CHAPTER VI. THE SAYBROOK PLATFORM.
57, Saybrook Platform.
58, L. Bacon, Thirteen Historical Discourses, pp. 190, 191.
59, S. Stoddard, Inst.i.tuted Churches, p. 29.
60, Trumbull, Hist, of Connecticut, i, 406; T. Clap, Hist, of Yale College, p. 30.
61, Trumbull, Hist, of Connecticut, i, 406.
62, L. Bacon, Thirteen Historical Discourses, p. 190.
63, H. M. Dexter, Congregationalism as seen in Literature, pp. 489, 490.
64, Conn. Col. Rec., v, 87.
65, Ibid., v, 50.
66, A. Johnston, Connecticut, p. 232.
CHAPTER VII. THE SAYBROOK PLATFORM AND THE TOLERATION ACT.
67, John Bolles, A Relation of the Opposition some Baptist People met at Norwich in 1761.
68, Ibid., p. 7.
69, Quaker Laws. The New Haven Laws against Quakers deal thus fiercely:--
"_Whereas_ there is a cursed sect of heretics lately risen up in the world, which are commonly called Quakers, who take upon them that they are immediately sent of G.o.d and infallibly a.s.sisted by his spirit, who yet write and speak blasphemous opinions, despise governments and the order of G.o.d, in church and commonwealth... we do hereby order and declare
"That whosoever shall hereafter bring, or cause to be brought, directly or indirectly, any known Quaker or Quakers, or other blasphemous heretics, into this jurisdiction, every such person shall forfeit the sum of 600 pounds to the jurisdiction, except it appear that he wanted true knowledge or information of their being such... and it is hereby ordered that what Quaker or Quakers soever come into this jurisdiction, from foreign parts or places adjacent, if it be about their civil, lawful occasions to be quickly despatched among us, which time of stay shall be limited by the civil authority in each plantation, and that they shall not use any means by words, writings, books, or any other way, to go about to seduce others, nor revile nor reproach, nor any other way make disturbance or offend. They shall upon their first arrival, or coming in, appear to be brought before the authorities of the place and from them have license to put about and issue their lawful occasions, and shall have one or more to attend upon them at their charge until such occasions of theirs be discharged, and they return out of the jurisdiction which if they refuse to do, they shall be denied such free pa.s.sage and commerce and be caused to return back again, but if this first time they shall offend in any of the ways as before expressed, and contrary to the intent of this law, they shall be committed to prison, severely whipped, kept to work, and none suffered to converse with them during their imprisonment, which shall be no longer than necessity requires, and at their own charge sent out of the jurisdiction."
For a second offense, they were to be branded, as well as to be committed to prison. For a fourth offense, they were to have their tongues bored through with hot irons. Their books, papers, etc., were to subject their possessors to a fine of 5 pounds, and entertaining or concealing a Quaker was to be punished by a fine of 20s.; while undertaking to defend any of their heretical opinions was doubly fined.--New Haven Col. Kec., ii, 217, 238,363.
In 1656, the Connecticut Court, in conformity to a suggestion from the commissioners of the United Colonies, ordered that "no towne within this jurisdiction shall entertaine any Quakers, Kanters, Adamites, or such notorious heretiques, or suffer them to continue with them above the s.p.a.ce of fourteen days,... and shall give notice to the two next towns to send them on their way under penalty of 5 per week for any town entertaining any such person, nor shall any master of a ship land such or any." In August, 1657, the above fine was imposed on the individual who entertained the Quaker, etc., as well as on the town, and an officer was appointed to examine suspects. A little later, a penalty of 10s. was imposed for Quaker books and MSS. found in the possession of any but a teaching elder. Twice the Court saw fit to leave, notwithstanding all former orders, all such cases to the jurisdiction of the separate towns, to order fines, banishment, or corporal punishment, provided the fines "exceed not ten pounds."
The tone is brief and businesslike, dealing with a matter that had already caused great trouble to the other United Colonies, and which might become a menace to Connecticut. There are almost no recorded cases of sentence being imposed. See Conn. Col. Kec., i, 283,303,308, 324.
70, J. Bowden, History of the Society of Friends, i, 104, quoting Norton"s Ensign, p. 52.
71, Ibid., i, 106.
72, Ibid., i, 440.
73, R. P. Hallowell, The Pioneer Quakers, p. 47.
74, R. R. Hinman, Antiquities of the Charter Government of Connecticut, p. 229.
75, E. E. Beardsley, History of the Episcopal Church in Connecticut, i, 19.
76, A. L. Cross, Anglican Episcopate in the American Colonies, pp. 33 et seq.
77, Ibid., p. 95, note.
78, C. F. Hawkins, Missions of the Church of England, 377, 378.
79, Church Doc.u.ments, Conn., i, 14.
80, Ibid., i, 59.
81, Ibid., i, 136.
CHAPTER VIII. THE FIRST VICTORY FOR DISSENT.
82, Church Doc.u.ments, Conn., i, 153.
83, Ibid., i, 56.
84, S. D. McConnell, History of the American Episcopal Church, p. 132.
85, Conn. Col. Rec., viii, 106; and Church Doc.u.ments, Conn., i, 280, 283.
86, Conn. Col. Rec., vii, 459, and viii, 123, 334.
87, Rogerine Laws. See Conn. Col. Rec., v. 248, 249.
88, C. W. Bowen, The Boundary Disputes of Connecticut, especially pp. 48, 58, and 74.
89, The Talcott Papers, published in vols. iv and v of the Conn. Hist. Soc. Collections.
90, Conn. Col. Rec., iv, 307.
91, Talcott Papers, i, 147, 189, and ii, 245, 246, in Conn. Hist. Soc. Collections, vols. iv and v.
92, C. M. Andrews, The Connecticut Intestacy Law, in Yale Review, iii, 261 et seq.
93, Conn. Col. Rec., vii, 237.
94, Ibid., vii, 257.
CHAPTER IX. THE GREAT AWAKENING.
95, Jonathan Edwards" Works, iv, 306-324.
96, Ibid., iv, 81.