[Footnote 34: P. 245.]
[Footnote 35: P.F. 222.]
[Footnote 36: Thus he a.s.sumes Mr. Spurgeon"s definition of inspiration as the basis of operations (See H.O. 189), and says, "It is perfectly obvious that for those who accept these confessions of faith ... all the discoveries of modern science, from Galileo and Newton down to Lyall and Darwin, are simple delusions."]
[Footnote 37: M.S. 215.]
[Footnote 38: Ibid. 251.]
[Footnote 39: "The _simplest straightforward evidence_ of the _earliest_ Christian writer who gives any account of their origin, viz., Papias."
(P.F. 236.) "What does Papias say? Practically this: that he preferred oral tradition to written doc.u.ments.... This is a _perfectly clear_ and _intelligible_ statement made apparently in good faith without any dogmatic or other prepossession.... It has always seemed to me that all theories ... were comparatively worthless which did not take into account _the fundamental fact_ of this statement of Papias." (238.) "The _clear_ and _explicit_ statement of Papias." (250.)]
[Footnote 40: PP. 258--260.]
[Footnote 41: P. 262.]
[Footnote 42: P.F. 266.]
[Footnote 43: With regard to this "very precise statement," it is noticeable that Matthew speaks of "Mary the mother of James and Joses;"
Mark, of "Mary the mother of James the less and of Joseph and Salome,"
but not "of Salome." If Mr. Laing"s precise mind had looked for a moment at the text he was criticizing he would have seen that Salome is a common name in the nominative case. St. Luke does not give the names of the women at all. These points are trifling in themselves, but important as evidencing Mr. Laing"s standard of intellectual conscientiousness.]
[Footnote 44: P.F. 235]
[Footnote 45: M.S. 332 ff.]
[Footnote 46: H.O. 2.]
[Footnote 47: H.O. 8.]
[Footnote 48: H.O. II]
[Footnote 49: H.O. 9 and 199.]
[Footnote 50: H.O. 10.]
[Footnote 51: This seems, later, to be an inference, not an a.s.sertion.
"Manetho was a learned priest of a celebrated temple, who _must have had_ access to all the temples and royal records and other literature of Egypt, and who _must have been_ also conversant with foreign literature to have been selected as the best man to write a complete history of his native country." (H.O. 22.)]
[Footnote 52: He seems to think that Josephus was a Christian, and Syncellus a "Father." We might mention that from the fragments of Africa.n.u.s" _Pentabiblion Chronicon_, preserved in Eusebius, the author places the Creation at 5499 B.C., which is certainly hardly compatible with his giving such fragments of Manetho as would place Menes one year before that date. If we know nothing of Manetho"s results except through these "orthodox" sources, it is inconceivable that Mr. Laing"s version of them should have any historical basis whatever. It comes in fine to this, that because their report of Manetho does not give Mr. Laing what he wants, they have been tampered with.]
[Footnote 53: H.O. 11.]
[Footnote 54: H.O. 22.]
[Footnote 55: H.O. 17.]
[Footnote 56: H.O. 42.]
[Footnote 57: "There can be no doubt, moreover, that this Sargon I. is a perfectly historical personage. _A statue of him has been found at Agade."_ (H.O. 55.)]
[Footnote 58: M.S. 50.]
[Footnote 59: Ibid.]
[Footnote 60: P.F. 28.]
[Footnote 61: M.S. 61.]
[Footnote 62: "Matter is made of molecules; molecules are made of atoms; atoms are little magnets which link themselves together and form all the complex creations of an ordered cosmos [an ordered order] by virtue of the attractive and repulsive forces which are the result of polarity."
(P.F, 223.)]
[Footnote 63: We suppose he has a right to call himself _agnostic_ as being a disciple of Professor Huxley, who, we believe, started or revived the term in our own times. Of course he is also a dogmatic materialist, and by no means an "agnostic" in the wider sense of general scepticism.]
[Footnote 64: M.S. 171.]
[Footnote 65: "Not only have no missing links been discovered, but the oldest known human skulls and skeletons, which date from the glacial period and are probably at least one hundred thousand years old, show no very decided approximation towards any such pre-human type. On the contrary," &c. (M.S. 181.) He replies (H.O. 373) that "five hundred thousand years prior to these men of Spy and Neanderthal, the human race has existed in higher physical perfection, nearer to the existing type of modern man," (Cf. P.F. 158.)]
[Footnote 66: M.S. 112, 114.]
[Footnote 67: P.F. 154.]
[Footnote 68: P.F. 154.]
[Footnote 69: M.S. 175.]
[Footnote 70: The horse "may be taken as the typical instance of descent by progressive specialization. What is a horse? It is essentially an animal specialized for ... the rapid progression of a bulky body over plains or deserts" [a definition which applies equally to the camel, &c.]. It commenced existence as a "pentadactyle plantigrade bunodont."
For some indefined reason "the first step was to walking on the toes instead of on the flat of the foot, ... which became general in most lines of their descendants. For galloping on hard ground _it is evident_ that one strong and long toe, protected by a solid hoof, was more serviceable than four short and weak toes." [But why should it gallop more than other animals; or why on the _hard_ ground in the deserts and plains; or would not _four_ strong and long toes have been better than one?] "The coalescence of the toes is the fundamental fact in the progress ... by which the primitive bunodont was converted into the modern horse." But we thought evolution was a change from the h.o.m.ogeneous, incoherent to the heterogeneous and coherent: surely the change from five toes to one must have been a misfortune on the whole, if the flexibility of the human hand accounts for man"s intellect. The advantages of a convenient gallop over occasional oases of hard ground in the desert would hardly balance that of being able to climb trees.
(P.F. 143.)]
[Footnote 71: Cf. P.F. 151.]
[Footnote 72: M.S. 180.]
[Footnote 73: "A wide gap which has never been bridged over." (Huxley, P.F. 150.)]
[Footnote 74: But cf. M.S. 181. "Attempt after attempt has been made to find some fundamental characters in the human brain, on which to base a generic distinction between man and the brute creation." (P.F. 149.)]
[Footnote 75: Cf. "It is probable, therefore, that this (drill-friction) was the original mode of obtaining fire, but if so it must have required a good deal of intelligence and observation, for the discovery is by no means an obvious one." (M.S. 204.)]
[Footnote 76: P.F. 153.]
[Footnote 77: P.F. 135.]
[Footnote 78: "The inference, therefore, to be drawn alike from the physical development of the individual man and from the origin and growth" [as though he had explained their origin] "of all the faculties which specially distinguish him from the brute creation, ... all point to the conclusion that he is the product of evolution." (M.S. 210.) "Man ... whose higher faculties of intelligence and morality are _so clearly_ ... the products of evolution and education." (M.S. 182.)]
[Footnote 79: H.O. 260.]
[Footnote 80: M.S. 48.]