It is, as you say, to object to discussion of the cause of the evils he professes to eradicate.
"Yours obligedly,
"G. J. HOLYOAKE."
"County Gaol, Gloucester, August 18th, 1842.
"R. Carlile, Esq., Cheltenham.
"My Dear Sir,--I was much obliged by your kind letter, and although I must regard your remarks rather as those of a friend than of a critic, yet am I much gratified that my exertions should have met your approval.
Your good opinion will compensate me for the unpleasantness of my condition. I shall take care of my health as far as is possible. I learn from Seymour that you have sent him a communication for the _Oracle_ [Holyoake"s paper]. Your name will do the cause infinite service independently of what you will write. "With many thanks, etc., etc.,
"G. J. HOLYOAKE."
"Gloucester Gaol, October 22nd, 1842.
"My Dear Sir,--I am certainly gratified that you should have taken the trouble to write me so long a letter. The sovereign you so kindly caused to be remitted, duly came to hand by seven o"clock on Monday morning, and at the same time and hour my eldest little girl died, so that it arrived opportunely to a.s.sist in defraying the expenses of the melancholy obsequies of the grave.
"You say the word Christian originally meant wisdom and goodness. What it originally meant you can better say than I can; certainly it means nothing of the kind now, therefore I have acquired a distaste for the t.i.tle. I do not cavalierly adopt that of "Atheist", names little entice me, and in this case, you will archly rejoin, "there are no principles to allure." What you say about the prices of lectures, working-out reforms by poor men"s instrumentality, etc., interests me very much, and will occupy my consideration. Your remarks concerning scarcity of subscribers for my support little surprises me. I did not expect what I have received. Enquiring into that subject prior to my imprisonment, or rather to my incurring it, did not present itself. It shows little knowledge of the world, and perhaps insufficient attention to the wants of those depending upon me. Busy with what I conceived to be an important principle, other things had few attractions. Shall I find at last that principles are to be talked of and the world to be lived in?... Should be gratified if you would present my regards to Mrs.
Carlile [Isis].
"Yours truly,
"G. J. HOLYOAKE."
THE FALLEN HERO.
What though the head be weary, What though the hand be tired, The rest of a sweet contentment, Shall be by peace inspired.
What though the hero falleth, In the heat of the battle"s strife, If he naileth the waving colors, To the mast of a n.o.ble life.
If he breast and conquer the tyrant, Who our cherished rights a.s.sail, Shall he sink in the sea"s oblivion, Or pa.s.s beyond memory"s pale?
Not so, for his deeds we"ll emblazon, On the "scutcheon of Liberty bright As one who feared not to be foremost In hope"s forlorn Battle of Right.
And longer still longer and ever Will the roll of his virtues unfold, How he fought on, in lonely endeavor, Like the "Lion Heart Richard" of old.
And the eyes of the maiden will moisten, And the spirit of youth grow bold, As they learn of his love and his daring, Wherever his story is told.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX I. TRIAL OF MR. CARLILE
FOR THE PUBLICATION OF PAINE"S "AGE OF REASON".
The first days" defence was devoted to the reading of the "Age of Reason", the book for which Carlile was prosecuted. He read and commented on it all as he went along, and in this way made the immense concourse of people acquainted with the arguments there used. It is almost unnecessary to say that the sale of the book after the publication of the trial reports was something enormous. Many thousands of Englishmen who never thought on such subjects before dated their awakening of mind from this event. The real "pa.s.sage of arms" between Carlile and his accusers commenced on the second day.
COURT OF KING"S BENCH, GUILDHALL. From the "British Press", October 14th, 1819.
SECOND DAY.--Wednesday, October 13TH, 1819.
The interest excited by this trial continues unabated. A considerable concourse of people a.s.sembled before the great entrance at Guildhall, between eight and nine o"clock. To the gentlemen connected with the public Press every facility was afforded by the secondary, Mr.
Collenridge, and by Mr. Temple, the hall-keeper. The former admitted them into the body of the Court at an early hour, where they were accommodated with seats at the table. At a quarter before nine o"clock, the Court was regularly opened; and in a few minutes it was completely filled.
The Counsel for the prosecution, the Attorney and Solicitor General, Mr.
Littledale, and Mr. Campbell, took their seats soon after.
At a quarter after nine, Mr. Carlile entered the Courts He was preceded by two friends, who placed on the table an immense pyramid of books, in folio, quarto, octavo, and duodecimo.
At twenty minutes before ten, the jury having arrived, and having answered to their names, the cause of the King v. Carlile was called, the Chief Justice having previously taken his seat.
After a short pause, Mr. Carlile rose, and proceeded with his defence.
He said he had endeavored yesterday, by going through the whole of three parts of "The Age of Reason", to show to the jury that it did not contain one immoral sentiment or expression; but that any expressions, which were at all questionable in that work, were quoted from other publications. He endeavored, satisfactorily, he hoped, to prove that Paine"s object was to rescue the character of the Almighty from the account which was given of him in those books called "The Bible". He (Mr. Carlile) was anxious as far as possible to make the writings of Paine justify the composition, and the doctrines laid down by him in "The Age of Reason ". In order to do this, he would read a discourse p.r.o.nounced by Mr. Paine before the Society of Theophilanthropists, at Paris. That discourse contained a complete refutation of the statement that Paine was an Atheist. His character was in fact most remote from Atheism. He had indeed proved that he entertained a more correct idea of the character of the Almighty than was to be found in the Bible. Mr.
Carlile then proceeded to read the "Discourse", which is printed along with Paine"s "Theological Tracts". [The whole _gist_ of this production may be collected from a single paragraph, "The _un verse_", says the author, "is the Bible of a true Theophilanthropist; it is there that he reads of G.o.d; it is there that the proofs of his existence are to be sought and to be found. As to written or printed books, by whatever name they are called, they are the work of man"s hands, and carry no evidence in themselves that G.o.d is the author of any of them. It must be in something that man could not make that we must seek evidence for our belief, and that _something is the universe_--the true Bible--the inimitable word of G.o.d." In going over this tract, the whole of which he read, Mr. Carlile made no observation, except in one place, where the text set forth "that persecution had ceased". "Happy", said he, "would it be for me, if persecution had indeed-ceased!" Having concluded the tract, he said this little discourse had been published by some persons, who were so convinced that it was a perfect refutation of Atheism that they sent it into the world with Mr. Paine"s name to it. Having gone through so much of "The Age of Reason" as, at present, was necessary for his purpose, he would lay it aside; but he would in a future stage of the trial again to refer to it, for the purpose of supporting certain principles connected with his defence. He would now proceed to examine the book of which Mr. Paine"s work was an investigation. But before he went further, he must observe that the Bible was not the only book supposed to be a revelation from G.o.d. The Koran, for instance, was supposed, by millions of people, to be of divine origin.
The Attorney-General here interrupted the defendant. He submitted that he could not proceed further with such a line of defence. The expression of the defendant was, that he would go into an examination of the book of which Paine"s work was an investigation. He contended that he could not go into such an examination. The question was whether, according to the law of the country, the defendant had been guilty of the offence with which he was charged? It was neither competent for his lordship nor the gentlemen of the jury to go into such an examination as the defendant proposed--an examination of the truth of the Scriptures.
The Chief Justice: You hear the objection taken by the Attorney-General?
Mr. Carlile: Yes, my lord. The Attorney-General states that it is not competent for your lordship or the jury to go into such an examination as I propose; but he has quite forgotten that it is necessary to my defence. I have been brought into this Court to answer charges, and must avail myself of every means of defence. The Attorney-General has stated that I have published a work in which the Scriptures are spoken of as containing obscene stories, voluptuous debaucheries, cruel and tortuous executions, inconsistencies, and contradictions. Now I feel it to be my duty to justify what has been published by appealing to the Bible, which contains them.
The Attorney-General: I did not at all forget that the defendant is very deeply interested in the result of this trial; but this, like all other causes, must be proceeded in according to the rules of law. And, looking to those rules, it is not competent for a defendant, charged with this offence, to go into such an investigation. I beg to call your lordship"s attention to the trial of an individual charged with a similar offence--I mean Williams. When he was brought up to the Court of King"s Bench to receive judgment, Lord Kenyon said, that "having re-considered what had been done during the trial, he took blame to himself for having listened even to the arguments used on that occasion". In that case of the King and Williams, the whole Court expressed their opinion that they could not allow anything to be said against the established religion of the country--the Christian religion. That is the proposition for which I contend. I trust it will receive the sanction of your lordship, and that the defendant will not be suffered to promulgate blasphemous doctrines as part of his defence.
The Chief Justice: The charge against the defendant on this occasion is the publication of a book calumniating and reviling the Holy Scriptures.
It is not that, in any book published by him the doctrines of revealed religion were discussed with that respect, temper, and moderation which ought to be applied to the discussion of every subject, human or divine, public or private. It can be no defence of such a charge that the party against whom it is preferred should reiterate, in his address to the jury, the same sort of calumny as that which is contained in the book, for the publication of which he has been called on to answer; and I should very ill discharge my duty, as a Judge or a Christian, if I suffered this Court to be made a theatre for uttering calumny against the religion of the country. Any thing the defendant can advance to the jury, to explain away what is contained in the book, and to show that its tendency is proper, I am most ready to hear. I wish to give to this defendant, as well as to every other person, an opportunity to defend himself fully and fairly, according to the established law of the land.
But I am not to suffer the law of the land to be calumniated by such a defence. I cannot permit it.
Mr. Carlile: The only object I have in view is to clear the book, ent.i.tled "The Age of Reason", from the charge make against it, and to justify the observations which it contains on the Old and New Testament.
I presume that book cannot be founded on any law of this country. Your lordship has spoken of the law of the land as applicable to this case. I should like to have that law pointed out.
The Chief Justice: I state that the Christian religion is a part of the law of the land--and the most important part--because it is that on which all its inst.i.tutions are founded, and to which they all refer. I speak of the Christian religion generally. There is one particular mode of faith amongst those who follow the Christian religion which const.i.tutes what is called the Established Church; the law of England, however, admits every other cla.s.s of Christians to adhere to their religious worship, according to their own particular faith, tenets, and creed; but it permits to no man the right to impugn the whole sum and substance of the Christian religion, and to treat the book which contains its doctrines as a ma.s.s of lies and falsehoods. I cannot permit such a defence.
Mr. Carlile: I cannot submit to have my course of defence marked out for me.
The Chief Justice: Whether you submit to it or no, I have stated the law, as was my duty; and it is not for a man, accused of having infringed the law, to rise in this place and declare what is or what is not law. I speak in the hearing of gentlemen who have often attended in this Court, and such of them that know me will answer for the truth of what I a.s.sert when I say that, though I lay down the law to them, as I conceive it to be, according to my judgment, yet, when a question of fact arises, I leave it in the fullest manner to their consideration.
But I never will suffer the Holy Scriptures to be examined in this Court for the purpose of calumniating and reviling them.
Mr. Carlile: I appeal to your lordship, what proof have we that they are _divine?_
The Chief Justice: I will not answer such a question as that. You have not, I say, been brought here to answer for any work containing a fair and dispa.s.sionate consideration of the Christian religion; but for a publication reviling and calumniating the Scriptures. And calumnies and revilings, whatever the subject may be, are contrary to the law of the land. Is it to be supposed that the law, which affords protection to every individual, has not the power to protect itself? Is it not to protect those who, from their youth, from want of education or from weakness of mind, are not so deeply confirmed in their religious feelings as they ought to be, from being exposed to all those aberrations which, not the force of reason, but the influence of calumny, may occasion?
Mr. Carlile: I wish to arrive at the same end; but we take different ways of effecting it.