[49:2] Horne"s _Introduction_ (ed. 1856), p. 333.
[52:1] Ed. Dindorf, Lipsiae, 1859. [The index given in vol. iii.
p. 893 sqq. contains many inaccuracies, and is, indeed, of little use for identifying the pa.s.sages of Scripture.]
[56:1] _Some Account of the Writings and Opinions of Clement of Alexandria,_ p. 407 sqq.
[56:2] In the new Preface to his work on the Canon (4th edition, 1875), p. x.x.xii.
[58:1] _S.R._ i. p. 221, and note.
[59:1] _S.R._ i. p. 222, n. 3.
[59:2] _Lehrb. chr. Dogmengesch._ p. 74 (p. 82 _S.R._?).
[59:3] _Das nachapost. Zeitalter_, p. 126 sq.
[60:1] _Der Ursprung unserer Evangelien_, p. 64; compare Fritzche, art. "Judith" in Schenkel"s _Bibel-Lexicon_.
[61:1] Vol. i. p. 221, n. I feel it due to the author to say that I have found his long lists of references, though not seldom faulty, very useful. I willingly acknowledge the justice of his claim to have "fully laid before readers the actual means of judging of the accuracy of every statement which has been made"
(Preface to sixth edition, p. lx.x.x).
[65:1] i. p. 226.
[66:1] i. p. 228.
[69:1] _Der Ursprung_, p. 138.
[71:1] _The Apostolical Fathers_ (London, 1874), p. 273.
[71:2] The original Greek of this work is lost, but in the text as reconstructed by Hilgenfeld from five still extant versions (Latin, Syriac, Aethiopic, Arabic, Armenian) the verse runs thus, [Greek: polloi men ektisthaesan, oligoi de sothaesontai]
(_Messias Judaeorum_, p. 69).
[73:1] A curious instance of disregard of context is to be seen in Tertullian"s reading of John i. 13, which he referred to _Christ_, accusing the Valentinians of falsification because they had the ordinary reading (cf. Ronsch, _Das Neue Testament Tertullian"s_, pp. 252, 654). Compare also p. 24 above.
[73:2] _Novum Testamentum extra Canonem Receptum_, Fasc. ii.
p. 69.
[74:1] c. v.
[74:2] _S. R._ i. p. 250 sqq.
[76:1] Lardner, _Credibility, &c_., ii. p .23; Westcott, _On the Canon_, p. 50, n. 5.
[77:1] Since this was written the author of "Supernatural Religion" has replied in the preface to his sixth edition. He has stated his case in the ablest possible manner: still I do not think that there is anything to retract in what has been written above. There _would_ have been something to retract if Dr.
Lightfoot had maintained positively the genuineness of the Vossian Epistles. As to the Syriac, the question seems to me to stand thus. On the one side are certain improbabilities--I admit, improbabilities, though not of the weightiest kind--which are met about half way by the parallel cases quoted. On the other hand, there is the express testimony of the Epistle of Polycarp quoted in its turn by Irenaeus. Now I cannot think that there is any improbability so great (considering our ignorance) as not to be outweighed by this external evidence.
[81:1] Cf. Hilgenfeld, _Nov. Test. ext. Can. Rec._, Fasc. iv.
p. 15.
[81:2] Cf. _ibid._, pp. 56, 62, also p. 29.
[82:1] But see _Contemporary Review_, 1875, p. 838, from which it appears that M. Waddington has recently proved the date to be rather 155 or 156. Compare Hilgenfeld, _Einleitung_, p.
72, where reference is made to an essay by Lipsius, _Der Martyrertod Polycarp"s_ in _Z. f. w. T._ 1874, ii. p. 180 f.
[82:2] _Adv. Haer._ iii. 3, 4.
[83:1] _Entstehung der alt-katholischen Kirche_, p. 586; Hefele, _Patrum Apostolicorum Opera_, p. lx.x.x.
[84:1] Cf. _S. R._ i. p. 278.
[84:2] _Ent. d. a. K._ pp. 593, 599.
[84:3] _Apostolical Fathers_, p. 227 sq.
[84:4] _Ursprung_, pp. 43, 131.
[85:1] [Greek: mnaemoneuontes de hon eipen ho kurios didaskon; mae krinete hina mae krithaete; aphiete kai aphethaesetai hymin; eleeite hina eleaethaete; en ho metro metreite, antimetraethaesetai hymin; kai hoti makarioi hoi ptochoi kai hoi diokomenoi heneken dikaiosynaes, hoti auton estin hae basileia tou Theou.]
[89:1] _Geschichte Jesu von Nazara_, 1. p. 138, n. 2.
[89:2] _Einleilung in das N. T._ p. 66, where Lipsius" view is also quoted.
[89:3] Cf. Westcott, _On the Canon_, p. 88, n. 4.
[89:4] As appears to be suggested in _S. R._ i. p. 292. The reference in the note to Bleek, _Einl._ p. 637 (and Ewald?), does not seem to be exactly to the point.
[89:5] _Apol._ i. 67.
[90:1] _Dial. c. Tryph._ 103.
[90:2] _Apol._ i. 66; cf. _S.R._ i. p. 294.
[91:1] The evangelical references and allusions in Justin have been carefully collected by Credner and Hilgenfeld, and are here thrown together in a sort of running narrative.
[101:1] This was written before the appearance of Mr. M"Clellan"s important work on the Four Gospels (_The New Testament_, vol. i, London, 1875), to which I have not yet had time to give the study that it deserves.
[103:1] Unless indeed it was found in one of the many forms of the Gospel (cf. _S.R._ i. P. 436, and p. 141 below). The section appears in none of the forms reproduced by Dr. Hilgenfeld (_N.T.
extra Can. Recept._ Fasc. iv).
[107:1] In like manner Tertullian refers his readers to the "autograph copies" of St. Paul"s Epistles, and the very "chairs of the Apostles," preserved at Corinth and elsewhere. (_De Praescript. Haeret._ c. 36). Tertullian also refers to the census of Augustus, "quem testem fidelissimum dominicae nativitatis Romana archiva custodiunt" (_Adv. Marc._ iv. 7).
[110:1] _Beitrage_, i. p. 261 sqq.
[110:2] _Evangelien Justin"s u.s.w._, p. 270 sqq.
[110:3] The chief authority is Eus. _H. E._ vi. 12.
[110:4] Cf. Hilgenfeld, _Ev. Justin"s_, p. 157.