"I"m glad you"re here, commander. It"ll probably take both of us to move that beam."
"Shall we try, sir?"
Between the two of them, they managed to shift the weight off Scott"s torso. Briefly the latter"s eyes met Bienne"s. There was still no friendliness in them, but there was a look of wry self-mockery.
Bienne hadn"t saved Scott"s life, exactly. It was, rather, a question of being a Dooneman. For Bienne was, first of all, a soldier, and a member of the Free Company.
Scott tested his limbs; they worked.
"How long was I out, commander?"
"Ten minutes, sir. The Armageddon"s in sight."
"Good. Are the h.e.l.ldivers veering off?"
Bienne shook his head. "So far they"re not suspicious."
Scott grunted and made his way to the door, the others at his heels.
Mendez said, "We"ll need another control ship."
"All right. The Arquebus. Commander, take over here. Cinc Mendez--" A flitterboat took them to the Arquebus, which was still in good fighting trim. The monitor Armageddon, Scott saw, was rolling helplessly in the trough of the waves. In accordance with the battle plan, the Doone ships were leading the h.e.l.ldivers toward the apparently capsized giant. The technicians had done a good job; the false keel looked shockingly convincing.
Aboard the Arquel1us, Scott took over, giving Mendez the auxiliary control for his substrafers. The Cinc beamed at Scott over his shoulder.
"Wait till that monitor opens up, captain."
"Yeah . . . we"re in bad shape, though."
Neither man mentioned the incident that was in both their minds. It was tacitly forgotten--the only thing to do now.
Guns were still bellowing. The h.e.l.ldivers were pouring their fire into the Doone formation, and they were winning. Scott scowled at the screens. If he waited too long, it would be just too bad.
Presently he put a beam on the Armageddon. She was in a beautiful position now, midway between two of the h.e.l.ldivers" largest battleships.
"Unmask. Open fire."
Firing ports opened on the monitor. The sea t.i.tan"s huge guns snouted into view. Almost simultaneously they blasted, the thunder drowning out the noise of the lighter guns.
"All Doone ships attack," Scott said. "Plan R-7."
This was it. This was it!
The Doones raced in to the kill. Blasting, bellowing, shouting, the guns tried to make themselves heard above the roaring of the monitor.
They could not succeed, but that savage, invincible onslaught won the battle.
It was nearly impossible to maneuver a monitor into battle formation, but, once that was accomplished, the only thing that could stop the monster was atomic power.
But the h.e.l.ldivers fought on, trying strategic formation. They could not succeed. The big battlewagons could not get out of range of the Armageddon"s guns. And that meant Cinc Flynn"s face showed on the screen.
"Capitulation, sir. Cease firing."
Scott gave orders. The roar of the guns died into humming, incredible silence.
"You gave us a great battle, cinc."
"Thanks. So did you. Your strategy with the monitor was excellent."
So--that was that. Scott felt something go limp inside of him.
Flynn"s routine words were meaningless; Scott was drained of the vital excitement that had kept him going till now.
The rest was pure formula.
Token depth charges would be dropped over Virginia Keep. They would not harm the Dome, but they were the rule. There would be the ransom, paid always by the Keep which backed the losing side. A supply of korium, or its negotiable equivalent. The Doone treasury would be swelled. Part of the money would go into replacements and new keels.
The life of the forts would go on.
Alone at the rail of the Arque7us, heading for Virginia Keep, Scott watched slow darkness change the clouds from pearl to gray, and then to invisibility. He was alone in the night. The wash of waves came up to him softly as the Arque1us rushed to her destination, three hundred miles away.
Warm yellow lights gleamed from ports behind him, but he did not turn. This, he thought, was like the cloud-wrapped Olympus in Montana Keep, where he had promised Ilene--many things.
Yet there was a difference. In an Olympus a man was like a G.o.d, shut away completely from the living world. Here, in the unbroken dark, there was no sense of alienage. Nothing could be seen--Venus has no moon, and the clouds hid the stars. And the seas are not phosph.o.r.escent.
Beneath these waters stand the Keeps, Scott thought. They hold the future.
Such battles as were fought today are fought so that the Keeps may not be destroyed.
And men will sacrifice. Men have always sacrificed, for a social organization or a military unit. Man must create his own ideal. "If there had been no G.o.d, man would have created Him."
Bienne had sacrificed today, in a queer, twisted way of loyalty to his fetish. Yet Bienne still hated him, Scott knew.
The Doones meant nothing. Their idea was a false one. Yet, because men were faithful to that ideal, civilization would rise again from the guarded Keeps. A civilization that would forget its doomed guardians, the watchers of the seas of Venus, the Free Companions yelling their mad, futile battle cry as they drove on--as this ship was driving--into a night that would have no dawn.
Jeana.
It was no such simple choice. It was, in fact, no real choice at all.
For Scott knew, very definitely, that he could never, as long as he lived, believe wholeheartedly in the Free Companions. Always a sardonic devil deep within him would be laughing in bitter self-mockery.
The whisper of the waves drifted up.
It wasn"t sensible. It was sentimental, crazy, stupid, sloppy thinking.
But Scott knew, now, that he wasn"t going back to Ilene.
He was a fool.
But he was a soldier.
First Published: 1944
INVARIANT
by John Pierce
YOU KNOW THE GENERAL FACTs CONCERNING HOMER GREEN, SO I DON"T need to describe him or his surroundings. I knew as much and more, yet it was an odd sensation, which you don"t get through reading, actually to dress in that primitive fashion, to go among strange surroundings, and to see him.
The house is no more odd than the pictures. Hemmed in by other twentieth century buildings, it must be indistinguishable from the original structure and its surroundings. To enter it, to tread on rugs, to see chairs covered in cloth with a nap, to see instruments for smoking, to see and hear a primitive radio, even though operating really from a variety of authentic transcriptions, and above all to see an open fire; all this gave me a sense of unreality, prepared though I was. Green sat by the fire in a chair, as we almost invariably find him, with a dog at his feet. He is perhaps the most valuable man in the world, I thought. But I could not shake off the sense of unreality concerning the substantial surroundings. He, too, seemed unreal, and I pitied him.
The sense of unreality continued through the form of self-introduction.
How many have there been? I could, of course, examine the records.
"I"m Carew, from the Inst.i.tute," I said. "We haven"t met before, but they told me you"d be glad to see me."
Green rose and extended his hand. I took it obediently, making the unfamiliar gesture.
"Glad to see you," he said. "I"ve been dozing here. It"s a little of a shock, the treatment, and I thought I"d rest a few days. I hope it"s really permanent.
"Won"t you sit down?" he added.
We seated ourselves before the fire. The dog, which had risen, lay down, pressed against his master"s feet.
"I suppose you want to test my reactions?" Green asked.
"Later," I replied. "There"s no hurry. And it"s so very comfortable here."
Green was easily distracted. He relaxed, staring at the fire. This was an opportunity, and I spoke in a somewhat purposeful voice.
"It seems more a time for politics, here," I said. "What the Swede intends, and what the French--"
"Drench our thoughts in mirth--" Green replied.
I had thought from the records the quotation would have some effect.
"But one doesn"t leave politics to drench his thoughts in mirth," he continued. "One studies them--" I won"t go into the conversation.
You"ve seen it in Appendix A of my thesis, "An Aspect of Twentieth Century Politics and Speech." It was brief, as you know. I had been very lucky to get to see Green. I was more lucky to hit on the right thread directly. Somehow, it had never occurred to me before that twentieth century politicians had meant, or had thought that they meant, what they said; that indeed, they had in their own minds attached a sense of meaning or relevancy to what seem to us meaningless or irrelevant phrases. It"s hard to explain so foreign an idea; perhaps an example would help.
For instance, would you believe that a man accused of making a certain statement would seriously reply, "I"m not in the habit of making such statements?" Would you believe that this might even mean that he had not made the statement? Or would you further believe that even if he had made the statement, this would seem to him to cla.s.sify it as some sort of special instance, and his reply as not truly evasive? I think these conjectures plausible, that is, when I struggle to immerse myself in the twentieth century. But I would never have dreamed them before talking with Green. How truly invaluable the man is!
I have said that the conversation recorded in Appendix A is very short.
There was no need to continue along political lines after I had grasped the basic idea. Twentieth century records are much more complete than Green"s memory, and that itself has been thoroughly catalogued. It is not the dry bones of information, but the personal contact, the infinite variation in combinations, the stimulation of the warm human touch, that are helpful and suggestive.
So I was with Green, and most of a morning was still before me. You know that he is given meal times free, and only one appointment between meals, so that there will be no overlapping. I was grateful to the man, and sympathetic, and I was somewhat upset in his presence. I wanted to talk to him of the thing nearest his heart. There was no reason I shouldn"t. I"ve recorded the rest of the conversation, but not published it. It"s not new.
Perhaps it is trivial, but it means a great deal to me. Maybe it"s only my very personal memory of it. But I thought you might like to know.
"What led to your discovery?" I asked him.
"Salamanders," he replied without hesitation. "Salamanders."
The account I got of his perfect regeneration experiments was, of course, the published story. How many thousands of times has it been told? Yet, I swear I detected variations from the records. How nearly infinite the possible combinations are! But the chief points came in the usual order.
How the regeneration of limbs in salamanders led to the idea of perfect regeneration of human parts. How, say, a cut heals, leaving not a scar, but a perfect replica of the damaged tissue. How in normal metabolism tissue can be replaced not imperfectly, as in an aging organism, but perfectly, indefinitely. You"ve seen it in animals, in compulsory biology. The chick whose metabolism replaces its tissues, but always in an exact, invariant form, never changing. It"s disturbing to think of it in a man. Green looked so young, as young as I. Since the twentieth centuryWhen Green had concluded his description, including that of his own inoculation in the evening, he ventured to prophesy.
"I feel confident," he said, "that it will work, indefinitely."
"It does work, Dr. Green," I a.s.sured him. "Indefinitely."
"We mustn"t be premature," he said. "After all, a short time--"
"Do you recall the date, Dr. Green?" I asked.
"September 11th," he said. "1943, if you want that, too."
"Dr. Green, today is August 4, 2I70," I told him earnestly.
"Look here," Green said. "If it were, I wouldn"t be here dressed this way, and you wouldn"t be there dressed that way."
The impa.s.se could have continued indefinitely. I took my communicator from my pocket and showed it to him. He watched with growing wonder and delight as I demonstrated, finally with projection, binaural and stereo. Not simple, but exactly the sort of electronic development which a man of Green"s era a.s.sociated with the future. Green seemed to have lost all thought of the conversation which had led to my production of the communicator.
"Dr. Green," I said, "the year is 2170. This is the twenty-second century."
He looked at me baffled, but this time not with disbelief. A strange sort of terror was spread over his features.
"An accident?" he asked. "My memory?"
"There has been no accident," I said. "Your memory is intact, as far as it goes. Listen to me. Concentrate."
Then I told him, simply and briefly, so that his thought processes would not lag. As I spoke to him he stared at me apprehensively, his mind apparently racing. This is what I said: "Your experiment succeeded, beyond anything you had reason to hope.
Your tissues took on the ability to reform themselves in exactly the same pattern year after year. Their form became invariant.
"Photographs and careful measurements show this, from year to year, yes, from century to century. You are just as you were over two hundred years ago.
"Your life has not been devoid of accident. Minor, even major, wounds have left no trace in healing. Your tissues are invariant.