[1060] State Tax Comrs. _v._ Jackson, 283 U.S. 527, 537 (1931).
[1061] Colgate _v._ Harvey, 296 U.S. 404, 422 (1935).
[1062] Darnell _v._ Indiana, 226 U.S. 390, 398 (1912); Farmers & M. Sav.
Bank _v._ Minnesota, 232 U.S. 516, 531 (1914).
[1063] Morf _v._ Bingaman, 298 U.S. 407, 413 (1936).
[1064] Baltic Min. Co. _v._ Ma.s.sachusetts, 231 U.S. 68, 88 (1913). _See also_ Cheney Bros. Co. _v._ Ma.s.sachusetts, 246 U.S. 147, 157 (1918).
[1065] Fire a.s.so. of Philadelphia _v._ New York, 119 U.S. 110, 119 (1886).
[1066] Hanover F. Ins. Co. _v._ Harding, 272 U.S. 494, 511 (1926).
[1067] Southern R. Co. _v._ Greene, 216 U.S. 400, 418 (1910).
[1068] Concordia F. Ins. Co. _v._ Illinois, 292 U.S. 535 (1934).
[1069] Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co. _v._ Read, 325 U.S. 673 (1945).
[1070] Wheeling Steel Corp. _v._ Glander, 337 U.S. 562, 571, 572 (1949).
[1071] Royster Guano Co. _v._ Virginia, 253 U.S. 412 (1920).
[1072] Shaffer _v._ Carter, 252 U.S. 37, 56, 57 (1920); Travis _v._ Yale & T. Mfg. Co., 252 U.S. 60, 75, 76 (1920).
[1073] Welch _v._ Henry, 305 U.S. 134 (1938).
[1074] Magoun _v._ Illinois Trust & Sav. Bank, 170 U.S. 283, 288, 300 (1898).
[1075] Billings _v._ Illinois, 188 U.S. 97 (1903).
[1076] Campbell _v._ California, 200 U.S. 87 (1906).
[1077] Salomon _v._ State Tax Commission, 278 U.S. 484 (1929).
[1078] Board of Education _v._ Illinois, 203 U.S. 553 (1906).
[1079] Maxwell _v._ Bugbee, 250 U.S. 525 (1919).
[1080] Continental Baking Co. _v._ Woodring, 286 U.S. 352 (1932).
[1081] Dixie Ohio Express Co. _v._ State Revenue Commission, 306 U.S.
72, 78 (1939).
[1082] Alward _v._ Johnson, 282 U.S. 509 (1931).
[1083] Bekins Van Lines _v._ Riley, 280 U.S. 80 (1929).
[1084] Morf _v._ Bingaman, 298 U.S. 407 (1936).
[1085] Clark _v._ Paul Gray, Inc., 306 U.S. 583 (1939).
[1086] Carley & Hamilton _v._ Snook, 281 U.S. 66 (1930).
[1087] Aero Mayflower Transit Co. _v._ Georgia Pub. Serv. Commission, 295 U.S. 285 (1935).
[1088] Breedlove _v._ Suttles, 302 U.S. 277 (1937).
[1089] Royster Guano Co. _v._ Virginia, 253 U.S. 412, 415 (1920).
[1090] Missouri _v._ Dockery, 191 U.S. 165 (1903).
[1091] Kentucky Union Co. _v._ Kentucky, 219 U.S. 140, 161 (1911).
[1092] Sunday Lake Iron Co. _v._ Wakefield Twp., 247 U.S. 350 (1918); Raymond _v._ Chicago Union Traction Co., 207 U.S. 20, 35, 37 (1907).
[1093] Coulter _v._ Louisville & N.R. Co., 196 U.S. 599 (1905). _See also_ Chicago, B. & Q.R. Co. _v._ Babc.o.c.k, 204 U.S. 585 (1907).
[1094] Charleston a.s.sn. _v._ Alderson, 324 U.S. 182 (1945). Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. _v._ Browning, 310 U.S. 362 (1940).
[1095] Sioux City Bridge Co. _v._ Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441, 446 (1923).
[1096] Hillsborough _v._ Cromwell, 326 U.S. 620, 623 (1946).
[1097] St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co. _v._ Middlekamp, 256 U.S. 226, 230 (1921).
[1098] Memphis & C.R. Co. _v._ Pace, 282 U.S. 241 (1931).
[1099] Kansas City Southern R. Co. _v._ Road Improv. Dist., 256 U.S. 658 (1921); Thomas _v._ Kansas City Southern R. Co., 261 U.S. 481 (1923).
[1100] Road Improv. Dist. _v._ Missouri P.R. Co., 274 U.S. 188 (1927).
[1101] Branson _v._ Bush, 251 U.S. 182 (1919).
[1102] Columbus & G.R. Co. _v._ Miller, 283 U.S. 96 (1931).
[1103] Buck _v._ Bell, 274 U.S. 200, 208 (1927).
[1104] Cla.s.sifications under police regulations have been held valid in the following situations:
_Advertising:_ discrimination between billboard and newspaper advertising of cigarettes, Packer Corp. _v._ Utah, 285 U.S. 105 (1932); prohibition of advertising signs on motor vehicles, except when used in the usual business of the owner, and not used mainly for advertising, Fifth Ave. Coach Co. _v._ New York, 221 U.S. 467 (1911); prohibition of advertising on motor vehicles except notices or advertising of products of the owner, Railway Express Inc. _v._ New York, 336 U.S. 106 (1949); prohibition against sale of articles on which there is a representation of the flag for advertising purposes, except newspapers, periodicals and books; Halter _v._ Nebraska, 205 U.S. 34 (1907).
_Amus.e.m.e.nt:_ prohibition against keeping billiard halls for hire, except in case of hotels having twenty-five or more rooms for use of regular guests. Murphy _v._ California, 225 U.S. 623 (1912).
_Barber shops:_ a law forbidding Sunday labor except works of necessity or charity, and specifically forbidding the keeping open of barber shops. Pet.i.t _v._ Minnesota, 177 U.S. 164 (1900).
_Cattle:_ a cla.s.sification of sheep, as distinguished from cattle, in a regulation restricting the use of public lands for grazing. Bacon _v._ Walker, 204 U.S. 311 (1907). _See also_ Omaechevarria _v._ Idaho, 246 U.S. 343 (1918).