STARKEY--No.
PETERS--Did you see me there at three o"clock in the morning?
STARKEY--I have seen you go up at ten o"clock at night to Mr.
Ireton"s chamber, and sometimes I understood you did not go away till four o"clock in the morning: I went to bed it is true, but I understood it so.
_Thomas Walkely_ saw Cromwell, Goodwin, Peters, and others in the Painted Chamber at Westminster on the day after the proclamation for the trial of the King was made. Goodwin sat in the middle of the table and made a long speech or prayer, and then it was ordered that strangers should leave the room, and Walkely went out, and afterwards saw Peters leave the room with the others. When the King was brought to London as a prisoner, Walkely "saw his majesty in his coach with six horses and Peters, like a bishop almoner, riding before the king triumphing."
_Proctor_ also saw the King driving into London with the prisoner riding before him, the King sitting alone in his coach. "My Lord, I did put off my hat, and he was graciously pleased to put off his hat; the troopers seeing this, they threw me into the ditch, horse and all, where I stayed till they pa.s.s by, and was glad I escaped so."
_Hardwick_ heard the proclamation for the High Court of Justice made in Westminster Hall, and afterwards Peters came into Palace Yard and told the officers there that the proclamation must also be made in Cheapside and at the Old Exchange.
_Holland Simpson_ saw the sitting of the High Court; he saw Peters there, but not as a judge.
There was one day in the hall colonel Stubbards, who was adjutant-general (he was a very busy man) and colonel Axtel; Mr.
Peters going down the stairs, comes to him, and bids Stubbards to command the soldiers to cry out "justice, justice, against the traitor at the bar."
COUNSEL--Who did he mean?
SIMPSON--The King was at the bar at the same time; whereupon, my lord, the soldiers did cry out upon the same; and as the King was taken away to sir Robert Cotton"s some of them spit in the King"s face, but he took his handkerchief, wiped it off, and smiled.
_Thomas Richardson_ and _Sir Jeremy Whichcot_ spoke to casual expressions of Peters which showed approval of the King"s trial and deposition.
_Richard Nunnelly, sworn._
COUNSEL--Was Peters upon the Scaffold at the time of execution or before?
NUNNELLY--On that unhappy day, 30th of Jan. 1649, this Hugh Peters came an hour before the king came to Whitehall; I came with a warrant of a 40 or 50,000 to Oliver Cromwell, being door-keeper to the Committee of the Army; Nunnelly, says Oliver Cromwell, will you go to Whitehall? Surely you will see the beheading of the king; and he let me into Whitehall; coming into the boarded gallery I met Hugh Peters, and he was in the gallery; and then I got with Hugh Peters into the Banqueting-House; being there, Hugh Peters met one Tench of Hounsditch, that was a joiner meeting him; he speaks to him, and whispers in his ear, and told him somewhat, I do not know what it was; but Tench presently went and knocked four staples upon the scaffold; I meeting Tench again, What art thou doing? said I. What, will you turn hangman? Says he, This day will be a happy day. Said I, Pray G.o.d send it be not a b.l.o.o.d.y day; upon that Hugh Peters went upon the scaffold just an hour before the king came, and then he went off again. I watched at the window when the king"s head was cut off, and afterwards I saw the vizards going into a chamber there; about an hour afterwards (I staying there at the door) there comes Hugh Peters in his black cloak and broad hat out of that chamber (as I take it) with the hangman; I am sure I did see him go along with the hangman to take water; this is all I can remember, it being many years since.
PETERS--I humbly beg I may be heard in this case; I have here a witness, and I desire he may be examined; it is noised I was upon the scaffold, I here call G.o.d to witness I was not out of my chamber that day; I was sick that day; I speak in the presence of the Lord.
COURT--If your witness will stay he shall be heard; there are more witnesses to the same thing, and so he may speak to all together.
_Dr. Mortimer, sworn._
MORTIMER--Me lar, me ha serd de king, etc.
COURT--We cannot understand a word.
COUNSEL--He is a Frenchman, my lord.
COURT--Pray let there be an interpreter.
[One Mr. Young was sworn to interpret truly his evidence. But it being afterwards found difficult and troublesome, the Counsel waved his evidence, and prayed another witness might be called.]
MORTIMER--Me Lar, me can peak Englis----
COUNSEL--No, no, pray sit down, we will examine other witnesses.
Call Stephen Clough.
_Stephen Clough_ heard there was to be a meeting of the Council of officers at Westminster, about three weeks or a month before the King"s execution,
and I being willing (my Lord) to hear what their consultations were, I went thither, and was there as one of them (but I was not one); amongst the rest Hugh Peters was one; when the room was pretty full the door was shut. Mr. Peters was desired to call for a blessing upon their business; in his prayer he uttered these words, "O Lord (said he) what a mercy it is to see this great city fall down before us! And what a stir there is to bring this great man to trial, without whose blood he will turn us all into blood if he reign again!"
_Beaver_, upon the day appointed for a fast for those that sat then as a parliament,
went to Westminster to find out some company to dine with me, and having walked about an hour in Westminster Hall, and finding none of my friends to dine with me, I went to that place called Heaven, and dined there.
After he had dined he went through St. Margaret"s churchyard, and finding it all full of muskets and pikes, asked some soldiers what was their business there. They told him that Peters was preaching in the church, and "I must needs have the curiosity to hear that man, having heard many stories of the manner of his preaching (G.o.d knows I did not do it out of any manner of devotion); I crowded near the pulpit, and came near to the speaker"s pew." He heard Peters preaching on the text about the Jews releasing Barabbas and crucifying Christ; interpreting Barabbas to mean the King, and Christ the Army.
Says he, and because that you should think, my lords and gentlemen, that it is a question, I tell you it is a question; I have been in the city which may very well be compared to Hierusalem in this conjuncture of time, and I profess these foolish citizens for a little trading and profit, they will have Christ (pointing to the redcoats on the pulpit stairs) crucified, and the great Barabbas at Westminster released.
He told the members that they were the Sanhedrim, and that it was they to whom the people looked for justice--
Do not prefer the great Barabbas, Murderer, Tyrant, and Traitor, before these poor hearts (pointing to the redcoats) and the army who are our saviours.
It was proved by the journal of the House of Commons that a fast had been ordered for the 20th of December 1648.
_Chace_ had heard Peters preaching on the 21st of January; his text was, "Bind your kings with chains, and your n.o.bles with fetters of iron." He maintained that the King was not above the law. It was said they had no power to behead the King; "Turn to your bibles," he answered, "and you shall find it there, Whosoever sheds man"s blood, by man shall his blood be shed; and I see neither King Charles, Prince Charles, nor prince Rupert, nor prince Maurice, nor any of that rabble excepted out of it."
PETERS--Ask him if he took notes.
CHACE--No sir, but it being so memorable a sermon I took special notice of it; I came to my brother"s house in Shoe lane, and told him; said I, Brother, I have been at Whitehall and have heard the most execrable business that ever was in the world by a minister of the Gospel, and told him the words, and I observed that Oliver Cromwell did laugh at that time when you were preaching.
_Tongue_, _Bowdler_, _Rider_, and _Walker_ all gave similar evidence as to Peters" preaching.
_Cornelius Glover_ was called by Peters, but was not sworn. He was Peters" servant at the time of the King"s execution; on the morning of that day Peters was ill in his chamber.
I had a desire to go to see the meeting where they were at Whitehall; saith he, "Thou seemest to have a great desire to go and look about thee, it is very sad, but if you will go you may." I did go over the park.
He went about noon, the soldiers and people filled the place, and he went back in a quarter of an hour"s time. When he got back, Peters was still in his chamber. He was melancholy sick, as he used to be.
LORD CHIEF-BARON--Did you desire to go, or did he send you?
GLOVER--I did desire to go, being newly come to London.
_Peters_ was then called on to make his defence. He began by pointing out that he had nothing to do with the beginning of the war.
I lived fourteen years out of England, when I came over I found the wars begun; I began no war, my lord, nor have been the trumpeter; when I came out of the West Indies I fled from the war into Ireland, to the western parts there. I was neither at Edge-Hill nor Naseby; but my lord, after I came over there was war that the people were engaged in; I was not here in the beginning of it, but was a stranger to the carriage of it. When I came into the nation I looked after three things; One was that there might be sound Religion; the second was that Learning and Laws might be maintained; the third that the poor might be cared for; and I must confess I have spent most of my time in these things to this end and purpose.
He explains how he acted for these ends in Ireland, and how, being sent over to England, "that we might have a little help in point of Excise and Customs," he saw the state of the country, and
in some measure I did stir, but by strong importunities, the ministers of London deeper than I; I am very sorry to hear of my carriage towards the King; it is my great trouble; I beg pardon for my own folly and weakness; I thought G.o.d had a great controversy with the nation, and the Lord was displeased on all hands; that which some people took to, I did take unto; I went into the army; I saw at the beginning of it that corruptions grew among them.... I had neither malice nor mischief in my heart against the King; upon this I did engage so far, being invited; I went into the wars, and there I found very strange and several kinds of providences, as this day hath been seen; I do not deny but that I was active, but not to stir in a way that was not honourable. I had so much respect for his majesty, particularly at Windsor, that I propounded to his majesty my thoughts, three ways to preserve himself from danger, which were good as he was pleased to think though they did not succeed, and the work died; as for malice I had none in me; I have not persecuted with malice, I will only take off malice.
The _Lord Chief-Baron_ reminded him that the business was a matter of fact, and shortly recapitulated the evidence against him. Consulting about the King"s death; proposing or determining that he should die; making seditious speeches, in the pulpit or out of it, would all be overt acts proving treasonable intention. His conversations with Dr.
Young at Milford, his meetings with Cromwell and others at the Star, his partic.i.p.ation in the councils held at Starkey"s house at Windsor, all proved the consulting and proposing. His presence at the meeting in the Painted Chamber; his riding in front of the King when he was brought to London (which Peters interrupted to explain that he did by the King"s command that he might procure the Bishop of London to come to him); the part he took in ordering the reading the proclamation about the High Court, which Peters denied; his telling the soldiers to cry out Justice, Justice; his presence at the scaffold before the execution [_Peters_--"I do not profess to your lordship, before angels and men, that I did not stir out of my chamber that day." _Lord Chief-Baron_--"Counsel doth not put reliance upon that because of what your witness saith, though his evidence is not satisfactory"]; his prayers and his sermons all go to complete the case. When Peters objects that some of the witnesses to the sermons are but single witnesses, the judge expressly lays it down that the two witnesses required need not both speak to the same overt act.