[674] Long Island Water Supply Co. _v._ Brooklyn, 166 U.S. 685, 695 (1897).
[675] Hays _v._ Seattle, 251 U.S. 233, 238 (1920); Bailey _v._ Anderson, 326 U.S. 203, 205 (1945).
[676] The requirements of due process in tax and eminent domain proceedings are discussed in conjunction with the coverage of these topics. _See_ pp. 1056-1062, 1069.
[677] Hagar _v._ Reclamation Dist., 111 U.S. 701, 708 (1884); Hurtado _v._ California, 110 U.S. 516, 537 (1884).
[678] Brown _v._ New Jersey, 175 U.S. 172, 175 (1899); Hurtado _v._ California, 110 U.S. 516, 529 (1884); Twining _v._ New Jersey, 211 U.S.
78, 101 (1908); Anderson Nat. Bank _v._ Luckett, 321 U.S. 233, 244 (1944).
[679] Marchant _v._ Pennsylvania R. Co., 153 U.S. 380, 386 (1894).
[680] Ballard _v._ Hunter, 204 U.S. 241, 255 (1907); Palmer v. McMahon, 133 U.S. 660, 668 (1890).
[681] McMillen _v._ Anderson, 95 U.S. 37, 41 (1877).
[682] R.R. Commission _v._ Oil Co., 311 U.S. 570 (1941). _See also_ Railroad Commission _v._ Oil Co., 310 U.S. 573 (1940).
[683] Dreyer _v._ Illinois, 187 U.S. 71, 83-84 (1902).
[684] New York ex rel. Lieberman _v._ Van De Carr, 199 U.S. 552, 562 (1905).
[685] Ohio ex rel. Bryant _v._ Akron Metropolitan Park Dist, 281 U.S.
74, 79 (1930).
[686] Carfer _v._ Caldwell, 200 U.S. 293, 297 (1906).
[687] Scott _v._ McNeal, 154 U.S. 34, 46 (1894); Pennoyer _v._ Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 733 (1878).
[688] National Exchange Bank _v._ Wiley, 195 U.S. 257, 270 (1904); Iron Cliffs Co. _v._ Negaunee Iron Co., 197 U.S. 463, 471 (1905).
[689] Arndt _v._ Griggs, 134 U.S. 316, 321 (1890); Grannis _v._ Ordean, 234 U.S. 385 (1914); Pennington _v._ Fourth Nat. Bank, 243 U.S. 269, 271 (1917).
[690] Goodrich _v._ Ferris, 214 U.S. 71, 80 (1909).
[691] Pennington _v._ Fourth Nat. Bank, 243 U.S. 269, 271 (1917).
[692] The jurisdictional requirements for rendering a valid decree in divorce proceedings are considered under the full faith and credit clause, _supra_, pp. 662-670.
[693] Pennoyer _v._ Neff, 95 U.S. 714 (1878); Simon _v._ Southern R.
Co., 236 U.S. 115, 122 (1915); Grannis _v._ Ordean, 234 U.S. 385, 392, 394 (1914).
[694] Louisville & N.R. Co. _v._ Schmidt, 177 U.S. 230 (1900); McDonald _v._ Mabee, 243 U.S. 90, 91, (1917). _See also_ Adam _v._ Saenger, 303 U.S. 59 (1938).
[695] Rees _v._ Watertown, 19 Wall. 107 (1874); Coe _v._ Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U.S. 413, 423 (1915); Griffin _v._ Griffin, 327 U.S. 220 (1946).
[696] Sugg _v._ Thornton, 132 U.S. 524 (1889).
[697] Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills _v._ Menefee, 237 U.S. 189, 193 (1915); Hess _v._ Pawloski, 274 U.S. 352, 355 (1927). _See also_ Harkness _v._ Hyde, 98 U.S. 476 (1879); Wilson _v._ Seligman, 144 U.S.
41 (1892).
[698] Milliken _v._ Meyer, 311 U.S. 457, 462-464 (1940).
[699] McDonald _v._ Mabee, 243 U.S. 90, 92 (1917).
[700] Thus, in an older decision rendered in 1919, the Court held that whereas "States could exclude foreign corporations * * *, and therefore establish * * * [appointment of such an agent] as a condition to letting them in," they had no power to exclude individuals; and as a consequence, a statute was ineffective which treated nonresident partners, by virtue of their having done business therein, as having consented to be bound by service of process on a person who was their employee when the transaction sued on arose but was not their agent at the time of service.--Flexner _v._ Farson, 248. U.S. 289, 293 (1919).
Because it might be construed to negative extension to nonresidents, other than motorists, of the statutory device upheld in Hess _v._ Pawloski, the doctrine of Flexner _v._ Farson, "that the mere transaction of business in a State by a nonresident natural person does not imply consent to be bound by the process of its courts," was recently condemned as inadequate "to cope with the increasing problem of practical responsibility of hazardous business conducted in absentia * *
*"--Sugg _v._ Hendrix, 142 F. (2d) 740, 742 (1944).
[701] Hess _v._ Pawloski, 274 U.S. 352 (1927); Wuchter _v._ Pizzutti, 276 U.S. 13, 20, 24 (1928).
[702] 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945).
[703] 326 U.S. 310.
[704] Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co. _v._ McKibbin, 243 U.S. 264, 265 (1917).
[705] In a very few cases, "continuous operations within a State were thought to be so substantial and of such a nature as to justify suits against [a foreign corporation] on causes of action arising from dealings entirely distinct from those" operations.--_See_ St. Louis S.W.R. Co. _v._ Alexander, 227 U.S. 218 (1913); Missouri, K. & T.R. Co.
_v._ Reynolds, 255 U.S. 565 (1921).
[706] Old Wayne Life a.s.sn. _v._ McDonough, 204 U.S. 8, 21 (1907).
[707] Simon _v._ Southern R. Co., 236 U.S. 115, 129-130 (1915).--In neither this case, nor the preceding decision were the defendant corporations notified of the pendency of the action, service having been made only on the Insurance Commissioner or the Secretary of State.
[708] Green _v._ Chicago, B. & Q.R. Co., 205 U.S. 530 (1907). _See also_ Davis _v._ Farmers Co-operative Co., 262 U.S. 312, 317 (1923).
[709] Pennsylvania F. Ins. Co. _v._ Gold Issue Min. & M. Co., 243 U.S.
93, 95-96 (1917).
[710] Rosenberg Bros. & Co. _v._ Curtis Brown Co., 260 U.S. 516, 517 (1923).
[711] Goldey _v._ Morning News, 156 U.S. 518 (1895).
[712] Conley _v._ Mathieson Alkali Works, 190 U.S. 406 (1903).
[713] Riverside Mills _v._ Menefee, 237 U.S. 189, 195 (1915).
[714] Mutual Life Insurance Co. _v._ Spratley, 172 U.S. 602 (1899).
[715] St. Clair _v._ c.o.x, 106 U.S. 350, 356 (1882). _See_ St. Louis S.W.R. Co. _v._ Alexander, 227 U.S. 218 (1913).
[716] Mutual Reserve &c. a.s.sn. _v._ Phelps, 190 U.S. 147, 156 (1903).
[717] Washington _v._ Superior Court, 289 U.S. 361, 365 (1933).
[718] 326 U.S. 310, 317-320 (1945).