I always found that the first portion of the heavy inflammable air, resulting from the pa.s.sage of steam over heated charcoal was loaded with fixed air (CO_2), but that in the course of the process this disappeared, the remaining air (CO) burning with a lambent flame.
Scarcely had Priestley set foot in Philadelphia on his third visitation than the _Port Folio_, devoted usually to literature and biography, printed the following unkind words:
The tricks of Dr. Priestley to embroil the government, and disturb the religion of his own country, have not the merit of novelty.
To which the _Aurora_ replied:
When Porcupine rioted in the filth of a debauched and corrupt faction in this city, no person experienced so much of his obscene and vulgar abuse as Dr. Priestley. There is not a single fact on record or capable of being shewn, to prove that Dr. Priestley was guilty of any other crime than being a dissenter from the church of England, and a warm friend of American Independence. For this he was abused by Porcupine--and Denny is only Porcupine with a little more tinsel to cover his dirt. It is worthy of remark, that after a whole sheet of promises of "literary lore" and "products of the master of spirits" of the nation--the first and second numbers of the _Portable Foolery_, are stuffed with extracts from British publications of an ordinary quality.
The attack of the Port Folio was most ungracious. It may have been due to irritation caused by the appearance of a second edition of Priestley"s "Letters to the Inhabitants of Northumberland." Nevertheless the thoughtful and dignified men of the City--men who admired Priestley"s broad catholic spirit and brave att.i.tude upon all debatable questions, men who appreciated his scientific attainments, invited him to the following subscription dinner, as announced in the _Aurora_, March, 6th:
At 4 o"clock in the afternoon about one hundred citizens sat down to an elegant entertainment prepared by Mr. Francis to celebrate the commencement of the administration of Mr. Jefferson. The Governor honored the company with his presence. Several respectable Foreigners were invited to partake of the festival....
A variety of patriotic songs were admirably sung; and the following toasts were drank with unanimous applause.
1. The Governor of Pennsylvania
2. Dr. Priestley: The Philosopher and Philanthropist....
He was present and enjoyed himself, and sad must it have been to read on March 30th:
Some weeks ago, Dr. Priestley having caught cold by attending a meeting of the Philosophical Society on a wet evening, was taken ill of a violent inflammatory complaint which rendered his recovery for a long time dubious. We announce with sincere pleasure the returning health of a man, whose life hath hitherto been sedulously and successfully devoted to the interests of mankind.
He had, indeed, been very ill. The trouble was pleurisy. Dr. Rush was his physician. By his order the patient was bled profusely seven times.
During this trying and doubtful period there came to him a cheery letter from President Jefferson who had only learned of his illness. Among other things the President wrote--
Yours is one of the few lives precious to mankind, and for the continuance of which every thinking man is solicitous. Bigots may be an exception.... But I have got into a long disquisition on politics when I only meant to express my sympathy in the state of your health, and to tender you all the affections of public and private hospitality. I should be very happy to see you here (Washington). I leave this about the 30th to return about the 25th of April. If you do not leave Philadelphia before that, a little excursion hither would help your health. I should be much gratified with the possession of a guest I so much esteem, and should claim a right to lodge you, should you make such an excursion.
But Priestley journeyed homeward on April 13th, and en route wrote the following letter, addressed to John Vaughan, Esq. 179 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, Pa.:
April 17, 1801 Reading, Friday Evening
Dear Sir,
I have the pleasure to inform you, agreeably to your kind request, that we are safely arrived at this place, my daughter better than when we left Philadelphia, and as to myself, I feel just as well, and as able to bear any fatigue, as before my late illness. This, however, will always remind me of your friendly attentions, and those of your sister, if a thousand and other circ.u.mstances did not do the same, and of them all I hope I shall ever retain a grateful remembrance.
Along the whole road I am struck with the marks of an astonishing degree of improvement since I came this way four years ago. I do not think that any part of England is better cultivated, and at present the wheat is in a very promising state. I wish we may hear of that of England promising as well. Three years of such a scarcity is more than any country could bear, and you will believe me when I say that, if it was in my power, I would guard it not only from famine, but from every other calamity.
With my daughter"s kindest remembrance, I am, as ever
Dear Sir Yours sincerely, J. PRIESTLEY.[8]
Resuming his correspondence with his numerous friends in England, he said:
My chief resource is my daily occupation.
He also wrote Dr. Rush his thanks for having advised him to read Noah Webster"s _Pestilential Disorders_ which follow the appearance of meteors and earthquakes, taking occasion also to excuse his opposition to blood-letting,--
I believe that I owe my life to your judicious direction of it. I shall never forget your so readily forgiving my suspicion, and my requesting the concurrence of Dr. Wistar after the third bleeding.
It was his opinion as well as yours and Dr. Caldwell"s, that my disorder required several more; and the completeness of my cure, and the speediness of my recovery, prove that you were right. In the future I shall never be afraid of the lancet when so judiciously directed.
To Rush he confided his doubts about his paper on Dreams. He cannot account for them, hence he has offered merely an hypothesis, and continues--
I frequently think with much pleasure and regret on the many happy hours I spent in your company, and wish we were not at so great distance. Such society would be the value of life to me. But I must acquiesce in what a wise providence has appointed.
His friends continued sending him books. And how joyously he received them. At times he would mention special works, as for example,--
Please to add Gate"s Answer to Wall, and Wall"s Reply; Sir John Pringle"s Discourses and Life by Dr. Kippis; Chandler"s Life of King David; Colin Milne"s Botanical Dictionary, Botanic Dialogues, and other books of Natural History; Kirwan"s a.n.a.lysis of Mineral Waters; Crosby"s History of English Baptists.
In one of his letters he observed--
A person must be in my situation ... to judge of my feelings when I receive new books.
Strangely enough a _box_ of books was sent him to Carlisle (Pa.) and had been there for two years before he learned of it.
Perhaps a word more may be allowed in regard to the paper on _Pestilential Disorders_ by Noah Webster. This was the lexicographer.
Priestley thought the work curious and important, but the philosophy in it wild and absurd in the extreme. And of Rush he asks--
Pray is he (Webster) a believer in revelation or not? I find several atheists catch at everything favourable to the doctrine of _equivocal generation_; but it must be reprobated by all who are not.
Chemists will be glad to hear that
The annual expense of my laboratory will hardly exceed 50 pounds, and I think I may have done more in proportion to my expenses than any other man. What I have done here, and with little expense, will in time be thought very considerable; but on account of the almost universal reception of the new theory, what I do is not, at present, attended to; but Mr. Watt and Mr. Kier, as good chemists as any in Europe, approve of my tract on _Phlogiston_, and truth will in time prevail over any error.
And to another he said,
Having had great success in my experiments in this country ... I shall never desert philosophy.
The following year (1802) had several points of interest in connection with the good Doctor; for one, who has followed his career thus far, will wish to call him that.
Communications from the home country and from France, while not so numerous, were yet full of interesting news. His friend Belsham brought out his Elements of Philosophy of the Mind, and although Priestley paid it a most gracious tribute he did not hesitate to suggest alterations and additions of various kinds. His dearest friend Lindsey fell seriously ill this year. This gave him inexpressible anxiety and grief.
As soon as Lindsey was, in a measure, restored the fraternal correspondence was resumed.
Much time was given by the Doctor to reading and preparing for the press the volumes of his _Church History_ and _Notes on the Scriptures_. The printing was to be done in Northumberland. Some doubt was entertained as to whether he would have funds sufficient to pay for the publication, and when the urgent letters from friends tempted him to undertake a European trip he generally replied that he was too far advanced in life, that the general debility produced by pernicious ague rendered him unfit for extended travel, and then he offset the disappointment by saying that the expense of the voyage would more than suffice for the printing of one of his proposed four volumes of the _Church History_. This was a most complete, interesting and instructive work. Even today one profits by its perusal and an immense fund of worthwhile information and knowledge may be derived from even a cursory study of his _Notes on the Scriptures_.
The monotony of village life was broken by occasional letters from President Jefferson. These were most affectionate and also illuminating on national matters. Copies of these were sent to English friends with the injunction not to show them or permit them to fall into other hands.
Dr. Thomas Cooper was not with Priestley in this year (1802), being detained at Lancaster where the a.s.sembly sat. Naturally Cooper made himself conspicuous, and Priestley prophesied a great future for him, providing that the jealousy entertained for foreigners did not prove too serious an obstacle.
Priestley took much pleasure at this period in his garden, and wrote,
Plants, as well as other objects, engage more of my attention than they ever did before.... I wish I knew a little more botany; but old, as I am, I learn something new continually.
Now and then he mentions a considerable degree of deafness, and sent to Philadelphia for a speaking trumpet, but cheerily adds,
I am, however, thankful that my eyes do not fail me.
Here and there occur plaints like these: