[Sidenote: An Editorial Perplexity]
Unfortunately, Merrill had greater confidence in my newspaper skill and experience than I had, and so when I reported for duty on Sunday, Merrill was already gone on his vacation and I was left responsible for next day"s editorial page.
I knew nothing of the _World"s_ staff or organization or methods. There were no other editorial writers present in the office and upon inquiry of the office boys I learned that no others were expected to present themselves on that day.
I sent to the foreman of the composing room for the "overproofs"--that is to say, proofs of editorial matter left over from the day before.
He reported that there were none, for the reason that Merrill, before leaving on the preceding day, had "killed" every editorial galley in the office.
c.o.c.kerill was not expected at the office until nine or ten o"clock that night, and there was n.o.body else there who could tell me anything about the matter.
Obviously, there was only one thing to do. I sat down and wrote an entire editorial page, for a newspaper whose methods and policy I knew only from the outside. When I had done that, and had got my matter into type, and had read my revised proofs, messengers arrived bearing the ma.n.u.scripts of what the other editorial writers--men unknown to me--had written at their homes during the day, after the Sunday custom that then prevailed but which I abolished a little later when Merrill went to Europe upon Mr. Pulitzer"s invitation and I was left in control of the editorial page.
I have related this experience thinking that it may interest readers unfamiliar with newspaper work, as an exemplification of the emergency problems with which newspaper men have often to deal. These are of frequent occurrence and of every conceivable variety. I remember that once some great utterance seemed necessary, and Mr. Pulitzer telegraphed it from Bar Harbor. It filled the entire available editorial s.p.a.ce, so that I provided no other editorial articles whatever. I had "made up"
the page and was only waiting for time before going home, when news despatches came that so completely changed the situation treated in the editorial as to compel its withdrawal.
It was after midnight, and I hadn"t a line of editorial matter on the galleys with which to fill the void. The editorial page must go to the stereotypers at half-past one, and I had no soul to help me even by writing twaddle with which to fill s.p.a.ce. The situation was imperative and the case was clear. The case was that I must write two or three columns of editorial matter and get it into type, proof-read, and corrected, before one-thirty of the clock--or one-forty-five, as the foreman of the composing room, a royal good fellow, Mr. Jackson, volunteered to stretch the time limit by some ingenious device of his own.
I wish to say here, lest no other opportunity offer, that in the thirty years of my newspaper service, I have found no better or more loyal friends than the men of the composing room, whether in high place or low; that I have never known them to hesitate, in an emergency, to help out by specially strenuous endeavor and by enduring great inconvenience on their own part. So great is my grat.i.tude for their comradely good-fellowship that even now--ten years after a final end came to my newspaper work--one of the first parts of the establishment I visit when I have occasion to go to the _World_ office is the composing room, where old friends greet me cordially on every hand. Great--very great--are the printers. They do their work under a stress of hurry, noise, and confusion that would drive less well-made men frantic, and they do it mightily well. To one who knows, as I do, what the conditions are, every printed newspaper page is a miracle of human achievement under well-nigh inconceivable difficulties.
[Sidenote: Donn Piatt]
It was soon after my service on the _World_ began that I became acquainted with a man of brilliant gifts, often erratically employed, and of singularly interesting personality--Donn Piatt. From that time until his death I saw much of him in a quiet club-corner way, and listened with interest while he set forth his views and conclusions, always with a suggestion of humor in them and often in perverse, paradoxical ways.
One day some question arose between us as to the failure of a certain book to achieve the success we both thought it deserved. Donn Piatt"s explanation was ready:
"It is because we have altogether too much education in this country,"
he said. "You see, our schools are turning out about a million graduates every year, under the mistaken belief that they are educated. All these boys and girls have been taught how to read, but they haven"t the smallest notion of what to read, or why to read. They regard reading as you and I might regard a game of solitaire--as a convenient means of relaxing the mind, diverting the attention from more serious things--in brief, they read for amus.e.m.e.nt only, and have no notion of any other possible purpose in reading. That"s why every sublimated idiot who makes a mountebank of himself as a "humorist" wins his public instantly and easily. The great majority of readers are that way minded, and of course the publishers must cater to the taste of the mult.i.tude. They"d be worse idiots than their customers if they didn"t. It"s the same way with plays. The people who go to the theater want to be amused without the necessity of doing even a little thinking. Why, a few years ago when Wallack was running such things as "She Stoops to Conquer," "School for Scandal," "London a.s.surance," and the like, in his old Thirteenth Street theater, with Dion Boucicault, John Brougham, Harry Montague, John Gilbert, Harry Beckett, and a lot of other really great actors in the casts, he played to slender houses, while just around the corner there wasn"t standing room when "Pink Dominoes" was on."
My acquaintance with Donn Piatt began in a rather curious way. Some time before, there had appeared in one of the magazines a series of letters signed "Arthur Richmond." They were political philippics, inspired chiefly by a reckless, undiscriminating spirit of attack. They were as mysterious in their origin as the letters of Junius, but otherwise they bore little if any of the a.s.sumed and intended resemblance to that celebrated series. There was little of judgment, discretion, or discrimination in them, and still less of conscience. But they attracted widespread attention and the secret of their authorship was a matter of a good deal of popular curiosity. A number of very distinguished men were mentioned as conjectural possibilities in that connection.
Even after the letters themselves had ceased to be of consequence, a certain measure of curiosity as to their authorship survived, so that any newspaper revelation of the secret was exceedingly desirable. One day somebody told me that Donn Piatt had written them. Personally I did not know him, but in the freemasonry of literature and journalism every man in the profession knows every other man in it well enough at least for purposes of correspondence. So I wrote a half playful letter to Donn Piatt, saying that somebody had charged him with the authorship of that "iniquitous trash"--for so I called it--and asking him if I might affirm or deny the statement in the _World_. He replied in a characteristic letter, in which he said:
[Sidenote: "A Syndicate of Blackguards"]
"I was one of a syndicate of blackguards engaged to write the "Arthur Richmond" letters and I did write some of them. You and I ought to know each other personally and we don"t. Why won"t you come up to the ---- Club to-night and help me get rid of one of the infamous table d-hote dinners they sell there for seventy-five cents? Then I"ll tell you all about the "Arthur Richmond" letters and about any other crimes of my commission that may interest you. Meanwhile, I"m sending you a letter for publication in answer to your inquiry about that particular atrocity."
As we talked that night and on succeeding occasions, Donn Piatt told me many interesting anecdotes of his career as a newspaper correspondent much given to getting into difficulty with men in high place by reason of his freedom in criticism and his vitriolic way of saying what he had to say in the most effective words he could find.
"You see the dictionary was my ruin," he said after relating one of his anecdotes. "I studied it not wisely but too well in my youth, and it taught me a lot of words that have always seemed to me peculiarly effective in the expression of thought, but to which generals and statesmen and the other small fry of what is called public life, seem to have a rooted objection. By the way, did you ever hear that I once committed arson?"
I pleaded ignorance of that incident in his career, and added:
"I shall be interested to hear of that crime if you"re sure it is protected by the statute of limitations. I shouldn"t like to be a witness to a confession that might send you to the penitentiary."
"Oh, I don"t know that that would be so bad," he interrupted. "I"m living with my publisher now, you know, and a change might not prove undesirable. However, the crime is outlawed by time now. And besides, I didn"t myself set fire to the building. I"m guilty only under the legal maxim "Qui facit per alium facit per se." The way of it was this: When I was a young man trying to get into a law practice out in Ohio, and eager to advertise myself by appearing in court, a fellow was indicted for arson. He came to me, explaining that he had no money with which to pay a lawyer, but that he thought I might like to appear in a case so important, and that if I would do the best I could for him, he stood ready to do anything for me that he could, by way of recompense. I took the case, of course. It was a complex one and it offered opportunities for browbeating and "balling up" witnesses--a process that specially impresses the public with the sagacity of a lawyer who does it successfully. Then, if by any chance I should succeed in acquitting my client, my place at the bar would be a.s.sured as that of "a sharp young feller, who had beaten the prosecuting attorney himself."
"But in telling my client I would take his case the demon of humor betrayed me. Just across the street from my lodging was a negro church, and there was a "revival" going on at the time. They "revived" till two o"clock or later every night with shoutings that interfered with my sleep. With playful impulse I said to the accused man:
""You seem to be an expert in the arts of arson. If you"ll burn that negro church I"ll feel that you have paid me full price for my service in defending you."
"I defended him and, as the witnesses against him were all of shady character, I succeeded in securing his acquittal. About four o"clock the next morning a fire broke out under all four corners of that negro church, and before the local fire department got a quart of water into action, it was a heap of smouldering ashes--hymn-books and all. A week or so later I received a letter from my ex-client. He wrote from St.
Louis, "on his way west," he said. He expressed the hope that I was "satisfied with results," and begged me to believe that he was "a man of honor who never failed to repay an obligation or reward a service.""
With Donn Piatt"s permission I told that story several times. Presently I read it in brief form in a newspaper where the hero of it was set down as "Tom Platt." I suppose the reporter in that case confused the closely similar sounds of "Donn Piatt" and "Tom Platt." At any rate, it seems proper to say that the venerable ex-Senator from New York never practiced law in Ohio and never even unintentionally induced the burning of a church. The story was Donn Piatt"s and the experience was his.
LXVI
[Sidenote: First Acquaintance with Mr. Pulitzer]
I first made Mr. Pulitzer"s personal acquaintance in Paris, where he was living at that time. I had been at work on the _World_ for a comparatively brief while, when he asked me to visit him there--an invitation which he several times afterwards repeated, each time with increased pleasure to me.
On the occasion of my first visit to him, he said to me one evening at dinner:
"I have invited you here with the primary purpose that you shall have a good time. But secondly, I want to see you as often as I can. We have luncheon at one o"clock, and dinner at seven-thirty. I wish you"d take luncheon and dinner with me as often as you can, consistently with my primary purpose that you shall have a good time. If you"ve anything else on hand that interests you more, you are not to come to luncheon or dinner, and I will understand. But if you haven"t anything else on hand, I sincerely wish you"d come."
In all my experience--even in Virginia during the old, limitlessly hospitable plantation days--I think I never knew a hospitality superior to this--one that left the guest so free to come on the one hand and so entirely free to stay away without question if he preferred that. I, who have celebrated hospitality of the most gracious kind in romances of Virginia, where hospitality bore its most gorgeous blossoms and its richest fruitage, bear witness that I have known no such exemplar of that virtue in its perfect manifestation as Joseph Pulitzer.
Years afterwards, at Bar Harbor, I had been working with him night and day over editorial problems of consequence, and, as I sat looking on at a game of chess in which he was engaged one evening, he suddenly ordered me to bed.
"You"ve been overworking," he said. "You are to go to bed now, and you are not to get up till you feel like getting up--even if it is two days hence. Go, I tell you, and pay no heed to hours or anything else. You shall not be interrupted in your sleep."
I was very weary and I went to bed. The next morning--or I supposed it to be so--I waked, and looked at my watch. It told me it was six o"clock. I tried to woo sleep again, but the effort was a failure. I knew that breakfast would not be served for some hours to come, but I simply could not remain in bed longer. I knew where a certain dear little lad of the family kept his fishing tackle and his bait. I decided that I would get up, take a cold plunge, pilfer the tackle, and spend an hour or two down on the rocks fishing.
[Sidenote: Mr. Pulitzer"s Kindly Courtesy]
With this intent I slipped out of my room, making no noise lest I should wake some one from his morning slumber. The first person I met was Mr. Pulitzer. He gleefully greeted me with congratulations upon the prolonged sleep I had had, and after a brief confusion of mind, I found that it was two o"clock in the afternoon, and that my unwound watch had misled me. In his anxiety that I should have my sleep out, Mr. Pulitzer had shut off the entire half of the building in which my bedroom lay, and had stationed a servant as sentinel to prohibit intrusion upon that part of the premises and to forbid everything in the nature of noise.
Mr. Pulitzer himself never rested, in the days of my a.s.sociation with him. His mind knew no surcease of its activity. He slept little, and with difficulty. His waking hours, whether up or in bed, were given to a ceaseless wrestling with the problems that belong to a great newspaper"s conduct. I have known him to make an earnest endeavor to dismiss these for a time. To that end he would peremptorily forbid all reference to them in the conversation of those about him. But within the s.p.a.ce of a few minutes he would be in the midst of them again, and completely absorbed. But he recognized the necessity of rest for brains other than his own, and in all kindly ways sought to secure and even to compel it.
I remember once at Bar Harbor, when for two or three days and nights in succession I had been at work on something he greatly wanted done, he said to me at breakfast:
"You"re tired, and that task is finished. I want you to rest, and, of course, so long as you and I remain together you can"t rest. Your brain is active and so is mine. If we stay in each other"s company we shall talk, and with us talk means work. In five minutes we"ll be planning some editorial crusade, and you"ll get to work again. So I want you to go away from me. Let Eugene drive you to the village, and there secure an open carriage and a pair of good horses--the best you can get--and drive all over this interesting island. Get yourself rested. And when you come back, don"t let me talk newspaper with you, till you"ve had a night"s sleep."
It was in that kindly spirit that Mr. Pulitzer always treated his lieutenants when he invited them to pa.s.s a time with him. So long as he and they were together, he could not help working them almost to death. But, when he realized their weariness, he sent them off to rest, on carriage drives or yachting voyages or what not, with generous consideration of their inability to carry weight as he did night and day and every day and every night.
Sometimes his eagerness in work led him to forget his own kindly purpose. I remember once when I had been writing all day and throughout most of the night in execution of his prolific inspiration, he suddenly became aware of the fact that I must be weary. Instantly he said:
"You must rest. You must take a carriage or a boat and go off somewhere.
Think out where it shall be, for yourself. But you sha"n"t do another thing till you"ve had a good rest."
Then, as we strolled out into the porch and thence to the sea wall against which the breakers were recklessly dashing themselves to pieces, he suddenly thought of something. In a minute we were engaged in discussing that something, and half an hour later I was busy in my room, with books of reference all about me, working out that something, and it was three o"clock next morning before I finished the writing of what he wanted written on that theme. At breakfast next morning I was late, and the fact reminded him of the plans he had formed twenty-four hours before for a rest for me. He refused even to light a cigar until I should be gone.
"If we smoke together," he said, "we shall talk. If we talk we shall become interested and you"ll be set to work again. Get you hence. Let me see no more of you till dinner to-night. In the meantime, do what you will to rest yourself. That"s my only concern now. Drive, sail, row, loaf, play billiards--do whatever will best rest you."
I relate these things by way of showing forth one side of the character of a man who has wrought a revolution in the world. I have other things to relate that show forth another side of that interestingly complex nature.