And G.o.d sent him to h.e.l.l anyway.
Ethan saw all of this. He saw Neil and Janice remade by Heaven"s light, and he saw the pious love on their eyeless faces. He saw the skies become clear and the sunlight return. He was holding Neil"s hand, waiting for the paramedics, when Neil died, and he saw Neil"s soul leave his body and rise toward Heaven, only to descend into h.e.l.l.
Janice didn"t see it, for by then her eyes were already gone. Ethan was the sole witness, and he realized that this was G.o.d"s purpose for him: to follow Janice Reilly to this point and to see what she could not.
When statistics were compiled for Barakiel"s visitation, it turned out that there had been a total of ten casualties, six among light-seekers and four among ordinary pilgrims. Nine pilgrims received miracle cures; the only individuals to see Heaven"s light were Janice and Neil. There were no statistics regarding how many pilgrims had felt their lives changed by the visitation, but Ethan counted himself among them.
Upon returning home, Janice resumed her evangelism, but the topic of her speeches has changed. She no longer speaks about how the physically handicapped have the resources to overcome their limitations; instead she, like the other eyeless, speaks about the unbearable beauty of G.o.d"s creation. Many who used to draw inspiration from her are disappointed, feeling they"ve lost a spiritual leader. When Janice had spoken of the strength she had as an afflicted person, her message was rare, but now that she"s eyeless, her message is commonplace. She doesn"t worry about the reduction in her audience, though, because she has complete conviction in what she evangelizes.
Ethan quit his job and became a preacher so that he too could speak about his experiences. His wife Claire couldn"t accept his new mission and ultimately left him, taking their children with her, but Ethan was willing to continue alone. He"s developed a substantial following by telling people what happened to Neil Fisk. He tells people that they can no more expect justice in the afterlife than in the mortal plane, but he doesn"t do this to dissuade them from worshiping G.o.d; on the contrary, he encourages them to do so. What he insists on is that they not love G.o.d under a misapprehension, that if they wish to love G.o.d, they be prepared to do so no matter what His intentions. G.o.d is not just, G.o.d is not kind, G.o.d is not merciful, and understanding that is essential to true devotion.
As for Neil, although he is unaware of any of Ethan"s sermons, he would understand their message perfectly. His lost soul is the embodiment of Ethan"s teachings.
For most of its inhabitants, h.e.l.l is not that different from Earth; its princ.i.p.al punishment is the regret of not having loved G.o.d enough when alive, and for many that"s easily endured. For Neil, however, h.e.l.l bears no resemblance whatsoever to the mortal plane. His eternal body has well-formed legs, but he"s scarcely aware of them; his eyes have been restored, but he can"t bear to open them. Just as seeing Heaven"s light gave him an awareness of G.o.d"s presence in all things in the mortal plane, so it has made him aware of G.o.d"s absence in all things in h.e.l.l. Everything Neil sees, hears, or touches causes him distress, and unlike in the mortal plane this pain is not a form of G.o.d"s love, but a consequence of His absence. Neil is experiencing more anguish than was possible when he was alive, but his only response is to love G.o.d.
Neil still loves Sarah, and misses her as much as he ever did, and the knowledge that he came so close to rejoining her only makes it worse. He knows his being sent to h.e.l.l was not a result of anything he did; he knows there was no reason for it, no higher purpose being served. None of this diminishes his love for G.o.d. If there were a possibility that he could be admitted to Heaven and his suffering would end, he would not hope for it; such desires no longer occur to him.
Neil even knows that by being beyond G.o.d"s awareness, he is not loved by G.o.d in return. This doesn"t affect his feelings either, because unconditional love asks nothing, not even that it be returned.
And though it"s been many years that he has been in h.e.l.l, beyond the awareness of G.o.d, he loves Him still. That is the nature of true devotion.
Liking What You See: A Doc.u.mentary "BEAUTY IS THE PROMISE OF HAPPINESS.".
- Stendhal Tamera Lyons, first-year student at Pembleton: I can"t believe it. I visited the campus last year, and I didn"t hear a word about this. Now I get here and it turns out people want to make calli a requirement. One of the things I was looking forward to about college was getting rid of this, you know, so I could be like everybody else. If I"d known there was even a chance I"d have to keep it, I probably would"ve picked another college. I feel like I"ve been scammed.
I turn eighteen next week, and I"m getting my calli turned off that day. If they vote to make it a requirement, I don"t know what I"ll do; maybe I"ll transfer, I don"t know. Right now I feel like going up to people and telling them, "Vote no." There"s probably some campaign I can work for.
Maria deSouza, third-year student, President of the Students for Equality Everywhere (SEE): Our goal is very simple. Pembleton University has a Code of Ethical Conduct, one that was created by the students themselves, and that all incoming students agree to follow when they enroll. The initiative that we"ve sponsored would add a provision to the code, requiring students to adopt calliagnosia as long as they"re enrolled.
What prompted us to do this now was the release of a spex version of Visage. That"s the software that, when you look at people through your spex, shows you what they"d look like with cosmetic surgery. It became a form of entertainment among a certain crowd, and a lot of college students found it offensive. When people started talking about it as a symptom of a deeper societal problem, we thought the timing was right for us to sponsor this initiative.
The deeper societal problem is lookism. For decades people"ve been willing to talk about racism and s.e.xism, but they"re still reluctant to talk about lookism. Yet this prejudice against unattractive people is incredibly pervasive. People do it without even being taught by anyone, which is bad enough, but instead of combating this tendency, modern society actively reinforces it.
Educating people, raising their awareness about this issue, all of that is essential, but it"s not enough. That"s where technology comes in. Think of calliagnosia as a kind of a.s.sisted maturity. It lets you do what you know you should: ignore the surface, so you can look deeper.
We think it"s time to bring calli into the mainstream. So far the calli movement has been a minor presence on college campuses, just another one of the special-interest causes. But Pembleton isn"t like other colleges, and I think the students here are ready for calli. If the initiative succeeds here, we"ll be setting an example for other colleges, and ultimately, society as a whole.
Joseph Weingartner, neurologist: The condition is what we call an a.s.sociative agnosia, rather than an apperceptive one. That means it doesn"t interfere with one"s visual perception, only with the ability to recognize what one sees. A calliagnosic perceives faces perfectly well; he or she can tell the difference between a pointed chin and a receding one, a straight nose and a crooked one, clear skin and blemished skin. He or she simply doesn"t experience any aesthetic reaction to those differences.
Calliagnosia is possible because of the existence of certain neural pathways in the brain. All animals have criteria for evaluating the reproductive potential of prospective mates, and they"ve evolved neural "circuitry" to recognize those criteria. Human social interaction is centered around our faces, so our circuitry is most finely attuned to how a person"s reproductive potential is manifested in his or her face. You experience the operation of that circuitry as the feeling that a person is beautiful, or ugly, or somewhere in between. By blocking the neural pathways dedicated to evaluating those features, we induce calliagnosia.
Given how much fashions change, some people find it hard to imagine that there are absolute markers of a beautiful face. But it turns out that when people of different cultures are asked to rank photos of faces for attractiveness, some very clear patterns emerge across the board. Even very young infants show the same preference for certain faces. This lets us identify certain traits that are common to everyone"s idea of a beautiful face.
Probably the most obvious one is clear skin. It"s the equivalent of a bright plumage in birds or a shiny coat of fur in other mammals. Good skin is the single best indicator of youth and health, and it"s valued in every culture. Acne may not be serious, but it looks looks like more serious diseases, and that"s why we find it disagreeable. like more serious diseases, and that"s why we find it disagreeable.
Another trait is symmetry; we may not be conscious of millimeter differences between someone"s left and right sides, but measurements reveal that individuals rated as most attractive are also the most symmetrical. And while symmetry is what our genes always aim for, it"s very difficult to achieve in developmental terms; any environmental stressor- like poor nutrition, disease, parasites- tends to result in asymmetry during growth. Symmetry implies resistance to such stressors.
Other traits have to do with facial proportions. We tend to be attracted to facial proportions that are close to the population mean. That obviously depends on the population you"re part of, but being near the mean usually indicates genetic health. The only departures from the mean that people consistently find attractive are exaggerations of secondary s.e.xual characteristics.
Basically, calliagnosia is a lack of response to these traits; nothing more. Calliagnosics are not not blind to fashion or cultural standards of beauty. If black lipstick is all the rage, calliagnosia won"t make you forget it, although you might not notice the difference between pretty faces and plain faces wearing that lipstick. If everyone around you sneers at people with broad noses, you"ll pick up on that. blind to fashion or cultural standards of beauty. If black lipstick is all the rage, calliagnosia won"t make you forget it, although you might not notice the difference between pretty faces and plain faces wearing that lipstick. If everyone around you sneers at people with broad noses, you"ll pick up on that.
So calliagnosia by itself can"t eliminate appearance-based discrimination. What it does, in a sense, is even up the odds; it takes away the innate predisposition, the tendency for such discrimination to arise in the first place. That way, if you want to teach people to ignore appearances, you won"t be facing an uphill battle. Ideally you"d start with an environment where everyone"s adopted calliagnosia, and then socialize them to not value appearances.
Tamera Lyons: People here have been asking me what it was like going to Saybrook, growing up with calli. To be honest, it"s not a big deal when you"re young; you know, like they say, whatever you grew up with seems normal to you. We knew that there was something that other people could see that we couldn"t, but it was just something we were curious about.
For instance, my friends and I used to watch movies and try to figure out who was really good-looking and who wasn"t. We"d say we could tell, but we couldn"t really, not by looking at their faces. We were just going by who was the main character and who was the friend; you always knew the main character was better-looking than the friend. It"s not true a hundred percent of the time, but you could usually tell if you were watching the kind of thing where the main character wouldn"t be good looking.
It"s when you get older that it starts to bother you. If you hang out with people from other schools, you can feel weird because you have calli and they don"t. It"s not that anyone makes a big deal out of it, but it reminds you that there"s something you can"t see. And then you start having fights with your parents, because they"re keeping you from seeing the real world. You never get anywhere with them, though.
Richard Hamill, founder of the Saybrook School: Saybrook came about as an outgrowth of our housing cooperative. We had maybe two dozen families at the time, all trying to establish a community based on shared values. We were holding a meeting about the possibility of starting an alternative school for our kids, and one parent mentioned the problem of the media"s influence on their kids. Everyone"s teens were asking for cosmetic surgery so they could look like fashion models. The parents were doing their best, but you can"t isolate your kids from the world; they live in an image-obsessed culture.
It was around the time the last legal challenges to calliagnosia were resolved, and we got to talking about it. We saw calli as an opportunity: What if we could live in an environment where people didn"t judge each other on their appearance? What if we could raise our children in such an environment?
The school started out being just for the children of the families in the cooperative, but other calliagnosia schools began making the news, and before long people were asking if they could enroll their kids without joining the housing co-op. Eventually we set up Saybrook as a private school separate from the co-op, and one of its requirements was that parents adopt calliagnosia for as long as their kids were enrolled. Now a calliagnosia community has sprung up here, all because of the school.
Rachel Lyons: Tamera"s father and I gave the issue a lot of thought before we decided to enroll her there. We talked to people in the community, found we liked their approach to education, but really it was visiting the school that sold me.
Saybrook has a higher than normal number of students with facial abnormalities, like bone cancer, burns, congenital conditions. Their parents moved here to keep them from being ostracized by other kids, and it works. I remember when I first visited, I saw a cla.s.s of twelve-year-olds voting for cla.s.s president, and they elected this girl who had burn scars on one side of her face. She was wonderfully at ease with herself, she was popular among kids who probably would have ostracized her in any other school. And I thought, this is the kind of environment I want my daughter to grow up in.
Girls have always been told that their value is tied to their appearance; their accomplishments are always magnified if they"re pretty and diminished if they"re not. Even worse, some girls get the message that they can get through life relying on just their looks, and then they never develop their minds. I wanted to keep Tamera away from that sort of influence.
Being pretty is fundamentally a pa.s.sive quality; even when you work at it, you"re working at being pa.s.sive. I wanted Tamera to value herself in terms of what she could do do, both with her mind and with her body, not in terms of how decorative she was. I didn"t want her to be pa.s.sive, and I"m pleased to say that she hasn"t turned out that way.
Martin Lyons: I don"t mind if Tamera decides as an adult to get rid of calli. This was never about taking choices away from her. But there"s more than enough stress involved in simply getting through adolescence; the peer pressure can crush you like a paper cup. Becoming preoccupied with how you look is just one more way to be crushed, and anything that can relieve that pressure is a good thing, in my opinion.
Once you"re older, you"re better equipped to deal with the issue of personal appearance. You"re more comfortable in your own skin, more confident, more secure. You"re more likely to be satisfied with how you look, whether you"re "good-looking" or not. Of course not everyone reaches that level of maturity at the same age. Some people are there at sixteen, some don"t get there until they"re thirty or even older. But eighteen"s the age of legal majority, when everyone"s got the right to make their own decisions, and all you can do is trust your child and hope for the best.
Tamera Lyons: It"s been kind of an odd day for me. Good, but odd. I just got my calli turned off this morning.
Getting it turned off was easy. The nurse stuck some sensors on me and made me put on this helmet, and she showed me a bunch of pictures of people"s faces. Then she tapped at her keyboard for a minute, and said, "I"ve switched off the calli," just like that. I thought you might feel something when it happened, but you don"t. Then she showed me the pictures again, to make sure it worked.
When I looked at the faces again, some of them seemed... different. Like they were glowing, or more vivid or something. It"s hard to describe. The nurse showed me my test results afterwards, and there were readings for how wide my pupils were dilating and how well my skin conducted electricity and stuff like that. And for the faces that seemed different, the readings went way up. She said those were the beautiful faces.
She said that I"d notice how other people"s faces look right away, but it"d take a while before I had any reaction to how I looked. Supposedly you"re too used to your face to tell.
And yeah, when I first looked in a mirror, I thought I looked totally the same. Since I got back from the doctor"s, the people I see on campus definitely look different, but I still haven"t noticed any difference in how I look. I"ve been looking at mirrors all day. For a while I was afraid that I was ugly, and any minute the ugliness was going to appear, like a rash or something. And so I"ve been staring at the mirror, just waiting, and nothing"s happened. So I figure I"m probably not really ugly, or I"d have noticed it, but that means I"m not really pretty either, because I"d have noticed that too. So I guess that means I"m absolutely plain, you know? Exactly average. I guess that"s okay.
Joseph Weingartner: Inducing an agnosia means simulating a specific brain lesion. We do this with a programmable pharmaceutical called neurostat; you can think of it as a highly selective anesthetic, one whose activation and targeting are all under dynamic control. We activate or deactivate the neurostat by transmitting signals through a helmet the patient puts on. The helmet also provides somatic positioning information so the neurostat molecules can triangulate their location. This lets us activate only the neurostat in a specific section of brain tissue, and keep the nerve impulses there below a specified threshold.
Neurostat was originally developed for controlling seizures in epileptics and for relief of chronic pain; it lets us treat even severe cases of these conditions without the side-effects caused by drugs that affect the entire nervous system. Later on, different neurostat protocols were developed as treatments for obsessive-compulsive disorder, addictive behavior, and various other disorders. At the same time, neurostat became incredibly valuable as a research tool for studying brain physiology.
One way neurologists have traditionally studied specialization of brain function is to observe the deficits that result from various lesions. Obviously, this technique is limited because the lesions caused by injury or disease often affect multiple functional areas. By contrast, neurostat can be activated in the tiniest portion of the brain, in effect simulating a lesion so localized that it would never occur naturally. And when you deactivate the neurostat, the "lesion" disappears and brain function returns to normal.
In this way neurologists were able to induce a wide variety of agnosias. The one most relevant here is prosopagnosia, the inability to recognize people by their faces. A prosopagnosic can"t recognize friends or family members unless they say something; he can"t even identify his own face in a photograph. It"s not a cognitive or perceptual problem; prosopagnosics can identify people by their hairstyle, clothing, perfume, even the way they walk. The deficit is restricted purely to faces.
Prosopagnosia has always been the most dramatic indication that our brains have a special "circuit" devoted to the visual processing of faces; we look at faces in a different way than we look at anything else. And recognizing someone"s face is just one of the face-processing tasks we do; there are also related circuits devoted to identifying facial expressions, and even detecting changes in the direction of another person"s gaze.
One of the interesting things about prosopagnosics is that while they can"t recognize a face, they still have an opinion as to whether it"s attractive or not. When asked to sort photos of faces in order of attractiveness, prosopagnosics sorted the photos in pretty much the same way as anyone else. Experiments using neurostat allowed researchers to identify the neurological circuit responsible for perceiving beauty in faces, and thus essentially invent calliagnosia.
Maria deSouza: SEE has had extra neurostat programming helmets set up in the Student Health Office, and made arrangements so they can offer calliagnosia to anyone who wants it. You don"t even have to make an appointment, you can just walk in. We"re encouraging all the students to try it, at least for a day, to see what it"s like. At first it seems a little odd, not seeing anyone as either good-looking or ugly, but over time you realize how positively it affects your interactions with other people.
A lot of people worry that calli might make them as.e.xual or something, but actually physical beauty is only a small part of what makes a person attractive. No matter what a person looks like, it"s much more important how the person acts; what he says and how he says it, his behavior and body language. And how does he react to you? For me, one of the things that attracts me to a guy is if he seems interested in me me. It"s like a feedback loop; you notice him looking at you, then he sees you looking at him, and things s...o...b..ll from there. Calli doesn"t change that. Plus there"s that whole pheromone chemistry going on too; obviously calli doesn"t affect that.
Another worry that people have is that calli will make everyone"s face look the same, but that"s not true either. A person"s face always reflects their personality, and if anything, calli makes that clearer. You know that saying, that after a certain age, you"re responsible for your face? With calli, you really appreciate how true that is. Some faces just look really bland, especially young, conventionally pretty ones. Without their physical beauty, those faces are just boring. But faces that are full of personality look as good as they ever did, maybe even better. It"s like you"re seeing something more essential about them.
Some people also ask about enforcement. We don"t plan on doing anything like that. It"s true, there"s software that"s pretty good at guessing if a person has calli or not, by a.n.a.lyzing eye gaze patterns. But it requires a lot of data, and the campus security cams don"t zoom in close enough. Everyone would have to wear personal cams, and share the data. It"s possible, but that"s not what we"re after. We think that once people try calli, they"ll see the benefits themselves.
Tamera Lyons: Check it out, I"m pretty!
What a day. When I woke up this morning I immediately went to the mirror; it was like I was a little kid on Christmas or something. But still, nothing; my face still looked plain. Later on I even (laughs) I tried to catch myself by surprise, by sneaking up on a mirror, but that didn"t work. So I was kind of disappointed, and feeling just, you know, resigned to my fate.
But then this afternoon, I went out with my roommate Ina and a couple other girls from the dorm. I hadn"t told anyone that I"d gotten my calli turned off, because I wanted to get used to it first. So we went to this snack bar on the other side of campus, one I hadn"t been to before. We were sitting at this table, talking, and I was looking around, just seeing what people looked like without calli. And I saw this girl looking at me, and I thought, "She"s really pretty." And then, (laughs) this"ll sound really stupid, then I realized that this wall in the snack bar was a mirror, and I was looking at myself!
I can"t describe it, I felt this incredible sense of relief relief. I just couldn"t stop smiling! Ina asked me what I was so happy about, and I just shook my head. I went to the bathroom so I could stare at myself in the mirror for a bit.
So it"s been a good day. I really like like the way I look! It"s been a good day. the way I look! It"s been a good day.
Jeff Winthrop, third-year student, speaking at a student debate: Of course it"s wrong to judge people by their appearance, but this "blindness" isn"t the answer. Education is.
Calli takes away the good as well as the bad. It doesn"t just work when there"s a possibility of discrimination, it keeps you from recognizing beauty altogether. There are plenty of times when looking at an attractive face doesn"t hurt anyone. Calli won"t let you make those distinctions, but education will.
And I know someone will say, what about when the technology gets better? Maybe one day they"ll be able to insert an expert system into your brain, one that goes, "Is this an appropriate situation to apprehend beauty? If so, enjoy it; else, ignore it." Would that be okay? Would that be the "a.s.sisted maturity" you hear people talking about?
No, it wouldn"t. That wouldn"t be maturity; it"d be letting an expert system make your decisions for you. Maturity means seeing the differences, but realizing they don"t matter. There"s no technological shortcut.
Adesh Singh, third-year student, speaking at a student debate: No one"s talking about letting an expert system make your decisions. What makes calli ideal is precisely that it"s such a minimal change. Calli doesn"t decide for you; it doesn"t prevent you from doing anything. And as for maturity, you demonstrate maturity by choosing calli in the first place.
Everyone knows physical beauty has nothing to do with merit; that"s what education"s accomplished. But even with the best intentions in the world, people haven"t stopped practicing lookism. We try to be impartial, we try not to let a person"s appearance affect us, but we can"t suppress our autonomic responses, and anyone who claims they can is engaged in wishful thinking. Ask yourself: Don"t you react differently when you meet an attractive person and when you meet an unattractive one?
Every study on this issue turns up the same results: looks help people get ahead. We can"t help but think of good-looking people as more competent, more honest, more deserving than others. None of it"s true, but their looks still give us that impression.
Calli doesn"t blind you to anything; beauty is what blinds you. Calli lets you see.
Tamera Lyons: So, I"ve been looking at good-looking guys around campus. It"s fun; weird, but fun. Like, I was in the cafeteria the other day, and I saw this guy a couple tables away, I didn"t know his name, but I kept turning to look at him. I can"t describe anything specific about his face, but it just seemed much more noticeable than other people"s. It was like his face was a magnet, and my eyes were compa.s.s needles being pulled toward it.
And after I looked at him for a while, I found it really easy to imagine that he was a nice guy! I didn"t know anything about him, I couldn"t even hear what he was talking about, but I wanted to get to know him. It was kind of odd, but definitely not in a bad way.
From a broadcast of EduNews, on the American College Network: In the latest on the Pembleton University calliagnosia initiative: EduNews has received evidence that public-relations firm Wyatt/Hayes paid four Pembleton students to dissuade cla.s.smates from voting for the initiative, without having them register their affiliations. Evidence includes an internal memo from Wyatt/Hayes, proposing that "good-looking students with high reputation ratings" be sought, and records of payments from the agency to Pembleton students.
The files were sent by the SemioTech Warriors, a culture-jamming group responsible for numerous acts of media vandalism.
When contacted about this story, Wyatt/Hayes issued a statement decrying this violation of their internal computer systems.
Jeff Winthrop: Yes, it"s true, Wyatt/Hayes paid me, but it wasn"t an endors.e.m.e.nt deal; they never told me what what to say. They just made it possible for me to devote more time to the anti-calli campaign, which is what I would"ve done anyway if I hadn"t needed to make money tutoring. All I"ve been doing is expressing my honest opinion: I think calli"s a bad idea. to say. They just made it possible for me to devote more time to the anti-calli campaign, which is what I would"ve done anyway if I hadn"t needed to make money tutoring. All I"ve been doing is expressing my honest opinion: I think calli"s a bad idea.
A couple of people in the anti-calli campaign have asked that I not speak publicly about the issue anymore, because they think it"d hurt the cause. I"m sorry they feel that way, because this is just an ad hominem ad hominem attack. If you thought my arguments made sense before, this shouldn"t change anything. But I realize that some people can"t make those distinctions, and I"ll do what"s best for the cause. attack. If you thought my arguments made sense before, this shouldn"t change anything. But I realize that some people can"t make those distinctions, and I"ll do what"s best for the cause.
Maria deSouza: Those students really should have registered their affiliations; we all know people who are walking endors.e.m.e.nts. But now, whenever someone criticizes the initiative, people ask them if they"re being paid. The backlash is definitely hurting the anticalli campaign.
I consider it a compliment that someone is taking enough interest in the initiative to hire a PRfirm. We"ve always hoped that its pa.s.sing might influence people at other schools, and this means that corporations are thinking the same thing.
We"ve invited the president of the National Calliagnosia a.s.sociation to speak on campus. Before we weren"t sure if we wanted to bring the national group in, because they have a different emphasis than we do; they"re more focused on the media uses of beauty, while here at SEE we"re more interested in the social equality issue. But given the way students reacted to what Wyatt/Hayes did, it"s clear that the media manipulation issue has the power to get us where we need to go. Our best shot at getting the initiative pa.s.sed is to take advantage of the anger against advertisers. The social equality will follow afterwards.
From the speech given at Pembleton by Walter Lambert, president of the National Calliagnosia a.s.sociation: Think of cocaine. In its natural form, as coca leaves, it"s appealing, but not to an extent that it usually becomes a problem. But refine it, purify it, and you get a compound that hits your pleasure receptors with an unnatural intensity. That"s when it becomes addictive.
Beauty has undergone a similar process, thanks to advertisers. Evolution gave us a circuit that responds to good looks- call it the pleasure receptor for our visual cortex- and in our natural environment, it was useful to have. But take a person with one-in-a-million skin and bone structure, add professional makeup and retouching, and you"re no longer looking at beauty in its natural form. You"ve got pharmaceutical-grade beauty, the cocaine of good looks.
Biologists call this "supernormal stimulus;" show a mother bird a giant plastic egg, and she"ll incubate it instead of her own real eggs. Madison Avenue has saturated our environment with this kind of stimuli, this visual drug. Our beauty receptors receive more stimulation than they were evolved to handle; they"re getting more in one day than our ancestors" did in their entire lives. And the result is that beauty is slowly ruining our lives.
How? The way any drug becomes a problem: by interfering with our relationships with other people. We become dissatisfied with the way ordinary people look because they can"t compare to supermodels. Two-dimensional images are bad enough, but now with spex, advertisers can put a supermodel right in front of you, making eye contact. Software companies offer G.o.ddesses who"ll remind you of your appointments. We"ve all heard about men who prefer virtual girlfriends over actual ones, but they"re not the only ones who"ve been affected. The more time any of us spend with gorgeous digital apparitions around, the more our relationships with real human beings are going to suffer.
We can"t avoid these images and still live in the modern world. And that means we can"t kick this habit, because beauty is a drug you can"t abstain from unless you literally keep your eyes closed all the time.
Until now. Now you can get another set of eyelids, one that blocks out this drug, but still lets you see. And that"s calliagnosia. Some people call it excessive, but I call it just enough. Technology is being used to manipulate us through our emotional reactions, so it"s only fair that we use it to protect ourselves too.
Right now you have an opportunity to make an enormous impact. The Pembleton student body has always been at the vanguard of every progressive movement; what you decide here will set an example for students across the country. By pa.s.sing this initiative, by adopting calliagnosia, you"ll be sending a message to advertisers that young people are no longer willing to be manipulated.
From a broadcast of EduNews: Following NCA president Walter Lambert"s speech, polls show that 54% of Pembleton students support the calliagnosia initiative. Polls across the country show that an average of 28% of students would support a similar initiative at their school, an increase of 8% in the past month.
Tamera Lyons: I thought he went overboard with that cocaine a.n.a.logy. Do you know anyone who steals stuff and sells it so he can get his fix of advertising?
But I guess he has a point about how good-looking people are in commercials versus in real life. It"s not that they look better than people in real life, but they look good in a different way.
Like, I was at the campus store the other day, and I needed to check my email, and when I put on my spex I saw this poster running a commercial. It was for some shampoo, Jouissance I think. I"d seen it before, but it was different without calli. The model was so- I couldn"t take my eyes off her. I don"t mean I felt the same as that time I saw the good-looking guy in the cafeteria; it wasn"t like I wanted to get to know her. It was more like... watching a sunset, or a fireworks display.
I just stood there and watched the commercial like five times, just so I could look at her some more. I didn"t think a human being could look so, you know, spectacular.
But it"s not like I"m going to quit talking to people so I can watch commercials through my spex all the time. Watching them is very intense, but it"s a totally different experience than looking at a real person. And it"s not even like I immediately want to go out and buy everything they"re selling, either. I"m not even really paying attention to the products. I just think they"re amazing to watch.
Maria deSouza: If I"d met Tamera earlier, I might have tried to persuade her not to get her calli turned off. I doubt I would"ve succeeded; she seems pretty firm about her decision. Even so, she"s a great example of the benefits of calli. You can"t help but notice it when you talk to her. For example, at one point I was saying how lucky she was, and she said, "Because I"m beautiful?" And she was being totally sincere! Like she was talking about her height. Can you imagine a woman without calli saying that?
Tamera is completely unself-conscious about her looks; she"s not vain or insecure, and she can describe herself as beautiful without embarra.s.sment. I gather that she"s very pretty, and with a lot of women who look like that, I can see something in their manner, a hint of showoffishness. Tamera doesn"t have that. Or else they display false modesty, which is also easy to tell, but Tamera doesn"t do that either, because she truly is is modest. There"s no way she could be like that if she hadn"t been raised with calli. I just hope she stays that way. modest. There"s no way she could be like that if she hadn"t been raised with calli. I just hope she stays that way.
Annika Lindstrom, second-year student: I think this calli thing is a terrible idea. I like it when guys notice me, and I"d be really disappointed if they stopped.
I think this whole thing is just a way for people who, honestly, aren"t very good-looking, to try and make themselves feel better. And the only way they can do that is to punish people who have what they don"t. And that"s just unfair.
Who wouldn"t want to be pretty if they could? Ask anyone, ask the people behind this, and I bet you they"d all say yes. Okay, sure, being pretty means that you"ll be ha.s.sled by jerks sometimes. There are always jerks, but that"s part of life. If those scientists could come up with some way to turn off the jerk circuit in guys" brains, I"d be all in favor of that.
Jolene Carter, third-year student: I"m voting for the initiative, because I think it"d be a relief if everyone had calli.
People are nice to me because of how I look, and part of me likes that, but part of me feels guilty because I haven"t done anything to deserve it. And sure, it"s nice to have men pay attention to me, but it can be hard to make a real connection with someone. Whenever I like a guy, I always wonder how much he"s interested in me, versus how much he"s interested in my looks. It can be hard to tell, because all relationships are wonderful at the beginning, you know? It"s not until later that you find out whether you can really be comfortable with each other. It was like that with my last boyfriend. He wasn"t happy with me if I didn"t look fabulous, so I was never able to truly relax. But by the time I realized that, I"d already let myself get close to him, so that really hurt, finding out that he didn"t see the real me.
And then there"s how you feel around other women. I don"t think most women like it, but you"re always comparing how you look relative to everyone else. Sometimes I feel like I"m in a compet.i.tion, and I don"t want to be.