Sir Walter Scott.
by George Saintsbury.
PREFACE
To the very probable remark that "Another little book about Scott is not wanted," I can at least reply that apparently it is, inasmuch as the publishers proposed this volume to me, not I to them. And I believe that, as a matter of fact, no "little book about Scott" has appeared since the _Journal_ was completed, since the new and important instalment of _Letters_ appeared (in both cases with invaluable editorial apparatus by Mr. David Douglas), and especially since Mr.
Lang"s _Lockhart_ was published. It is true that no one of these, nor any other book that is likely to appear, has altered, or is likely to alter, much in a sane estimate of Sir Walter. His own matchless character and the genius of his first biographer combined to set before the world early an idea, of which it is safe to say that nothing that should lower it need be feared, and hardly anything to heighten it can be reasonably hoped. But as fresh items of ill.u.s.trative detail are made public, there can be no harm in endeavouring to incorporate something of what they give us in fresh abstracts and _apercus_ from time to time.
And for the continued and, as far as s.p.a.ce permits, detailed criticism of the work, it may be pleaded that criticism of Scott has for many years been chiefly general, while in criticism, even more than in other things, generalities are deceptive.
CHAPTER I
LIFE TILL MARRIAGE
Scott"s own "autobiographic fragment," printed in Lockhart"s first volume, has made other accounts of his youth mostly superfluous, even to a day which persists in knowing better about everything and everybody than it or they knew about themselves. No one ever recorded his genealogy more minutely, with greater pride, or with a more saving sense of humour than Sir Walter. He was connected, though remotely, with gentle families on both sides. That is to say, his great-grandfather was son of the Laird of Raeburn, who was grandson of Walter Scott of Harden and the "Flower of Yarrow." The great-grandson, "Beardie," acquired that cognomen by letting his beard grow like General Dalziel, though for the exile of James II., instead of the death of Charles I.--"whilk was the waur reason," as Sir Walter himself might have said.
Beardie"s second son, being more thoroughly sickened of the sea in his first voyage than Robinson Crusoe, took to farming and Whiggery, and married the daughter of Haliburton of Newmains--there was also Macdougal and Campbell blood on the spindle side of the older generations of the family. Their eldest son Walter, father of Sir Walter, was born in 1729, and, being bred to the law, became the original, according to undisputed tradition, of the "Saunders Fairford" of _Redgauntlet_, the most autobiographical as well as not the least charming of the novels. He married Anne Rutherford, who, through her mother, brought the blood of the Swintons of Swinton to enrich the joint strain; and from her father, a member of a family distinguished in the annals of the University of Edinburgh, may have transmitted some of the love for books which was not the most prominent feature of the other ingredients.
Walter himself was the third "permanent child" (to adopt an agreeable phrase of Mr. Traill"s about another person) of a family of twelve, only five of whom survived infancy. His three brothers, John, Thomas, and Daniel, and his sister Anne, all figure in the records; but little is heard of John and not much of Anne. Thomas, the second, either had, or was thought by his indulgent brother to have, literary talents, and was at one time put up to father the novels; while Daniel (whose misconduct in money matters, and still more in showing the white feather, brought on him the only display of anything that can be called rancour recorded in Sir Walter"s history) concerns us even less. The date of the novelist"s birth was 15th August 1771, the place, "the top of the College Wynd," a locality now whelmed in the actual Chambers Street face of the present Old University buildings, and near that of Kirk of Field.
Escaping the real or supposed dangers of a consumptive wet-nurse, he was at first healthy enough; but teething or something else developed the famous lameness, which at first seemed to threaten loss of all use of the right leg. The child was sent to the house of his grandfather, the Whig farmer of Sandyknowe, where he abode for some years under the shadow of Smailholm Tower, reading a little, listening to Border legends a great deal, and making one long journey to London and Bath. This first blessed period of "making himself"[1] lasted till his eighth year, and ended with a course of sea-bathing at Prestonpans, where he met the original in name and perhaps in nature of Captain Dalgetty, and the original in character of the Antiquary. Then he returned (_circ._ 1779) to his father"s house, now in George Square, to his numerous, if impermanent, family of brothers and sisters, and to the High School. The most memorable incident of this part of his career is the famous episode of "Greenbreeks."[2]
His health, as he grew up, becoming again weak, the boy was sent once more Borderwards--this time to Kelso, where he lived with an aunt, went to the town school, and made the acquaintance there, whether for good or ill, who shall say? of the Ballantynes. And he had to return to Kelso for the same cause, at least once during his experiences at College, where he did not take the full usual number of courses, and acquired no name as a scholar. But he always read.
As it had not been decided whether he was to adopt the superior or the inferior branch of the law, he was apprenticed to his father at the age of fifteen, as a useful preparation for either career. He naturally enough did not love "engrossing," but he did not cross his father"s soul by refusing it, and though returns of illness occurred now and then, his const.i.tution appeared to be gradually strengthening itself, partly, as he thought, owing to the habit of very long walks, in which he took great delight. He tried various accomplishments; but he could neither draw, nor make music, nor (at this time) write. Still he always read--irregularly, uncritically, but enormously, so that to this day Sir Walter"s real learning is under-estimated. And he formed a very noteworthy circle of friends--William Clerk, "Darsie Latimer," the chief of them all. It must have been just after he entered his father"s office that he met Burns, during that poet"s famous visit to Edinburgh in 1786-87.
Considerably less is known of his late youth and early manhood than either of his childhood or of his later life. His letters--those invaluable and unparalleled sources of biographical information--do not begin till 1792, the year of his majority, when (on July 11) he was called to the Bar. But it is a universal tradition that, in these years of apprenticeship, in more senses than one, he, partly in gratifying his own love of wandering, and partly in serving his father"s business by errands to clients, etc., did more than lay the foundation of that unrivalled knowledge of Scotland, and of all cla.s.ses in it, which plays so important a part in his literary work. I say "of all cla.s.ses in it,"
and this point is of the greatest weight. Scott has been accused (for the most part foolishly) of paying an exaggerated respect to rank. If this had been true, it would at least not have been due to late or imperfect acquaintance with persons of rank. Democratic as the Scotland of this century has sometimes been called, it is not uncommon to find a considerable respect for aristocracy in the greatest Scotch Radicals; and Scott was notoriously not a Radical. But his familiarity with all ranks from an early age is undoubted, and only very shallow or prejudiced observers will doubt the beneficial effect which this had on his study of humanity.[6] The uneasy caricature which mars d.i.c.kens"s picture of the upper, and even the upper middle, cla.s.ses is as much absent from his work as the complete want of familiarity with the lower which appears, for instance, in Bulwer. It is certain that before he had written anything, he was on familiar terms with many persons, both men and women, of the highest rank--the most noteworthy among his feminine correspondents being Lady Louisa Stuart (sister of the Marquis of Bute and grand-daughter of Lady Mary Wortley Montagu) and Lady Abercorn. With the former the correspondence is always on the footing of mere though close friendship, literary and other; in part at least of that with Lady Abercorn, I cannot help suspecting the presence, especially on the lady"s side, of that feeling,
"Too warm for friendship and too pure for love,"
which undoubtedly sometimes does exist between men and women who cannot, and perhaps who would not if they could, turn love into marriage.
However this may be, it is, let it be repeated, certain that Scott, in the six years from his fifteenth, when he is said to have first visited the Highlands and seen Rob Roy"s country, to his majority, and yet again in the five or six between his call to the Bar and his marriage, visited many, if not all, parts of Scotland; knew high and low, rich and poor, with the amiable interest of his temperament and the keen observation of his genius; took part in business and amus.e.m.e.nt and conviviality (he accuses himself later of having been not quite free from the prevalent peccadillo of rather deep drinking); and still and always _read_. He joined the "Speculative Society" in January 1791, and, besides taking part in the debates on general subjects, read papers on Feudalism, Ossian, and Northern Mythology, in what were to be his more special lines.
His young lawyer friends called him "Colonel Grogg," a _sobriquet_ not difficult to interpret on one of the hints just given, and "Duns Scotus," which concerns the other; while yet a third characteristic, which can surprise n.o.body, is indicated in the famous introduction of him to a boisterous party of midshipmen of the Marryat type by James Clerk, the brother of Darsie Latimer, who kept a yacht, and was fond of the sea: "You may take Mr. Scott for a poor _lamiter_, gentlemen, but he is the first to begin a row and the last to end it."
It appears that it was from a time somewhat before the call that the beginning of Scott"s famous, his unfortunate, and (it has been the fashion, rightly or wrongly, to add) his only love affair dates. Some persons have taken the trouble to piece together and eke out the references to "Green Mantle," otherwise Miss Stuart of Belches, later Lady Forbes. It is better to respect Scott"s own reticence on a subject of which very little is really known, and of which he, like most gentlemen, preferred to say little or nothing. The affection appears to have been mutual; but the lady was probably not very eager to incur family displeasure by making a match decidedly below her in rank, and, at that time, distinctly imprudent in point of fortune. But the courtship, such as it was, appears to have been long, and the effects of the loss indelible. Scott speaks of his heart as "handsomely pieced"--"pieced," it may be observed, not "healed." A healed wound sometimes does not show; a pieced garment or article of furniture reminds us of the piecing till the day when it goes to fire or dustbin.
But it has been supposed, with some reason, that those heroines of Scott"s who show most touch of personal sympathy--Catherine Seyton, Die Vernon, Lilias Redgauntlet--bear features, physical or mental or both, of this Astarte, this
"Lost woman of his youth, yet unpossessed."
And no one can read the _Diary_ without perceiving the strange bitter-sweet, at the moment of his greatest calamity, of the fact that Sir William Forbes, who rendered him invaluable service at his greatest need, was his successful rival thirty years before, and the widower of "Green Mantle."
This affair came to an end in October 1796; and it may astonish some wise people, accustomed to regard Scott as a rather humdrum and prosaic person, who escaped the scandals so often a.s.sociated with the memory of men of letters from sheer want of temptation, to hear that one of his most intimate friends of his own age at the time "shuddered at the violence of his most irritable and ungovernable mind." There is no reason to doubt the fidelity of this description. And those who know something of human nature will be disposed to a.s.sign the disappearance of the irritableness and ungovernableness precisely to this incident, and to the working of a strong mind, confronted by fate with the question whether it was to be the victim or the master of its own pa.s.sions, fighting out the battle once for all, and thenceforward keeping its house armed against them, it may be with some loss, but certainly with much gain.
It has been said that he states (with a touch of irony, no doubt) that his heart was "handsomely pieced"; and it is not against the theory hinted in the foregoing paragraph, but, on the contrary, in favour of it, that the piecing did not take long. In exactly a year Scott became engaged to Miss Charlotte Margaret Carpenter or Charpentier,[4] and they were married on Christmas Eve, 1797, at St. Mary"s, Carlisle. They had met at Gilsland Spa in the previous July, and the courtship had not taken very long. The lady was of French extraction, had an only brother in the service of the East India Company, and, being an orphan, was the ward of the Marquis of Downshire,--circ.u.mstances on which gossips like Hogg made impertinent remarks. It is fair, however, to "the Shepherd" to say that he speaks enthusiastically both of Mrs. Scott"s appearance ("one of the most beautiful and handsome creatures I ever saw in my life"; "a perfect beauty") and of her character ("she is cradled in my remembrance, and ever shall be, as a sweet, kind, and affectionate creature").[5] She was very dark, small, with hair which the Shepherd calls black, Lockhart dark brown; her features not regular, but her complexion, figure, and so forth "unusually attractive." Not very much is said about her in any of the authentic accounts, and traditional t.i.ttle-tattle may be neglected. She does not seem to have been extremely wise, and was entirely unliterary; but neither of these defects is a _causa redhibitionis_ in marriage; and she was certainly a faithful and affectionate wife. At any rate, Scott made no complaints, if he had any to make, and nearly the most touching pa.s.sage in the _Diary_ is that written after her death.
The minor incidents, not literary, of his life, between his call to the Bar and his marriage, require a little notice, for they had a very great influence on the character of his future work. His success at the Bar was moderate, but his fees increased steadily if slowly. He defended (unsuccessfully) a Galloway minister who was accused among other counts of "toying with a sweetie-wife," and it is interesting to find in his defence some casuistry about _ebrius_ and _ebriosus_, which reminds one of the Baron of Bradwardine. He took part victoriously in a series of battles with sticks, between Loyalist advocates and writers and Irish Jacobin medical students, in the pit of the Edinburgh theatre during April 1794. In June 1795 he became a curator of the Advocates" Library, and a year later engaged (of course on the loyal side) in another great political "row," this time in the streets.
Above all, in the spring and summer between the loss of his love and his marriage, he engaged eagerly in volunteering, becoming quartermaster, paymaster, secretary, and captain in the Edinburgh Light Horse--an occupation which has left at least as much impression on his work as Gibbon"s equally famous connection with the Hampshire Militia on his.
His friendships continued and multiplied; and he began with the sisters of some of his friends, especially Miss Cranstoun (his chief confidante in the "Green Mantle" business) and Miss Erskine, the first, or the first known to us, of those interesting correspondences with ladies which show him perhaps at his very best. For in them he plays neither jack-pudding, nor c.o.xcomb, nor sentimentalist, nor any of the involuntary counterparts which men in such cases are too apt to play; and they form not the least of his t.i.tles to the great name of gentleman.
But by far the most important contribution of these six or seven years to his "making" was the further acquaintance with the scenery, and customs, and traditions, and dialects, and local history of his own country, which his greater independence, enlarged circle of friends, and somewhat increased means enabled him to acquire. It is quite true that to a man with his gifts any microcosm will do for a macrocosm in miniature. I have heard in conversation (I forget whether it is in any of the books) that he picked up the word "whomled" (= "bucketed over"--"turned like a tub"), which adds so much to the description of the nautical misfortune of Claud Halcro and Triptolemus in _The Pirate_, by overhearing it from a scold in the Gra.s.smarket. But still the enlarged experience could not but be of the utmost value. It was during these years that he saw Glamis Castle in its unspoiled state, during these that, in connection with the case of the unfortunate but rather happily named devotee of Bacchus and Venus, M"Naught, he explored Galloway, and obtained the decorations and scenery, if not the story, of _Guy Mannering_. He also repeated his visits to the English side of the Border, not merely on the occasion during which he met Miss Carpenter, but earlier, in a second excursion to Northumberland.
But, above all, these were the years of his famous "raids" into Liddesdale, then one of the most inaccessible districts of Scotland, under the guidance of Mr. Shortreed of Jedburgh--raids which completed the information for _Guy Mannering_, which gave him much of the material for the _Minstrelsy_, and the history of which has, I think, delighted every one of his readers and biographers, except one or two who have been scandalised at the exquisite story of the Arrival of the Keg.[3] Of these let us not speak, but, regarding them with a tender pity not unmixed with wonder, pa.s.s to the beginnings of his actual literary life and to the history of his early married years. The literature a little preceded the life; but the life certainly determined the growth of the literature.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] His friend Shortreed"s well-known expression for the results of the later Liddesdale "raids."
[2] See General Preface to the Novels, or Lockhart, i. 136.
[3] He attributes to Lady Balcarres the credit of being his earliest patroness, and of giving him, when a mere shy boy, the run of her drawing-room and of her box at the theatre.
[4] He himself, in his entries of his children"s births, always gives the order of the names as Margaret Charlotte.
[5] The Boar of the Forest seems, not unnaturally, to have had a rather less warm "cradle" in Lady Scott"s feelings. She thought he took liberties; and though he meant no harm, he certainly did.
[6] Lockhart, i. 270. I quote, as is usual, the second or ten-volume edition. But, for reading, some may prefer the first, in which the number of the volumes coincides with their real division, which has the memories of the death of Sophia Scott and others connected with its course, and to which the second made fewer positive additions than may be thought.--[It has been pointed out to me in reference to the word "whomle" on the opposite page that Fergusson has "whumble" in "The Rising of the Session." But if Scott had quoted, would he have altered the spelling? The Gra.s.smarket story, moreover, exactly corresponds to his words, "as a gudewife would whomle a bowie."]
CHAPTER II
EARLY LITERARY WORK
It is pretty universally known, and must have been perceived even from the foregoing summary, that Scott was by no means a very precocious writer. He takes rank, indeed, neither with those who, according to a famous phrase, "break out threescore thousand strong" in youth; nor with those who begin original composition betimes, and by degrees arrive at excellence; nor yet with those who do not display any apt.i.tude for letters till late in life. His cla.s.s--a fourth, which, at least as regards the greater names of literature, is perhaps the smallest of all--comprises those who may almost be said to drift into literary work and literary fame, whose first production is not merely tentative and unoriginal, but, so to speak, accidental, who do not discover their real faculty for literary work till after a pretty long course of casual literary play.
Part of this was no doubt due to the fact--vouched for sufficiently, and sufficiently probable, though not, so far as I know, resting on any distinct and firsthand doc.u.mentary evidence--that Walter Scott the elder had, even more than his _eidolon_ the elder Fairford, that horror of literary employment on the part of his son which was for generations a tradition among persons of business, and which is perhaps not quite extinct yet. For this opposition, as is well known, rather stimulates than checks, even in dutiful offspring, the n.o.ble rage. It was due partly, perhaps, to a metaphysical cause--the fact that until Scott was well past his twentieth year, the wind of the spirit was not yet blowing, that the new poetical and literary day had not yet dawned; and partly to a more commonplace reason or set of reasons. About 1790 literary work was extremely badly paid;[11] and, even if it had been paid better, Scott had no particular need of money. Till his marriage he lived at home, spent his holidays with friends, or on tours where the expenses were little or nothing, and obtained sufficient pocket-money, first by copying while he was still apprenticed to his father, then by his fees when he was called. He could, as he showed later, spend money royally when he had it or thought he had it; but he was a man of no extravagant tastes of the ordinary kind, and Edinburgh was not in his days at all an extravagant place of living. Even when he married, he was by no means badly off. His wife, though not exactly an heiress, had means which had been estimated at five hundred a year, and which seem never to have fallen below two hundred; Scott"s fees averaged about another two hundred; he evidently had an allowance from his father (who had been very well off, and was still not poor), and before very long the Sheriffship of Selkirkshire added three hundred more, though he seems to have made this an excuse for giving up practice, which he had never much liked. His father"s death in 1799 put him in possession of some property; legacies from relations added more. Before the publication of the _Lay_ (when he was barely three-and-thirty), Lockhart estimates his income, leaving fees and literary work out of the question, at nearly if not quite a thousand a year; and a thousand a year at the beginning of the century went as far as fifteen hundred, if not two thousand, at its close.
Thus, with no necessity to live by his pen, with no immediate or extraordinary temptation to use it for gain, and as yet, it would seem, with no overmastering inducement from his genius to do so, while he at no time of his life felt any stimulus from vanity, it is not surprising that it was long before Scott began to write in earnest. A few childish verse translations and exercises of his neither encourage nor forbid any particular expectations of literature from him; they are neither better nor worse than those of hundreds, probably thousands, of boys every year. His first published performance, now of extreme rarity, and not, of course, produced with any literary object, was his Latin call-thesis on the rather curious subject (which has been, not improbably, supposed to be connected with his German studies and the terror-literature of the last decade of the century) of the disposal of the dead bodies of legally executed persons. His first English work was directly the result of the said German studies, to which, like many of his contemporaries, he had been attracted by fashion. It consisted of nothing more than the well-known translations of Burger"s _Lenore_ and _Wild Huntsman_, which were issued in a little quarto volume by Manners & Miller of Edinburgh, in October 1796--a date which has the special interest of suggesting that Scott sought some refuge in literature from the agony of his rejection by Miss Stuart.
These well-known translations, or rather imitations, the first published under the t.i.tle of _William and Helen_, which it retains, the other as _The Chase_, which was subsequently altered to the better and more literal rendering, show unmistakably the result of the study of ballads, both in the printed forms and as orally delivered. Some crudities of rhyme and expression are said to have been corrected at the instance of one of Scott"s (at this time rather numerous) Egerias, the beautiful wife of his kinsman, Scott of Harden, a young lady partly of German extraction, but of the best English breeding. Slight books of the kind, even translations, made a great deal more mark sometimes in those days than they would in these; but there were a great many translations of _Lenore_ about, and except by Scott"s friends, little notice was taken of the volume. There were some excuses for the neglect, the best perhaps being that English criticism at the time was at nearly as low an ebb as English poetry. A really acute critic could hardly have mistaken the difference between Scott"s verse and the fustian or tinsel of the Della Cruscans, the frigid rhetoric of Darwin, or the drivel of Hayley. Only Southey had as yet written ballad verses with equal vigour and facility; and, I think, he had not yet published any of them. It is Scott who tells us that he borrowed
"Tramp, tramp, along the land they rode, Splash, splash, along the sea,"
from Taylor of Norwich; but Taylor himself had the good taste to see how much it was improved by the completion--
"The scourge is red, the spur drops blood, _The fashing pebbles flee_"--
which last line, indeed, Coleridge himself hardly bettered in the not yet written _Ancient Mariner_, the _ne plus ultra_ of the style. It must be mainly a question of individual taste whether the sixes and eights of the _Lenore_ version or the continued eights of the _Huntsman_ please most. But any one who knows what the present state of British poetry was in October 1796 will be more than indifferently well satisfied with either.