The disposition of the lower orders of the people ... for the French ... is not extinguished.
He was much annoyed by Peter Porcupine. The latter was publishing a daily paper (1799) and in it frequently brought forward Priestley"s name in the most opprobrious manner, although Priestley in his own words--
had nothing to do with the politics of the country.
The Doctor advised friend Lindsey that
He (Porcupine) every day, advertizes his pamphlet against me, and after my name adds, "commonly known by the name of the fire-brand philosopher."
However, he flattered himself that he would soon be back in Northumberland, where he would be usefully engaged, as
I have cut myself out work for a year at least ... besides attending to my experiments.
Mr. Adams had come into the Presidency, so Priestley very properly went to pay his respects and
take leave of the late President (Washington)
whom he thought in not very good spirits, although
he invited me to Mount Vernon and said he thought he should hardly go from home twenty miles as long as he lived.
Priestley"s fame was rapidly spreading through the land. Thoughtful men were doing him honor in many sections of the country, as is evident from the following clipping from a Portland (Me.) paper for March 27, 1797:--
On Friday the twenty-fourth a number of gentlemen, entertaining a high sense of the character, abilities and services of the Reverend Doctor JOSEPH PRIESTLEY, as a friend and promoter of true science dined together at the Columbian Tavern, in commemoration of his birth. The following toasts were given.
1. That Ill.u.s.trious Christian and Philosopher, Joseph Priestley: May the world be as grateful to him for his services as his services are beneficial to the world.
2. May the names of Locke, Newton, Montesquieu, Hartley and Franklin be had in everlasting remembrance.
3. The great gift of G.o.d to man, Reason! May it influence the world in policy, in laws, and in religion.
4. TRUTH: May the splendour of her charms dissipate the gloom of superst.i.tion, and expel hypocricy from the heart of man.
5. May our laws be supported by religion: but may religion never be supported by law.
6. White-robed Charity: May she accompany us in all our steps and cover us with a mantle of love.
7. Christians of all denominations: May they "love one another."
As it was a "feast of reason" the purest philanthrophy dignified the conversation; and moderation and temperance bounded every effusion of the heart.
It was in the summer of 1797 that he carried forward his work on Phlogiston, alluded to on p. 81. He understood quite well that the entire chemical world was against him but he was not able to find good reasons
to despair of the old system.
It must be remembered that in these days, also, he had Thomas Cooper with him. With this gentleman he discussed his scientific studies and with him also he carried on many arguments upon the burning subject of infidelity, about which he continuously wrote his friends in this country and in England. It was quite generally believed that Cooper was an infidel. Never, however, did their intimacy suffer in the slightest by their conflicting views.
The _Church History_ continued to hold Priestley"s first thought. He was a busy student, occupied with a diversity of interests and usually cheerful and eager to follow up new lines of endeavor. The arrival of vessels from the home country was closely watched. Books and apparatus were brought by them. While, as observed, he was singularly cheerful and happy, he confessed at times that
my character as a philosopher is under a cloud.
Yet, this was but a momentary depression, for he uttered in almost the same breath--
Everything will be cleared up in a reasonable time.
Amid the constant daily duties he found real solace in his scientific pursuits; indeed when he was quite prepared to abandon all his activities he declared of his experiments that he could not stop them for
I consider them as that study of the works of the great Creator, which I shall resume with more advantage hereafter.
He advised his friends Lindsey and Belsham--
I cannot express what _I_ feel on receiving your letters. They set my thoughts afloat, so that I can do nothing but ruminate a long time; but it is a most pleasing melancholy.
Far removed from European events he was nevertheless ever keen and alert concerning them. Then the winter of 1797 appears to have been very severe. His enforced confinement to home probably gave rise to an introspection, and a slight disappointment in matters which had formerly given him pleasure. For example, he puzzled over the fact that on his second visit to Philadelphia, Mr. Adams was present but once at his lectures, and remarks--
When my lectures were less popular, and he was near his presidentship, he left me, making a kind of apology, from the members of the princ.i.p.al Presbyterian Church having offered him a pew there. He seemed to interest himself in my favour against M.
Volney, but did not subscribe to my Church History ... I suppose he was not pleased that I did not adopt his dislike of the French.
When January of 1798 arrived his joy was great. A box of books had come.
Among them was a General Dictionary which he regarded as a real treasure. Reading was now his princ.i.p.al occupation. He found the making of many experiments irksome and seemed, all at once, "quite averse to having his hands so much in water." Presumably these were innocent excuses for his devotion to the Church History which had been brought up to date. Furthermore he was actually contemplating transplanting himself to France. But with it all he wrote a.s.siduously on religious topics, and was highly pleased with the experimental work he had sent to Dr.
Mitchill (p. 85).
He advised his friends of the "intercepted letters" which did him much harm when they were published. They called down upon him severest judgement and suspicion, and made him--
disliked by all the friends of the ruling power in this country.
It may be well to note that these "intercepted letters" were found on a Danish ship, inclosed in a cover addressed to
DR. PRIESTLEY, IN AMERICA
They came from friends, English and French, living in Paris. They abounded
with matter of the most serious reflection.... If the animosity of these apostate Englishmen against their own country, their conviction that no submissions will avert our danger, and their description of the engines employed by the Directory for our destruction, were impressed as they ought to be, upon the minds of all our countrymen, we should certainly never again be told of the innocent designs of these traitors, or their a.s.sociates--
The preceding quotation is from a booklet containing exact copies of the "intercepted letters."
In the first of the letters, dated Feb. 12, 1798, the correspondent of Priestley tells that he had met a young Frenchman who had visited Northumberland
and we all rejoiced at the aggreeable information that at the peace you would not fail to revisit Europe; and that he hoped you would fix yourself in this country (France). Whether you fix yourself here or in England, (_as England will then be_) is probably a matter of little importance ... but we all think you are misplaced where you are, though, no doubt, in the way of _usefulness_--
The editor of the letters annotates _usefulness_ thus:
Dr. Priestley is _in the way of usefulness_ in America, because he is labouring there, as his a.s.sociates are in Europe, to disunite the people from their government, and to introduce the blessings of French anarchy.
These "intercepted letters" in no way prove that Dr. Priestley was engaged in any movement against his native land or against his adopted country. However, the whole world was in an uproar. People were ready to believe the worst regarding their fellows, so it is not surprising that he should have declared himself "disliked."
He alludes frequently to the marvelous changes taking place in the States. Everything was in rapid motion. Taxes were the topic of conversation on all sides.
To divert his philosophizing he busied himself in his laboratory where many "original experiments were made." He avoided the crowd. There was too great a party spirit. Indeed, there was violence, so he determined not to visit Philadelphia. He sought to escape the "rancorous abuse"