??e????? pa?a???????s??t?? s??tet???a?. Sec. 103. Here "the apostles" are not necessarily Matthew and John. Apocryphal gospels then current bore the name of apostles or their attendants,-of Peter, James, Nicodemus, Matthias, &c.
169 ?a? t? e?pe?? et???a???a? a?t?? ??t??? ?a? ?e???f?a? ?? t???
?p?????e?asa? a?t?? ?e?e?????? ?a? t??t?, et? t?? ?a?, ?. t. ?.
Dial. c.u.m Tryph., 106. Here the p.r.o.noun a?t?? probably refers to Peter. And the expression "his memoirs" can hardly mean Mark"s gospel, since Jerome is the first that calls it such.
_ 170 Dialogus_, part ii., p. 315, ed. Thirlby. Comp. on Justin, Tjeenk-Willink"s _Justinus Martyr in zijne Verhouding tot Paulus_.
_ 171 Apolog._ i. 97, ed. Thirlby.
_ 172 Hieronymi Prooem._ in _Epist. ad t.i.tum._
173 Comp. chap. xii., where ??afa? is applied to the apostolic epistles; a t.i.tle they did not receive so early as the age of Polycarp. Zahn himself admits this.
174 Chapter xiv. 2.
175 Chapter ii. 4.
176 See _Clementis Romani ad Corinthios quae disc.u.n.tur epistulae, ed. de Gebhardt et Harnack_, 2., sec. 10, Prolegomena.
_ 177 Legat. pro Christ._ II, 12.
_ 178 Ibid._ 33.
179 Chapter xviii.
_ 180 Ap._ Euseb. H. E., iv. 23.
_ 181 Ap_. Euseb. H. E., v. 1, p. 144, ed. Bright.
182 ?e??? ?????. _Ad Autolyc.u.m_, iii. 14, p. 1141, ed Migne.
_ 183 Ibid._, ii. 22.
184 Epist. 151, ad Algasiam.
185 See Overbeck"s _Studien zur Geschichte der alten Kirche, Abhandlung_ I., in which the date of the letter is brought down till after Constantine. Surely this is too late.
186 Davidson"s _Introduction to the Study of the New Testament_, vol.
ii. p. 508, &c.
187 t? e?a???????.
188 ? ?p?st????.
_ 189 Adves. Haeres._, iv. 20, 2.
_ 190 Stromateis_, ii. 6, p. 965, ed. Migne.
_ 191 Ibid._, iv. 17, p. 1312.
_ 192 Ibid._, i. 29, p. 928.
_ 193 De Oratione_, cap. 12.
_ 194 De Pudicitia_, cap. 10-20.
195 G. of St. Paul"s epistles, a MS. of the ninth century according to Tischendorf.
196 See Anger"s _Ueber den Laodicener Brief_, 1843.
_ 197 Fertur etiam ad Laudecences alia ad Alexandrinos Pauli nomine fincte ad hesem Marcionis el alia plura quae in Catholicam ecclesiam recepi non potest._ Perhaps a comma should be put after _nomine_, and _fincte_ joined to what follows, to the _alia plura_ said to be forged in the interest of Marcion.
_ 198 Quarti evangeliorum Johannis ex discipulis cohortantibus condiscipulis et episcopis suis dixit conjejunate mihi odie triduo el quid cuique fuerit revelatum alterutrum n.o.bis ennarremus eadem nocte revelatum Andreae ex apostolis ut recogniscentibus cunctis Johannis suo nomine cuncta discriberet._
199 It is printed and largely commented on by Credner in his _Geschichte des neutestamentlichen Kanon_ edited by Volkmar, p. 141, &c., and by Westcott _On the Canon_, Appendix C, p. 466, 2d edition. Many others have explained it; especially Hilgenfeld.
200 About A.D. 190.
_ 201 Euseb._ H. E. vi. 12.
202 Tischendorf edited the Pauline epistles from this MS. Lipsiae, 1852.
203 Died 254 A.D.
204 t? ?? t? d?a???? ???a, ??d?????a, ???????e?a.
205 In one place, however, he calls it _very useful and divinely inspired_. _Comment. in ep. ad Roman._, xvi. 14.
206 ???a.
207 Ap. Euseb, _Hist. Eccles._, vi. 25; iii. 25, ??t??e??e?a.
208 See Euseb. _H. E._ vi. 25. _Comment. in Malth._, iii. p. 463; _Ibid._, p. 814; _Comment. in ep. ad Roman._, iv. p. 683; _in Matth._, iii. p. 644; _Homil._ viii. _in Numb._, ii. p. 294; _Contra Cels._, i. 63, p. 378; _De Principiis praef._, i. p. 49. _Opp._, ed.
Delarue.
209 Died 340 A.D.
_ 210 Hist. Eccles._, iii. 25; also 31, 39; vi. 13, 14.
211 ???????e?a, ??d?????a, ??af??e?ta, ??a?t????ta.
212 ??t??e??e?a, ?????a d? t??? p??????, ?? p?e?sta?? ?????s?a??
ded??s?e???a, ???a.
213 ?t?pa p??t? ?a? d?sse?; pa?te??? ???a (iii. 31).
214 This last with the qualification e??e fa?e??. In another place he states that it was rejected by some, and therefore it is also along with the ??t??e??e?a or ???a.
215 ??t?.