you that all the fame which ever cheated humanity into higher notions of its own importance, would never weigh in my mind against the pure and pious interest which a virtuous being may be pleased to take in my welfare. In this point of view I would not exchange the prayers of the deceased in my behalf for the united glory of Homer, Caesar, and Napoleon, could such be acc.u.mulated upon a living head. Do me at least the justice to suppose that
"Video meliora proboque,"
however the _deteriora sequor_ may have been applied to my conduct.
BYRON."
Not only did Lord Byron prevent his reason being influenced by the arguments of others, but even by the dictates of his own heart. Both his mind and his heart were perfectly independent of one another, nay, often took different directions. It was to him unquestionably painful to see such a division, but it was the fatal result of the excessive development of the powers of each. In the same letter to Mr. Sheppard which we have quoted, and which is full of grat.i.tude for the prayers which the young wife had addressed to heaven to obtain his conversion, Byron adds:--
"A man"s creed does not depend upon himself: who can say, "I will believe this, that, or the other?" and, least of all, that which he least can comprehend."