10,433. Who is paymaster there now?-Mr. Gardner. I think the men are paid at his house.
10,434. The company have no shop?-No.
10,435. And Mr. Gardner has no connection with any shop?- None whatever.
Baltasound, Unst, January 19, 1872, GILBERT WILLIAMSON, examined.
10,436. Did you receive a citation some days ago to attend here?- There was a citation handed to me not bearing my name.
10,437. It bore the name of Peter Williamson, storekeeper, Haroldswick?-Yes.
10,438. Is there any person named Williamson who is a storekeeper at Haroldswick except yourself?-No.
10,439. Did you not know that that citation was intended for you?-I could not certify that it was.
10,440. Had you any doubt that it was?-I had some doubt.
10,441. How could you possibly have any doubt when there is no other person of that name there who is a storekeeper?-Because my name in the register is Gilbert, not Peter.
10,442. Did you think that was a sufficient excuse for not attending this Court?-Yes.
10,443. Did you receive a citation to-day?-From a boy.
10,444. From a messenger from me?-Yes.
10,445. Did he tell you he had been sent from here?-He said he got it from Mr. White.
10,446. In reply to that, you wrote saying that you did not think that was intended for you either?-No.
10,447. Or that you received it too late, and that you did not know whether you were bound to come?-Yes. I took witnesses to see what time it was when I got it.
10,448. Are you the princ.i.p.al storekeeper to Spence & Co. at Haroldswick?-Yes.
10,449. Have you anything to do with the purchases of hosiery which are made at that shop?-We don"t deal in it.
10,450. At the shop you do not; but Mrs. John Spence, who is not able to attend here to-day, has some dealings in hosiery?-We never see her buy hosiery in the shop, to my knowledge.
10,451. Do you not know that she buys hosiery in her house?-I hear that she buys hosiery, but I never saw her do so.
10,452. Have you ever received lines from her directing you to supply goods to parties from whom she has bought hosiery?-I have received lines from her to supply value for so much, but not stating that it was for hosiery. It might have been for anything.
10,453. Have you any of these lines?-No, I have none.
10,454. In what form are they drawn?-Suppose it was to Ursula Johnston, the line would be, Pay to Ursula Johnston the value of 2s., and it is signed J. Spence.
10,455. Do you always honour these lines by supplying the party named in them with goods up to the value of the sum named in the line?-Yes, with whatever they ask for.
10,456. Do you receive many of them?-Sometimes we receive a few, but not very many; at least I do not consider it very many.
10,457. What would you consider very many?-100 in a week; I would consider that very many.
10,458. How many is it that you do receive?-I never counted them.
10,459. Would there be twenty in a week?-Sometimes not one half of that, sometimes more, and some weeks none at all.
10,460. Is that according as the business is brisk, or the reverse?- So far as I know, it is. I am under the conviction that for a month I have had no advances to pay at all.
10,461. Is there any other way in which parties who sell hosiery to Mrs. Spence, or who you have reason to believe sell hosiery to her, are paid out of the shop?-I don"t quite understand the question.
10,462. Have you any other transactions with Mrs. Spence?- None with her.
10,463. Do you know whether any other parties who sell hosiery to Mrs. Spence have accounts at the shop-I could not certify as to that.
10,464. Have you got any of these lines?-I have none of them on my person.
10,465. Have you any of them in the shop?-Yes.
10,466. Were they left there by parties to whom you had supplied goods?-Yes.
10,467. Did you read the citation which was sent to you?-Yes.
10,468. Did you see that you were required to bring with you specimens of lines given or received by any party connected with the company in the purchase of hosiery?-I saw that written there.
10,469. Why did you not bring them?-Because they were not mine to bring.
10,470. Whose were they?-Spence & Co."s.
10,471. Why did you not ask leave to bring them?-Because the members of the firm were all here.
10,472. Could you not have brought them with you, and asked leave of the partners of the firm here to produce them?-That never occurred to my mind.
10,473. Do you make the same answer with regard to the citation to produce all papers, books, and accounts, [Page 254] showing the nature of the company"s dealings with fishermen or knitters?- Yes.
10,474. You could not bring these here without asking leave of the members of the firm to produce them-I could not ask their leave, because they were here.
10,475. Could you not have brought the books here and asked permission then to produce them?-I did not think it was right for me to remove them from the office until I had asked leave to do so. There is one of the books here, the fisherman"s ledger, which has been spoken to by Mr. Mouat.
10,476. How was that book brought here?-Mr. Mouat sent for it.
10,477. Why did you come here yourself without asking leave of the members of the firm?-Because I was summoned.
10,478. Was it not just as necessary for you to ask leave to come yourself as to ask leave to bring the books?-No, I came when I was sent for.
10,479. Let me recommend you in future to pay more attention to a legal citation when it is served upon you, or you will get into trouble. I cannot allow you any expenses for attending here, in consequence of the way in which you have behaved.
*The following specimen of the lines issued by Mrs. Spence was afterwards produced:-"Haroldswick, 13th Novr. 1871 Messrs. Spence & Co. pay Andrina Boyne the sum of one shilling.
1s. J. SPENCE"
The line is crossed, "Entd. G.W."