"All these are deponed, not to be given till farther orders."
What use the Princesse de Talmond was to make of these doc.u.ments, on what occasion, is not at all obvious. That the Prince actually went to London, we know from a memorandum in his own hand. "My full powers and commission of Regency renewed, when I went to England in 1750, and nothing to be said at Rome, for every thing there is known, and my brother, who has got no confidence of my Father, has always acted, as far as his power, against my interest." {105}
Of Charles"s doings in London, no record survives in the Stuart Papers of 1750. We merely find this jotting:
"Parted ye 2d. Sep. Arrived to A. [Antwerp] ye 6th. Parted from thence ye 12th. Sept. E. [England] ye 14th, and at L. [London] ye 16th. Parted from L. ye 22d. and arrived at P. ye 24th. From P.
parted ye 28th. Arrived here ye 30th Sept. If she [Madame de Talmond, probably] does not come, and ye M. [messenger] agreed on to send back for ye Letters and Procuration [to] ye house here of P. C.
and her being either a tretor or a hour, to chuse which, [then] not to send to P. even after her coming unless absolute necessity order, requiring it then at her dor."
On the back of the paper is:
"The letter to G.o.die [Gaudie?] r.e.t.a.r.ded a post; ye Lady"s being arrived, or her r.e.t.a.r.d to be little, if she is true stille."
Then follow some jottings, apparently of the lady"s movements. "N.S.
[New style] ye 16th. Sept. Either ill counselled or she has made a confidence. M. Lorain"s being here [the Duke of Lorraine, ex-King of Poland, probably, a friend of Madame de Talmond] ye 12th. Sept. To go ye same day with ye King, speaking to W. [Waters?] ye last day, Madame A. here this last six weeks."
These scrawls appear to indicate some communication between Madame de Talmond, the Duke of Lorraine, and Louis XV. {106}
In London Charles did little but espouse the Anglican religion. Dr.
King, in his "Anecdotes," tells how the Prince took the refreshment of tea with him, and how his servant detected a resemblance to the busts sold in Red Lion Square. He also appeared at a party at Lady Primrose"s, much to her alarm. {107} He prowled about the Tower with Colonel Brett, and thought a gate might be damaged by a petard. His friends, including Beaufort and Westmoreland, held a meeting in Pall Mall, to no purpose. The tour had no results, except in the harmless region of the fine arts. A medal was struck, by Charles"s orders, and we have the following information for collectors of Jacobite trinkets. The English Government, never dreaming that the Prince was in Pall Mall, was well informed about cheap treasonable jewellery.
"Paris: August 31, 1750.
"The Artist who makes the seals with the head of the Pretender"s eldest Son, is called le Sieur Malapert, his direction is hereunder, he sells them at 3 Livres apiece, but by the Dozen he takes less.
"It is one Tate, who got the engraving made on metal, from which the Artist takes the impression on his Composition in imitation of fine Stones of all colours. This Tate was a Jeweller at Edinborough, where he went into the Rebellion and having made his escape, has since settled here, but has left his wife and Family at Edinborough.
He is put upon the list of the French King"s Bounty for eight hundred Livres yearly, the same as is allowed to those that had a Captain"s Commission in the Pretender"s Service and are fled hither. It is Sullivan and Ferguson who employ Tate to get the 1,500 Seals done, he being a man that does still Jeweller"s business and follows it. The Artist has actually done four dozen of seals, which are disposed of, having but half a dozen left. He expects daily an order for the said quant.i.ty more--As there are no Letters or Inscription about it, the Artist may always pretend that it is only a fancy head, though it is in reality very like the Pretender"s Eldest Son." {108}
Oddly enough, we find Waters sealing, with this very intaglio of the Prince, a letter to Edgar, in 1750. It is a capital likeness.
Wise after the event, Hanbury Williams wrote from Berlin (October 13, 1750) that Charles was in England, "in the heart of the kingdom, in the county of Stafford." By October 20, Williams knows that the Prince is in Suffolk. All this is probably a mere echo of Charles"s actual visit to London, reverberated from the French Emba.s.sy at Berlin, and arriving at Hanbury Williams, he says, through an Irishman, who knew a lacquey of the French Amba.s.sador"s. In English official circles no more than this was known. Troops were concentrated near Stafford after Charles had returned to Lorraine.
Hume told Sir John Pringle a story of how Charles was in London in 1753, how George II. told the fact to Lord Holdernesse, and how the King expressed his good-humoured indifference. But Lord Holdernesse contradicted the tale, as we have already observed. If Hume meant 1750 by 1733 he was certainly wrong. George was then in Hanover. In 1753 I have no proof that Charles was in London, though Young Glengarry told James that the Prince was "on the coast" in November 1752. If Charles did come to London in 1753, and if George knew it, the information came through Pickle to Henry Pelham, as will appear later. Hume gave the Earl Marischal as his original authority. The Earl was likely to be better informed about events of 1752-1753 than about those of September 1750.
After Charles"s departure from London, the English Government received information from Paris (October 5, 1750) to the following effect:
"Paris: October 5, 1750.
"It is supposed that the Pretender"s Son keeps at Montl"hery, six leagues from Paris, at Mr. Lumisden"s, or at Villeneuve St. Georges, at a small distance from Town, at Lord Nairn"s; Sometimes at Sens, with Col. Steward and Mr. Ferguson; when at Paris, at Madme. la Princesse de Talmont"s, or the Scotch Seminary; n.o.body travels with him but Mr. Goring, and a Biscayan recommended to him by Marshal Saxe: the young Pretender is disguised in an Abbe"s dress, with a black patch upon his eye, and his eyebrows black"d.
"An Officer of Ogilvie"s Regimt. in this Service listed lately. An Irish Priest, who belonged to the Parish Church of S. Eustache at Paris, has left his Living, reckoned worth 80l. St. a year, and is very lately gone to London to be Chaplain to the Sardinian Minister: he has carried with him a quant.i.ty of coloured Gla.s.s Seals with the Pretender"s Son"s Effigy, as also small heads made of silver gilt about this bigness [example] to be set in rings, as also points for watch cases, with the same head, and this motto round "Look, Love, and follow."" {110}
On October 30, Walton wrote that James was much troubled by a letter from Charles, doubtless containing the news of his English failure; perhaps notifying his desertion of the Catholic faith. On January 15, 1751, Walton writes that James has confided to the Pope that Charles is at Boulogne-sur-Mer, which he very possibly was. On January 9 and 22, Horace Mann reports, on the information of Cardinal Albani, that James and the Duke of York are ill with grief.
"Something extraordinary has happened to the Pretender"s eldest son."
He had turned Protestant, that was all. But Cardinal Albani withdraws his statement, and thinks that nothing unusual has really occurred. In fact, Charles, as we shall see, had absolutely vanished for three months.
Charles returned to France in September 1750, and renewed his amantium irae with Madame de Talmond. Among the Stuart Papers of 1750 are a number of tiny billets, easily concealed, and doubtless pa.s.sed to the lady furtively. "Si vous ne voulez, Reine de Maroc, pas cet faire, quelle plaisir mourir de chagrin et de desespoire!"
"Aiez de la Bonte et de confience pour celui qui vous aime et vous adore pa.s.sionement."
To some English person:
"Ask the Channoine where you can by hocks [buy hooks!] and lines for fishing, and by a few hocks and foure lines." {111}
The Princess writes:
"Je partirai dimanche comme j"ai promis au Roy de Pologne"
(Stanislas). "Je vous embra.s.se bien tendrement, si vous etes tel que vous devez etre a mon egard." She is leaving for Commercy. On the reverse the Prince has written, "Judi. Je comance a ouvrire mes yeux a votre egar, Madame, vous ne voulez pas de mois, ce soire, malgre votre promes, et ma malheureuse situation."
The quarrels grew more frequent and more embittered. We have marked his suspicious view of the lady"s movements. On September 26, 1750, she had not returned, and he wrote to her in the following terms.
The Prince.
September 26, 1750.
"Je pars, Madame, dans L"instant, en Sorte que vous feriez reflection, et retourniez au plus vite, tout doit vous Engager, si vous avez de l"amitie pour mois, Car je ne puis pas me dispenser de vous repeter, Combien chaque jour de votre absence faira du tor a mes affaier outre Le desire d"avoire une Coinpagnie si agreable dans une si triste solitude, que ma malheureuse situation m"oblige indispensablement de tenire. J"ai cesse [?] des Ordres positive a Mlle. Luci, de ne me pas envoier La Moindre Chose meme une dilligence come aussi de mon cote je n"en veres rien, jusqu"a ce que vous soiez arrive.
"Quant vous partires alors Mdll. Luci vous remettera tout ce quil aura pour mois, vous rien de votre cote que votre personne."
On the same paper Charles announces his intention of going instantly to "Le Lorain." There must have been a great quarrel with Madame de Talmond, outwearied by the exigencies of a Prince doomed to a triste solitude after a week of London. On September 30 he announces to Waters that there will be no news of him till January 15, 1751. For three months he disappears beyond even his agent"s ken. On October 20 he writes to Mademoiselle Luci, styling himself "Mademoiselle Chevalier," and calling Madame de Talmond "Madame Le Nord." The Princesse de Talmond has left him, is threatening him, and may ruin him.
"Le October 20, 1750.
"A Mll. Luci: Mademoiselle Chevalier est tres affligee de voir le peu d"egard que Madame Lenord a pour ses Interest. La Miene du 12 auroit ete La derniere mais cette dame a ecrit une Letre en date du 18 a M. Le Lorrain qui a choque cette Demoiselle [himself], Et je puis dire avec raison quelle agit come Le plus Grand de ses ennemis par son r.e.t.a.r.d, elle ajoute encor a cela des menaces si on La presse d"avantage, et si l"on se plain de son indigne procede. Md. Poulain seroit deja part.i.t, et partiroit si cette dame lui en donnoit Les Moiens. Je ne puis trop vous faire connoitre Le Tort que Md. Lenord fait a cette demoiselle en abandonant sa societe et La risque qu"elle fait courir a Md. de Lille qui par La pouroit faire banqueroute.
"A Mdll. La Marre.
Chez M. Lecuyer tap.i.s.se [Tap.i.s.sier].
Grande Rue Garonne, Faubourg St. Germain a Paris.
"Vous pouvez accuser La reception de cette Lettre par Le premier Ordinaire a M. Le Vieux [Old Waters].
"Adieu Mdll.
"Je vous embrace de tout mon Cour."
On November 7 Charles writes again to Mademoiselle Luci: the Princesse de Talmond is here la vieille tante: now estranged and perhaps hostile. Madame de la Bruere is probably the wife of M. de la Bruere, whom Montesquieu speaks highly of when, in 1749, he was Charge d"Affaires in Rome. {113}
"Le 7 Nov. 1750.
"Mdlle. Luci,--Je suis fort Etone Mademoiselle qu"une fame de cette Age qu"a notre Tante soi si deresonable. Elle se done tout La paine immaginable pour agire contre Les interets de sa niece par son r.e.t.a.r.d du payment dont vous m"avez deja parle.
"Voici une lettre que je vous prie de cachete, et d"y mettre son adress, et de l"envoier sur Le Champ a Madame de Labruiere. Il est inutile d"hors en avant que vous communiquier aucune Chose de ce qui regard Mlle. Chevalier [himself], a Md. la Tante [Talmond] jusqu"a ce que Elle pense otrement, car, il n"est que trop cler ques es procedes sont separes et oposes a ce qui devroit etre son interet. Je vous embrace de tout mon Coeur."