"I know of it." It was one of the few epithets that was dimorphic, having male and female variants.
"I needed two versions of the name, obviously, to induce the generation of both males and females." He indicated the paired arrangement of needles in the cabinet.
Stratton saw that the needle could be clamped into the bra.s.s framework with its tip approaching the slide beneath the microscope; the knurled wheels presumably were used to bring the needle into contact with an ovum. He returned the instrument. "You said the name is not embedded, but impressed. Do you mean to tell me that touching the frog"s egg with this needle is all that"s needed? Removing the name doesn"t end its influence?"
"Precisely. The name activates a process in the egg that cannot be reversed. Prolonged contact of the name had no different effect."
"And the egg hatched a tadpole?"
"Not with the names initially tried; the only result was that symmetrical involutions appeared in the surface of the egg. But by incorporating different epithets, I was able to induce the egg to adopt different forms, some of which had every appearance of embryonic frogs. Eventually I found a name that caused the egg not only to a.s.sume the form of a tadpole, but also to mature and hatch. The tadpole thus hatched grew into a frog indistinguishable from any other member of the species."
"You had found a euonym for that species of frog," said Stratton.
Ashbourne smiled. "As this method of reproduction does not involve s.e.xual congress, I have termed it "parthenogenesis.""
Stratton looked at both him and Fieldhurst. "It"s clear what your proposed solution is. The logical conclusion of this research is to discover a euonym for the human species. You wish for mankind to perpetuate itself through nomenclature."
"You find the prospect troubling," said Fieldhurst. "That is to be expected: Dr. Ashbourne and myself initially felt the same way, as has everyone who has considered this. No one relishes the prospect of humans being conceived artificially. But can you offer an alternative?" Stratton was silent, and Fieldhurst went on. "All who are aware of both Dr. Ashbourne"s and Dubuisson and Gille"s work agree: there is no other solution."
Stratton reminded himself to maintain the dispa.s.sionate att.i.tude of a scientist. "Precisely how do you envision this name being used?" he asked.
Ashbourne answered. "When a husband is unable to impregnate his wife, they will seek the services of a physician. The physician will collect the woman"s menses, separate out the ovum, impress the name upon it, and then reintroduce it into her womb."
"A child born of this method would have no biological father."
"True, but the father"s biological contribution is of minimal importance here. The mother will think of her husband as the child"s father, so her imagination will impart a combination of her own and her husband"s appearance and character to the foetus. That will not change. And I hardly need mention that name impression would not be made available to unmarried women."
"Are you confident this will result in well-formed children?" asked Stratton. "I"m sure you know to what I refer." They all knew of the disastrous attempt in the previous century to create improved children by mesmerizing women during their pregnancies.
Ashbourne nodded. "We are fortunate in that the ovum is very specific in what it will accept. The set of euonyms for any species of organism is very small; if the lexical order of the impressed name does not closely match the structural order of that species, the resulting foetus does not quicken. This does not remove the need for the mother to maintain a tranquil mind during her pregnancy; name impression cannot guard against maternal agitation. But the ovum"s selectivity provides us a.s.surance that any foetus induced will be well formed in every aspect, except the one antic.i.p.ated."
Stratton was alarmed. "What aspect is that?"
"Can you not guess? The only incapacity of frogs created by name impression was in the males; they were sterile, for their spermatozoa bore no preformed foetuses inside. By comparison, the female frogs created were fertile: their eggs could be fertilized in either the conventional manner, or by repeating the impression with the name."
Stratton"s relief was considerable. "So the male variant of the name was imperfect. Presumably there needs to be further differences between the male and female variants than simply the s.e.xual epithet."
"Only if one considers the male variant imperfect," said Ashbourne, "which I do not. Consider: while a fertile male and a fertile female might seem equivalent, they differ radically in the degree of complexity exemplified. A female with viable ova remains a single organism, while a male with viable spermatozoa is actually many organisms: a father and all his potential children. In this light, the two variants of the name are well matched in their actions: each induces a single organism, but only in the female s.e.x can a single organism be fertile."
"I see what you mean." Stratton realized he would need practice in thinking about nomenclature in the organic domain. "Have you developed euonyms for other species?"
"Just over a score, of various types; our progress has been rapid. We have only just begun work on a name for the human species, and it has proved far more difficult than our previous names."
"How many nomenclators are engaged in this endeavor?"
"Only a handful," Fieldhurst replied. "We have asked a few Royal Society members, and the Acadeas some of France"s leading designateurs designateurs working on it. You will understand if I do not mention any names at this point, but be a.s.sured that we have some of the most distinguished nomenclators in England a.s.sisting us." working on it. You will understand if I do not mention any names at this point, but be a.s.sured that we have some of the most distinguished nomenclators in England a.s.sisting us."
"Forgive me for asking, but why are you approaching me? I am hardly in that category."
"You have not yet had a long career," said Ashbourne, "but the genus of names you have developed is unique. Automata have always been specialized in form and function, rather like animals: some are good at climbing, others at digging, but none at both. Yet yours can control human hands, which are uniquely versatile instruments: what else can manipulate everything from a wrench to a piano? The hand"s dexterity is the physical manifestation of the mind"s ingenuity, and these traits are essential to the name we seek."
"We have been discreetly surveying current nomenclatoral research for any names that demonstrate marked dexterity," said Fieldhurst. "When we learned of what you had accomplished, we sought you out immediately."
"In fact," Asbourne continued, "the very reason your names are worrisome to sculptors is the reason we are interested in them: they endow automata with a more humanlike manner than any before. So now we ask, will you join us?"
Stratton considered it. This was perhaps the most important task a nomenclator could undertake, and under ordinary circ.u.mstances he would have leapt at the opportunity to partic.i.p.ate. But before he could embark upon this enterprise in good conscience, there was another matter he had to resolve.
"You honor me with your invitation, but what of my work with dexterous automata? I still firmly believe that inexpensive engines can improve the lives of the laboring cla.s.s."
"It is a worthy goal," said Fieldhurst, "and I would not ask you to give it up. Indeed, the first thing we wish you to do is to perfect the epithets for dexterity. But your efforts at social reform would be for naught unless we first ensure the survival of our species."
"Obviously, but I do not want the potential for reform that is offered by dexterous names to be neglected. There may never be a better opportunity for restoring dignity to common workers. What kind of victory would we achieve if the continuation of life meant ignoring this opportunity?"
"Well said," acknowledged the earl. "Let me make a proposal. So that you can best make use of your time, the Royal Society will provide support for your development of dexterous automata as needed: securing investors and so forth. I trust you will divide your time between the two projects wisely. Your work on biological nomenclature must remain confidential, obviously. Is that satisfactory?"
"It is. Very well then, gentlemen: I accept." They shook hands.
Some weeks had pa.s.sed since Stratton last spoke with Willoughby, beyond a chilly exchange of greetings in pa.s.sing. In fact, he had little interaction with any of the union sculptors, instead spending his time working on letter permutations in his office, trying to refine his epithets for dexterity.
He entered the manufactory through the front gallery, where customers normally perused the catalogue. Today it was crowded with domestic automata, all the same model char-engine. Stratton saw the clerk ensuring they were properly tagged.
"Good morning, Pierce," he said. "What are all these doing here?"
"An improved name is just out for the "Regent,"" said the clerk. "Everyone"s eager to get the latest."
"You"re going to be busy this afternoon." The keys for unlocking the automata"s name slots were themselves stored in a safe that required two of Coade"s managers to open. The managers were reluctant to keep the safe open for more than a brief period each afternoon.
"I"m certain I can finish these in time."
"You couldn"t bear to tell a pretty housemaid that her char-engine wouldn"t be ready by tomorrow."
The clerk smiled. "Can you blame me, sir?"
"No, I cannot," said Stratton, chuckling. He turned toward the business offices behind the gallery, when he found himself confronted by Willoughby.
"Perhaps you ought to prop open the safe," said the sculptor, "so that housemaids might not be inconvenienced. Seeing how destroying our inst.i.tutions seems to be your intent."
"Good morning, Master Willoughby," said Stratton stiffly. He tried to walk past, but the other man stood in his way.
"I"ve been informed that Coade will be allowing nonunion sculptors onto the premises to a.s.sist you."
"Yes, but I a.s.sure you, only the most reputable independent sculptors are involved."
"As if such persons exist," said Willoughby scornfully. "You should know that I recommended that our trade union launch a strike against Coade in protest."
"Surely you"re not serious." It had been decades since the last strike launched by the sculptors, and that one had ended in rioting.
"I am. Were the matter put to a vote of the membership, I"m certain it would pa.s.s: other sculptors with whom I"ve discussed your work agree with me about the threat it poses. However, the union leadership will not put it to a vote."
"Ah, so they disagreed with your a.s.sessment."
Here Willoughby frowned. "Apparently the Royal Society intervened on your behalf and persuaded the Brotherhood to refrain for the time being. You"ve found yourself some powerful supporters, Mr. Stratton."
Uncomfortably, Stratton replied, "The Royal Society considers my research worthwhile."
"Perhaps, but do not believe that this matter is ended."
"Your animosity is unwarranted, I tell you," Stratton insisted. "Once you have seen how sculptors can use these automata, you will realize that there is no threat to your profession."
Willoughby merely glowered in response and left.
The next time he saw Lord Fieldhurst, Stratton asked him about the Royal Society"s involvement. They were in Fieldhurst"s study, and the earl was pouring himself a whiskey.
"Ah yes," he said. "While the Brotherhood of Sculptors as a whole is quite formidable, it is composed of individuals who individually are more amenable to persuasion."
"What manner of persuasion?"
"The Royal Society is aware that members of the trade union"s leadership were party to an as-yet-unresolved case of name piracy to the Continent. To avoid any scandal, they"ve agreed to postpone any decision about strikes until after you"ve given a demonstration of your system of manufacturing."
"I"m grateful for your a.s.sistance, Lord Fieldhurst," said Stratton, astonished. "I must admit, I had no idea that the Royal Society employed such tactics."
"Obviously, these are not proper topics for discussion at the general sessions." Lord Fieldhurst smiled in an avuncular manner. "The advancement of Science is not always a straightforward affair, Mr. Stratton, and the Royal Society is sometimes required to use both official and unofficial channels."
"I"m beginning to appreciate that."
"Similarly, although the Brotherhood of Sculptors won"t initiate a formal strike, they might employ more indirect tactics; for example, the anonymous distribution of pamphlets that arouse public opposition to your automata." He sipped his whiskey. "Hmm. Perhaps I should have someone keep a watchful eye on Master Willoughby."
Stratton was given accommodations in the guest wing of Darrington Hall, as were the other nomenclators working under Lord Fieldhurst"s direction. They were indeed some of the leading members of the profession, including Holcombe, Milburn, and Parker; Stratton felt honored to be working with them, although he could contribute little while he was still learning Ashbourne"s techniques for biological nomenclature.
Names for the organic domain employed many of the same epithets as names for automata, but Ashbourne had developed an entirely different system of integration and factorization, which entailed many novel methods of permutation. For Stratton it was almost like returning to university and learning nomenclature all over again. However, it was apparent how these techniques allowed names for species to be developed rapidly; by exploiting similarities suggested by the Linnaean system of cla.s.sification, one could work from one species to another.
Stratton also learned more about the s.e.xual epithet, traditionally used to confer either male or female qualities to an automaton. He knew of only one such epithet, and was surprised to learn it was the simplest of many extant versions. The topic went undiscussed by nomenclatoral societies, but this epithet was one of the most fully researched in existence; in fact its earliest use was claimed to have occurred in biblical times, when Joseph"s brothers created a female golem golem they could share s.e.xually without violating the prohibition against such behavior with a woman. Development of the epithet had continued for centuries in secrecy, primarily in Constantinople, and now the current versions of automatous courtesans were offered by specialized brothels right here in London. Carved from soapstone and polished to a high gloss, heated to blood temperature and sprinkled with scented oils, the automata commanded prices exceeded only by those for incubi and succubi. they could share s.e.xually without violating the prohibition against such behavior with a woman. Development of the epithet had continued for centuries in secrecy, primarily in Constantinople, and now the current versions of automatous courtesans were offered by specialized brothels right here in London. Carved from soapstone and polished to a high gloss, heated to blood temperature and sprinkled with scented oils, the automata commanded prices exceeded only by those for incubi and succubi.
It was from such ign.o.ble soil that their research grew. The names animating the courtesans incorporated powerful epithets for human s.e.xuality in its male and female forms. By factoring out the carnality common to both versions, the nomenclators had isolated epithets for generic human masculinity and femininity, ones far more refined than those used when generating animals. Such epithets were the nuclei around which they formed, by accretion, the names they sought.
Gradually Stratton absorbed sufficient information to begin partic.i.p.ating in the tests of prospective human names. He worked in collaboration with the other nomenclators in the group, and between them they divided up the vast tree of nominal possibilities, a.s.signing branches for investigation, pruning away those that proved unfruitful, cultivating those that seemed most productive.
The nomenclators paid women- typically young housemaids in good health- for their menses as a source of human ova, which they then impressed with their experimental names and scrutinized under microscopes, looking for forms that resembled human foetuses. Stratton inquired about the possibility of harvesting ova from female megafoetuses, but Ashbourne reminded him that ova were viable only when taken from a living woman. It was a basic dictum of biology: females were the source of the vital principle that gave the offspring life, while males provided the basic form. Because of this division, neither s.e.x could reproduce by itself.
Of course, that restriction had been lifted by Ashbourne"s discovery: the male"s partic.i.p.ation was no longer necessary since form could be induced lexically. Once a name was found that could generate human foetuses, women could reproduce purely by themselves. Stratton realized that such a discovery might be welcomed by women exhibiting s.e.xual inversion, feeling love for persons of the same rather than the opposite s.e.x. If the name were to become available to such women, they might establish a commune of some sort that reproduced via parthenogenesis. Would such a society flourish by magnifying the finer sensibilities of the gentle s.e.x, or would it collapse under the unrestrained pathology of its membership? It was impossible to guess.
Before Stratton"s enlistment, the nomenclators had developed names capable of generating vaguely homuncular forms in an ovum. Using Dubuisson and Gille"s methods, they enlarged the forms to a size that allowed detailed examination; the forms resembled automata more than humans, their limbs ending in paddles of fused digits. By incorporating his epithets for dexterity, Stratton was able to separate the digits and refine the overall appearance of the forms. All the while, Ashbourne emphasized the need for an unconventional approach.
"Consider the thermodynamics of what most automata do," said Ashbourne during one of their frequent discussions. "The mining engines dig ore, the reaping engines harvest wheat, the woodcutting engines fell timber; yet none of these tasks, no matter how useful we find them to be, can be said to create order. While all their names create order at the thermal level, by converting heat into motion, in the vast majority the resulting work is applied at the visible level to create disorder."
"This is an interesting perspective," said Stratton thoughtfully. "Many long-standing deficits in the capabilities of automata become intelligible in this light: the fact that automata are unable to stack crates more neatly than they find them; their inability to sort pieces of crushed ore based on their composition. You believe that the known cla.s.ses of industrial names are not powerful enough in thermodynamic terms."
"Precisely!" Ashbourne displayed the excitement of a tutor finding an unexpectedly apt pupil. "This is another feature that distinguishes your cla.s.s of dexterous names. By enabling an automaton to perform skilled labor, your names not only create order at the thermal level, they use it to create order at the visible level as well."
"I see a commonality with Milburn"s discoveries," said Stratton. Milburn had developed the household automata able to return objects to their proper places. "His work likewise involves the creation of order at the visible level."
"Indeed it does, and this commonality suggests a hypothesis." Ashbourne leaned forward. "Suppose we were able to factor out an epithet common to the names developed by you and Milburn: an epithet expressing the creation of two levels of order. Further suppose that we discover a euonym for the human species, and were able to incorporate this epithet into the name. What do you imagine would be generated by impressing the name? And if you say "twins" I shall clout you on the head."
Stratton laughed. "I daresay I understand you better than that. You are suggesting that if an epithet is capable of inducing two levels of thermodynamic order in the inorganic domain, it might create two generations in the organic domain. Such a name might create males whose spermatozoa would contain preformed foetuses. Those males would be fertile, although any sons they produced would again be sterile."
His instructor clapped his hands together. "Precisely: order that begets order! An interesting speculation, wouldn"t you agree? It would halve the number of medical interventions required for our race to sustain itself."
"And what about inducing the formation of more than two generations of foetuses? What kind of capabilities would an automaton have to possess, for its name to contain such an epithet?"
"The science of thermodynamics has not progressed enough to answer that question, I"m afraid. What would const.i.tute a still-higher level of order in the inorganic domain? Automata working cooperatively, perhaps? We do not yet know, but perhaps in time we will."
Stratton gave voice to a question that had posed itself to him some time ago. "Dr. Ashbourne, when I was initiated into our group, Lord Fieldhurst spoke of the possibility that species are born in the wake of catastrophic events. Is it possible that entire species were created by use of nomenclature?"
"Ah, now we tread in the realm of theology. A new species requires progenitors containing vast numbers of descendants nested within their reproductive organs; such forms embody the highest degree of order imaginable. Can a purely physical process create such vast amounts of order? No naturalist has suggested a mechanism by which this could occur. On the other hand, while we do know that a lexical process can create order, the creation of an entire new species would require a name of incalculable power. Such mastery of nomenclature could very well require the capabilities of G.o.d; perhaps it is even part of the definition.
"This is a question, Stratton, to which we may never know the answer, but we cannot allow that to affect our current actions. Whether or not a name was responsible for the creation of our species, I believe a name is the best chance for its continuation."
"Agreed," said Stratton. After a pause, he added, "I must confess, much of the time when I am working, I occupy myself solely with the details of permutation and combination, and lose sight of the sheer magnitude of our endeavor. It is sobering to think of what we will have achieved if we are successful."
"I can think of little else," replied Ashbourne.
Seated at his desk in the manufactory, Stratton squinted to read the pamphlet he"d been given on the street. The text was crudely printed, the letters blurred.
"Shall Men be the Masters of names, or shall Names be the masters of Men? For too long the Capitalists have h.o.a.rded Names within their coffers, guarded by Patent and Lock and Key, ama.s.sing fortunes by mere possession of LETTERS, while the Common Man must labour for every shilling. They will wring the ALPHABET until they have extracted every last penny from it, and only then discard it for us to use. How long will We allow this to continue?"
Stratton scanned the entire pamphlet, but found nothing new in it. For the past two months he"d been reading them, and encountered only the usual anarchist rants; there was as yet no evidence for Lord Fieldhurst"s theory that the sculptors would use them to target Stratton"s work. His public demonstration of the dexterous automata was scheduled for next week, and by now Willoughby had largely missed his opportunity to generate public opposition. In fact, it occurred to Stratton that he might distribute pamphlets himself to generate public support. He could explain his goal of bringing the advantages of automata to everyone, and his intention to keep close control over his names" patents, granting licenses only to manufacturers who would use them conscientiously. He could even have a slogan: "Autonomy through Automata," perhaps?
There was a knock at his office door. Stratton tossed the pamphlet into his wastebasket. "Yes?"
A man entered, somberly dressed, and with a long beard. "Mr. Stratton?" he asked. "Please allow me to introduce myself. My name is Benjamin Roth. I am a kabbalist."
Stratton was momentarily speechless. Typically such mystics were offended by the modern view of nomenclature as a science, considering it a secularization of a sacred ritual. He never expected one to visit the manufactory. "A pleasure to meet you. How may I be of a.s.sistance?"
"I"ve heard that you have achieved a great advance in the permutation of letters."
"Why, thank you. I didn"t realize it would be of interest to a person like yourself."
Roth smiled awkwardly. "My interest is not in its practical applications. The goal of kabbalists is to better know G.o.d. The best means by which to do that is to study the art by which He creates. We meditate upon different names to enter an ecstatic state of consciousness; the more powerful the name, the more closely we approach the Divine."
"I see." Stratton wondered what the kabbalist"s reaction would be if he learned about the creation being attempted in the biological nomenclature project. "Please continue."
"Your epithets for dexterity enable a golem golem to sculpt another, thereby reproducing itself. A name capable of creating a being that is, in turn, capable of creation would bring us closer to G.o.d than we have ever been before." to sculpt another, thereby reproducing itself. A name capable of creating a being that is, in turn, capable of creation would bring us closer to G.o.d than we have ever been before."