[Footnote 77: Account of the commissioners, dated March 15. 1688.]
[Footnote 78: "Le Roi d"Angleterre connait bien que les gens mal intentionnes pour lui sont les plus prompts et les plus disposes a donner considerablement.... Sa Majeste Britannique connoit bien qu"il auroit a propos de ne point ordonner de collecte, et que les gens mal intentionnes contre la religion Catholique et contre lui se servent de cette occasion pour temoigner leur zele."--Barillon, April 19/29 1686.]
[Footnote 79: Barillon, Feb 15/25 Feb 22/Mar 4. April 19/29, Lewis to Barillon Mar 5/15.]
[Footnote 80: Barillon, April 19/29. 1686; Lady Russell to Dr.
Fitzwilliam, April 14. "He sent away many," she says "with sad hearts."]
[Footnote 81: London Gazette of May 13. 1686.]
[Footnote 82: Reresby"s Memoirs; Eachard, iii. 797.; Kennet, iii. 451.]
[Footnote 83: London Gazette, April 22. and 29. 1686; Barillon, April 19/29.; Evelyn"s Diary, June 2.; Luttrell, June 8.; Dodd"s Church History.]
[Footnote 84: North"s Life of Guildford, 288.]
[Footnote 85: Reresby"s Memoirs.]
[Footnote 86: See the account of the case in the Collection of State Trials; Citters, May 4/14., June 22/July 2 1686; Evelyn"s Diary, June 27.; Luttrell"s Diary, June 25. As to Street, see Clarendon"s Diary, Dec. 27. 1688.]
[Footnote 87: London Gazette, July 19. 1686.]
[Footnote 88: See the letters patent in Gutch"s Collectanca Curiosa. The date is the 3d of May, 1686. Sclater"s Consensus Veterum; Gee"s reply, ent.i.tled Veteres Vindicati; Dr. Anthony Horneck"s account of Mr.
Sclater"s recantation of the errors of Popery on the 5th of May, 1689; Dodd"s Church History, part viii. book ii. art. 3.]
[Footnote 89: Gutch"s Collectanea Curiosa; Dodd, viii. ii. 3.; Wood, Ath. Ox.; Ellis Correspondence, Feb. 27. 1686; Commons" Journals, Oct.
26. 1689.]
[Footnote 90: Gutch"s Collectanea Curiosa; Wood"s Athenae Oxonienses; Dialogue between a Churchman and a Dissenter, 1689.]
[Footnote 91: Adda, July 9/19 1686.]
[Footnote 92: Adda, July 30/Aug 9 1686.]
[Footnote 93: "Ce prince m"a dit que Dieu avoit permie que toutes les loix qui ont ete faites pour etablir la religion Protestante, et detruire la religion Catholique, servent presentement de fondement ce qu"il veut faire pour l"etabliss.e.m.e.nt de la vraie religion, et le mettent en droit d"exercer un pouvoir encore plus grand que celui qu"ont les role Catholiques sur les affaires ecclesiastiques dans les autres pays."--Barillon, July 12/22. 1686. To Adda His Majesty said, a few days later, "Che l"autorita concessale dal parlamento sopra l"Ecclesiastico senza alcun limite con fine contrario fosse adesso per servire al vantaggio de" medesimi Cattolici." July 23/Aug 2.]
[Footnote 94: The whole question is lucidly and unanswerably argued in a little contemporary tract, ent.i.tled "The King"s Power in Matters Ecclesiastical fairly stated." See also a concise but forcible argument by Archbishop Sancroft. Doyly"s Life of Sancroft, i. 229.]
[Footnote 95: Letter from James to Clarendon, Feb. 18. 1685/6.]
[Footnote 96: The best account of these transactions is in the Life of Sharp, by his son. Citters, June 29/July 9 1686.]
[Footnote 97: Barillon, July 21/Aug 1 1686. Citters, July 16/26; Privy Council Book, July 17.; Ellis Correspondence, July 17.; Evelyn"s Diary, July 14.; Luttrell"s Diary, Aug. 5, 6.]
[Footnote 98: The device was a rose and crown. Before the device was the initial letter of the Sovereign"s name; after it the letter R. Round the seal was this inscription, "Sigillum commissariorum regiae majestatis ad causas ecclesiasticas."]
[Footnote 99: Appendix to Clarendon"s Diary; Citters, Oct. 8/18 1686; Barillon, Oct. 11/21; Doyly"s Life of Sancroft.]
[Footnote 100: Burnet, i. 676.]
[Footnote 101: Burnet, i. 675. ii. 629.; Sprat"s Letters to Dorset.]
[Footnote 102: Burnet, i. 677.; Barillon, Sept. 6/16. 1686. The public proceedings are in the Collection of State Trials.]
[Footnote 103: 27 Eliz. c. 2.; 2 Jac. I. c. 4; 3 Jac. I. c. 5.]
[Footnote 104: Clarke"s Life of James the Second, ii. 79, 80. Orig.
Mem,]
[Footnote 105: De Augmentis i. vi. 4.]
[Footnote 106: Citters, May 14/24 1686.]
[Footnote 107: Citters. May 18/28 1686. Adda, May 19/29]
[Footnote 108: Ellis Correspondence, April 27. 1686; Barillon, April 19/29 Citters, April 20/30; Privy Council Book, March 26; Luttrell"s Diary; Adda Feb 26/Mar 8 March 26/April 5, April 2/12 April 23/May 3]
[Footnote 109: Burnet"s Travels.]
[Footnote 110: Barillon, May 27/June 6 1686.]
[Footnote 111: Citters, May 23/June 1 1686.]
[Footnote 112: Ellis Correspondence, June 26. 1686; Citters, July 2/12 Luttrell"s Diary, July 19.]
[Footnote 113: See the contemporary poems, ent.i.tled Hounslow Heath and Caesar"s Ghost; Evelyn"s Diary, June 2. 1686. A ballad in the Pepysian collection contains the following lines
"I liked the place beyond expressing, I ne"er saw a camp so fine, Not a maid in a plain dressing, But might taste a gla.s.s of wine."]
[Footnote 114: Luttrell"s Diary, June 18. 1686.]
[Footnote 115: See the memoirs of Johnson, prefixed to the folio edition of his life, his Julian, and his answers to his opponents. See also Hickes"s Jovian.]
[Footnote 116: Life of Johnson, prefixed to his works; Secret History of the happy Revolution, by Hugh Speke; State Trials; Citters, Nov 23/Dec 3 1686. Citters gives the best account of the trial. I have seen a broadside which confirms his narrative.]
[Footnote 117: See the preface to Henry Wharton"s Posthumous Sermons.]
[Footnote 118: This I can attest from my own researches. There is an excellent collection in the British Museum. Birch tells us, in his Life of Tillotson, that Archbishop Wake had not been able to form even a perfect catalogue of all the tracts published in this controversy.]
[Footnote 119: Cardinal Howard spoke strongly to Burnet at Rome on this subject Burnet, i. 662. There is a curious pa.s.sage to the same effect in a despatch of Barillon but I have mislaid the reference.
One of the Roman Catholic divines who engaged in this controversy, a Jesuit named Andrew Patton, whom Mr. Oliver, in his biography of the Order, p.r.o.nounces to have been a man of distinguished ability, very frankly owns his deficiencies. "A. P. having been eighteen years out of his own country, pretends not yet to any perfection of the English expression or orthography." His orthography is indeed deplorable. In one of his letters wright is put for write, woed for would. He challenged Tenison to dispute with him in Latin, that they might be on equal terms.
In a contemporary satire, ent.i.tled The Advice, is the following couplet
"Send Pulton to be lashed at Bushy"s school, That he in print no longer play the fool."
Another Roman Catholic, named William Clench, wrote a treatise on the Pope"s supremacy, and dedicated it to the Queen in Italian. The following specimen of his style may suffice. "O del sagro marito fortunata consorte! O dolce alleviamento d" affari alti! O grato ristoro di pensieri noiosi, nel cui petto latteo, lucente specchio d"illibata matronal pudicizia, nel cui seno odorato, come in porto damor, si ritira il Giacomo! O beata regia coppia! O felice inserto tra l"invincibil leoni e le candide aquile!"
Clench"s English is of a piece with his Tuscan. For example, "Peter signifies an inexpugnable rock, able to evacuate all the plots of h.e.l.l"s divan, and naufragate all the lurid designs of empoisoned heretics."