All this and much more we learn from a book written by her father which bears the pathetic t.i.tle of "Sorrows." For little Penelope died at the age of seven, and the stricken parent solaced himself in his loneliness by writing the memories of his darling.
The portrait by Reynolds was made when the child was four years old.
After her death, Fuseli painted a picture representing her borne to heaven by an angel. There is also a lovely marble monument to Penelope, by Banks, in the Ashbourne church.[3]
[Footnote 3: See Mrs. Rebecca Harding Davis"s article in _St.
Nicholas_, November, 1875, "About the Painter of Little Penelope."]
II
MASTER CREWE AS HENRY VIII
There was once on the throne of England a king named Henry VIII. He was a man of extraordinary character, with qualities both good and bad. His conduct was sometimes unscrupulous and tyrannical, and he let nothing interfere with his own pleasure. Nevertheless his reign brought many benefits to England, and his memory is respected by English people.
In his early manhood, Henry was accounted the handsomest prince of his time, but allowance must be made for the flattery of his subjects. He was a big, rather coa.r.s.e-looking man, with small eyes, and a large face and double chin. For his noisy ways and rough manners he has been familiarly called "Bluff King Hal" and "Burly King Harry." He was fond of the hunt and the tournament and all kinds of manly exercise. He was also much given to show and display, and loved rich dresses.
He employed as his court painter the celebrated Dutch artist Holbein, who made various portraits of the members of the royal family. There was one particularly fine group which was unfortunately destroyed by fire, but as a copy had previously been made we still know what the picture was like.
Henry VIII. had been dead some two hundred years before the Master Crewe of our picture was born, but English kings are not allowed to be forgotten. Successive generations of children were shown Holbein"s portraits of the bluff old ruler, and were taught something about his reign.
It happened one time that the children of Master Crewe"s acquaintance had a fancy dress party. The Crewes were people of fashion who entered constantly into social affairs. Naturally there was much discussion over their son"s part and costume. It was a happy thought which fixed upon the character of Henry VIII., for the boy"s round face, square shoulders, and st.u.r.dy frame were well fitted for the role.
Evidently no pains were spared to make the costume historically correct. Holbein"s portrait was the costumer"s model, and every detail was faithfully followed. The boy is dressed in the fashion of the sixteenth century in "doublet and hose." This consists first of a richly embroidered waistcoat, the most effective part of the dress.
The sleeves are made of the same material and are gathered at the wrists in a ruffle. The lower part of the doublet is a skirt falling just above the knees.
[Ill.u.s.tration: MASTER CREWE AS HENRY VIII.]
Over all is flung a handsome mantle; but this is drawn apart in front to display the smart waistcoat to full advantage. A broad-brimmed hat set jauntily on one side, and trimmed with a long feather, completes the costume. By way of ornament is worn a big jewelled collar and a long chain with locket. A short sword swings from the girdle, and on the left leg is the garter, which is the badge of membership in the ancient Order of the Garter, of which Henry VIII. was the tenth sovereign member. This is of dark blue ribbon edged with gold, and bearing in gold letters the motto "Honi soit qui mal y pense".[4]
[Footnote 4: Evil to him who evil thinks.]
It is one thing to have a perfect costume, and another to understand the role. Master Crewe not only looks his part, but he acts it as well. He has not failed to take in all the points of the portrait, and imitates the pompous att.i.tude to perfection. He stands with feet wide apart, grasping his gloves in the right hand and supporting the other on the sash.
He is a bright boy, who enters into the spirit of the game, and it tickles him hugely to play the part of a despot. But while he is Henry VIII. in miniature, he is Henry VIII. without the king"s coa.r.s.eness, and in the place is a child"s innocent pleasure. It was no wonder that his parents, delighted with the success of the costume, wished to have a portrait made.
The boy is painted as he appeared when posing for his admiring friends. In his effort to a.s.sume a lordly air his boyish glee gets the better of him, and he belies the character by a broad grin. Perhaps he has caught the twinkle in his father"s eye, or his mother"s suppressed smile, and he can keep serious no longer. "Bravo!" cries the audience, and he smiles in innocent delight at his success.
His pet dogs are in the room, and one of them is rather suspicious of this strange young prince. He sniffs cautiously at his legs, for though his eyes deceive him, his sense of smell cannot be mistaken.
Through a window in the rear we get a glimpse of the park beyond, which adds much to the beauty of the picture. As we shall see in other pictures of this collection[5] an interior gives a sense of imprisonment unless it contains some opening. The ma.s.s of bright color which the landscape makes in the upper right corner is balanced in the lower left corner by a cloak thrown over a chair.
[Footnote 5: See Lady c.o.c.kburn and her Children, and the d.u.c.h.ess of Devonshire and her Child.]
Reynolds painted so many fine portraits of boys that it is hard to say that this or that one is best, though some have preferred Master Crewe to all others.[6] We shall see by-and-by in Master Bunbury, and the Cupid, that the painter understood boy nature pretty thoroughly. This rollicking Master Crewe is not so serious as Master Bunbury, nor so sly as the Cupid boy; he is in fact a typical English lad, st.u.r.dy, masterful, frank, and good-natured.
[Footnote 6: Leslie and Taylor say that "none of his many admirable boy pictures is so consummate."]
III
LADY c.o.c.kBURN AND HER CHILDREN
A pretty story is told of a Roman matron named Cornelia, who was one day entertaining a visitor, when the conversation led to the subject of jewels. "These are my jewels," said the hostess, and turned to show the stranger her beautiful children. The story comes readily to mind as one looks at this portrait of Lady c.o.c.kburn and her Children.
Indeed, the picture was once engraved[7] under the fanciful t.i.tle of "Cornelia and her Children." Like the Roman matron of old, the English mother gathers her children about her as the choicest jewels of her possession. Her stately beauty is of the cla.s.sic sort, and the children are as charming as English children are reputed to be.
[Footnote 7: By Tomkins, in 1792.]
All three are boys. The eldest is James, who kneels on his mother"s lap, playfully grasping the mantle about her neck, and supported in his precarious position by her hand placed firmly on his back. He has the sweet expression which betokens a sunny nature, and his well-cut features are such as make a handsome man. He was his father"s heir and namesake, succeeding him as the seventh baronet.
The rogue peeping over his mother"s shoulder is George. Though his features are less regular than his elder brother"s, he is none the less attractive, for he is a jolly little fellow. When he grew to manhood he entered the navy and became an admiral. It was on his ship, the Northumberland, that Napoleon was conveyed to the island of St.
Helena to end his days in exile. In the course of time Admiral c.o.c.kburn became the eighth baronet of the name.
The baby lying on the mother"s lap is William. In after years he entered the ministry, married a daughter of Sir Robert Peel, and became Dean of York. It was fitting that one of Lady c.o.c.kburn"s sons should enter the Church, as her father, Dr. Ayscough, had been Dean of Bristol. Upon the death of his elder brother, the Dean of York became the ninth baronet.
The picture shows the three children in a game of hide-and-seek.
George, who is evidently the leader of the fun, dodges up and down behind his mother, throwing little William into an ecstasy of delight.
As the round face appears again over the shoulder, the baby reaches up his fat little hand to clutch his brother"s arm, fairly doubling himself up in his pleasure, and grasping one foot in his other hand.
James enjoys the play more quietly. It is quite likely that he has been hiding his face in his mother"s mantle, but now he pauses to watch his little brother"s amus.e.m.e.nt, his lips parted in a smile, his finger directing the baby where to look.
[Ill.u.s.tration: LADY c.o.c.kBURN AND HER CHILDREN]
The mother turns her face towards that of her eldest son, scanning it closely.
The action in the picture is so delightfully natural that we do not at first realize how difficult a problem is solved in the arrangement of the four figures. An amateur photographer places his sitters in a stiff row and directs them all to look towards a single point. The master artist conceives of some action which shall engage the attention of all, and form a natural connection between them. Thus, in our picture, the interest of the game binds the figures together. The baby lifts his face to that of the mother and brother; the mother turns to the child at her right, and the latter looks down at the baby, thus completing the circle.
The lines of the composition are also so disposed as to bring the figures together in a close unity. Follow the outer edge of the figure of James at the left; trace across the mother"s lap the line made by the border of her mantle, and continued along the baby"s body. From the mother"s elbow move the pencil past the baby"s head and along his out-stretched arm till the line ends at the top of George"s head, and from this point carry a somewhat irregular line across to the head of James. We have thus traced the parallelogram which incloses the group.
The centre of the group is somewhat at the left of the centre of the canvas, and the picture would seem one-sided were it not for the details of the background at the right. Here the painter has represented a parapet supporting a marble pillar, at the base of which a large macaw perches. Beyond is seen a beautiful landscape.
This spot of color brings the composition into perfect balance. More than this, the view thus opened relieves the crowded effect of the compact grouping. The surrounding s.p.a.ce would not seem large enough for the four figures were it not for this added depth of s.p.a.ce, which gives the eye a long distance to traverse.
The composition is as fine in color as it is in lines and ma.s.ses. It is a "splendid tawny color harmony, formed by the red of the curtain, the warm flesh tints, the rich orange yellow of the outer robe of satin bordered with white fur, and the gaudy plumage of the macaw".[8]
[Footnote 8: Claude Phillips.]
With so many great artistic qualities, it is no wonder that the portrait has always been admired. Upon its completion in 1774 it was sent to the Royal Academy to be exhibited, and when it was first brought into the room, all the painters present, struck with admiration, burst into a tumult of applause and handclapping. Even after this the painstaking painter probably added some finishing touches and inscribed his name and the date, 1775, upon the ornamental border of the lady"s mantle.
IV