"Very sincerely your friend, E. L. SAXON."
"_May 5, 1879._"
[518] Of her speech Mrs. Merrick writes: "Fearing that I could not be heard, I proposed to my son-in law, Mr. Guthrie, that he should read it for me, but Mrs. Saxon objected, saying, "No matter if they do not hear a word you say! You do not wish a man to represent you at the polls; represent yourself now, if you only stand up and move your lips." "I will," said I, "you are right."--[EDITORS.
[519] The Claibornes are a distinguished Virginia family, but belong to the history of Mississippi and Louisiana since territorial times. Mr. Claiborne now regrets that he did not go farther, for he is satisfied that women may be trusted with powers that have long been withheld. He says he was led to reflect seriously on the subject by the able addresses of Mrs. Keating, Mrs. Saxon and Mrs. Merrick, who made a profound impression on the convention.
[520] The officers of the Christian Woman"s Exchange for 1885, were: _President_, Mrs. R. M. Walmsley; _Vice-Presidents_, Mesdames T. G. Richardson, M. W. Bartlett, Albert Baldwin, John R. Juden, J.
H. Allen; _Recording Secretary_, Mrs. Theo. Auze; _Corresponding Secretary_, Mrs. E. J. Wharton; _Treasurer_, Mrs. S. H. Davis; _Acting Treasurer_, Mrs. F. N. Griswold; _Board of Managers_, Mesdames S. Landrum, M. C. Jennings, B. D. Wood, A. Brittin, Percy Roberts, S. Delgado, F. N. Griswold, E. L. Wood, Wm. Muller, E.
Ranlett, G. W. Pritchard, L. P. Wayne, T. H. Holmes, J. B. Wallace, Albert Baldwin, P. N. Strong, K. Fuhri, S. H. Kennedy, H. J. Leovy, John Parker, R. M. Walmsley, T. G. Richardson, Theo. Auze, E. J.
Wharton, S. H. Davis. M. W. Bartlett, D. A. Given, John R. Juden, J. H. Allen, Fred. Wing.
[521] The original members of the Woman"s Club were: Miss Bessie Bisland, Mrs. Elizabeth W. Baker, Miss C. Farrar, Mrs. J. M.
Ferguson, Miss M. E. Hagan, Miss J. E. Linsler, Miss H. D. Pickens, Miss M. Siebold, Mrs. M. J. C. Swayze, Miss E. Schrieves, Miss M.
Manning, Miss P. Teiltebaum.
[522] See Report Washington Convention, 1884.
CHAPTER LV. (CONTINUED).
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA--MARYLAND--DELAWARE--KENTUCKY--TENNESSEE-- VIRGINIA--WEST VIRGINIA--NORTH CAROLINA--SOUTH CAROLINA--FLORIDA-- ALABAMA--GEORGIA.
Secretary Chase--Women in the Government Departments--Myrtilla Miner--Mrs. O"Connor"s Tribute--District of Columbia Suffrage Bill--The Universal Franchise a.s.sociation, 1867--Bill for a Prohibitory Law Presented by Hon. S. C. Pomeroy, 1869--A Bill for Equal Wages for the Women in the Departments, Introduced by Hon.
S. M. Arnell, 1870--In 1871 Congress Pa.s.sed the Organic Act for the District Confining the Right of Suffrage to Males--In 1875 it Withdrew all Legislative Power from the People--Women in Law, Medicine, Journalism and the Charities--Dental College Opened to Women--Mary A. Stuart--The Clay Sisters--The School of Pharmacy--Elizabeth Avery Meriwether--Judge Underwood--Mary Bayard Clarke--Dr. Susan Dimock--Governor Chamberlain--Coffee-Growing--Priscilla Holmes Drake--Alexander H.
Stephens.
I.--DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
The District covers an area of 64 square miles, and contains a population of 200,000. It was originally a portion of Maryland, and was ceded to congress by that State for the exclusive use of the Federal government. Hon. Salmon P. Chase, secretary of the treasury under Abraham Lincoln, seeing that most of the gifted young men had been drafted or had enlisted in the army, introduced young women as clerks in the government departments. The experiment proved successful, and now there are about six thousand women in the various departments. Mr. Chase often alluded to this afterwards as one of the most important acts of his life. The war brought many bright, earnest women to Washington, led thither by patriotism, ambition, or the necessity of finding some new employment. This new vital force, this purer element, infused into the society at the capitol, has been slowly introducing more liberal ideas into that community.
The first specific work for woman in the District of Columbia of which we find any record was that of Myrtilla Miner of New York, who opened a Normal School for colored girls, December 3, 1851. She began with six pupils in a small room in a private house, but soon had more offered than could be accommodated. Through much ridicule and untold difficulties she struggled alone, but successfully, for ten years, when Miss Emily Howland came to her aid. The heroism of this n.o.ble woman has been told by Mrs. Ellen O. Connor in a little volume[523] which is a beautiful tribute to the memory of Miss Miner. The Miner Normal School of Washington is now a thorough and popular school for colored girls.
For a brief report of what has been accomplished in the District of Columbia, we are indebted to Belva A. Lockwood:
In 1866, the women of Washington were first aroused to the consideration of the suffrage question, by the discussion of "The District of Columbia suffrage bill" proposing to strike out the word "white" in order to extend the franchise to colored men. Mr.
Cowan, a Democrat from Pennsylvania, offered an amendment to strike out the word "male" also, and thus enfranchise the women of the District. It was said his proposition was not made in good faith, but simply to embarra.s.s Republican legislation. However it served a good purpose for all disfranchised cla.s.ses, as the amendment called out a notable debate,[524] lasting three days, and received the votes of nine influential senators in its favor.
The voting of the newly enfranchised negroes at the May election, 1867, brought out in strong color the beauties of masculine legislation, and immediately after there was a movement among the friends of woman"s enfranchis.e.m.e.nt. A meeting was called by James and Julia Holmes at their residence, where the "Universal Franchise a.s.sociation" was organized.[525] As soon as their meetings, regularly held, took on a serious air, the combined power of the press was brought to bear upon them with the determination to break them up. But the meetings were continued, notwithstanding the opposition; and although most of the speeches were good, they were often interrupted with hisses and yells, and the police, when appealed to, failed to keep order, seeming rather to join hands with the mob. In order to put a check on the rabble, contrary to the spirit of the society, a fee was charged at the door. Strangely enough, so great had the interest become, the crowd increased instead of lessening, and night after night Union League Hall was crowded, until the coffers of the a.s.sociation contained nearly $1,000. The press of the city in the meantime had kept up a fusilade of ludicrous reports, in which the women were caricatured and misrepresented, all of which they bore with fort.i.tude, and without any attempt at reply. The meetings continued through the year notwithstanding the cry of the timid that the cause was being injured and fair reputations blighted.
June 25, 1868, a deputation from the District Franchise a.s.sociation appeared, by appointment, before the House Committee of the District, to urge the pa.s.sage of the bill presented in the House of Representatives by Hon. Henry D. Washburn, accompanied by a pet.i.tion signed by eighty women of the District:
"Be it enacted, etc., That from and after the pa.s.sage of this act, no person shall be debarred from voting or holding office in the District of Columbia by reason of s.e.x."
Mrs. Josephine S. Griffing began by saying that the friends of equal freedom for women in the District had thought the revision of the local government a fit time to present their claims and submit a memorial, setting forth the justice of pa.s.sing the bill before the committee to remove the restrictions that forbid women to vote in the District. The movement was not wholly new, and was known by those active in the work to be approved by a large ma.s.s of women who were not prepared to express themselves openly. The enfranchis.e.m.e.nt of woman is needful to a real reconstruction.
Mr. Wilc.o.x read a memorial, signed by a committee of residents of the district, consisting of eleven ladies and eleven gentlemen, including Mrs. Griffing, Mrs. E. D. E. N.
Southworth, Miss Lydia S. Hall (formerly of Kansas), Mrs.
Annie Denton Cridge, Judge A. B. Olin and Mrs. Olin, recalling the fact that congress had freed 3,000 slaves, and enfranchised the 8,000 colored men of the district, both of which experiments had worked well, notwithstanding conservative predictions to the contrary; and showing that, while the former experiments, on a small scale comparatively, had yielded rich results, so the enfranchis.e.m.e.nt of half the adult population would produce vast good. He incidentally answered the usual arguments against suffrage, and affirmed that those who possess neither the power of wealth nor of knowledge wherewith to protect themselves, most need political power for that purpose. He remarked that the compet.i.tion for votes among politicians was a tremendous educating force, and that laws would not be certain of enforcement unless those for whose benefit they were made were clothed with power to compel such enforcement.
Mrs. Mary T. Corner presented a number of points as to the laws of the district relating to women, of some of which Judge Welker took notes with a view to their speedy investigation by the committee. As to suffrage, she pointed out that women do not come under the head of paupers, minors, felons, rebels, idiots or aliens, and that the reasons existing for the disfranchis.e.m.e.nt of such persons do not apply to native-born, loyal women. She showed that women are not represented in the government of the district, though taxed by it, and by law cannot properly protect themselves, their children, or their property, nor hold munic.i.p.al office, however fit. A wife cannot hold property in the district except by proxy. Women understand their needs and condition better than men, and should be free to regulate them. The swarms of foreigners who are freely admitted to the polls know less of our inst.i.tutions than the ma.s.ses of our women. Women have voted and held the highest offices in other countries with great success. Are our women less capable than these? At the conclusion Mrs. Corner returned thanks to the committee for their attention; and the latter, without expressing an opinion on the matter, complimented the speakers on the ability and eloquence with which their views had been presented. It was also stated that a large number of pet.i.tions would be presented in support of the bill. The committee expressed themselves as unable, by reason of the lateness of the session and the pressure of other business, to promise an early report. The interview lasted about an hour, and was very cordial and pleasant on both sides.
September 25, 1868, the Universal Franchise a.s.sociation held its first annual meeting[526] at Union League Hall, Mrs. Josephine S.
Griffing presiding. A letter was read from Senator Pomeroy, stating that he was willing to act as president of the society.
In closing he said:
I trust the friends will unite in one a.s.sociation. We have but one object in view, and should all labor together to accomplish this end, viz.: the enfranchis.e.m.e.nt of every citizen, with no partiality for race or s.e.x. The American citizen is the only safe depository for the ballot, and the only safeguard for individual and national liberty. Let us labor to realize, even in our day and time, this true type of republican government. The rights and safety of individuals and of the nation demand it.
In 1869, the executive committee pa.s.sed a resolution to expend the money that had been acc.u.mulated at the meetings of the a.s.sociation in a series of lectures for the purpose of enlightening the public mind upon the question of equal political rights for women. Among the speakers engaged were Anna d.i.c.kinson, Mrs. Stanton, Miss Anthony, D. R. Locke (Nasby), Theodore Tilton.
From that time the women of the district were permitted to speak their minds freely.
In the House of Representatives, March 21, 1870, Mr. Arnell, on leave, introduced the following bill:
_A bill to do justice to the female employees of the Government, and for other purposes._
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress a.s.sembled, That hereafter all clerks and other employes in the civil service of the United States shall be paid, irrespective of s.e.x, with reference to the character and amount of services performed by them.
SEC. 2. And be it further enacted, That, in the employment of labor, clerical or other, in any branch of the civil service of the United States, no discrimination shall be made in favor of either s.e.x.
SEC. 3. And be it further enacted, That where examinations of candidates for positions in the civil service of the United States are prescribed by law, or by the heads of departments, bureaus, or offices, said examinations shall be of the same character for persons of both s.e.xes.
SEC. 4. And be it further enacted, That the designations, chief clerk, chief or head of division, chief or head of section, clerk of the fourth cla.s.s, clerk of the third cla.s.s, clerk of the second cla.s.s, clerk of the first cla.s.s, copyist, messenger, laborer, and all other designations of employes, in existing acts of Congress, or in use in any branch of the civil service of the United States, shall be held, hereafter to apply to women as well as to men; and that women shall be regarded equally eligible with men to perform the duties of the afore-designated clerks and employes, and shall receive the compensation therefor prescribed by law.
SEC. 5. And be it further enacted, That this act shall not be so construed as to require the displacement of any person now employed, but shall apply to all vacancies hereafter occurring, for any cause.
SEC. 6. And be it further enacted, That all acts and parts of acts, in conflict with any of the provisions of this act be, and the same are hereby, expressly repealed.
Thousands of pet.i.tions for this bill were circulated. Mrs.
Lockwood went to New York, and secured seven hundred signatures, visiting both of the suffrage conventions then in session in that city, the National and the American. The bill was shortly afterward pa.s.sed in a modified form, and has ever since been in force in all of the government departments.
In February, 1871, congress pa.s.sed the organic act for the district, making of it a territory and granting suffrage to the male members of the commonwealth. There was also granted under this bill a right to a delegate in congress. In the meetings which followed for the nomination of delegates a number of women took part. Mrs. Lockwood often broke the monotony with a short speech, and on one occasion only lacked one vote of an election to the general convention for the nomination of a delegate to congress.
The women of the district were not permitted to vote under the organic act, but soon after the organization of its legislature, bills to provide for this were introduced into both Houses. Mrs.
Lockwood prepared an exhaustive address upon these pending bills, and was granted a hearing before both Houses of the legislature, but they were finally lost. In 1875 congress withdrew the legislative power from the people of the District of Columbia.
It was also in 1871 that the National University Law School, then princ.i.p.ally under the control of Prof. Wm. B. Wedgewood, organized a law cla.s.s for women, in which fifteen matriculated.
Mrs. Lockwood had been denied admission the previous year to the law cla.s.s of Columbia College for the reason, as given by the trustees, "that it would distract the attention of the young men." About this time a young colored woman, Charlotte Ray of New York, was graduated from the law cla.s.s of Howard University and admitted to the bar with the cla.s.s. Of the fifteen women who entered the National University only two completed the course, viz., Lydia S. Hall, and Belva A. Lockwood. The former never received her diploma. The latter, after an appeal to President Grant, received her diploma, and was admitted to the district bar, September 23, 1873. Since that period Emma M. Gillett, Marilla M. Ricker, and Laura DeForce Gordon have been admitted to the district bar, and there seems to be no longer any hindrance to such admissions. The above-named have all appeared in court, and a number of other ladies have been graduated in the district.
Women have also been appointed notaries public, and examiners in chancery.
In the profession of medicine there has been more liberality. Dr.
Susan A. Edson and Dr. Caroline B. Winslow have been in full practice here since the close of the war. Dr. Mary Parsons and Dr. Cora M. Bland and others, are practicing with marked success.
Last year there were fourteen women duly registered with the health department, and they all seem to be in good standing.
Howard University has admitted women to its medical cla.s.ses for some years, and both white and colored women have availed themselves of the privilege. Last year Columbia College opened its doors in the medical department, with a suggestion that the cla.s.ses in law and theology may soon be opened also.
Many women in the district within the last few years have entered into business for themselves, as they are now permitted to do under the law of 1869, and are milliners, merchants, market-women, hucksters. In the art of nursing, which has been reduced to a science, they have free course.
In 1871, a large number of ladies tried to register in the city of Washington. They marched in solid phalanx some seventy[527]