[34] Our now-accepted texts, of course, read "food"; but no one who remembers the pleasant use which Sir Walter himself has made of the other reading in the Introduction to _Quentin Durward_ will readily give it up.
[35] As Scott, like Swift and Shakespeare, like Thackeray and Fielding, never hesitated at a touch of grim humour even though it might border on grotesque, he himself would probably not have missed the coincidence of--
"Though _bill_men ply the ghastly blow,"
which suggests itself only too tragi-comically.
[36] _Journal_, Feb. 3, 1826, p. 103, ed. Douglas; _Lockhart_, viii.
216, 217.
CHAPTER VI
LAST WORKS AND DAYS
It has been mentioned that when Scott returned from Ireland, and before his misfortunes came upon him, he had already engaged in two works of magnitude, a new novel, _Woodstock_, and a _Life of Napoleon_, planned upon a very large scale, for which Constable made great preparations, and from which he expected enormous profits. After the catastrophe it became a question whether Constable"s estate could claim the fulfilment of these contracts, or whether the profits of them could be devoted wholly to the liquidation of Scott"s, or rather Ballantyne & Co."s, own debts. The completion of _Woodstock_ was naturally delayed until this point was settled. But from the very moment when Sir Walter had resolved to devote himself to the heroic but apparently hopeless task of paying off his nominal liabilities in full, he arranged a system of work upon these two books, and especially upon the _Napoleon_, which exceeded in dogged determination anything that even he had hitherto done. The novel was, of course, to him comparative child"s play: he had written novels before in six weeks or thereabouts all told, though his impaired vigour, the depression of his spirits, and the sense of labouring for the mere purpose of pouring the results into a sieve, made things harder now. But the _Napoleon_, though he had made some preparation for this kind of writing by his elaborate and multifarious editorial work, especially by that on Dryden and Swift, was to a great extent new; and it required, what was always irksome to him, elaborate reading up of books and doc.u.ments for the special purpose. No man has ever utilised the results of previous reading for his own pleasure better than Scott, and few men, not mere professed book-grubbers, have ever had vaster stores of it. But he frequently confesses--a confession which in many ways makes his plight in these years still more to be pitied--an ingrained dislike to task-work of any kind; and there is no more laborious task-work than getting up and piecing together the materials for history.
The book, one, at a rough guess, of at least a million words, was completed from end to end in less than eighteen months, during which he also wrote _Woodstock_, _Malachi Malagrowther_ (_vide infra_), with several reviews and minor things, besides serving his usual number of days at the Clerk"s table, devoting necessarily much time to the not more painful than troublesome business of his pecuniary affairs, his removal from Castle Street, etc., and taking one journey of some length in the summer of 1826 to London and Paris for materials. The feat was accomplished by a rigid system of "so much per day"--by dint of which, no doubt, an amount of work, surprising to the inexperienced, can be turned out with no necessarily disastrous consequences. But Scott, disgusted with society, and avoiding it from motives of economy as well as of want of heart, disturbed hardly at all by strangers at Abbotsford, and not at all in the lodgings and furnished houses which he took while in Edinburgh, let "his own thought drive him like a goad" to work in the interest of his task-masters, and perhaps, also, for the sake of drowning care, pushed the system to the most extravagant lengths. We know that he sometimes worked from six in the morning to six at even, with breakfast and luncheon brought into his study and consumed there; and though his court duties made this fortunately impossible for a part of the year, at least during a part of the week, they were not a complete preservative. In the eighteen months he cleared for his bloodsuckers nearly twenty thousand pounds, eight thousand for _Woodstock_ and eleven or twelve for _Napoleon_. The trifling profits of _Malachi_ and the reviews seem to have been permitted to go into his own pocket. He was naturally proud of the exploit, but it may be feared that it made the end certain.
Of the merits of the _Napoleon_ (the second edition of which, by the way, carried its profits to eighteen thousand pounds) it is perhaps not necessary to say very much. I should imagine that few living persons have read it word for word through, and I confess very frankly that I have not done so myself, though I think I have read enough to qualify me for judging it. It is only unworthy of its author in the sense that one feels it to have been not in the least the work that he was born to do.
It is nearly as good, save for the technical inferiority of Scott"s prose style, as the historical work of Southey, and very much better than the historical work of Campbell and Moore. The information is sufficient, the narrative clear, and the author can at need rise to very fair eloquence, or at least rhetoric. But it is too long to be read, as one reads Southey"s _Nelson_, for its merits as biography, and not technically authoritative enough to be an exhaustive work of reference from the military, diplomatic, and political side. Above all, one cannot read a page without remembering that there were living then in England at least a dozen men who could have done it better,--Grote, Thirlwall, Mitford, Arnold, Hallam, Milman, Lingard, Palgrave, Turner, Roscoe, Carlyle, Macaulay, to mention only the most prominent, and mention them at random, were all alive and of man"s estate,--and probably scores who could have done it nearly or quite as well; while there was not one single man living, in England or in the world, who was capable of doing the work which Scott, if not as capable as ever, was still capable of doing like no one before and scarcely any one after him.
Take, for instance, _Woodstock_ itself. In a very quaint, characteristic, agreeable, and, as criticism, worthless pa.s.sage of _Wild Wales_, Borrow has stigmatised it as "trash." I only wish we had more such trash outside the forty-eight volumes of the _Waverley Novels_, or were likely to have more. The book, of course, has certain obvious critical faults--which are not in the least what made Borrow object to it. Although Scott, and apparently Ballantyne, liked the catastrophe, it has always seemed to me one of his worst examples of "huddling up." For it is historically and dramatically impossible that Cromwell should change his mind, or that Pearson and Robbins should wish to thwart severity which, considering the death of Humgudgeon, had a good deal more excuse than Oliver often thought necessary. Nor may the usual, and perhaps a little more than the usual, shortcomings in construction be denied. But as of old, and even more than on some occasions of old, the excellences of character, description, dialogue, and incident are so great as to atone over and over again for defects of the expected kind.
If Everard has something of that unlucky quality which the author recognised in Malcolm Graeme when he said, "I ducked him in the lake to give him something to do; but wet or dry I could make nothing of him,"
Alice is quite of the better cla.s.s of his heroines; and from her we ascend to personages in whose case there is very little need of apology and proviso. Sir Henry Lee, Wildrake, Cromwell himself, Charles, may not satisfy others, but I am quite content with them; and the famous scene where Wildrake is a witness to Oliver"s half-confession seems to me one of its author"s greatest serious efforts. Trusty Tomkins, perhaps, might have been a little better; he comes somewhat under the ban of some unfavourable remarks which Reginald Heber makes in his diary on this cla.s.s of Scott"s figures, though the good bishop seems to me to have been rather too severe. But the pictures of Woodstock Palace and Park have that indescribable and vivid charm which Scott, without using any of the "realist" minuteness or "impressionist" contortions of later days, has the faculty of communicating to such things. For myself, I can say--and I am sure I may speak for hundreds--that Tullyveolan, Ellangowan, the Bewcastle moor where Bertram rescued Dandie, Clerihugh"s, Monkbarns (I do not see Knockwinnock so clearly), the home of the Osbaldistones, and the district from Aberfoyle to Loch Ard, the moors round Drumclog, Torquilstone, and, not to make the list tedious, a hundred other places, including Woodstock itself, are as real as if I had walked over every inch of the ground and sat in every room of the houses. In some cases I have never seen the supposed originals, in others, I have recognised them as respectable, though usually inferior, representatives of Scott"s conceptions. But in any case _these_ are all real, all possessions, all part of the geographical and architectural furniture of the mind. They are like the wood in the "Dream of Fair Women": one knows the flowers, one knows the leaves, one knows the battlements and the windows, the platters and the wine-cups, the cabinets and the arras. They are, like all the great places of literature, like Arden and Elsinore, like the court before Agamemnon"s palace, and that where the damsel said to Sir Launcelot, "Fair knight, thou art unhappy," our own--our own to "pa.s.s freely through until the end of time."
It must not be forgotten in this record of his work that Scott wrote "Bonnie Dundee" in the very middle of his disaster, and that he had not emerged from the first shock of that disaster, when the astonishingly clever _Letters of Malachi Malagrowther_ appeared. Of the reasonableness of their main purpose--a strenuous opposition to the purpose of doing away, in Scotland as in England, with notes of a less denomination than five pounds--I cannot pretend to judge. It is possible that suppressed rage at his own misfortunes found vent, and, for him, very healthy vent, while it did harm to no one, in a somewhat too aggressive patriotism, of a kind more particularist than was usual with him. But the fire and force of the writing are so great, the alternations from seriousness to humour, from denunciation to ridicule, so excellently managed, that there are few better specimens of this particular kind of pamphlet. As for "Bonnie Dundee," there are hardly two opinions about that. As a whole, it may not be quite equal to "Lochinvar," to which it forms such an excellent pendant, and which it so nearly resembles in rhythm. But the best of it is equal as poetry, and perhaps superior as meaning. And it admirably completes in verse the tribute long before paid by _Old Mortality_ in prose, to the "last and best of Scots," as Dryden called him in the n.o.ble epitaph,[46] which not improbably inspired Scott himself to do what he could to remove the vulgar aspersions on the fame of the hero of Killiecrankie.
Moreover, according to his wont, Scott had barely finished, indeed he had not finished, the _Napoleon_ before he had arranged for new work of two different kinds; and he was soon, without a break, actually engaged upon both tasks, one of them among the happiest things he ever undertook, and the other containing, at least, one piece of his most interesting work. These were the _Tales of a Grandfather_ and the _Chronicles of the Canongate_. Both supplied him with his tasks, his daily allowance of "leaves,"[38] for great part of 1827, and both were finished and the _Chronicles_ actually published, before the end of it.[39]
For the actual stories comprising these _Chronicles_ I have never cared much. The chief in point of size, the _Surgeon"s Daughter_, deals with Indian scenes, of which Scott had no direct knowledge, and in connection with which there was no interesting literature to inspire him. It appears to me almost totally uninteresting, more so than _Castle Dangerous_ itself. _The Two Drovers_ and _The Highland Widow_ have more merit; but they are little more than anecdotes.[40] On the other hand, the "Introduction" to these _Chronicles_, with the history of their supposed compiler, Mr. Chrystal Croftangry, is a thing which I should be disposed to put on a level with his very greatest work. Much is admittedly personal reminiscence of himself and his friends, handled not with the clumsy and tactless directness of reporting, which has ruined so many novels, but in the great transforming way of Fielding and Thackeray. Chrystal"s early thoughtless life, the sketch of his ancestry (said to represent the Scotts of Raeburn), the agony of Mr. Somerville, suggested partly by the last illness of Scott"s father, the sketches of Janet M"Evoy and Mrs. Bethune Baliol (Mrs. Murray Keith of Ravelston), the visit to the lost home,--all these things are treated not merely with consummate literary effect, but with a sort of _sourdine_ accompaniment of heart-throbs which only the dullest ear can miss. Nor, as we see from the _Diary_, were the author"s recent misfortunes, and his sojourn in a moral counterpart of the Deserted Garden of his friend Campbell, the only disposing causes of this. He had in several ways revived the memory of his early love, Lady Forbes, long since dead. Her husband had been among the most active of his business friends in arranging the compromise with creditors, and was shortly (though Scott did not know it) to discharge privately the claim of the recalcitrant Jew bill-broker Abud, who threatened Sir Walter"s personal liberty. Her mother, Lady Jane Stuart, had renewed acquaintance with him, and very soon after the actual publication sent him some MS. memorials of the days that were long enough ago--memorials causing one of those paroxysms of memory which are the best of all things for a fairly hale and happy man, but dangerous for one whom time and ill-luck have shaken.[41] He had, while the _Chronicles_ were actually a-writing, revisited St.
Andrews, and, while his companions were climbing St. Rule"s Tower, had sat on a tombstone and thought how he carved her name in Runic letters thirty-four years before. In short, all the elements, sentimental and circ.u.mstantial, of the moment of literary projection were present, and the Introduction was no vulgar piece of "chemic gold."
The delightful and universally known _Tales of a Grandfather_ present no such contrasts of literary merit, and were connected with no such powerful but exhausting emotions of the mind. They originated in actual stories told to "Hugh Littlejohn," they were encouraged by the fact that there was no popular and readable compendium of Scottish history, they came as easily from his pen as the _Napoleon_ had run with difficulty, and are as far removed from hack-work as that vast and, to his creditors, profitable compilation must be p.r.o.nounced to be on the whole near to it. The book, of course, is not in the modern sense strictly critical, though it must be remembered that the authorities for at least the earlier history of Scotland are so exceedingly few and meagre, that criticism of the saner kind has very little to fasten upon. But in this book eminently, in the somewhat later compilation for _Lardner"s Cyclopaedia_ to a rather less degree, this absence of technical criticism is more than made up by Scott"s knowledge of humanity, by the divining power, so to say, which his combined affection for the subject and general literary skill gave him, and by that singularly shrewd and pervading common sense which in him was so miraculously united with the poetical and romantic gift. I was pleased, but not at all surprised, when, some year or so ago, I asked a professed historian, and one of the best living authorities on the particular subject, what he thought of the general historic effect of Scott"s work, to find him answer without the slightest hesitation that it was about the soundest thing, putting mere details aside, that exists on the matter. It may be observed, in pa.s.sing, that the later compilation referred to was a marked example of the way in which Scott could at this time "coin money." He was offered a thousand pounds for one of the Lardner volumes; and as his sketch swelled beyond the limit, he received fifteen hundred. The entire work, much of which was simple paraphrase of the _Tales_, occupied him, it would seem, about six working weeks, or not quite so much. Can it be wondered that both before and after the crash this power of coining money should have put him slightly out of focus with pecuniary matters generally? Mediaeval and other theorisers on usury have been laughed at for their arguments as to the "unnatural" nature of usurious gain, and its consequent evil. One need not be superst.i.tious more than reason, to scent a certain unnaturalness in the gift of turning paper into gold in this other way also. Every _peau de chagrin_ has a faculty of revenging itself on the possessor.
For the time, however, matters went with Scott as swimmingly as they could with a man who, by his own act, was, as he said, "eating with spoons and reading books that were not his own," and yet earning by means absolutely within his control, and at his pleasure to exercise or not, some twenty thousand a year. _The Fair Maid of Perth_, a t.i.tle which has prevailed over what was its first, _St. Valentine"s Eve_, and has entirely obscured the fact that it was issued as a second series of the _Chronicles of the Canongate_, provided money for a new scheme. This scheme, outlined by Constable himself, and now carried out by Cadell and accepted by Scott"s trustees, was for buying in the outstanding copyrights belonging to the bankrupt firm, and issuing the entire series of novels, with new introductions and notes by Scott himself, with attractive ill.u.s.trations and in a cheap and handy form. Scott himself usually designates the plan as the _Magnum Opus_, or more shortly (and perhaps not without remembrance of more convivial days) "the _Magnum_".
_The Fair Maid_ itself was very well received, and seems to have kept its popularity as well as any of the later books. Indeed, the figures of the Smith, of Oliver Proudfute (the last of Scott"s humorous-pathetic characters), of the luckless Rothsay, and of Ramornie (who very powerfully affected a generation steeped in Byronism), are all quite up to the author"s "best seconds." The opening and the close are quite excellent, especially the fight on the North Inch and "Another for Hector!" and the middle part is full of attractive bits of the old kind.
But Conachar-Eachin is rather a thing of shreds and patches, and the entire episode of Father Clement and the heresy business is dragged in with singularly little initial excuse, valid connection, or final result.
We have unluckily no diary for the last half of 1828, after Scott returned from a long stay with the Lockharts in London, and we thus hear little of the beginnings of the next novel, _Anne of Geierstein_. When the _Journal_ begins again, complaints are heard from Ballantyne.
Alterations (which Scott always loathed, and which certainly are detestable things) became or were thought necessary, and when the poor _Maid of the Mist_ at length appeared in May 1829, she was dismissed by her begetter very unkindly, as "not a good girl like the other Annes"--his daughter and her cousin, _fille de Thomas_, who were living with him. The book was not at all ill received, but Lockhart is apologetic about it, and it has been the habit of criticism since to share the opinions of "Aldiborontiphoscophormio."[45] I cannot agree with this, and should put _Anne of Geierstein_--as a mere romance and not counting the personal touches which exalt _Redgauntlet_ and the Introduction to the _Chronicles_--on a level with anything, and above most things, later than _The Pirate_. Its chief real fault is not so much bad construction--it is actually more, not less, well knit than _The Fair Maid of Perth_,--as the too great predominance of merely episodic and unnecessary things and persons, like the _Vehmgericht_ and King"s Rene"s court. Its merits are manifold. The opening storm and Arthur"s rescue by Anne, as well as the quarrel with Rudolf, are excellent; the journey (though too much delayed by the said Rudolf"s tattlings), with the sojourn at Grafsl.u.s.t and the adventures at La Ferette, ranks with Scott"s many admirable journeys, and high among them; Queen Margaret is n.o.bly presented (I wish Shakespeare, Lancastrian that he was, had had the chance of versifying the scene where she flings the feather and the rose to the winds, as a pendant to "I called thee then vain shadow of my fortune"); and not only Philipson"s rattling peal of thunder to wake Charles the Bold from his stupor, but the Duke"s final scenes, come well up to the occasion. Earlier, Scott would not have made Rene quite such a mere old fool, and could have taken the slight touch of pasteboard and sawdust out of the Black Priest of St.
Paul"s. But these are small matters, and the whole merits of the book are not small. Even Arthur and Anne are above, not below, the usual hero and heroine.
The gap in the _Journal_ for the last half of 1828 is matched by another and more serious one for nearly a twelvemonth, from July 1829 to May 1830, a period during which Sir Walter"s health went from bad to worse, and in which he lost his Abbotsford factotum, Tom Purdie. But the first six months of 1829, and perhaps a little more, are among its pleasantest parts. The shock of the failure and of his wife"s death were, as far as might be, over; he had resumed the habit of seeing a fair amount of society; his work, though still busily pursued, was less killing than during the composition of the _Napoleon_; and his affairs were looking almost rosily. A first distribution, of thirty-two thousand pounds at once, had been made among the creditors. Cadell"s scheme of the _Magnum_--wisely acquiesced in by the trustees, and facilitated by a bold purchase at auction of Constable"s copyrights for some eight thousand pounds, and later, of those of the poems from Longmans for about the same or a little less--was turning out a great success. They had counted on a sale of eight thousand copies; they had to begin with twelve thousand, and increase it to twenty, while the number ultimately averaged thirty-five thousand. The work of annotation and introduction was not hard, and was decidedly interesting.
Unluckily, irreparable mischief had already been done, and when the _Diary_ begins again, we soon see signs of it. The actual beginning of the end had occurred before the resumption, on February 15, 1830, when Sir Walter had, in the presence of his daughter and of Miss Violet Lockhart, experienced an attack of an apoplectic-paralytic character, from which he only recovered by much blood-letting and starvation. There can be little doubt that this helped to determine him to do what he had for some time meditated, and resign his place at the Clerk"s table: nor perhaps could he have well done otherwise. But the results were partly unfortunate. The work had been very trifling, and had saved him from continual drudgery indoors at home, while it incidentally provided him with society and change of scene. He was now to live at Abbotsford,--for neither his means nor his health invited an Edinburgh residence when it was not necessary,--with surroundings only too likely to encourage "thick-coming fancies," out of reach of immediate skilled medical attendance, and with very dangerous temptations to carry on the use of his brain, which was now becoming almost deadly. Yet he would never give in. The pleasant and not exhausting task of arranging the _Magnum_ (which was now bringing in from eight to ten thousand a year for the discharge of his debts) was supplemented by other things, especially _Count Robert of Paris_, and a book on Demonology for Murray"s _Family Library_.
This last occupied him about the time of his seizure, and after the _Diary_ was resumed, it was published in the summer of 1830. Scott was himself by this time conscious of a sort of aphasia of the pen (the direct result of the now declared affection of his brain), which prevented him from saying exactly what he wished in a connected manner; and the results of this are in part evident in the book. But it must always remain a blot, quite unforgivable and nearly inexplicable, on the memory of Wilson, that "Christopher North" permitted himself to comment on some lapses in logic and style in a way which would have been rather that side of good manners and reasonable criticism in the case of a mere beginner in letters. It is true that he and Scott were at no time very intimate friends, and that there were even some vague antipathies between them. But Wilson had been deeply obliged to Scott in the matter of his professorship;[44] he at least ought to have been nearly as well aware as we are of the condition of his benefactor"s health; and even if he had known nothing of this, the rest of Sir Walter"s circ.u.mstances were known to all the world, and should surely have secured silence. But it seems that Wilson was for the moment in a pet with Lockhart, to whom the _Letters on Demonology_ were addressed, and so he showed, as he seldom, but sometimes did, the "black drop," which in his case, though not in Lockhart"s, marred at times a generally healthy and n.o.ble nature.
As a matter of fact, it needs either distinct malevolence or silly hypercriticism to find any serious fault with the _Demonology_. If not a masterpiece of scientific treatment in reference to a subject which hardly admits of any such thing, it is an exceedingly pleasant and amusing and a by no means uninstructive medley of learning, traditional anecdote, reminiscence, and what not, on a matter which, as we know, had interested the writer from very early days, and which he regarded from his usual and invaluable combined standpoint of shrewd sense and poetical appreciation.
The decay, now not to be arrested, though its progress was comparatively slow, was more evident in the last two works of fiction which Scott completed, _Count Robert of Paris_ and _Castle Dangerous_.
Against the first ending of the former (we do not possess it, so we cannot criticise their criticism) Ballantyne and Cadell formally protested, and Scott rewrote a great deal of it by dictation to Laidlaw.
The loss of command both of character and of story-interest is indeed very noticeable. But the opening incident at the Golden Gate, the interview of the Varangian with the Imperial family, the intrusion of Count Robert, and, above all, his battle with the tiger and liberation from the dungeon of the Blachernal, with some other things, show that astonishing power of handling single incidents which was Scott"s inseparable gift, and which seems to have accompanied him throughout to the very eve of his death. The much briefer _Castle Dangerous_ (which is connected with an affecting visit of Scott and Lockhart to the tombs of the Douglases) is too slight to give room for very much shortcoming. Its chief artistic fault is the happy ending--for though a romancer is in no respect bound to follow his text exactly, and happy endings are quite good things, yet it is rather too much to turn upside down the historic catastrophe of the Good Lord James"s fashion of warfare. Otherwise the book is more noticeable for a deficiency of spirit, life, and light--for the evidence of shadow and stagnation falling over the once restless and brilliant scene--than for anything positively bad.
These two books were mainly dictated, the paralytic affection having injured the author"s power of handwriting,[43] to William Laidlaw between the summer of 1830 and the early autumn of 1831, increasing weakness, and the demands of the _Magnum_, preventing more speed. The last pages of _Castle Dangerous_ contain Scott"s farewell, and the announcement to the public of that voyage to Italy which had actually begun when the novels appeared in the month of November.
The period between the fatal seizure and the voyage to the Mediterranean has not much diary concerning it, but has been related with inimitable judgment and sympathy by Lockhart. It was, even putting failing health and obscured mental powers aside, not free from "browner shades"; for the Reform agitation naturally grieved Sir Walter deeply, while on two occasions he was the object of popular insult and on one of popular violence. Both were at Jedburgh; but the blame is put upon intrusive weavers from Hawick. The first, a meeting of Roxburghshire freeholders, saw nothing worse than unmannerly interruption of a speech made partially unintelligible by the speaker"s failing articulation. He felt it bitterly, and when hissing was repeated as he bowed farewell, is said to have replied, low, but now quite distinctly, "_Moriturus vos saluto!_" On the second, the election after the throwing out of the first Bill, he was stoned, spat upon, and greeted with cries of "Burke Sir Walter."[42] Natural indignation has often been expressed at this behaviour towards the best neighbour and the greatest man in Scotland--behaviour which, as we know, haunted him on his deathbed; but it is to be presumed that the persons who thus proclaimed their cause knew the line of conduct most worthy of it.
It does not appear with absolute certainty who first suggested the Italian journey. It could not have been expected to produce any radical cure; but it seems to have been hoped that change of scene would prevent the patient from indulging in that attempt to write from which at Abbotsford it was impossible to keep him, though it was simply slow, and not so very slow, suicide. The wishes of his family were most kindly and generously met by the Government of the day, among whose members he had many personal friends, though political opponents; and the frigate _Barham_, a cut-down seventy-four, which had the credit of being one of the smartest vessels in the navy, was a.s.signed to take him to Malta. He had, before he left Abbotsford itself, an affecting interview with Wordsworth, which occasioned _Yarrow Revisited_ and the beautiful sonnet, "A trouble, not of clouds or weeping rain," and had no doubt part in the initiation of the last really great thing that Wordsworth ever wrote--the _Effusion_ on the deaths of Hogg, Coleridge, Crabbe, Lamb, and Scott himself, in 1835. Some stay was made with the Lockharts in London, and a little at Portsmouth, waiting for a wind; but the final departure took place on October 29, 1831.
Scott was abroad for the best part of a year, the time being chiefly made out in visits of some length to Malta, Naples, and Rome. We have a good deal of diary for this period, and it, even more than the subsidiary doc.u.ments and Lockhart"s summary of no doubt much that is unpublished, betrays the state of the case. Every now and then--indeed, for long pa.s.sages--there is nothing very different from the matter to which, since the first warning in 1818, we have been accustomed. Scott is, if not the infinitely various but never mutable Scott of the earlier years, still constant in fun and kindness, in quaint erudition and hearty friendship, though he is all this in a slightly deadened and sicklied degree. But there are strange breaks-down and unfamiliar touches, now of almost querulous self-concern (the thing most foreign to his earlier nature), as where he complains that his companions, his son and daughter, "are neither desirous to follow his amus.e.m.e.nts nor anxious that he should adopt theirs"; now of still more foreign callousness, as where he dismisses the news of the death of Hugh Littlejohn, whose illnesses earlier had been almost his chief anxiety, and records in the same entry that he "went to the opera." The pa.s.sage in the Introduction to the _Chronicles_, written not so very long before, traces with an almost horrible exactness the changes which were now taking place in himself. Moreover, he would resume the pen; and, first in Malta, then at Naples, began and went far to complete two new novels, _The Siege of Malta_ and _Il Bizarro_, which, I suppose, are still at Abbotsford, with Lockhart"s solemn curse on the person who shall publish them. He had now (it does not seem clear on what grounds, or by what stages) confirmed himself in the belief that he had paid off all his debts, instead of nearly half of them.[37] And he founded divers schemes on the profits of these works, added to the (as he thought) liberated returns of the _Magnum_; and even revived his notions of buying Faldonside with its thousand acres, and "holding all Tweed-bank, from Ettrick-foot to Calla weel." Feted, too, as he was, and in this condition of mind, it seems to have been difficult for his companions to make him observe the absolute temperance in food and drink which was as necessary to the staving off of the end as abstinence from brain-work; and it must be regarded as a signal proof of the extraordinary strength of his const.i.tution that it resisted as long as it did.
At last, and of course suddenly, came the final warning of all: the occurrence, without notice, of an almost agonising home-sickness. The party travelled by land, as speedily as they could, to the Channel, a last attack of apoplectic paralysis taking place at Nimeguen; and after crossing it and reaching London, Sir Walter was taken by sea to the Forth, and thence home. The actual end was delayed but very little longer, and it has been told by Lockhart in one of those capital pa.s.sages of English literature on which it is folly to attempt to improve or even to comment, and which, a hundred times quoted, can never be stale. Sir Walter Scott died at Abbotsford on September 21, 1832, and was buried four days later at Dryburgh, a post-mortem examination having disclosed considerable softening of the brain.
There remained unpaid at his death about fifty-five thousand pounds of the Ballantyne debts, besides private enc.u.mbrances on Abbotsford, etc., including the ten thousand which Constable had extracted, he knowing, from Scott unknowing, the extent of the ruin, in the hours just before it. The falling in of a.s.surances cleared off two-fifths of this balance, and Cadell discharged the rest on the security of the _Magnum_, which was equal, though not much more than equal, to the burden in the longrun. Thus, if Scott"s exertions during the last seven years of his life had benefited his own pocket, his ambition--whether wise or foolish, persons more confident in their judgment of human wishes than the present writer must decide--would have been amply fulfilled, and his son, supposing the money to have been invested with ordinary care and luck, would have been left a baronet and squire, with at least six or seven thousand a year. As it was, he did not succeed to much more than the t.i.tle, a costly house, and a not very profitable estate, burdened, though not heavily, with mortgages. This burden was reduced by the good sense of the managers of the English memorial subscription to Scott, who devoted the six or seven thousand pounds, remaining after some embezzlement, to clearing off the enc.u.mbrances as far as possible. The chief result of many Scottish tributes of the same kind was the well-known Scott Monument on the edge of Princes Street Gardens, which has the great good luck to be one of the very few not unsatisfactory things of the kind in the British Islands. By mishap rather than neglect, no monument in Westminster Abbey was erected for the greater part of the century; but one has been at last set up in May of the present year.
FOOTNOTES:
[37] This is a translation, of course; but if anyone will compare Pitcairn"s Latin and Dryden"s English, he will see where the poetry comes in.
[38] He wrote on sheets of a large quarto size, in a very small and close hand, so that his usual "task" of six "leaves" meant about thirty pages of print, though not very small or close print.
[39] It was early in this year, on February 23, at a Theatrical Fund dinner, that he made public avowal of the authorship of _Waverley_.
[40] Cadell did not like any of them much, and objected still more to others intended to follow them. Sir Walter, therefore, kept these back, and gave them later to Heath"s _Keepsake_. They now appear with their intended companions: the slightest, _The Tapestried Chamber_, is perhaps the best.
[41] Compare _Diary_, 1827, Nov. 7 ("I fairly softened myself like an old fool with recalling old stories, till I was fit for nothing but shedding tears and repeating verses the whole night"), with the famous couplet in "Rose Aylmer"--
"A night of memories and of sighs I consecrate to thee."
[42] Scott"s name for _James_ Ballantyne, as "Rigdumfunnidos" was for John.
[43] See his own unqualified and almost too gushing acknowledgment of this ten years before, in the _Familiar Letters_, ii. 84-85, _note_.
[44] It had also caused great and very painful trouble in his lame leg, which from this time onwards had to be mechanically treated.
[45] The Burke and Hare murders were recent.
[46] The success of the _Magnum_ had allowed a second large dividend to be paid, and the creditors had been generous enough to restore Scott"s forks, spoons, and books to him.
CHAPTER VII