"Lord, yes! Slit a cannon."
"Would it be sufficient--I ask your opinion as one having experience in this line--would it be sufficient to cause the mutilation visible in that safe?"
"All that and a sight more."
"And the accused gave you to understand that he had undertaken the construction of just such a bomb?"
"I took him so."
"Very well. So much for that. Did you examine the piece of fuse which Mr. McCausland found in the desk occupied by Floyd at the Beacon office?"
"I did."
"What kind of fuse was it?"
"Same as I sold him."
At this point a small piece of fuse, some six inches in length, was submitted to the jury for inspection and pa.s.sed along from hand to hand.
"And the powder found in it?"
"Same powder."
"And the powder in Floyd"s coat pockets?"
"Same powder."
"And the grains on the knees of his trousers, where they may have spilled?"
"Same powder."
"That"s the black side of the shield," whispered Ecks, as the district attorney sat down.
"Now for the white," answered Wye.
"It is not part of your regular business, I presume," said s.h.a.garach, "to furnish anarchists with bombs?"
"Oh, no, sir," answered the witness, making corkscrew curls of his beard points.
"Or incendiaries with igniting material?"
"No, sir; never did it before in my life, sir."
"Why did Floyd say he wanted this powder and fuse and information as to the construction of bombs?"
"Said he was studying up anarchism."
"For what purpose?"
"Wanted to write an article on it, he said."
"And you seem to have believed him?"
"At the time, or I wouldn"t have sold him the goods."
"What made you believe him?"
The witness paused, puzzled and shifted from foot to foot.
"Well, I can"t say, sir, as to his credentials."
"Couldn"t he have procured these materials in some less public way if secrecy had been an object with him?"
"Plenty of other ways of getting such things, sir."
"Yet he walked in openly to your office?"
"Yes, sir."
"Told you his name?"
"No, sir."
"Gave you his card?"
"Yes, sir; business card; said he was a reporter."
"Where is the card?"
"I don"t know, sir."
"Did you notice the name?"
"No, sir; took no particular notice. Thought it was all right at the time."
"But the young man stated that he was studying up anarchism?"
"And wanted to see for himself just how easy it was to make a bomb."
"That will do."
"Rather an eccentric whim," said Wye. "Putting up a clever defense, though."
"Did you notice how the defendant"s jaws are set?" answered Ecks.
"Mr. Hero Leander," called Badger, and the city editor again took the stand.
"Did the Beacon ever give Floyd an a.s.signment to write up anarchy?"
The witness shook his head.
"Mr. McCausland once more," said Badger, while the city editor, whose occupation had taught him to reduce laconicism to a science, rushed off to write up his own somewhat abbreviated testimony for the evening edition of his paper.
"Did you find any ma.n.u.script or notes of an article on anarchism in the desk occupied by the accused?"
"None, sir."
"Or in the garments he wore at the time of the fire?"
"None."
"You had no opportunity," asked s.h.a.garach, "after the fire to search Floyd"s room at his uncle"s house?"
"I wish I had," replied the inspector.
"Then you could not testify that such notes or such a ma.n.u.script were not in existence before the fire?"
"I could offer an opinion."
"Mr. Chandler."
In the interim, during which our old acquaintance, the patrolman, was hunted up, the jury curiously examined the powder, which McCausland handed them.
"You recognize this article, Mr. Chandler?" asked Badger, pointing to the safe.
"I do."
"You removed it or had it removed from the ruins of the Arnold house after the fire?"
"Acting under Mr. McCausland"s instructions, I did so."
"It presented the same appearance as now?"
"As far as I know."
"The safe will be removed to the jury-room later for inspection," said Badger.
"What was the date of Prof. Arnold"s death, Mr. Chandler?" asked s.h.a.garach.
"He died on a Tuesday. Let me see. The fire was on the 28th; then it must have been the 24th."
"How is that competent, your honor?" objected Badger.
"Perhaps Mr. s.h.a.garach can explain its relevancy," said Chief Justice Playfair.
"Easily, your honor. Fowler, the chemist, has testified that Floyd"s first visit was on the 23d, which was Monday. His uncle died on Tuesday, suddenly and unexpectedly. The prosecution asks us to believe that the accused either foresaw in some occult manner his uncle"s death or contemplated blowing up the house while his uncle was still alive."
"Admit the testimony," said the judge.
"District Chief Wotherspoon," called the district attorney, relieving his a.s.sistant. The witness was rugged and weather-beaten and his uniform was not brushed for inspection. He had just answered an alarm.
"You had charge of the fire forces in the early part of the Arnold fire, did you not?"
"Yes, sir; until Chief McKay arrived I was senior officer."
"Do you recall the explosions which took place?"
"Perfectly."
"How many in number were the explosions?"
"Two."
"Two distinct explosions?"
"Yes, sir."
"Will you state to the best of your knowledge the portion of the burning buildings from which the explosions came?"
"The first one was a single discharge. It came from the second story of the Arnold house."
"Where the study was located?"
"Yes, sir."
"You feel positive?"
"I do. I was climbing a ladder at the time and was thrown off my hold by the shock."
"And the second of the explosions?"
"The second came after an interval and was different in character--more like the setting-off of a bunch of firecrackers, but greatly exaggerated in the volume of sound. There can be no doubt this was the fireworks shop in the adjoining building."
"But the first one positively came from the study?"
"Positively."
"A very loud report?"
"Very loud."
"Such as might have been caused by the explosion of the bomb Mr. Fowler described?"
"I should say so."
"At what time," asked s.h.a.garach, "did the explosion take place? How long after you arrived?"
"I couldn"t say exactly; a few minutes."