FOOTNOTES:
[142] ?ef??a??? (viii. 1).
[143] ?e?t?????? (viii. 2).
[144] Chap. viii. 3.
[145] Chap. viii. 4.
[146] Chap. viii. 5
[147] Chap. viii. 6.
[148] Jer. x.x.xi. 3134.
[149] Lamentations, _Preface_.
[150] John vi. 45.
[151] a?t??? (viii. 8).
[152] Chap. viii. 4.
[153] Rom. v. 20.
[154] Rom. iv. 7.
[155] Isa. xliii. 25.
[156] Chap. x. 2, 4.
[157] Chap. iii. 13.
[158] ????s?? st?s?? (ix. 8).
[159] ????sa (ix. 4).
[160] d?????t?? (ix. 8).
[161] Reading ?e?????? (ix. 11).
[162] Chap. ix. 11. Cf. chap. ix. 24.
[163] Rev. xxi. 3.
[164] te?e??t??a? (ix. 11).
[165] ??s???? (ix. 1).
[166] d?? (ix. 11).
[167] Chap. iv. 14.
[168] Chap. vii. 26.
[169] Chap. x. 12.
[170] Chap. ix. 12.
[171] Chap. ix. 13.
[172] ?????e? (ix. 13).
[173] 1 Cor. viii. 7.
[174] Chap. ix. 14.
[175] ?at?e?e?? (ix. 14).
[176] a?????? (ix. 15).
[177] tet??????? ... f??????????? (1 Pet. i. 4).
[178] d?a????.
[179] To forestall censure for inconsistency, the present writer may be permitted to refer to what he now sees to have been a desperate attempt on his part (in the _Expositor_) to explain the pa.s.sage on the supposition that the word d?a???? means "covenant" throughout. He is bound to admit that the attempt was a failure. If he lives to write retractations, this will be one.
[180] a?ate???s?a? (ix. 22).
[181] Chap. viii. 5.
[182] ????t??? (ix. 25).
[183] p??es?? (Rom. iii. 25), as contrasted with ?fes??.
[184] Chap. iv. 3.
[185] Chap. ix. 26.
[186] p??se?e??e?? (ix. 28).
[187] e??.
[188] ?????.
[189] ?pe?de???????.
[190] Chap. viii. 2.