Miss Fellowes remembered the rope that Hoskins had pulled outside the room containing Professor Ademewski"s rock specimen so long ago.
She cried out, "No!"
But Hoskins put Timmie down and gently removed the overcoat he was wearing. "You stay here, Timmie. Nothing will happen to you. We"re just going outside for a moment. All right?"
Timmie, white and wordless, managed to nod.
Hoskins steered Miss Fellowes out of the dollhouse ahead of himself. For the moment, Miss Fellowes was beyond resistance. Dully, she noticed the hand-pull being adjusted outside the dollhouse.
"I"m sorry, Miss Fellowes," said Hoskins. "I would have spared you this. I planned it for the night so that you would know only when it was over."
She said in a weary whisper, "Because your son was hurt. Because he tormented this child into striking out at him."
"No. Believe me. I understand about the incident today and I know it was Jerry"s fault. But the story has leaked out. It would have to with the press surrounding us on this day of all days. I can"t risk having a distorted story about negligence and savage Neanderthalers, so-called, distract from the success of Project Middle Ages. Timmie has to go soon anyway; he might as well go now and give the sensationalists as small a peg as possible on which to hang their trash."
"It"s not like sending a rock back. You"ll be killing a human being."
"Not killing. There"ll be no sensation. He"ll simply be a Neanderthal boy in a Neanderthal world. He will no longer be a prisoner and alien. He will have a chance at a free life."
"What chance? He"s only seven years old, used to being taken care of, fed, clothed, sheltered. He will be alone. His tribe may not be at the point where he left them now that four years have pa.s.sed. And if they were, they would not recognize him. He will have to take care of himself. How will he know how?"
Hoskins shook his head in hopeless negative. "Lord, Miss Fellowes, do you think we haven"t thought of that? Do you think we would have brought in a child if it weren"t that it was the first successful fix of a human or near-human we made and that we did not dare to take the chance of unfixing him and finding another fix as good? Why do you suppose we kept Timmie as long as we did, if it were not for our reluctance to send a child back into the past? It"s just"-his voice took on a desperate urgency-"that we can wait no longer. Timmie stands in the way of expansion! Timmie is a source of possible bad publicity; we are on the threshold of great things, and I"m sorry, Miss Fellowes, but we can"t let Timmie block us. We cannot. We cannot. I"m sorry, Miss Fellowes."
"Well, then," said Miss Fellowes sadly. "Let me say good-by. Give me five minutes to say good-by. Spare me that much."
Hoskins hesitated. "Go ahead."
Timmie ran to her. For the last time he ran to her and for the last time Miss Fellowes clasped him in her arms.
For a moment, she hugged him blindly. She caught at a chair with the toe of one foot, moved it against the wall, sat down.
"Don"t be afraid, Timmie."
"I"m not afraid if you"re here, Miss Fellowes. Is that man mad at me, the man out there?"
"No, he isn"t. He just doesn"t understand about us. -Timmie, do you know what a mother is?"
"Like Jerry"s mother?"
"Did he tell you about his mother?"
"Sometimes. I think maybe a mother is a lady who takes care of you and who"s very nice to you and who does good things."
"That"s right. Have you ever wanted a mother, Timmie?"
Timmie pulled his head away from her so that he could look into her face. Slowly, he put his hand to her cheek and hair and stroked her, as long, long ago she had stroked him. He said, "Aren"t you my mother?"
"Oh, Timmie."
"Are you angry because I asked?"
"No. Of course not."
"Because I know your name is Miss Fellowes, but-but sometimes, I call you "Mother" inside. Is that all right?"
"Yes. Yes. It"s all right. And I won"t leave you any more and nothing will hurt you. I"ll be with you to care for you always. Call me Mother, so I can hear you."
"Mother," said Timmie contentedly, leaning his cheek against hers.
She rose, and, still holding him, stepped up on the chair. The sudden beginning of a shout from outside went unheard and, with her free hand, she yanked with all her weight at the cord where it hung suspended between two eyelets.
And Stasis was punctured and the room was empty.
The Billiard Ball
James Priss-I suppose I ought to say Professor James Priss, though everyone is sure to know whom I mean even without the t.i.tle-always spoke slowly.
I know. I interviewed him often enough. He had the greatest mind since Einstein, but it didn"t work quickly. He admitted his slowness often. Maybe it was because because he had so great a mind that it didn"t work quickly. he had so great a mind that it didn"t work quickly.
He would say something in slow abstraction, then he would think, and then he would say something more. Even over trivial matters, his giant mind would hover uncertainly, adding a touch here and then another there.
Would the Sun rise tomorrow, I can imagine him wondering. What do we mean by "rise"? Can we be certain that tomorrow will come? Is the term "Sun" completely unambiguous in this connection? the Sun rise tomorrow, I can imagine him wondering. What do we mean by "rise"? Can we be certain that tomorrow will come? Is the term "Sun" completely unambiguous in this connection?
Add to this habit of speech a bland countenance, rather pale, with no expression except for a general look of uncertainty; gray hair, rather thin, neatly combed; business suits of an invariably conservative cut; and you have what Professor James Priss was-a retiring person, completely lacking in magnetism.
That"s why n.o.body in the world, except myself, could possibly suspect him of being a murderer. And even I am not sure. After all, he was was slow-thinking; he was slow-thinking; he was always always slow-thinking. Is it conceivable that at one crucial moment he managed to think quickly and act at once? slow-thinking. Is it conceivable that at one crucial moment he managed to think quickly and act at once?
It doesn"t matter. Even if he murdered, he got away with it. It is far too late now to try to reverse matters and I wouldn"t succeed in doing so even if I decided to let this be published.
Edward Bloom was Priss"s cla.s.smate in college, and an a.s.sociate, through circ.u.mstance, for a generation afterward. They were equal in age and in their propensity for the bachelor life, but opposites in everything else that mattered.
Bloom was a living flash of light; colorful, tall, broad, loud, brash, and self-confident. He had a mind that resembled a meteor strike in the sudden and unexpected way it could seize the essential. He was no theroetician, as Priss was; Bloom had neither the patience for it, nor the capacity to concentrate intense thought upon a single abstract point. He admitted that; he boasted of it.
What he did have was an uncanny way of seeing the application of a theory; of seeing the manner in which it could be put to use. In the cold marble block of abstract structure, he could see, without apparent difficulty, the intricate design of a marvelous device. The block would fall apart at his touch and leave the device.
It is a well-known story, and not too badly exaggerated, that nothing Bloom ever built had failed to work, or to be patentable, or to be profitable. By the time he was forty-five, he was one of the richest men on Earth.
And if Bloom the Technician were adapted to one particular matter more than anything else, it was to the way of thought of Priss the Theoretician. Bloom"s greatest gadgets were built upon Priss"s greatest thoughts, and as Bloom grew wealthy and famous, Priss gained phenomenal respect among his colleagues.
Naturally it was to be expected that when Priss advanced his Two-Field Theory, Bloom would set about at once to build the first practical anti-gravity device.
My job was to find human interest in the Two-Field Theory for the subscribers to Tele-News Press, Tele-News Press, and you get that by trying to deal with human beings and not with abstract ideas. Since my interviewee was Professor Priss, that wasn"t easy. and you get that by trying to deal with human beings and not with abstract ideas. Since my interviewee was Professor Priss, that wasn"t easy.
Naturally, I was going to ask about the possibilities of anti-gravity, which interested everyone; and not about the Two-Field Theory, which no one could understand- "Anti-gravity?" Priss compressed his pale lips and considered. "I"m not entirely sure that it is possible, or ever will be. I haven"t-uh-worked the matter out to my satisfaction. I don"t entirely see whether the Two-Field equations would have a finite solution, which they would have to have, of course, if-" And then he went off into a brown study.
I prodded him. "Bloom says he thinks such a device can be built."
Priss nodded. "Well, yes, but I wonder. Ed Bloom has had an amazing knack at seeing the un.o.bvious in the past. He has an unusual mind. It"s certainly made him rich enough."
We were sitting in Priss"s apartment. Ordinary middle-cla.s.s. I couldn"t help a quick glance this way and that. Priss was not wealthy.
I don"t think he read my mind. He saw me look. And I think it was on his his mind. He said, "Wealth isn"t the usual reward for the pure scientist. Or even a particularly desirable one." mind. He said, "Wealth isn"t the usual reward for the pure scientist. Or even a particularly desirable one."
Maybe so, at that, I thought. Priss certainly had his own kind of reward. He was the third person in history to win two n.o.bel Prizes, and the first to have both of them in the sciences and both of then unshared. You can"t complain about that. And if he wasn"t rich, neither was he poor.
But he didn"t sound like a contented man. Maybe it wasn"t Bloom"s wealth alone that irked Priss; maybe it was Bloom"s fame among the people of Earth generally; maybe it was the fact that Bloom was a celebrity wherever he went, whereas Priss, outside scientific conventions and faculty clubs, was largely anonymous.
I can"t say how much of all this was in my eyes or in the way I wrinkled the creases in my forehead, but Priss went on to say, "But we"re friends, you know. We play billiards once or twice a week. I beat him regularly."
(I never published that statement. I checked it with Bloom, who made a long counterstatement that began "He beats me me at billiards. That jacka.s.s-" and grew increasingly personal thereafter. As a matter of fact, neither one was a novice at billiards. I watched them play once for a short while, after the statement and counterstatement, and both handled the cue with professional aplomb. What"s more, both played for blood, and there was no friendship in the game that I could see.) at billiards. That jacka.s.s-" and grew increasingly personal thereafter. As a matter of fact, neither one was a novice at billiards. I watched them play once for a short while, after the statement and counterstatement, and both handled the cue with professional aplomb. What"s more, both played for blood, and there was no friendship in the game that I could see.) I said, "Would you care to predict whether Bloom will manage to build an anti-gravity device?"
"You mean would I commit myself to anything? Hmm. Well, let"s consider, young man. Just what do we mean by anti-gravity? Our conception of gravity is built around Einstein"s General Theory of Relativity, which is now a century and a half old but which, within its limits, remains firm. We can picture it-"
I listened politely. I"d heard Priss on the subject before, but if I was to get anything out of him-which wasn"t certain-I"d have to let him work his way through in his own way.
"We can picture it," he said, "by imagining the Universe to be a Oat, thin, superflexible sheet of untearable rubber. If we picture ma.s.s as being a.s.sociated with weight, as it is on the surface of the Earth, then we would expect a ma.s.s, resting upon the rubber sheet, to make an indentation. The greater the ma.s.s, the deeper the indentation.
"In the actual Universe," he went on, "all sorts of ma.s.ses exist, and so our rubber sheet must be pictured as riddled with indentations. Any object rolling along the sheet would dip into and out of the indentations it pa.s.sed, veering and changing direction as it did so. It is this veer and change of direction that we interpret as demonstrating the existence of a force of gravity. If the moving object comes close enough to the center of the indentation and is moving slowly enough, it gets trapped and whirls round and round that indentation. In the absence of friction, it keeps up that whirl forever. In other words, what Isaac Newton interpreted as a force, Albert Einstein interpreted as geometrical distortion."
He paused at this point. He had been speaking fairly frequently-for him-since he was saying something he had said often before. But now he began to pick his way.
He said, "So in trying to produce anti-gravity, we are trying to alter the geometry of the Universe. If we carry on our metaphor, we are trying to straighten out the indented rubber sheet. We could imagine ourselves getting under the indenting ma.s.s and lifting it upward, supporting it so as to prevent it from making an indentation. If we make the rubber sheet Oat in that way, then we create a Universe-or at least a portion of the Universe-in which gravity doesn"t exist. A rolling body would pa.s.s the non-indenting ma.s.s without altering its direction of travel a bit, and we could interpret this as meaning that the ma.s.s was exerting no gravitational force. In order to accomplish this feat, however, we need a ma.s.s equivalent to the indenting ma.s.s. To produce antigravity on Earth in this way, we would have to make sure of a ma.s.s equal to that of Earth and poise it above our heads, so to speak."
I interrupted him. "But your Two-Field Theory-"
"Exactly. General Relativity does not explain both the gravitational field and the electromagnetic field in a single set of equations. Einstein spent half his life searching for that single set-for a Unified Field Theory-and failed. All who followed Einstein also failed. I, however, began with the a.s.sumption that there were two fields that could not be unified and followed the consequences, which I can explain, in part, in terms of the "rubber sheet" metaphor."
Now we came to something I wasn"t sure I had ever heard before. "How does that go?" I asked.
"Suppose that, instead of trying to lift the indenting ma.s.s, we try to stiffen the sheet itself, make it less indentable. It would contract, at least over a small area, and become flatter. Gravity would weaken, and so would ma.s.s, for the two are essentially the same phenomenon in terms of the indented Universe. If we could make the rubber sheet completely flat, both gravity and ma.s.s would disappear altogether.
"Under the proper conditions, the electromagnetic field could be made to counter the gravitational field, and serve to stiffen the indented fabric of the Universe. The electromagnetic field is tremendously stronger than the gravitational field, so the former could be made to overcome the latter."
I said uncertainly, "But you say "under the proper conditions. " Can those proper conditions you speak of be achieved, Professor?"
"That is what I don"t know," said Priss thoughtfully and slowly. "If the Universe were really a rubber sheet, its stiffness would have to reach an infinite value before it could be expected to remain completely flat under an indenting ma.s.s. If that is also so in the real Universe, then an infinitely intense electromagnetic field would be required and that would mean anti-gravity would be impossible."
"But Bloom says-"
"Yes, I imagine Bloom thinks a finite field will do, if it can be properly applied. Still, however ingenious he is," and Priss smiled narrowly, "we needn"t take him to be infallible. His grasp on theory is quite faulty. He-he never earned his college degree, did you know that?"
I was about to say that I knew that. After all, everyone did. But there was a touch of eagerness in Priss"s voice as he said it and I looked up in time to catch animation in his eye, as though he were delighted to spread that piece of news. So I nodded my head as if I were filing it for future reference.
"Then you would say, Professor Priss," I prodded again, "that Bloom is probably wrong and that anti-gravity is impossible?"
And finally Priss nodded and said, "The gravitational field can be weakened, of course, but if by anti-gravity we mean a true zero-gravity field-no gravity at all over a significant volume of s.p.a.ce-then I suspect anti-gravity may turn out to be impossible, despite Bloom."
And I had, after a fashion, what I wanted.
I wasn"t able to see Bloom for nearly three months after that, and when I did see him he was in an angry mood.
He had grown angry at once, of course, when the news first broke concerning Priss"s statement. He let it be known that Priss would be invited to the eventual display of the antigravity device as soon as it was constructed, and would even be asked to partic.i.p.ate in the demonstration. Some reporter-not I, unfortunately-caught him between appointments and asked him to elaborate on that and he said: "I"ll have the device eventually; soon, maybe. And you can be there, and so can anyone else the press would care to have there. And Professor James Priss can be there. He can represent Theoretical Science and after I have demonstrated antigravity, he can adjust his theory to explain it. I"m sure he will know how to make his adjustments in masterly fashion and show exactly why I couldn"t possibly have failed. He might do it now and save time, but I suppose he won"t."
It was all said very politely, but you could hear the snarl under the rapid flow of words.
Yet he continued his occasional game of billiards with Priss and when the two met they behaved with complete propriety. One could tell the progress Bloom was making by their respective att.i.tudes to the press. Bloom grew curt and even snappish, while Priss developed an increasing good humor.
When my umpteenth request for an interview with Bloom was finally accepted, I wondered if perhaps that meant a break in Bloom"s quest. I had a little daydream of him announcing final success to me. me.
It didn"t work out that way. He met me in his office at Bloom Enterprises in upstate New York. It was a wonderful setting, well away from any populated area, elaborately landscaped, and covering as much ground as a rather large industrial establishment. Edison at his height, two centuries ago, had never been as phenomenally successful as Bloom.
But Bloom was not in a good humor. He came striding in ten minutes late and went snarling past his secretary"s desk with the barest nod in my direction. He was wearing a lab coat, unb.u.t.toned.
He threw himself into his chair and said, "I"m sorry if I"ve kept you waiting, but I didn"t have as much time as I had hoped." Bloom was a born showman and knew better than to antagonize the press, but I had the feeling he was having a great deal of difficulty at that moment in adhering to this principle.
I had the obvious guess. "I am given to understand, sir, that your recent tests have been unsuccessful."
"Who told you that?"
"I would say it was general knowledge, Mr. Bloom."
"No, it isn"t. Don"t say that, young man. There is no general knowledge about what goes on in my laboratories and workshops. You"re stating the Professor"s opinions, aren"t you? Priss"s, I mean."
"No I"m-"
"Of course you are. Aren"t you the one to whom he made that statement-that anti-gravity is impossible?"
"He didn"t make the statement that flatly."
"He never says anything flatly, but it was flat enough for him, and not as flat as I"ll have his d.a.m.ned rubber-sheet Universe before I"m finished."
"Then does that mean you"re making progress, Mr. Bloom?"
"You know I am," he said with a snap. "Or you should know. Weren"t you at the demonstration last week?"
"Yes, I was."
I judged Bloom to be in trouble or he wouldn"t be mentioning that demonstration. It worked but it was not a world beater. Between the two poles of a magnet a region of lessened gravity was produced.
It was done very cleverly. A Mossbauer Effect Balance was used to probe the s.p.a.ce between the poles. If you"ve never seen an M-E Balance in action, it consists primarily of a tight monochromatic beam of gamma rays shot down the low-gravity field. The gamma rays change wavelength slightly but measurably under the influence of the gravitational field and if anything happens to alter the intensity of the field, the wavelength change shifts correspondingly. It is an extremely delicate method for probing a gravitational field and it worked like a charm. There was no question but that Bloom had lowered gravity.
The trouble was that it had been done before by others. Bloom, to be sure, had made use of circuits that greatly increased the ease with which such an effect had been achieved-his system was typically ingenious and had been duly patented-and he maintained that it was by this method that anti-gravity would become not merely a scientific curiosity but a practical affair with industrial applications.