"His hand open as day to melting charity."
"I may be pardoned for adding that Mr. Scott was supremely happy in his domestic ties. Blessed in all who gathered about his hearthstone, his cup of happiness was full to overflowing. All who crossed his threshold felt that they were indeed in the sunshine of the perfect home. He sleeps in the beautiful cemetery near the city he loved, his grave covered with flowers by those to whom in life he had been a benefactor and friend. To those to whom his toils and cares were given, to kindred and friends, his memory will ever be a precious heritage. Truly,
"the just Keeps something of his glory, in his dust."
"I know of no words more fitting with which to close this poor tribute to the man I honored and loved, than those of Dr. Craig in his beautiful eulogy upon the Rev. Dr. Lewis W. Green, father of Mrs. Julia G. Scott, the n.o.ble and gifted woman whose generosity has made possible the founding of the Inst.i.tution we now dedicate:
""Society at large felt the impress of his n.o.ble character, his polished breeding, and his widespread beneficence. His determination to excel, and that by means of faithful diligence and laborious applications, should arouse our young men to like fidelity to their increasing opportunities. He was the most unselfish of men, the most affectionate of friends, the humblest of Christians. He owed much to the soil from which he sprang. He repaid that much, and with large interest."
"The Inst.i.tution we now dedicate is just upon the threshold of what we trust will prove an abundantly useful and honorable career.
And while we may not "look into the seeds of time and say which grain will grow and which will not," yet we may well believe that under judicious management, already a.s.sured, this will prove a potent agency in the great work of education.
"In this connection the words of a former President of Transylvania University, and of Centre College, Dr. Green, possess to-day as deep significance as when uttered almost a half-century ago:
""But it may be truly said, that no domestic instruction, however wise, no political inst.i.tution, however free, no social organization, however perfect, no discoveries of science, however rapid or sublime, no activity of the press--pouring forth with prolific abundance its mult.i.tudinous publications--no acc.u.mulation of ancient learning in stately libraries, no one, nor all of these together, can supersede the education of the school; nay, all of them derive their n.o.blest elements and highest life from the instruction of the living teacher. The intelligence of families, the wisdom of Governments, the freedom of nations, the progress of science itself, and of all our useful arts, is measured by the condition and character of our literary inst.i.tutions. . . . It is from such as these, that the world"s great men have sprung. It is from the deep, granite foundations of society that the materials are gathered to rear a superstructure of ma.s.sive grandeur and enduring strength.
The G.o.d of nature has scattered broadcast over all our land and our mountain heights, in our secluded valleys, and in many a forest home, the choicest elements of genius; invaluable means of intellectual wealth, the n.o.blest treasures of the State."
"The hour has struck, and the Matthew T. Scott, Jr., Collegiate Inst.i.tution enters now upon its sacred mission.
"May we not believe that here will be realized in full fruition the fond hopes of those who have given it being? that as the years come and go, there will pa.s.s out from its walls those who by diligent application are fitted for the responsible duties that await them in life, well equipped, it may be, to acquit themselves with honor, in the high places of school, of church, or of State?"
XLV DEDICATION OF A NATIONAL PARK
CHICKAMAUGA NATIONAL PARK DEDICATED BY ACT OF CONGRESS--THE SURVIVORS OF THE GREAT BATTLE NOW BUT FEW--THE REAL CONSECRATION WAS ACCOMPLISHED BY THE HEROES OF THE FIGHT.
The Chickamauga National Park was by act of Congress dedicated September 19, 1895. Senators Palmer, of Illinois, and Gordon, of Georgia, were the orators of the occasion. The immense audience a.s.sembled included the Governors of twenty States and committees of both Houses of Congress. I presided on the occasion, and delivered the following address:
"I am honored by being called to preside over the ceremonies of this day. By solemn decree of the representatives of the American people, this magnificent Park, with its wondrous a.s.sociations and memories, is now to be dedicated for all time to national and patriotic purposes.
"This is the fitting hour for the august ceremonies we now inaugurate.
To-day, by act of the Congress of the United States, the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park is forever set apart from all common uses, solemnly dedicated for all the ages to all the American people.
"The day is auspicious. It notes the anniversary of one of the greatest battles known to history. Here, in the dread tribunal of last resort, valor contended against valor. Here brave men struggled and died for the right, "as G.o.d gave them to see the right."
"Thirty-two years have pa.s.sed, and the few survivors of that masterful day--victors and vanquished alike--again meet upon this memorable field. Alas, the splendid armies which rendezvoused there are now little more than a procession of shadows.
""On fame"s eternal camping-ground, Their silent tents are spread."
"Our eyes now behold the sublime spectacle of the honored survivors of the great battle coming together upon these heights once more.
They meet, not in deadly conflict, but as brothers, under one flag, fellow-citizens of a common country, all grateful to G.o.d, that in the supreme struggle, the Government of our fathers--our common heritage--was triumphant, and that to all the coming generations of our countrymen, it will remain "an indivisible union of indestructible States."
"Our dedication to-day is but a ceremony. In the words of the immortal Lincoln at Gettysburg: "But in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it far above our power to add or detract."
"I will detain you no longer from listening to the eloquent words of those who were partic.i.p.ants in the b.l.o.o.d.y struggle--the sharers alike in its danger and its glory."
XLVI A BAR MEETING STILL IN SESSION
APPOINTMENT OF A COMMITTEE TO FORMULATE RULES FOR COURT PROCEDURE-- SOME MEMBERS AGREE TO VOTE DOWN THE MOTION TO ADJOURN--THE MOTION REJECTED THREE TIMES--INDIGNATION OF THE PRESIDENT.
A Bar meeting recalled by the mention of Mr. Ingersoll would be worth while if it could only be described as it actually occurred.
At the opening of the December term of the Circuit Court in Woodford in the year of grace "fifty-nine, John Clark, Esq., announced that a meeting of the Bar would be held at the courthouse at "early candle-lighting" on that very evening, for the purpose of formulating rules to be presented to the Court for its government during the term.
At the appointed hour, the lawyers, "home and foreign," being promptly in attendance and the court-room crowded, an organization was duly effected by the election of Colonel Shope, an able and dignified barrister of the old school, as President. As undisputed spokesman of the occasion, Mr. Clark, at once moved the appointment of a committee of five to prepare the aforementioned rules. The motion prevailing, _nem. con.,_ in accordance with the time-honored usage, the mover of the resolution was duly appointed Chairman, with Ingersoll, Shaw, Ewing, and the chronicler of these important events as his coadjutors. Upon the retirement of the committee, the rules already prepared by Clark were read and promptly approved, and that gentleman instructed to present them to the Bar meeting --then in patient waiting.
As the recognized parliamentarian of the occasion--with the proposed rules in safe keeping--was in the van, upon the return to the court-room Ingersoll quietly proposed to his three unt.i.tled a.s.sociates that, after the adoption of the resolutions, we should _vote down Clark"s motion to adjourn_ and thereby remain all night in session. In approved form, and with a dignity that would have done no discredit to a high-church bishop, the rules were read off by the Chairman and agreed to without a dissenting voice.
After a brief silence, Mr. Clark arose and said: "Mr. President, if there is no further business before this meeting, I move we do now adjourn." The motion was duly seconded by Welcome P. Brown, who had been Probate Judge of McLean County far back in the thirties, and postmaster of the struggling village of Bloomington when Jackson was President. President Shope promptly arose and in the blandest possible terms submitted: "Gentlemen of the Bar, all who are in favor of the motion to adjourn will please say, Aye." Clark, Brown, and a half-a-dozen others at once voted, "Aye." "Those opposed to the motion to adjourn will please say, No," was the alternative then submitted by the impartial presiding officer. Ingersoll, his confederates, and a sufficient contingent won over quietly voted, "No."
"The motion is lost," observed the President, resuming his seat.
"What is the further pleasure of the meeting?" The silence of the grave for a time prevailed. Ingersoll and his followers deporting themselves with a solemnity well befitting an occasion for prayer.
Again arising, the chairman of the committee--in a voice less rotund than before--said: "Well, Mr. President, if there is no _further_ business before this meeting, I move we do now adjourn." Duly seconded, the motion was again put, Clark and half a dozen others voting as before. "Those opposed," remarked the President-- in tones perceptibly less conciliatory than an hour earlier--"will say, No." The scarcely audible, but none the less effective "no"
prevailed, the leader meanwhile giving no sign and apparently rapt as if unravelling the mysteries beyond the veil.
A silence that could be felt now in very truth fell upon the meeting in the old courthouse a.s.sembled. Even the bystanders seemed impressed that something far out of the ordinary was happening.
Receiving little in the way of encouragement, the Chairman of the late committee, as he dubiously looked around upon the forms of the silent majority--each of whom sat apparently buried in thought that touched the very depths,--again and for the last time addressed the presiding officer:
"Mr. President, I move _that we adjourn."_
Conclusions being again tried in wonted parliamentary form between the opposing forces, with like result as before, the venerable president,--by way of prelude first giving full vent to an exclamation nowhere to be found in the Methodist "book of discipline,"--at once indignantly vacated the chair, and literally shook the dust of the court-room from his feet. The others "stood not upon the order of their going," and although fifty years have come and gone, that identical Bar meeting in the old courthouse at Metamora _is still in session,_--never having been officially adjourned even to this day.
XLVII THE HAYNE-WEBSTER DEBATE RECALLED
THE PUBLIC CAREER OF LYMAN TRUMBULL--HE HEARS CALHOUN MAKE A MASTERLY SPEECH IN HIS OWN DEFENCE--TARIFF LAW THE SUBJECT OF DISCUSSION --MR. HAYNE"S REPLY.
Ex-Senator Lyman Trumbull called upon me at the Vice-President"s Chamber a few months before his death. It was upon the occasion of his last visit to Washington. He pointed out to me with much interest the seat he had occupied for many years in the Senate.
The Senators to whom I introduced him had all come in since his day. His a.s.sociates in that chamber, with three or four exceptions, had pa.s.sed beyond the veil.
The public career of Mr. Trumbull began nearly two-thirds of a century ago. He was distinguished as a judge, and later as an able and active partic.i.p.ant in exciting debates in the Senate, extending from the repeal of the Missouri Compromise to the impeachment of President Johnson. He was a member when the sessions of the Senate were held in the old chamber, and Ca.s.s, Crittenden, Douglas, Tombs, and Jefferson Davis were among his early official a.s.sociates.
As Chairman of the Judiciary Committee he had reported the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Const.i.tution of the United States.
In the course of my conversation with him upon the occasion first mentioned, I inquired whether he had ever met either Webster, Clay, or Calhoun. He replied that it was a matter of deep regret to him that he had never seen either Clay or Webster, but that he had in his early manhood heard a masterful speech from Mr. Calhoun.
Mr. Trumbull had then just been graduated from an eastern college; and on his way to Greenville, Georgia, to take charge of a school, he spent a few days in Charleston, South Carolina. This was in 1833, and the speech of Mr. Calhoun was in vindication of his course in the Senate in voting for the Compromise Bill of Mr. Clay, which provided for the gradual reduction of the tariff. The alleged injustice of the tariff law then in force had been the prime cause of the "nullification" excitement precipitated by South Carolina at that eventful period. The proclamation of President Jackson, it will be remembered, proved the death-blow, and the nullification excitement soon thereafter subsided. Mr. Trumbull told me that he distinctly recalled John C. Calhoun, his commanding presence and splendid argument, as he addressed the large a.s.semblage. As a clear-brained logician--whose statement alone was almost unanswerable argument--he thought Mr. Calhoun unsurpa.s.sed by any statesman our country had known. Mr. Trumbull added that at the close of Mr. Calhoun"s speech before mentioned, amid great enthusiasm, "Hayne! Hayne!" was heard from every part of the vast a.s.semblage.
For an hour or more he then listened spell-bound to Robert Y. Hayne, the formidable antagonist even of Webster in a debate now historic.
Mr. Trumbull said that of the two generations of public men he had heard, he had never listened to one more eloquent than Hayne.
XLVIII IN THE HIGHLANDS
THE WRITER THE GUEST OF A GENTLEMAN IN THE SCOTTISH HIGHLANDS-- DUNSTAFFNAGE CASTLE--IONA AND SAINT COLUMBA--SENATOR BECK AND MR. SMITH BOTH DEVOTEES OF BURNS.
During a sojourn of some weeks on the western coast of Scotland, I was the guest for a time of Mr. Stewart, the head of what remained of a once powerful clan in the Highlands. My host was a distinguished member of the London Bar, but spent his Summers at the home of his ancestors a few miles out from Alpin. Here, in as romantic a locality as is known even to the Highlands, with his kindred about him he enjoyed a full measure of repose from the distracting cares of the great metropolis. At the time of my visit his brother, an officer of the British army, just returned from India, was with him. Both gentlemen wore kilts for the time; and all the appointments of the house were reminders of bygone centuries when border warfare was in full flower, forays upon the Lowlands of constant occurrence, and the principle of the clans in action,
"Let him take who has the power And let him hold who can."
At the bountifully furnished board of my Highland host there was much "upon the plain highway of talk" I will not soon forget. And then, with the gathering shadows in the ancestral hall, with the rude weapons of past generations hanging upon every wall, and the stirring strains of the bagpipe coming from the distance, it was worth while to listen to the Highland legends that had been handed down from sire to son.