Oz Reimagined.
John Joseph Adams.
Dedication.
For that wonderful wizard, L. Frank Baum.
A NOTE ON THE CONTENT.
L. Frank Baum"s original Oz books were works of children"s fictiona"albeit ones that have been known and loved by "children of all ages" throughout their existence. Though many of the stories contained in this anthology are also suitable for the aforementioned children of all ages, Oz Reimagined is intended for ages thirteen and up, and as such, some of the stories deal with mature themes, so parental guidance is suggested.
FOREWORD: OZ AND OURSELVES.
BY GREGORY MAGUIRE.
When I try to settle upon some approach to the notion of Oz that might suit many different readers, and not just myself, I stumble upon a problem. The unit of measure that works for me might not work for you. Standards and definitions vary from person to person. Oz is nonsense; Oz is musical; Oz is satire; Oz is fantasy; Oz is brilliant; Oz is vaudeville; Oz is obvious. Oz is secret.
Look: imagine waiting at a bus stop with a friend. We"re both trying to convey something to each other about childhood. When you say childhood, do you mean "childhood as the species lives it"? Do I mean "my childhood upstate in the mid-twentieth century, my house on the north edge of town, my grouchy father, my lost duckie with the red wheels"?
Oz comes to us early in our lives, I thinka"maybe even in our dreams. It has no name way back then, just "the other place." It"s the unspecified site of adventures of the fledgling hero, the battleground for the working out of early dilemmas, and the garden of future delights yet unnamed.
Foreign and familiar at the same time.
Dream s.p.a.ce.
Lewis Carroll called it Wonderland, Shakespeare called it the Forest of Arden, the Breton troubadours called it Broceliande, and the Freudians called it Traum. The Greeks called it Theater, except for Plato, who called it Reality. Before we study history, though, before we learn ideas, we know childhood through our living of it. And for a century or so, we Americans have called that zone of mystery by the name of Oz.
Your little clutch of postcards from the beyond is a different set than mine, of course. n.o.body collects the same souvenirs from any trip, from any life. Yours might be the set derived from those hardcovers in your grandmother"s attic, the ones with the John R. Neill line drawings someone colored over in oily Crayola markings. (Crayons were invented at just about the same time as Oz, early in the twentieth century.) Or your souvenir cards might be the popular MGM set starring Margaret Hamilton and Bert Lahr and some child stara"I forget her name. Or your souvenirs might be more like mine: memories of being a kid and reenacting (and expanding upon) the adventures of Dorothy using the terrain at hand, which in my case was a filthy alleyway between close-set houses in the early 1960s. Dorothy in her blue-checked gingham and her pigtails is my baby sister in her brother"s T-shirt, hair all unbrushed and eyes bright with play.
What, I wonder, did we Americans do to conjure up a universal land of childhood before L. Frank Baum introduced us to Oz? Did the Bavarian forests of Grimm or the English fairylands (sprites and elves beckoning from stands of foxgloves, deep hedgerows) ever quite work for American kids? Or maybe that"s a silly question. Perhaps before 1900a"when The Wonderful Wizard of Oz was first published and the United States was still essentially rural and therefore by definition hardscrabblea"there was no time to identify the signposts of childhood. Children"s rooms in public libraries hadn"t yet been established. Reading for pleasure wasn"t for everyone, just for those who could afford their own private books. Few nineteenth-century Americans could relish childhood as a s.p.a.ce of play and freedom; instead, childhood was merely the first decade in a life of hard toil on the farm or the factory.
Maybe Oz arose and took hold because urban life began to win out over rural life. Maybe as our horizons became more built up and our childhoodsa"for some middle-cla.s.s American kids anywaya"a little more free, the Oz that came to us first on the page and later on the screen had a better chance of standing in for childhood. That merry old Land of Oz certainly did, and does, signify childhood for me; I mean this not as the author of Wicked and a few other books in that series, but as a man nearing sixty who recognized in Oz, more than half a century ago, a picture of home.
I don"t mean to be sentimental. There"s a lot to mistrust about home. It"s one of the best reasons for growing up: to get away, to make your own bargain with life, and then to look back upon what terms you accepted because you knew no better, and to a.s.sess their value. Travel is broadening precisely because it is away from as well as toward.
As a young man, on my first trip abroad, I went to visit relatives in northern Greece, where my mother"s family originates. In the great Balkan upheavals of the last century, the boundaries of political borders had shifted a dozen times, and the family village that had once been part of Greece, in the early twentieth century, lay now in Yugoslaviaa"still a Communist country in the late 1970s when I first saw it. Stony, poor, oppressed. My ancient, distant relatives, all peasant widows in black coats and neat headscarves, told me how their mother had spent her married life imprisoned in Thessaloniki, Greece, on the top edge of the Aegean; but, of a fine Sunday afternoon, she would direct her husband to drive her north, to a hillside just this side of the border of Yugoslavia. There she would sit by the side of the road and weep. The village of her childhood was on the other side of the border crossing. From this height she could see it, like Moses examining the Promised Land, but she was not allowed back. She could never go back. She never did, or not in this life, anyway. She never sent us postcards once she finally crossed over.
Oz lives contiguously with us. The Yellow Brick Road, the Emerald City, and the great Witch"s castle to the westa"these haunts are more than tourist traps and hamburger stands. They are this century"s Pilgrim"s Progress and Via Dolorosa and Valhalla. Oz is myriad as the Mediterranean with its spotted Homeric islands; Oz is vast as Middle-earth and moral as Camelot. This is to say, of course, that Oz is a mirror. Turn it about and, in the mirror, OZ nearly says ZOE, the Greek word for life.
Of course we recognize Oz when we see it. Of course we find ourselves there. If we can"t find ourselves there, well, we don"t have much chance of recognizing ourselves here. As some farmhand or other might have said to Dorothy, or she to the Wizard.
I will utter a word of caution, though. Perhaps my souvenirs of Oz are darker than yours. I can"t help that; life gives what it will. As a young reader, I learned about Oz the way I would later learn about Life on the Mississippi or life sailing to the lighthouse of the Hebrides or life lived on the verges of The Waste Land. And I found the insularity and even parochialism of Oz"s separate populations puzzling and, maybe, worrying. Racist even, though I hadn"t a word for it yet. Troublingly myopic, exceptionalist. Certainly lacking in intellectual curiosity. When Dorothy first arrived in the land of Munchkins, the kindly Munchkin farmers told her what they"d been told about the Emerald City and about the Wizard. But none of them had had the gumption of Dorothy to pick themselves up and go see for themselves. No firsthand experience. Few of them could predict what kind of population lived over the horizon. None of them cared.
Or maybe I"m being unkind. Maybe those Munchkins all just had to stay on the farm to bring in the crops. But they didn"t signal l.u.s.t for adventure in their remarks about the Emerald City; you"ll grant me that.
Well, they had not read any chronicles of Oz to whet their appet.i.tes for the adventure, I suppose. Kindly, good, solid working people, they were lacking in vision. They"d never gone far enough away from the villages of their own childhoods to be able to look back down the slope and see childhood for what it is: a paradise from which, if we are to survive, we must escape.
I write this in a small walled garden in what used to be called the Languedoc region of France, where for the past decade I have spent part of every summer. My French is close to execrable; even the birds chirp with a better accent than I do. The plane trees with their coats of mottling bark, and the stiff, brushlike sound of their leaves in the dawn winda"it"s all ineffably foreign to me a decade on, and if I can be forgiven an Anglicism, it"s ineffably dear to me, too. I like spending time every year in a place I only barely comprehend. It reminds me of childhood, when I was most alive because the world was so new. Being abroad, struggling to understand, reminds me of Oz.
There is more to say, but here comes the bus. It says OZ above the front window. Welcome aboard. Welcome home.
Gregory Maguire.
Cavillargues.
Bastille Day, 2012.
INTRODUCTION: THERE"S NO PLACE LIKE OZ.
BY JOHN JOSEPH ADAMS & DOUGLAS COHEN.
There"s no place like home.
The phrase has become one of the most famous in the English language, if not all of Western culture. Although first popularized by John Howard Payne (as a lyric in the song "Home! Sweet Home!" for his opera Clari, Maid of Milan), it"s safe to say that when most people hear it, they think not of the opera or the song but of L. Frank Baum"s most magical creation: Oz. It is to Dorothy Gale that most of us unconsciously attribute these wordsa"perhaps because her innocent longing for her farm while being surrounded by such wondrous magic makes the words all the more poignant. Whatever the reason, there is no denying the resonance of the message. Yet while the words may indeed evoke thoughts of home for some, it is somewhat ironic that those words now transport most of us to that magical Land of Oz.
But if this una.s.suming phrase should take our thoughts someplace vastly different than Baum intended, it"s hardly surprising, because while there"s no place like home, it"s equally true that there"s no place like Oz. It has not only transcended the ranks of fantasy readers; thanks to the beloved MGM film cla.s.sic The Wizard of Oz, it has also transcended the ranks of readers, period. Indeed, Oz has woven itself into the very fabric of our culture.
While the Land of Oz has achieved a level of fame that few fantasies ever manage, and while various political allegorical meanings have been attributed to these works, at its heart Oz remains a series of fairy talesa"tales written by a man who continued writing them long after he expected to because he received so many letters from children imploring him to write more Oz adventures. For many of those childrena"and for many of us even nowa"Oz became another home.
Of course, sometimes the home you remember can change. You"ll find that is the case with these stories. For this project we asked our authors to not only revisit Oza"we asked them to reimagine it.
And the results were everything we could have hoped for. Some authors chose to fill in the cracks of the existing mythology with their own unique vision. Others revised the original story, making it branch out in wildly unexpected directions. Still others took the bones of Oz and rebuilt it from the ground up, one magical limb at a time.
Characters you know and love might look different. They might act different. Their choices might shock you. They may make you laugh. They may make you cry. They may guide you down a gaily colored road to see a great and powerful wizard, but then again you might not even find yourself in Oz. (Though in spirit, all these stories take place in Oz, regardless of their actual location.) If it seems like we"re being vague regarding how our authors have reimagined Ozaguilty as charged. We want you to experience that same delight we did the first time we read these stories, discovering what is familiar versus what is different, seeing how it all fits together. We want you to wander into old, warm dreams only to find they"ve taken a delightful right turn.
Even so, we do want to mention one important bit of information before you begin your trip to Oz. If you"re only familiar with the cla.s.sic movie, you might notice that certain details in some of the stories are different from what you remember. The reason for this is simple: our authors were tasked with reimagining L. Frank Baum"s books rather than the famous film based on them. (Though quite faithful, the movie version does take some liberties with the source material.) As a result, some of the little details you remember may be slightly different herea"and not just because the stories have been reimagined. For example, in the movie version, Dorothy famously comes to possess a pair of magical ruby slippers; in the book, the shoes are silver instead. Another difference: thanks to the film, the Wicked Witch"s soldiers have come to be known as Flying Monkeys rather than Winged Monkeys, as they were originally. And in the book Glinda is the Witch of the South rather than the North, and so on. So when you encounter these details in the anthologya"things that may seem to be changed for no particular reasona"rest a.s.sured there is a method to our madness. But if the movie is all you know, have no fear: the movie and the book are similar enough that you"ll have no trouble following the stories and falling into these new versions of Oz.
Reimagining a creation as enduring and seminal as Oz is no small feata"we all have our memories of it, and for many these memories are dearly cherished. Perhaps this explains why our authors embraced this project with so much enthusiasm. Oz is as special to them as it is to you; it is a land of deep imagination, part of that dreaming landscape they delve into each time they create a new work of fantasy. Most of them discovered Oz in one form or another before they even realized they wanted to write fantasy stories of their own, and so it could be said that L. Frank Baum planted some of the earliest seeds that brought them to where they find themselves today. For those of whom this is true, perhaps this anthology is their chance to say thank youaa chance to celebrate one of the great fantasies of our timeaa chance to go back to Oz.
We all change as we pa.s.s out of childhood and become adults. Our perceptions of Oz may change as well. So follow the road of yellow brick when you"re ready, but prepare for a detour or two along the way. And remember: whatever version of Oz you find yourself in, there"s no place like it.
THE GREAT ZEPPELIN HEIST OF OZ.
BY RAE CARSON & C.C. FINLAY.
STRANGE IN A STRANGER LAND.
Sc.r.a.ps, the Patchwork Girl, witnessed the Wizard"s arrival.
She sat beneath a tree watching the most spectacular show ever performed by a summer sky. White clouds swirled above an emerald-colored sky, like whipped marshmallow topping on a gla.s.s bowl full of lime jello, spinning round and round and round on a potter"s wheel.
She didn"t think it could get any more amazing when the clouds cracked open and sunlight burst through, so blinding that she lifted one patchwork arm to shade her b.u.t.ton eyes.
That"s when she saw the balloon.
It was a big bubble made of brightly colored fabric, with a basket hanging underneath and a man inside the basket, clinging to its rim. And it was coming toward her tree.
She jumped up and shouted. "Turn away!"
"I am rudderless in the maelstrom!" yelled the man in the basket. His small voice was getting louder and closer. "Reinless in my carriage!"
The man was making no sense. Sc.r.a.ps waved her hands to shoo the odd vessel aside. "All right, but steer your picnic basket that way!"
"I can"t steer it becausea""
The balloon crashed into the branches of the venerable tree, which shook and shook and shook, like a dog shaking off a bath. The balloon deflated, becoming hopelessly entangled, but all the tree"s effort did manage one thing, which was to spill the pa.s.senger out of the basket.
He hit the ground with a loud thump, and Sc.r.a.ps ran toward him. She reached down to help, but he jumped to his feet like a cata"not all lithe and athletic like a cat making a spectacular leap but rather all arrogant and full of himself like a cat too embarra.s.sed to admit that he"d taken a bad tumble.
"Are you all right?" she asked.
He stared at her uncomprehendingly, so she spoke in a way that he might understand.
"ARE. YOU. ALL. RIGHT?"
"I must have knocked my noggin," he said, feeling his head for lumps. "I"ve shaken the coin purse, rattled the old dice cup."
"I don"t know about that," Sc.r.a.ps said. "But I think you b.u.mped your heada"you"re not making a lick of sense."
He startled when she spoke again, as if hearing her for the first time. "Merciful blessings," he said. "You"re a talking ragdoll! And a filthy one at that."
Sc.r.a.ps, who was very proud of her shiny b.u.t.ton eyes, orange yarn hair, and striped knickers, opened her mouth to say something likely to land her in a tussle with the strange man, even though she stood no higher than his knee. But the tree spoke first.
"And you"re a blithering idiot," boomed the good-natured old oak.
He was bending over as he said it, and the man from the balloon jumped so high that he hit his head on a branch and accomplished what falling from the sky could not: he knocked himself out cold.
"What a strange man," the tree said, his knotholes frowning. "What do we do with him now?"
"I"ll run to the Emerald City and get the Guardian of the Gates," Sc.r.a.ps replied. "He"ll know what to do."
PROGRESS!.
The Guardian of the Gates had no idea what to do.
The strange man had not stopped talking once since he"d been carried to the guardhouse. He called himself Oz, which was short for Oscar, because he had so many other things to say; there was no time to use a two-syllable name when one syllable was available. His talk was equal parts questions and opinions, although the latter seldom seemed related to the answers he received to the former, until he said, quite out of the blue: "I"ll tell you what"s not right about this country."
The statement startled Gigi, which is what the Guardian of the Gates was called by his friends, even though his proper namea"Georgea"was only one syllable long. But who in the world used one syllable when two perfectly good syllables were at hand?
"What"s wrong with this country?" asked Gigi, who already knew what was wrong with the guardhousea"half his bread and all his b.u.t.ter had been eaten by the stranger.
"Now don"t go putting words into my mouth," Oz said. "Not right is not the same as wrong. There"s right and not right, and there"s right and wrong, and there"s wrong and not wrong. But to insist that not right is the same as wrong is to infer a transitive property of equivalence that is not supported by the evidence, for we do not yet know the qualities that individually compose not right and wrong. Am I not right?"
"I think you"re wrong," Gigi said, trying desperately to follow.
"You haven"t been paying attention at all," Oz snapped. "Have you never studied the mathematical approach to language known as logic?"
"I can"t say that I have."
"Which is not the same as saying that you haven"t," Oz replied. "But I digress. To return to the originala"in fact, the essentiala"point that I was about to make: what"s not logical, what"s distinctly and preeminently not right about this country, as you have described it to me, is that there are four kingdoms."
"No, that"s right," Gigi said. "There are definitely four kingdoms."
"There are four kingdoms, but not one king. Every kingdom in this land is ruled by a woman! Why, in the land I come from, there is a great city called Omaha, not much different than your fine metropolis, in which my father served as a city councilman for two score years, give or take an annum. In all that time, he did not once serve under or even with a woman. And yet here you are ruled by four of them. Glinda, Bastinda, Locasta, andaCanasta?"
He waved his hand in the air, as if it were a matter of no consequence to forget a witch"s name.
"Her name isa"" Gigi started to say.
"Why, it"s poppyc.o.c.k!"
"No, it"sawhat"s poppyc.o.c.k?"
"Poppyc.o.c.k? It"s a species of flower. You usually find it planted in gardens along with balderdash and humbug and ample beds of bunk.u.m. Does she have an army?"
"The Witch?" Gigi said. "She has a few soldiers, I suppose. But mostly she has the Winged Monkeys."
"Monkey business, is it?" Oz murmured to himself.
"And she"s very capable with magic."
"I can do a bit of magic myself!"