They will miss nothing of the caprices and humours and comedies of every day of human life; for they will know that in the final issue none of us are wiser than the day and what the day brings; none of us wiser than the wisdom of street and field and market-place; the wisdom of the common people, the wisdom of our mother, the earth.
In the enjoyment of life spent thus fastidiously in the cultivation of our own sensations, and thus largely and generously in a broad sympathy with the emotions of the ma.s.ses of men, there is room for many kinds of love. But of all the love pa.s.sions which destiny offers us, none lends itself better to the peculiar path we have chosen than the pa.s.sion of friendship. It is the love of an "alter ego," a second self, a twin soul, which more than anything else is able to heighten and deepen our consciousness of life.
The "love of women" has always about it something tragic and catastrophic. It means the plunging of one"s hands into frozen snow or burning fire. It means the crossing of perilous glades in tropic jungles. It means the "sowing of the whirlwind" on the edge of the avalanche and the hunting of the mirage in the desert. The ecstasy brought by it is too blinding to serve as an illumination for our days; and for all the tremulous sweetness of its approach it leaves behind it the poison of disillusion and the scars of rancour and remorse.
But the pa.s.sion of friendship for one of one"s own s.e.x burns with a calm clear flame. A thousand little subtleties of observation, that would mean nothing were we alone, take to themselves a significant and symbolic value and lead us down pleasant and flower-strewn vistas of airy fancy. In the absence of our friend the colour of his imagination falls like a magical light upon the saddest and dullest scenes; while with him at our side, all the little jerks and jars and jolts and ironical tricks of the hour and the occasion lose their brutish emphasis and sink into humorous perspective. The sense of having some one for whom one"s weakest and least effective moments are of interest and for whom one"s weariness and unreason are only an additional bond, makes what were otherwise intolerable in our life easy and light to bear.
And what a delicious sense, in the midst of the open or hidden hostilities of our struggle against the world, to feel one has some one near at hand with whom, crouched in any "corner of the hubbub,"
we may "make game of _that_" which makes as much of us!
Love, in the s.e.xual sense, fails us in the bitterest crisis of our days because love, or the person loved, is the chief cause of the misery.
Scourged and lacerated by Aphrodite it is of little avail to flee to Eros. But friendship--of the n.o.ble, rare, _absolute_ kind such as existed between Montaigne and his sweet Etienne--is the only antidote, the only healing ointment, the only anodyne, which can make it possible for us to endure without complete disintegration "the pangs of despised love" and love"s bitter and withering reaction.
Love too--in the ordinary sense--implies jealousy, exclusiveness, insatiable exactions; whereas friendship, sure of its inviolable roots in spiritual equality, is ready to look generously and sympathetically upon every wandering obsession or pa.s.sing madness in the friend of its choice.
With the exception of the love of a parent for a child this is the only human love which is outward-looking and centrifugal in its gaze; and even in the case of the love of a mother there is often something possessive and indrawing.
How beautifully, how finally, Montaigne, in his description of this high pa.s.sion, sweeps aside at one stroke all that selfish emphasis upon "advantage" of which Bacon makes so much, and all that idealistic anxiety to retain one"s "separate ident.i.ty" in which Emerson indulges!
"I love him because he is he and he loves me because I am I." This is worthy to be compared with the beautiful and terrible "I _am_ Heathcliff" of the heroine in the Bronte novel.
Emerson speaks as though, having sounded the depths of one"s friend"s soul, one moved off, with a wave of the hand, upon one"s lonely quest, having none but G.o.d as one"s eternal companion.
This translunar preference for the "Over-soul" over every human feeling is not Montaigne"s notion of the pa.s.sion of friendship. He is more earth-bound in his proclivities.
"He is he and I am I," and as long as we are what we are, in our flesh, in our blood, in our bones, nothing, while we live, can sever the bond between us. And in death? Ah! how much nearer to the pagan heart of this great mystery is the cry of the son of Jesse over the body of his beloved than all the Ciceronian rhetoric in the world--and how much nearer to what that loss means!
Montaigne does not really, as Pater so charmingly hints, break the flexible consistency of his philosophic method when he loves his friends in this unbounded manner. He is too great a sceptic to let his scepticism stand in the way of high adventures of this sort.
The essence of his unsystematic system is that one should give oneself freely up to what the G.o.ds throw in one"s way. And if the G.o.ds--in their inescapable predestination--have made him "for me"
and me "for him," to cling fast with cold cautious hands to the anchor of moderation were to be false to the philosophy of the "Eternal Now."
The whole of life is an enormous accident--a dice-throw of eternity in the vapours of time and s.p.a.ce. Why not then, with him we love by our side, make richer and sweeter the nonchalant gaiety of our amus.e.m.e.nt, in the great mad purposeless preposterous show, by the "quips and cranks" of a companionable scepticism; canva.s.sing all things in earth and heaven, reverencing G.o.d and Caesar on _this side_ of idolatry, relishing the foolish, fooling the wise, and letting the world drift on as it will?
"What do I know?" There may be more in life than the moralists guess, and more in death than the atheists imagine.
PASCAL
There are certain figures in the history of human thought who in the deepest sense of the word must be regarded as _tragic_; and this not because of any accidental sufferings they have endured, or because of any persecution, but because of something inherently _desperate_ in their own wrestling with truth.
Thus Swift, while an eminently tragic figure in regard to his personal character and the events of his life, is not tragic in regard to his thought.
It is not a question of pessimism. Schopenhauer is generally, and with reason, regarded as a pessimist; but no one who has read his "World as Will and Idea" can visualise Schopenhauer, even in the sphere of pure thought, as a tragic personality.
The pre-eminent example in our modern world of the sort of desperate thinking which I have in mind as worthy of this t.i.tle is, of course, Nietzsche; and it is a significant thing that over and over again in Nietzsche"s writings one comes upon pa.s.sionate and indignant references to Pascal.
The great iconoclast seemed indeed, as he groped about like a blind Samson in the temple of human faith, to come inevitably upon the figure of Pascal, as if this latter were one of the main pillars of the formidable edifice. It is interesting to watch this pa.s.sionate attraction of steel for steel.
Nietzsche was constantly searching among apologists for Christianity for one who in intellect and imagination was worthy of his weapons; and it must be confessed that his search was generally vain. But in Pascal he did find what he sought.
His own high mystical spirit with its savage psychological insight was answered here by something of the same metal. His own "desperate thinking" met in this instance a temper equally "desperate," and the beauty and cruelty of his merciless imagination met here a "will to power" not less abnormal.
It is seldom that a critic of a great writer has, by the lucky throwing of life"s wanton dice, an opportunity of watching the very temper he is describing, close at hand. But it does sometimes happen, even when the subject of one"s criticism has been dead two hundred years, that one comes across a modern mind so penetrated with its master"s moods; so coloured, so dyed, so ingrained with that particular spirit, that intercourse with it implies actual contact with its archetype.
Such an encounter with the subtlest of Christian apologists has been my own good fortune in my a.s.sociation with Mr. W. J. Williams, the friend of Loisy and Tyrrel, and the interpreter, for modern piety, of Pascal"s deepest thoughts.
The superiority of Pascal over all other defenders of the faith is to be looked for in the peculiar angle of his approach to the terrific controversy--an angle which Newman himself, for all his serpentine sagacity, found it difficult to retain.
Newman worked in a mental atmosphere singularly unpropitious to formidable intellectual ventures, and one never feels that his essentially ecclesiastical mind ever really grasped the human plausibility of natural paganism. But Pascal went straight back to Montaigne, and, like Pater"s Marius under the influence of Aristippus, begins his search after truth with a clean acceptance of absolute scepticism.
Newman was sceptical too, but his peculiar kind of intellectual piety lacked the imagination of Pascal. He could play, cleverly enough, with hypothetical infidelity, and refute it, so to say, "in his study"
with his eye on the little chapel door; but there was a sort of refined shrinking from the jagged edges of reality in his somewhat Byzantine temperament which throws a certain suspicion of special pleading over his crafty logic.
Newman argues like a subtle theologian who has been clever enough to add to his "repertoire" a certain evasive mist of pragmatic modernism, under the filmy and wavering vapours of which the inveterate sacerdotalism of his temperament covers its tracks. But with Pascal we get clean away from the poison-trail of the obscurantist.
Pascal was essentially a layman. There was nothing priestly in his mood; nothing scholastic in his reasoning; nothing sacerdotal in his conclusions. We breathe with him the clear sharp air of mathematics; and his imagination, shaking itself free from all controversial pettifogging, sweeps off into the stark and naked s.p.a.ces of the true planetary situation.
One feels that Newman under all conceivable circ.u.mstances was bound to be a priest. There was priestliness writ large upon his countenance. His manner, his tone, his beautiful style, with something at once pleading and threatening, and a kind of feminine attenuation in its vibrant periods, bears witness to this.
Stripped of his ca.s.sock and tossed into the world"s "hurly-burly,"
Newman would have drawn back into himself in Puritan dismay, and with Puritan narrowness and sourness would have sneered at the feet of the dancers. There was, at bottom, absolutely nothing in Newman of the clear-eyed human sweetness of the Christ of the Gospels; that n.o.ble, benignant, tolerant G.o.d, full of poetic imagination, whose divine countenance still looks forth from the canva.s.ses of t.i.tian.
Newman"s piety, at best, was provincial, local, distorted. His Christ is the Christ of morbid Seminarists and ascetic undergraduates; not the Christ that Leonardo da Vinci saw breaking bread with his disciples; not the Christ that Paolo Veronese saw moving among the crowds of the street like a royal uncrowned king.
It is a mistake to regard Pascal as a Protestant. It is equally a mistake to press hard upon his Catholicity. He was indeed too tragically preoccupied with the far deeper question as to whether faith in Christ is possible at all, to be limited to these lesser disputes.
His quarrel with the Jesuits was not essentially a theological quarrel.
It was the eternal quarrel between the wisdom and caution and casuistry of the world and the uncompromising vision of the poet and prophet.
Nietzsche would never have singled out Pascal as his most formidable enemy if the author of "The Thoughts" had been nothing but a theological controversialist. What gives an eternal value to Pascal"s genius, is that it definitely cleared the air. It swept aside all blurring and confusing mental litter, and left the lamentable stage of the great dilemma free for the fatal duel.
Out of the immense darkness of the human situation, that forlorn stage rises. The fearful s.p.a.ces of the G.o.dless night are its roof, and row above row, tier above tier in its shadowy enclosure, the troubled crowds of the tribes of men wait the wavering issue of the contest.
Full on the high stage in this tragic theatre of the universe Pascal throws the merciless searchlight of his imaginative logic, and the rhythm of the duality of man"s fate is the rhythm of the music of his impa.s.sioned utterances.
The more one dreams over the unique position which Pascal has come to occupy, the more one realises how few writers there are whose imagination is large enough to grapple with the sublime horror of being born of the human race into this planetary system.
They take for granted so many things, these others. They have no power in them to lift eagle wings and fly over the cold grey boundless expanse of the shadowy waters.
They take for granted--materialists and mystics alike--so much; so much, that there is no longer any tragic dilemma left, any sublime "parting of the ways," any splendid or terrible decision.
Pascal"s essential grandeur consists in the fact hat he tore himself clear of all those peddling and pitiful compromises, those half humorous concessions, those lazy conventionalisms, with which most people cover their brains as if with wool, and ballast their imagination as if with heavy sand.
He tore himself clear of everything; of his own temperamental proclivities, of his pride, of his scientific vanity, of his human affections, of his l.u.s.ts, of his innocent enjoyments. He tore himself clear of everything; so as to envisage the universe in its unmitigated horror, so as to look the emptiness of s.p.a.ce straight between its ghastly lidless eyes.
One sees him there, at the edge of the world, silhouetted against the white terror of infinity, wrestling desperately in the dawn with the angel of the withheld secret.