This mistake in acting shows that she does not even know what the natural feeling in such circ.u.mstances would be; and Banquo"s curt answer, "Too cruel anywhere," is almost a reproof of her insensibility.
But, admitting this, we have in the first place to remember, in imagining the opening scenes, that she is deliberately bent on counteracting the "human kindness" of her husband, and also that she is evidently not merely inflexibly determined but in a condition of abnormal excitability. That exaltation in the project which is so entirely lacking in Macbeth is strongly marked in her. When she tries to help him by representing their enterprise as heroic, she is deceiving herself as much as him. Their attainment of the crown presents itself to her, perhaps has long presented itself, as something so glorious, and she has fixed her will upon it so completely, that for the time she sees the enterprise in no other light than that of its greatness. When she soliloquises,
Yet do I fear thy nature: It is too full o" the milk of human kindness To catch the nearest way: thou wouldst be great; Art not without ambition, but without The illness should attend it; what thou wouldst highly, That wouldst thou holily,
one sees that "ambition" and "great" and "highly" and even "illness" are to her simply terms of praise, and "holily" and "human kindness" simply terms of blame. Moral distinctions do not in this exaltation exist for her; or rather they are inverted: "good" means to her the crown and whatever is required to obtain it, "evil" whatever stands in the way of its attainment. This att.i.tude of mind is evident even when she is alone, though it becomes still more p.r.o.nounced when she has to work upon her husband. And it persists until her end is attained. But, without being exactly forced, it betrays a strain which could not long endure.
Besides this, in these earlier scenes the traces of feminine weakness and human feeling, which account for her later failure, are not absent.
Her will, it is clear, was exerted to overpower not only her husband"s resistance but some resistance in herself. Imagine Goneril uttering the famous words,
Had he not resembled My father as he slept, I had done "t.
They are spoken, I think, without any sentiment--impatiently, as though she regretted her weakness: but it was there. And in reality, quite apart from this recollection of her father, she could never have done the murder if her husband had failed. She had to nerve herself with wine to give her "boldness" enough to go through her minor part. That appalling invocation to the spirits of evil, to uns.e.x her and fill her from the crown to the toe topfull of direst cruelty, tells the same tale of determination to crush the inward protest. Goneril had no need of such a prayer. In the utterance of the frightful lines,
I have given suck, and know How tender "tis to love the babe that milks me: I would, while it was smiling in my face, Have pluck"d my nipple from his boneless gums, And dash"d the brains out, had I so sworn as you Have done to this,
her voice should doubtless rise until it reaches, in "dash"d the brains out," an almost hysterical scream.[227] These lines show unmistakably that strained exaltation which, as soon as the end is reached, vanishes, never to return.
The greatness of Lady Macbeth lies almost wholly in courage and force of will. It is an error to regard her as remarkable on the intellectual side. In acting a part she shows immense self-control, but not much skill. Whatever may be thought of the plan of attributing the murder of Duncan to the chamberlains, to lay their b.l.o.o.d.y daggers on their pillows, as if they were determined to advertise their guilt, was a mistake which can be accounted for only by the excitement of the moment.
But the limitations of her mind appear most in the point where she is most strongly contrasted with Macbeth,--in her comparative dulness of imagination. I say "comparative," for she sometimes uses highly poetic language, as indeed does everyone in Shakespeare who has any greatness of soul. Nor is she perhaps less imaginative than the majority of his heroines. But as compared with her husband she has little imagination.
It is not _simply_ that she suppresses what she has. To her, things remain at the most terrible moment precisely what they were at the calmest, plain facts which stand in a given relation to a certain deed, not visions which tremble and flicker in the light of other worlds. The probability that the old king will sleep soundly after his long journey to Inverness is to her simply a fortunate circ.u.mstance; but one can fancy the shoot of horror across Macbeth"s face as she mentions it. She uses familiar and prosaic ill.u.s.trations, like
Letting "I dare not" wait upon "I would,"
Like the poor cat i" the adage,
(the cat who wanted fish but did not like to wet her feet); or,
We fail?
But screw your courage to the sticking-place, And we"ll not fail;[228]
or,
Was the hope drunk Wherein you dress"d yourself? hath it slept since?
And wakes it now, to look so green and pale At what it did so freely?
The Witches are practically nothing to her. She feels no sympathy in Nature with her guilty purpose, and would never bid the earth not hear her steps, which way they walk. The noises before the murder, and during it, are heard by her as simple facts, and are referred to their true sources. The knocking has no mystery for her: it comes from "the south entry." She calculates on the drunkenness of the grooms, compares the different effects of wine on herself and on them, and listens to their snoring. To her the blood upon her husband"s hands suggests only the taunt,
My hands are of your colour, but I shame To wear a heart so white;
and the blood to her is merely "this filthy witness,"--words impossible to her husband, to whom it suggested something quite other than sensuous disgust or practical danger. The literalism of her mind appears fully in two contemptuous speeches where she dismisses his imaginings; in the murder scene:
Infirm of purpose!
Give me the daggers! The sleeping and the dead Are but as pictures: "tis the eye of childhood That fears a painted devil;
and in the banquet scene:
O these flaws and starts, Impostors to true fear, would well become A woman"s story at a winter"s fire, Authorised by her grandam. Shame itself!
Why do you make such faces? When all"s done, You look but on a stool.
Even in the awful scene where her imagination breaks loose in sleep she uses no such images as Macbeth"s. It is the direct appeal of the facts to sense that has fastened on her memory. The ghastly realism of "Yet who would have thought the old man to have had so much blood in him?" or "Here"s the smell of the blood still," is wholly unlike him. Her most poetical words, "All the perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little hand," are equally unlike his words about great Neptune"s ocean. Hers, like some of her other speeches, are the more moving, from their greater simplicity and because they seem to tell of that self-restraint in suffering which is so totally lacking in him; but there is in them comparatively little of imagination. If we consider most of the pa.s.sages to which I have referred, we shall find that the quality which moves our admiration is courage or force of will.
This want of imagination, though it helps to make Lady Macbeth strong for immediate action, is fatal to her. If she does not feel beforehand the cruelty of Duncan"s murder, this is mainly because she hardly imagines the act, or at most imagines its outward show, "the motion of a muscle this way or that." Nor does she in the least foresee those inward consequences which reveal themselves immediately in her husband, and less quickly in herself. It is often said that she understands him well.
Had she done so, she never would have urged him on. She knows that he is given to strange fancies; but, not realising what they spring from, she has no idea either that they may gain such power as to ruin the scheme, or that, while they mean present weakness, they mean also perception of the future. At one point in the murder scene the force of his imagination impresses her, and for a moment she is startled; a light threatens to break on her:
These deeds must not be thought After these ways: so, it will make us mad,
she says, with a sudden and great seriousness. And when he goes panting on, "Methought I heard a voice cry, "Sleep no more,"" ... she breaks in, "What do you mean?" half-doubting whether this was not a real voice that he heard. Then, almost directly, she recovers herself, convinced of the vanity of his fancy. Nor does she understand herself any better than him. She never suspects that these deeds _must_ be thought after these ways; that her facile realism,
A little water clears us of this deed,
will one day be answered by herself, "Will these hands ne"er be clean?"
or that the fatal commonplace, "What"s done is done," will make way for her last despairing sentence, "What"s done cannot be undone."
Hence the development of her character--perhaps it would be more strictly accurate to say, the change in her state of mind--is both inevitable, and the opposite of the development we traced in Macbeth.
When the murder has been done, the discovery of its hideousness, first reflected in the faces of her guests, comes to Lady Macbeth with the shock of a sudden disclosure, and at once her nature begins to sink. The first intimation of the change is given when, in the scene of the discovery, she faints.[229] When next we see her, Queen of Scotland, the glory of her dream has faded. She enters, disillusioned, and weary with want of sleep: she has thrown away everything and gained nothing:
Nought"s had, all"s spent, Where our desire is got without content: "Tis safer to be that which we destroy Than by destruction dwell in doubtful joy.
Henceforth she has no initiative: the stem of her being seems to be cut through. Her husband, physically the stronger, maddened by pangs he had foreseen, but still flaming with life, comes into the foreground, and she retires. Her will remains, and she does her best to help him; but he rarely needs her help. Her chief anxiety appears to be that he should not betray his misery. He plans the murder of Banquo without her knowledge (not in order to spare her, I think, for he never shows love of this quality, but merely because he does not need her now); and even when she is told vaguely of his intention she appears but little interested. In the sudden emergency of the banquet scene she makes a prodigious and magnificent effort; her strength, and with it her ascendancy, returns, and she saves her husband at least from an open disclosure. But after this she takes no part whatever in the action. We only know from her shuddering words in the sleep-walking scene, "The Thane of Fife had a wife: where is she now?" that she has even learned of her husband"s worst crime; and in all the horrors of his tyranny over Scotland she has, so far as we hear, no part. Disillusionment and despair prey upon her more and more. That she should seek any relief in speech, or should ask for sympathy, would seem to her mere weakness, and would be to Macbeth"s defiant fury an irritation. Thinking of the change in him, we imagine the bond between them slackened, and Lady Macbeth left much alone. She sinks slowly downward. She cannot bear darkness, and has light by her continually: "tis her command. At last her nature, not her will, gives way. The secrets of the past find vent in a disorder of sleep, the beginning perhaps of madness. What the doctor fears is clear. He reports to her husband no great physical mischief, but bids her attendant to remove from her all means by which she could harm herself, and to keep eyes on her constantly. It is in vain. Her death is announced by a cry from her women so sudden and direful that it would thrill her husband with horror if he were any longer capable of fear. In the last words of the play Malcolm tells us it is believed in the hostile army that she died by her own hand. And (not to speak of the indications just referred to) it is in accordance with her character that even in her weakest hour she should cut short by one determined stroke the agony of her life.
The sinking of Lady Macbeth"s nature, and the marked change in her demeanour to her husband, are most strikingly shown in the conclusion of the banquet scene; and from this point pathos is mingled with awe. The guests are gone. She is completely exhausted, and answers Macbeth in listless, submissive words which seem to come with difficulty. How strange sounds the reply "Did you send to him, sir?" to his imperious question about Macduff! And when he goes on, "waxing desperate in imagination," to speak of new deeds of blood, she seems to sicken at the thought, and there is a deep pathos in that answer which tells at once of her care for him and of the misery she herself has silently endured,
You lack the season of all natures, sleep.
We begin to think of her now less as the awful instigator of murder than as a woman with much that is grand in her, and much that is piteous.
Strange and almost ludicrous as the statement may sound,[230] she is, up to her light, a perfect wife. She gives her husband the best she has; and the fact that she never uses to him the terms of affection which, up to this point in the play, he employs to her, is certainly no indication of want of love. She urges, appeals, reproaches, for a practical end, but she never recriminates. The harshness of her taunts is free from mere personal feeling, and also from any deep or more than momentary contempt. She despises what she thinks the weakness which stands in the way of her husband"s ambition; but she does not despise _him_. She evidently admires him and thinks him a great man, for whom the throne is the proper place. Her commanding att.i.tude in the moments of his hesitation or fear is probably confined to them. If we consider the peculiar circ.u.mstances of the earlier scenes and the banquet scene, and if we examine the language of the wife and husband at other times, we shall come, I think, to the conclusion that their habitual relations are better represented by the later scenes than by the earlier, though naturally they are not truly represented by either. Her ambition for her husband and herself (there was no distinction to her mind) proved fatal to him, far more so than the prophecies of the Witches; but even when she pushed him into murder she believed she was helping him to do what he merely lacked the nerve to attempt; and her part in the crime was so much less open-eyed than his, that, if the impossible and undramatic task of estimating degrees of culpability were forced on us, we should surely have to a.s.sign the larger share to Macbeth.
"Lady Macbeth," says Dr. Johnson, "is merely detested"; and for a long time critics generally spoke of her as though she were Malcolm"s "fiend-like queen." In natural reaction we tend to insist, as I have been doing, on the other and less obvious side; and in the criticism of the last century there is even a tendency to sentimentalise the character. But it can hardly be doubted that Shakespeare meant the predominant impression to be one of awe, grandeur, and horror, and that he never meant this impression to be lost, however it might be modified, as Lady Macbeth"s activity diminishes and her misery increases. I cannot believe that, when she said of Banquo and Fleance,
But in them nature"s copy"s not eterne,
she meant only that they would some day die; or that she felt any surprise when Macbeth replied,
There"s comfort yet: they are a.s.sailable;
though I am sure no light came into her eyes when he added those dreadful words, "Then be thou jocund." She was listless. She herself would not have moved a finger against Banquo. But she thought his death, and his son"s death, might ease her husband"s mind, and she suggested the murders indifferently and without remorse. The sleep-walking scene, again, inspires pity, but its main effect is one of awe. There is great horror in the references to blood, but it cannot be said that there is more than horror; and Campbell was surely right when, in alluding to Mrs. Jameson"s a.n.a.lysis, he insisted that in Lady Macbeth"s misery there is no trace of contrition.[231] Doubtless she would have given the world to undo what she had done; and the thought of it killed her; but, regarding her from the tragic point of view, we may truly say she was too great to repent.[232]
2
The main interest of the character of Banquo arises from the changes that take place in him, and from the influence of the Witches upon him.
And it is curious that Shakespeare"s intention here is so frequently missed. Banquo being at first strongly contrasted with Macbeth, as an innocent man with a guilty, it seems to be supposed that this contrast must be continued to his death; while, in reality, though it is never removed, it is gradually diminished. Banquo in fact may be described much more truly than Macbeth as the victim of the Witches. If we follow his story this will be evident.
He bore a part only less distinguished than Macbeth"s in the battles against Sweno and Macdonwald. He and Macbeth are called "our captains,"
and when they meet the Witches they are traversing the "blasted heath"[233] alone together. Banquo accosts the strange shapes without the slightest fear. They lay their fingers on their lips, as if to signify that they will not, or must not, speak to _him_. To Macbeth"s brief appeal, "Speak, if you can: what are you?" they at once reply, not by saying what they are, but by hailing him Thane of Glamis, Thane of Cawdor, and King hereafter. Banquo is greatly surprised that his partner should start as if in fear, and observes that he is at once "rapt"; and he bids the Witches, if they know the future, to prophesy to _him_, who neither begs their favour nor fears their hate. Macbeth, looking back at a later time, remembers Banquo"s daring, and how
he chid the sisters, When first they put the name of king upon me, And bade them speak to him.
"Chid" is an exaggeration; but Banquo is evidently a bold man, probably an ambitious one, and certainly has no lurking guilt in his ambition. On hearing the predictions concerning himself and his descendants he makes no answer, and when the Witches are about to vanish he shows none of Macbeth"s feverish anxiety to know more. On their vanishing he is simply amazed, wonders if they were anything but hallucinations, makes no reference to the predictions till Macbeth mentions them, and then answers lightly.