[337] Northwestern Nat. L. Ins. Co. _v._ Riggs, 203 U.S. 243 (1906).
[338] Whitfield ex rel. Hadley _v._ Aetna L. Ins. Co., 205 U.S. 489 (1907).
[339] Polk _v._ Mutual Reserve Fund Life a.s.sociation, 207 U.S. 310 (1907).
[340] Neblett _v._ Carpenter, 305 U.S. 297 (1938).
[341] Brazee _v._ Michigan, 241 U.S. 340 (1916).--With four Justices dissenting, the Court, in Adams _v._ Tanner, 244 U.S. 590 (1917), "struck down a State law absolutely prohibiting maintenance of private employment agencies." Commenting on the "const.i.tutional philosophy"
thereof in Lincoln Union _v._ Northwestern Co., 335 U.S. 525, 535 (1949), Justice Black stated that Olsen _v._ Nebraska, 313 U.S. 236 (1941), (_see_ p. 997) "clearly undermined Adams _v._ Tanner."
[342] Liggett (Louis K.) Co. _v._ Baldridge, 278 U.S. 105 (1928).
[343] McNaughton _v._ Johnson, 242 U.S. 344, 349 (1917). _See also_ Dent _v._ West Virginia, 129 U.S. 114 (1889); Hawker _v._ New York, 170 U.S.
189 (1898); Reetz _v._ Michigan, 188 U.S. 505 (1903); Watson _v._ Maryland, 218 U.S. 173 (1910).
[344] Collins _v._ Texas, 223 U.S. 288 (1912); Hayman _v._ Galveston, 273 U.S. 414 (1927).
[345] Semler _v._ Oregon State Dental Examiners, 294 U.S. 608, 611 (1935). _See also_ Douglas _v._ n.o.ble, 261 U.S. 165 (1923); Graves _v._ Minnesota, 272 U.S. 425, 427 (1926).
[346] Olsen _v._ Smith, 195 U.S. 332 (1904).
[347] Nashville, C. &. St. L.R. Co. _v._ Alabama, 128 U.S. 96 (1888).
[348] Smith _v._ Texas, 233 U.S. 630 (1914).
[349] Western Turf a.s.so. _v._ Greenberg, 204 U.S. 359 (1907).
[350] Cargill (W.W.) Co. _v._ Minnesota ex rel. Railroad & W.
Commission, 180 U.S. 452 (1901).
[351] Lehon _v._ Atlanta, 242 U.S. 53 (1916).
[352] Gundling _v._ Chicago, 177 U.S. 183, 185 (1900).
[353] Bourjois, Inc. _v._ Chapman, 301 U.S. 183 (1937).
[354] Weller _v._ New York, 268 U.S. 319 (1925).
[355] Packer Corp. _v._ Utah, 285 U.S. 105 (1932).
[356] Halter _v._ Nebraska, 205 U.S. 34 (1907).
[357] McCloskey _v._ Tobin, 252 U.S. 107 (1920).
[358] Natal _v._ Louisiana, 139 U.S. 621 (1891).
[359] Murphy _v._ California, 225 U.S. 623 (1912).
[360] Rosenthal _v._ New York, 226 U.S. 260 (1912).
[361] Thompson _v._ Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp., 300 U.S. 55, 76-77 (1937), citing Ohio Oil Co. _v._ Indiana (No. 1), 177 U.S. 100 (1900); Lindsley _v._ Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U.S. 61 (1911); Oklahoma _v._ Kansas Natural Gas Co., 221 U.S. 229 (1911).
[362] Champlin Ref. Co. _v._ Corporation Commission, 286 U.S. 210 (1932).
[363] Railroad Commission _v._ Oil Co., 310 U.S. 573 (1940). _See also_ R.R. Commission _v._ Oil Co., 311 U.S. 570 (1941); R.R. Commission _v._ Humble Oil & Refining Co., 311 U.S. 578 (1941).
[364] Thompson _v._ Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp., 300 U.S. 55 (1937).
[365] Cities Service Co. _v._ Peerless Co., 340 U.S. 179 (1950); Phillips Petroleum Co. _v._ Oklahoma, ibid., 190 (1950).
[366] Walls _v._ Midland Carbon Co., 254 U.S. 300 (1920). _See also_ Henderson Co. _v._ Thompson, 300 U.S. 258 (1937).
[367] Bandini Petroleum Co. _v._ Superior Ct., 284 U.S. 8 (1931).
[368] Gant _v._ Oklahoma City, 289 U.S. 98 (1933).
[369] Pennsylvania Coal Co. _v._ Mahon, 260 U.S. 393 (1922).
[370] Hudson County Water Co. _v._ McCarter, 209 U.S. 349, 356-357 (1908).
[371] Miller _v._ Schoene, 276 U.S. 272, 277, 279 (1928).
[372] Sligh _v._ Kirkwood, 237 U.S. 52 (1915).
[373] Bayside Fish Flour Co. _v._ Gentry, 297 U.S. 422, 426 (1936).
[374] Manchester _v._ Ma.s.sachusetts, 139 U.S. 240 (1891); Geer _v._ Connecticut, 161 U.S. 519 (1896).
[375] Miller _v._ McLaughlin, 281 U.S. 261, 264 (1930).
[376] Bayside Fish Flour Co. _v._ Gentry, 297 U.S. 422 (1936).
[377] Geer _v._ Connecticut, 161 U.S. 519 (1896).
[378] Silz _v._ Hesterberg, 211 U.S. 31 (1908).
[379] Reinman _v._ Little Rock, 237 U.S. 171 (1915).
[380] Hadacheck _v._ Sebastian, 239 U.S. 394 (1915).
[381] Fischer _v._ St. Louis, 194 U.S. 361 (1904).
[382] Reinman _v._ Little Rock, 237 U.S. 171 (1915).
[383] Bacon _v._ Walker, 204 U.S. 311 (1907).
[384] Northwestern Laundry Co. _v._ Des Moines, 239 U.S. 486 (1916). For a case embracing a rather special set of facts, _see_ Dobbins _v._ Los Angeles, 195 U.S. 223 (1904).