to them. He was perfectly right; and when Christians obeyed him, they always spoke much better than when they thought out speeches beforehand. They said much less for one thing, and they said it much better. Take the case of the martyr--an early and historical one--whose two speeches were during her trial "Christiana sum" and, on her condemnation, "Deo gratias".
With this, remark his own gift of arresting phrase; the freshness of his language, how free it is from quotation, how natural and how extraordinarily simple. Everything worthwhile can be put in simple language; and, if the speech is complicated, it is a call to think again. "As a woman, over-curiously trimmed, is to be mistrusted, so is a speech," said John Robinson of Leyden, the minister of the Pilgrim Fathers. The language of Jesus is simple and direct, the inevitable expression of a rich nature and a habit of truth. You feel he does not strain after effect--epigram, ant.i.thesis, or alliteration. Of course he uses such things--like all real speakers--but he does not go out of his way for them. No, and so much the more significant are such characteristic ant.i.theses as: "Ye cannot serve G.o.d and mammon" (Luke 16:13), and "Whosoever will save his life shall lose it" (Matt. 16:25), coming with a spontaneous flash, and answering in their sharpness to the sharp edges of fact.
His words caught the attention, and lived in the memory; they revealed such a nature; they were so living and unforgettable.
Remark once again his preference for the actual and the ordinary.
There are religions in which holiness involves unusual conditions and special diet. Some forms of mysticism seem to be incompatible with married life. But the type of holiness which Jesus teaches can be achieved with an ordinary diet, and a wife and five children. He had lived himself in a family of eight or nine. It is perhaps harder, but it is a richer sanct.i.ty, if the real mark of a Saint is, as we have been told, that he makes it easier for others to believe in G.o.d. In any case the ordinary is always good enough with Jesus.
Only he would have men go deeper, always deeper. Why can you not think for yourselves? he asks. Signs were what men demanded. He pictures Dives" mind running on signs even in h.e.l.l (Luke 16:27).
"What could you do with signs? Look at what you have already. You read the weather for to-morrow by looking at the sky to-day. The south wind means heat; the red sky fair weather. Study, look, think"
(Luke 12:55). His animals, as we saw, are all real animals; it is real observation; real a.n.a.logy. When he speaks of the lost sheep, it is not a fict.i.tious joy that he describes or an imaginary one; it is real. The more we examine his sayings with any touch of his spirit, the more we wonder. Of course it is possible to handle them in the wrong way, to miss the real thought and make folly of everything.
Thus, when he says he is the door, the interpreter may stray into silly detail and make faith the key, and--I don"t know what the panels and hinges could be. That is not the style of Jesus. The soul of the thing, the great central meaning, the real a.n.a.logy is his concern. Seriousness in observation, seriousness in reflection, is what he teaches. Men and women break down for want of thinking things out. Many things become possible to those who think seriously, as he did--and, so to speak, without watertight compartments.
Jesus is always urging seriousness in reflection. Seriousness in action, too, is one of his lessons--an emphasis on doing, but on _doing_ with a clear sense of what one is about, and why. A part of action is clear thought; always exactness, accuracy; you must think the thing out, he says, and then act or let it alone. The artistic temperament, we all know, is very much in evidence to-day. In "The Comments of Bagshot" we are told that the drawback is that there is so much temperament and so little art. Why? Because the artistic temperament means so little by itself. It is one of the secrets of Jesus, that it is action that illuminates. What is it that makes the poem? The poet sees beggar children running races, or little Edward and the weather-c.o.c.k, or something greater if you like--the light on a woman"s hair, or a flower; and you say, he has his poem. He has not. He must work at the thing. When we study the great poets, we realize how these things are worked out to the point of nerve-strain and exhaustion. The poet devotes himself heart and soul to the work; he alters this and that, once and again; he sees a fresh aspect of the thing, and he alters all again; he writes and rewrites, getting deeper and deeper into the essential values of the thing all the time. Where in all this is the artistic temperament? It gave him the impulse, but something else achieves the work of art. I have a feeling that the great works of art are achieved by the shopkeeper virtues in addition to the artistic temperament that sees and feels them at the beginning. It is action that gives the value of a thought. Jesus sees that. He says that frankly to his disciples. If you want to understand in the long run, it is carrying the cross that will teach you the real values.
I have been treating him almost as if he were an authority on pedagogy. Fortunately, he never discussed pedagogy, never used the terms I have been using. But he dealt with men, he taught and he influenced them, and it is worth our study to understand how he did it--to master his methods. "One loving spirit sets another on fire."
As for the effects of his words at once, as Seeley put it, they were "seething effervescence ... broodings, resolutions, travail of heart." Men were brought face to face with a new issue; it was a time of choice; things would not be as they were men must be "with him or against him"--must accept or reject the new teaching, the new teacher, the new life. As he said, "I came to send fire on the earth" (Luke 12:49), to divide families, to divide the individual soul against itself, till the great choice was made; and so it has always been, where men have really seen him. We have to notice further the transformation of the disciples, who definitely accepted him. "Very wonderful to me," wrote Phillips Brooks, "to see how the disciples caught his method." The promise was made to them that they should become fishers of men (Mark 1:17), and it was fulfilled.
Jesus made them strong enough to defy the world and to capture the world. There is something attractive about them; they have his secret, something of his charm; they are magnetic with his power. A new impulse to win men marks them, a new power to do it, a new faith which grows in significance as you study it--the faith of William Carey, a hundred years ago, was the same thing--a perfectly incredible faith, that they actually will win men for G.o.d and Christ. And they did--and along his lines and by his methods of love--even for Gentiles. "Woe is me, if I preach not the Gospel,"
says St. Paul (1 Cor. 9:16), who to preach the Gospel shipwrecked his life and suffered the loss of all things (Phil. 3:8). But these men are sure that it is worthwhile. They have a new pa.s.sion for men and women--an interest not merely in the saving of their souls but in every real human need. The early Church made a point of teaching men trades when they had none. They learnt all this from him. The greatest miracle in history seems to me the transformation that Jesus effected in those men. Everything else in Christian or secular history, compared to it, seems easy and explicable; and it was achieved by the love of Jesus.
The Church spread over the world without social machinery. The Gospel was preached instinctively, naturally. The earliest Christians were persecuted in Jerusalem, and were driven out. I picture one of them in flight; on his journey he falls in with a stranger. Before he knows what he is doing, he is telling his fellow traveller about Jesus. It follows from his explanation of why he is on the road; he warms up as he speaks. He never really thought about the danger of doing so. And the stranger wants to know more; he is captured by the message, and he too becomes a Christian. And then this involuntary preacher of the Gospel is embarra.s.sed to learn that the man is a Gentile; he had not thought of that. I think that is how it began--so naturally and spontaneously. These people are so full of love of Jesus that they are bound to speak (Acts 8:4). "One loving heart sets another on fire."
CHAPTER V
THE TEACHING OF JESUS UPON G.o.d
It is worth taking some trouble to realize how profoundly Jesus has changed the thinking of mankind about G.o.d. "Since Jesus lived," Dr.
Fairbairn wrote, "G.o.d has been another and nearer Being to man."
"Jesus," writes Dr. Fosd.i.c.k, "had the most joyous idea of G.o.d that ever was thought of." That joyous sense of G.o.d he has given to his followers, and it stands in vivid contrast with the feelings men have toward G.o.d in the other religions. Christianity is the religion of joy. The New Testament is full of it.
We know the general character of Jesus" att.i.tude to G.o.d, his feeling for G.o.d, his sense of G.o.d"s nearness. How immediate his knowledge of G.o.d is, how intimate! Of course, here, as everywhere, his teaching has such an occasional character--or else the records of it are so fragmentary--that we must not press the absence of system in it; and yet, I think, it would be right to say that Jesus puts before us no system of G.o.d, but rather suggests a great exploration, an intimacy with the slow and sure knowledge that intimacy gives. He has no definition of G.o.d,[21] but he a.s.sumes G.o.d, lives on the basis of G.o.d, interprets G.o.d; and G.o.d is discovered in his acts and his relations. He said to Peter, in effect--for the familiar phrase comes to this in modern English: "You think like a man; you don"t think like G.o.d" (Mark 8:33). Elsewhere he contrasts G.o.d"s thoughts with man"s--their outlooks are so different "that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of G.o.d" (Luke 16:15; the Greek words are very interesting). In other words, he would have men see all things as G.o.d sees them. That we do not so see them, remains the weak spot in our thinking. What Luther said to Erasmus is true of most of us: "Your thoughts concerning G.o.d are too human."
"Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall _see_ G.o.d," said Jesus (Matt. 5:8), and throughout he emphasizes that the vision of G.o.d depends on likeness to G.o.d--it is love and a glowing purity that give that faculty, rather than any power of intellect apart from them. Jesus brings men back to the ultimate fact. Our views are too short and too narrow. He would have us face G.o.d, see him and realize him--think in the terms of G.o.d, look at things from G.o.d"s point of view, live in G.o.d and with G.o.d. In modern phrase, he breaks up our dogmatism and puts us at a universal point of view to see things over again in a new and true perspective.
How and where did he begin himself? Whence came his consciousness of G.o.d, his gift for recognizing G.o.d? We do not know. The story of his growth, his inward growth, is almost unrevealed to us. We are told that he learnt "by the things which he suffered" (Heb. 5:8), and that he "increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with G.o.d and man" (Luke 2:52). Where does anyone begin, who takes us any great distance? It is very hard to know. Where did our own thoughts of G.o.d begin? What made them? How did they come? There is an inherited element in them, but how much else? Whence came the inherited element? How is it that to another man, with the same upbringing as ours, everything is different, everything means more? Remark, at any rate, in the teaching of Jesus, that there is no mysticism of the type so much studied to-day. There is nothing in the least "psychopathic" about him, nothing abnormal--no mystical vision of G.o.d, no mystical absorption in G.o.d, no mystical union with G.o.d, no abstraction, nothing that is the mark of the professed mystic. Yet he speaks freely of "seeing G.o.d"; he lives a life of the closest union with G.o.d; and G.o.d is in all his thoughts. A phrase like that of Clement of Alexandria, "deifying into apathy we become monadic,"
is seas away from anything we find in the speech of Jesus. That is not the way he preaches G.o.d. He is far more natural; and that his followers accepted this naturalness, and drew him so, and gave his teaching as he gave it, is a fresh pledge of the truthfulness of the Gospels.
Again, his knowledge of G.o.d is not a matter of quotation, as ours very often tends to be. He is conscious always of the real nearness of G.o.d. He seems to wonder how it is that man can forget G.o.d. We do forget G.o.d. Augustine in his "Confessions" (iv. 12, 18) has to tell us that "G.o.d did not make the world and then go away." The practical working religion of a great many of us rests on a feeling that G.o.d is a very long way off. Our practical steps betray that we half think G.o.d did go away, when he had made the world. Prayer to us is not a real thing--it is not intercourse face to face; far too often it is like conversation over a telephone wire of infinite length which gets out of order. Even if words travel along that wire, there is so much "buzzing" that they are hardly recognizable. No, says Jesus, G.o.d is near, G.o.d is here--so near, that Jesus never feels that men have any need of a priesthood to come between, or to help them to G.o.d; G.o.d does all that. There is no common concern, no matter of food or clothing, no mere detail of the ordinary round of common duty and common life--father and mother, son, wife, friend--nothing of all that, but G.o.d is there; G.o.d knows about it; G.o.d is interested in it; G.o.d has taken care of it; G.o.d is enjoying it. How is it that men can "reject the counsel of G.o.d," refuse G.o.d"s plans and ideas (Luke 7:30)? How is it that they forget G.o.d altogether? Jesus is surprised at the dullness of men"s minds (Mark 8:17); it is a mystery to him. The rich fool, as we call him, though it is hard to see why we should call him a fool, when he is so like ourselves, had forgotten G.o.d somehow, and was startled when G.o.d spoke, and spoke to him. That story, seen so often among men,--the story of the thorns choking the seed (Matt. 13:22)--makes Jesus remark on the difficulty which a rich man finds in entering into the kingdom of G.o.d.
G.o.d knows--that is what Jesus repeats, G.o.d cares; and G.o.d can do things; his hands are not tied by impotence. The knowledge of G.o.d is emphasized by Jesus; "Even the very hairs of your head are all numbered" (Matt. 10:30); "your Father knoweth" (Luke 12:30); "seeth in secret" (Matt. 6:4); "knoweth your hearts" (Luke 16:15); knows your struggles, knows your worries, knows your worth; G.o.d knows all about you. And "all things are possible with G.o.d" (Matt. 19:26).
There is nothing that he cannot do, nothing that he will not do, for his children. Will a father refuse his child bread; will G.o.d not give what is good? (Matt. 7:11). Is it too big a thing for the Giver of Life to give food--which is the more difficult thing to give?
(Luke 12:23). Look at G.o.d, as Jesus draws him--interested in flowers; G.o.d takes care of them, and thinks about their colours, so that even "Solomon in all his glory" is not equal to them (Matt.
6:30). G.o.d knows the birds in the nest--knows there is one fewer there to-day than there was yesterday (Matt. 10:29). G.o.d cares for them; how much more will he care for you (Matt. 6:26)? "Ye are of more value than many sparrows" (Matt. 10:31). And G.o.d thinks out man"s life in all its relations, and provides for it. Society moves on lines he laid down for it; his plans underlie all. Thus, when Jesus is challenged on the question of marriage and divorce, with that clear thought and eye of his, he goes right back to G.o.d"s intent--not to man"s usage, not to the common law and practice of nations, but to G.o.d"s intent and G.o.d"s meaning. G.o.d ordained marriage; he thought it out (Matt. 19:4). Marriages will be better, if we think of them in this way. G.o.d gave men their food, does still, and all things that he gives are clean (Luke 11:41). We cannot have taboos at our Father"s table.
Over all is G.o.d"s throne (Matt. 23:22). That idea, it seems to me, lapses somehow from our minds to-day. When Luther had to face the hostility of the Kaiser, the Emperor Charles V., he wrote to one of his friends: "Christ comes and sits at the right hand--not of the Kaiser, for in that case we should have perished long ago--but at the right hand of G.o.d. This is a great and incredible thing; but I enjoy it, incredible as it is; some day I mean to die in it. Why should I not live in it?" So Luther wrote--in not quite our modern vein. We hardly calculate on G.o.d as a factor; we omit him. Jesus did not. G.o.d"s rule is over all; and in all our perplexity, doubt, and fear, Jesus reminds us that the first thing is faith in G.o.d. The fact is that "Thine is the Kingdom" means peace; it is a joyous reminder. For if he speaks of the Kingdom of G.o.d, the King is more than the Kingdom. It is the Kingdom, the rule, of the G.o.d whom Jesus teaches us to trust and to love. The Father is supreme. But that has more aspects than one. If our Father is supreme for us, he is supreme over us. Jesus emphasizes the will of G.o.d--G.o.d"s commandment against man"s tradition, G.o.d"s will against man"s notions (Mark 7:8). What a source of rest and peace to him is the thought of G.o.d"s will! When Dante writes: "And His will is our peace," it is the thought of Jesus. And at the same time G.o.d"s judgements are as real to Jesus" mind. "I will tell you," he says, "whom to fear, G.o.d--yes, fear him!" (Luke 12:5). He feels the tenderness and the awfulness of G.o.d at once.
In speaking of G.o.d, it is noticeable that Jesus chiefly emphasizes G.o.d"s interest in the individual, as giving the real clue to G.o.d"s nature. On the whole, there is very little even implied, still less explicit, in the Gospels, about G.o.d as the great architect of Nature--hardly anything on the lines familiar to us in the Psalms and in Isaiah--"The sea is his, and he made it; and his hands formed the dry land" (Psalm 95:5)--"He taketh up the isles as a very little thing" (Isaiah 40:15). There is little of this in the Gospels; yet it is implied in the affair of the storm (Matt. 8:26). The disciples in their anxiety wake him. He does not understand their fear. Whose sea is it? Whose wind is it? Whose children are you? Cannot you trust your Father to control his wind and his sea? Of course it is possible that he said more about G.o.d as the Author of Nature than our fragmentary reports give us; but it may be that it is because the emphasis on G.o.d"s care and love for the individual is hardest to believe, and at the same time best, gives the real value of G.o.d, that Jesus uses it so much. Perhaps the Great Artificer is too far away for our minds. He is too busy, we think; and yet, after all, if G.o.d is so great, why should he be so busy? If he is a real Father, why should not he be at leisure for his children? He is, says Jesus; a friend has leisure for his friends, and a father for his children; and G.o.d, Jesus suggests, always has leisure for you.
The great emphasis with Jesus falls on the love of G.o.d. Thus he tells the story of the impossible creditor with two debtors (Luke 7:42). One owed him ten pounds, and the other a hundred. When they had nothing to pay, they both came to him and told him so. The ordinary creditor, at the very best, would say: "Well, I suppose I must put it down as a bad debt." Jesus says that this creditor took up quite another att.i.tude. He smiled and said to his two troubled friends: "Is that all? Don"t let anything like that worry you. What is that between you and me?" He forgave them the debt with such a charm ("echarisato"), Jesus says, that they both loved him. One feels that the end of the story must be, that they both paid him and loved him all the more for taking the money. What a delightful story of charm, and friendship and forgiveness! And it is a true picture of G.o.d, Jesus would have us believe, of G.o.d"s forgiveness and the response it wakes in men.
If we do not definitely set our minds to a.s.similate the ideas of Jesus, we shall make too little of the heart of G.o.d. With Jesus this is the central and crucial reality. He emphasizes the generosity of G.o.d. G.o.d makes his sun rise on the good and on the bad; he sends rain on the just and the unjust (Matt. 5:45). G.o.d"s flowers are just as beautiful in the bad man"s garden. G.o.d knows what his child needs, and gives it, whether it is a very good child or a very bad one. The Father is the same great wise Friend in either case. The peacemakers are recognized as the children of G.o.d, because of their family likeness to G.o.d (Matt. 5:9). They come among people, and find them in discord with one another, and their presence stills that; or they come into a man"s life, when it is all in disorder and pain, and they bring peace there. They may not quite know it, but they do these things almost without meaning to do them. And Jesus says that this is a family likeness by which men know they are G.o.d"s children.
But it is not every teacher, pagan or Christian, who lays such stress on G.o.d"s gift of peace, or is so sure of it. He uses Hosea"s great saying about G.o.d--"I will have mercy and not sacrifice" (Hosea 6:6), as giving the truth about G.o.d. Matthew represents him as quoting it twice (Matt. 9:13, 12:7); and we can well believe that he found in it the real spirit of G.o.d and often referred to it. His own heart has taken him to the tenderest of the utterances of the Old Testament spoken by the most suffering of the Prophets. "Love your enemies," he says (Matt. 5:44); yes, for then you will be the real children of G.o.d. Or he speaks of the great patience of G.o.d, how G.o.d gives every man all the time and all the chance that he needs--sometimes, he half suggests, even a little more. Look at the parable of the fig tree, how the gardener pleads for the tree, begs and obtains another chance for it (Luke 13:8); that is like G.o.d, says Jesus.
It is easy enough to talk in a vague way about the love of G.o.d. But the love of G.o.d implies surely the individual; love has little content indeed if its object is merely a collective noun, an abstract, a concept. But that G.o.d loves individual men is very difficult for us to believe in earnest. The real crux comes when the question rises in a man"s own heart, "Does G.o.d love me?" Jesus says that he does, but it is very hard to believe, except in the company of Jesus and under his influence. Jesus throughout a.s.serts and rea.s.serts the value of the individual to G.o.d. Look, for example, at the picture he draws, when he tells of the recovery of the Lost Sheep, and brings out the a.n.a.logy. At the end of the Book of Job (ch. 38) the poet carries his reader back to the first sight of a world new-made, and tells how G.o.d, like the real artist and creator--we might not have thought of all this, but the poet did--loves his work so much that he must have his friends sharing it with him. He calls them; he shows them the world he has made--"the beauty, and the wonder, and the power," as Browning says. The poet tells us that what followed was that "the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of G.o.d shouted for joy." The sight was so good that song and shout came instinctively, almost involuntarily.
Is it not the same picture which Jesus draws of "joy in heaven in the presence of the angels of G.o.d over one sinner that repenteth"?
We can believe in such joy when G.o.d made the world; but can we believe that there was the same joy in the presence of G.o.d yesterday when a coolie gave his heart to G.o.d? Jesus does. That is the central thing, it seems to me, in his teaching about G.o.d--that G.o.d cares for the individual to an extent far beyond anything we could think possible. If we can wrestle with that central thought and a.s.similate it, or, as the old divines said, "appropriate" it, make it our own, the rest of the Gospel is easy. But one can never manage it except with the help, and in the company, of Jesus.
Jesus goes a step further, and believes in the possibility of a man loving G.o.d and G.o.d enjoying that too. If he speaks of prayer, must we not think he means that G.o.d wants it as much as his child can want it? How much is involved in the name "Father," which Jesus so uniformly gives to G.o.d? Something less than the word carries in the case of a human father, or more? What is the att.i.tude of a father to his child? Jesus, as we have seen, uses this ill.u.s.tration to bring out G.o.d"s care for the actual needs of his children. But is that all? What is the innermost thing in a father"s relation to his children? Surely something more than the bird"s instinct to feed her young, or to gather them under her wings (Luke 13:34). Is not one of the most real features of parenthood enjoyment of the child? Do not men and women frankly enjoy the grappling of the little mind with big things? Is there not a charm, as says one of the Christian Fathers (Minucius Felix), about the "half-words" that a child uses, as he learns to talk and wrestles with a grown-up vocabulary? About the extraordinary pictures he will draw of ships or cows--the quaint stories he will invent--the odd ways in which his grat.i.tude and his affection express themselves? Is it a real fatherhood where such things do not appeal? Jesus" language about G.o.d, his whole att.i.tude to G.o.d, implies throughout that G.o.d is as real a Father as anybody, and it suggests that G.o.d loves his children the more because they are real; because they are not very clever; because they do make such queer and imperfect prayers; because, in short, they need him; and because they fill a place in his heart.
We have to remark how firmly Jesus believes in his Gospel of G.o.d and man needing each other and finding each other--his "good news," as he calls it. He bases all on his faith in what has been called "Man"s incurable religious instinct"--that instinct in the human heart that must have G.o.d--and in G.o.d"s response to that instinct which he himself implanted, and which is no accident found here and missing there, but a genuine G.o.d-given characteristic of every man, whatever his temperament or his range in emotions may be, his swiftness or slowness of mind. The repeated parables of seed and leaven--the parables of vitality--again and again suggest his faith in his message, his conviction that G.o.d must have man and man must have G.o.d--that, as St. Augustine puts it, "Thou hast made us for Thyself, and our heart knows no rest till it rests in Thee" (Conf., i. 1). That is the essence of the Gospel.
How this union of the soul with G.o.d comes about, Jesus does not directly say, but there are many hints in his teaching that bear upon it. "The Kingdom of Heaven cometh not with observation," he said (Luke 17:20). Religious truth is not reached by "quick turns of self-applauding intellect," nor by demonstrations. It comes another way. The quiet familiarity with the deep true things of life, till on a sudden they are transfigured in the light of G.o.d, and truth is a new and glowing thing, independent of arguments and the strange evidence of thaumaturgy--this is the normal way; and Jesus holds by it. The great people, men of law and learning, want more; they want something to substantiate G.o.d"s messages from without. If Jesus comes to them with a word from G.o.d, can he not prove its authenticity preferably with "a sign from the sky" (Mark 8:11)? For the signs he gives, and the evidence he suggests, are unsatisfactory. "And he sighed deeply in his spirit, and saith, `Why doth this generation seek after a sign? Verily I say unto you, there shall no sign be given unto this generation." So he left them and went up into the ship again and went away." That scene is drawn from life.
But why no sign? In the parallel pa.s.sage we read: "`The wicked generation and adulterous seeketh a sign, but there shall no sign be given it, but the sign of the prophet Jonah"; so he left them and departed" (Matt. 16:4). The real explanation of this reference to Jonah is given by Luke (11:32), and missed or misdeveloped in Matthew (Matt. 12:40). Nineveh recognized instinctively the inherent truth of Jonah"s message, and repented. Truth is its own evidence--like leaven in the meal, like seed in the field, it does its work, and its life reveals it. G.o.d is known that way. When the chief priests demand of Jesus to be told plainly what is his authority (Mark 11:27), he carries the matter a stage further: Was the baptism of John, he asks, from heaven, i.e. from G.o.d, or was it of men? Does G.o.d make His message clear, does He properly authenticate Himself? And the uneasy weighing of alternatives, summarized by the evangelist, leads to the answer that they could not tell whence it was; and Jesus rejoins that he has nothing to say to them about his authority. He had taken what we might call an easy case--where it was evident that G.o.d had spoken; and this was all they made of it--they "could not tell." It was plain, then, either that these men did not recognize the obvious message of G.o.d ("the word of G.o.d came upon John," Luke 3:9,), or that, if they did recognize it, they thought it did not matter. For the insincere and the trivial there is no message from G.o.d, no truth of G.o.d--how should there be?
If we pursue this line of thought, we can see how, in Jesus"
opinion, a man may be sure of G.o.d and of G.o.d"s word for him. If a man be candid with himself, if he face the common facts of life with seriousness and in the doing of duty, perplexities vanish. Such a man is prepared for the Great Fact, by faithfulness to the little facts, and then G.o.d dawns on him in them. This is put directly in the Fourth Gospel (7:17), and in parable in the Synoptists. The leaven works, till the whole is leavened; the uneasy process is over and the result achieved. Or, it comes more quietly still--the seed grows while the farmer sleeps and rises, night and day; the blade springs up and the ear forms on the blade, the seed grows in the ear; and the end is reached and G.o.d"s Kingdom is a reality. Or, the knowledge of G.o.d comes like a lightning flash--sudden, illuminative, decisive. "The Son reveals" G.o.d to the simple, Jesus said (Matt.
11:27). The Son of Man may be a disputable figure--"Whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him"
(Matt. 12:32)--but there is no forgiveness in this world, or in any possible real world where G.o.d counts at all, for the refusal of the spirit of Truth. So he taught, and all history shows he was right--the refusal of truth is fatal. "Jesus," wrote Matthew Arnold, "never touches theory, but bases himself invariably upon experience." It is to experience that Jesus goes to authenticate his message. The real facts of life lead you to G.o.d, as the red sky, and the south wind, teach you to foretell the weather (Matt. 16:2; Luke 12:55).
"Eyes and ears," said the Greek thinker, Herac.l.i.tus, long before, "are bad witnesses for such as have barbarian souls." The Pharisees discredited Jesus--he "cast out devils by Beelzebub." Did he, he asked, or was it "by the finger of G.o.d" (Luke 11:20)? Is there no evidence of G.o.d in restored sanity? But the strength of his position lies in the good news for the poor (Matt. 11:5), for those who labour and are heavy--laden (Matt. 11:28)--news of rest and refreshment--as if the intuition of G.o.d, with the peace it brings, were its own proof. Truth is reached less by ingenuity than by intensity. To the simple mind, to the true heart, to the pure soul (Matt. 5:8), to those whose gift is peace, Truth comes flooding in--new light on old fact, and new light from old fact--and G.o.d is evident. So Jesus judged; and here again, before we decide for or against his view, we have to make sure that we know his meaning, and realize the experience by which he reached his thought. And then, perhaps, G.o.d will be more evident to us in our turn. "The Kingdom of G.o.d cometh not with observation" (Luke 17:20)--it is "within" (Luke 17:21); so quietly it comes, that we may not guess how in any particular instance the realization of G.o.d came to a soul; but if we are candid and truth-loving we can know it when it has come to ourselves, and we can recognize it when it comes to another. We can recognize it in its power and peace, we can see the greatness of the new knowledge in the new man it makes, in the new life, the man of the great spirit, of the great action, the man of the great quiet, the man who has the peace of G.o.d.
What does the discovery of G.o.d mean? Jesus himself speaks of a man turning right about, being converted (Matt. 18:3); of the revision of all ideas, of all standards, of all values. He gives us two beautiful pictures to ill.u.s.trate what it means; and it repays us to linger over them. First, there is the Treasure Finder. He is in the country, digging perhaps in another man"s field, or idling in the open; and by accident he stumbles on a buried treasure. Palestine was like Belgium--a land with a long history of wars fought on its soil by foreigners, Babylon or a.s.syria against Egypt, Ptolemies against Seleucids. It was the only available route for attack either on Egypt by land, or on Syria or Mesopotamia or Babylon from the Southern Mediterranean. In such a land when the foreign army marched through, a man had best hide his treasure and hope to find it again in better times, and again and again the secret of its place of burial died with him. The Treasure Finder had no lord of the manor to think of, no Treasury department. He made a great discovery, and made it initially for himself, and his own--"and for joy thereof he goeth and selleth all that he hath and buyeth that field." We can see him full of his discovery, full of eagerness and trying to hide his inner joy, as he realizes every penny he can manage, and achieves the great transaction which gives him the field and the treasure. The salient points are a sudden and great joy, an instant resolution, a complete sacrifice of everything, and a life unexpectedly and infinitely enriched. And so it is, says Jesus, with the Kingdom of G.o.d (Matt. 13:44).
The Pearl Merchant is a more interesting figure. Perhaps we may picture him middle-aged, a trifle worn, somewhat silent, a man of keen eyes. He has been in his trade for years, and he is a master at it. By now he has a knowledge which years give to a man in earnest--a knowledge more like instinct than anything acquired. A glance at pearls on a table--this, and this, and this he will take the other, perhaps; he would look at that one--the rest? he shook his head and did not look at them--he saw without looking. One day he is told of a pearl--a good one. He is not surprised, for pearls are always good when they are offered for sale. But again a glance is enough. The price? Yes, it is high, but he will take the pearl, but he must be allowed till evening to get the money. He goes away and sells his stock--the little collection of pearls in his wallet, representing "the experience of a life-time," all of them good, as he very well knows; and he sells them for what he can get--at a loss, if it must be. Yesterday"s bargainer cuts down his price for this and that pearl, and he is taken up; he never expected to do so well against the old dealer, and he laughs. But the merchant is content, too; he has sold all his pearls for what they would fetch--lost money on them, yes, and been laughed at behind his back.
But he owns the one pearl of great price; it is his, and he is satisfied. There is no reference to joy here or exultation; but there is the same instant recognition of the opportunity, the same resolve, the same sacrifice, and the same great acquisition (Matt.
13:45).
Both parables begin with a reference to the Kingdom of G.o.d--to that Rule and Kingship of G.o.d, the knowledge of which makes all the difference to a man. A small grammatical difference points us beyond minutiae to the common experience of the two men. Each makes a great discovery, and takes action in a great and urgent resolve; and they are both repaid. If we are to understand the two parables in the sense intended by Jesus, the term "G.o.d" must become alive to us with all the life and power and love that the name implies for him. Then to grasp that this Father of Jesus is King--that the G.o.d of his thoughts, of his faith, with all the tenderness and the power combined that Jesus teaches us to see in Him--rules the universe, controls our destiny and loves us--this is the experience that Jesus compares with that of the Treasure Finder and the Pearl Merchant--worth, he suggests, everything a man has, and more than all.
In pa.s.sing, we may notice that these stories suggest that this experience may be reached in different ways. In the parables of the seed and the leaven he indicates a natural, quiet and unconscious growth, a story without crisis, though full of change. To the Treasure Finder the discovery is a surprise--how came Jesus so far into the minds of men as to know what a surprise G.o.d can be, and how joyful a surprise? The Pearl Merchant, on the other hand, has lived in the region where he makes his discovery. He is the type that lives and moves in the atmosphere of high and true thought, that knows whatsoever things are pure and lovely and of good report, of help and use; he is no stranger to great and inspiring ideas. And one day, in no strange way, by no accident, but in the ordinary round of life, he comes on something that transcends all he has been seeking, all he has known--the One thing worth all. There is little surprise about it, no wild elation, but nothing is allowed to stand in the way of an instant entrance into the great experience--and the great experience is, Jesus says, G.o.d.
To see G.o.d, to know G.o.d--that is what Jesus means--to get away from "all the fuss and trouble" of life into the presence of G.o.d, to know he is ours, to see him smile, to realize that he wants us to stay there, that he is a real Father with a father"s heart, that his love is on the same wonderful scale as every one of his attributes, and in reality far more intelligible than any of them. That is the picture Jesus draws. The sheer incredible love of G.o.d, the wonderful change it means for all life--that is his teaching, and he encourages us, in the words of the Shorter Catechism, "to enjoy G.o.d for ever," as Jesus himself does. Those who learn his secret enjoy G.o.d in reality. Wherever they see G.o.d with the eyes of Jesus, it is joy and peace. And they realize with deepening emotion that this also is G.o.d"s gift, as Jesus said (Luke 8:10; 12:39).
Jesus entirely recast mankind"s common ideas of holiness. It is no longer asceticism, no longer the mystical trance, no longer the "fussiness," with which the early Christian reproached the Jew, which still haunts all the religions of taboo and merit, and even Christianity in some forms. Where men think of holiness as freedom from sin, the negative conception reacts on life. They begin at the wrong end. Solomon Schechter, the great Jewish scholar, once said of Oxford, that "they practice fastidiousness there, and call it holiness." Unfortunately Oxford has no monopoly of that type of holiness. But with Jesus holiness is a much simpler and more natural thing--as natural as the happy, easy life of father and child, and it rests on mutual faith. It is Theocentric, positive, active rather than pa.s.sive--not a state, but a relation and a force. Holiness with him is a living relation with the living G.o.d. That is why the first feature in it that strikes us is Courage. "Be of good cheer; be not afraid"; that note rings through the Gospels, and how much it means, and has meant, in sweet temper and cheerfulness in the very chequered history of the Church! His is the great voice of Hope in the world. "The Lord Jesus Christ, who is our Hope," Paul said (1 Tim. 1:1). Even on the Cross, according to one text, Jesus said to the penitent thief: "Courage! To-day thou shalt be with me in paradise" (Luke 23:43). We may not know where or what paradise is, but the rest is intelligible and splendid: "Courage; to-day thou shalt be with me." Look at the brave hearts the Gospel has made in every age; how venturesome they are! and we find the same venturesomeness in Jesus--for instance, as a German scholar emphasizes, in that episode of the daughter of Jairus. The messenger comes and says she is dead. Anybody else would stop, but Jesus goes on. That is a great piece of interpretation. Look again at his venturesomeness in trusting the Gospel to the twelve and to us--and in facing the Cross. "It was his knowledge of G.o.d," says Professor Peabody, "that gave him his tranquillity of mind."[22]
"Jesus," says Dr. Cairns, "said that no one ever trusted G.o.d enough, and that was the source of all the sin and tragedy." Look at his emphasis again and again on faith; and the language is not that of guesswork; they are the words of the great Son of Fact, who based himself on experience. "Have faith in G.o.d" (Mark 11:22). "Be not afraid, only believe" (Mark 5:36). "All things are possible to him that believeth" (Mark 9:23). When he criticizes his disciples, it is on the score of their want of faith--"O ye of little faith"--it has been taken as almost a nickname for them. In the hour of trial and danger they may trust to "the Spirit of your Father" (Matt. 10:20).
It is remarkable what value he attaches to faith even of the slightest--"faith as a grain of mustard seed" (Matt. 17:90)--it is little, but it is of the seed order, a living thing of the most immense vitality with the promise of growth and usefulness in it.
This brings us to the question of Prayer. Some of us, of course, do not believe very much in prayer for certain philosophical reasons, which perhaps, as a matter of fact, are not quite as sound as we think, because our definition of prayer is a wrong one, resting on insufficient experience and insufficient reflection. What is prayer?
We shall agree that it is the act by which man definitely tries to relate his soul and life to G.o.d. What Jesus then teaches on prayer will illuminate what he means by G.o.d; and conversely his conception of G.o.d will throw new light upon the whole problem of prayer. It is plain history that Jesus, the great Son of Fact, believed in prayer, told men to pray, and prayed himself. The Gospels and the Epistle to the Hebrews lay emphasis on his practice. Early in the morning he withdrew to the desert (Mark 1:35), late at night he remained on the hillside for prayer (Mark 6:46). Wearied by the crowds that thronged him, he kept apart and continued in prayer. He prays before he chooses the disciples (Luke 6:12). He gives thanks to G.o.d on the return of the seventy from their missionary journey (Luke 10:21).
Prayer is a.s.sociated with the confession of Caesarea Philippi (Luke 9:18), with the Mount of Transfiguration (Luke 9:29), with Gethsemane (Luke 22:41). The writer to the Hebrews speaks of his "strong crying and tears" (Heb. 5:7) in prayer. The Gospels even mention what we should call his unanswered prayers. The prayer before the calling of the Twelve does not exclude Judas; and the cup does not pa.s.s in spite of the prayer in Gethsemane. It is as if we had something to learn from the unanswered prayers of our Master.
Certainly the content of the Gospel for us would have been poorer if they had been answered in our sense of the word; and this fact, taken with his own teaching on prayer, and his own submission to the Father"s will, may help us over some of our difficulties. But Jesus had no doubt or fear about prayer being answered. "Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you" (Luke 11:9)--are not ambiguous statements in the least; and they come from one "who based himself on experience." It is worth thinking out that the experience of Jesus lies behind his recommendation of prayer. All his clear-eyed knowledge of G.o.d speaks in these plain sentences.
"As he was praying, they ask him, Teach us to pray, as John also taught his disciples" (Luke 11:1). It looks as if at times his disciples caught him at prayer or even overheard him, and felt that here was prayer that took them out beyond all they had ever known of prayer. There were men whom John had taught to pray; was it they who asked Jesus to teach them over again? There may have been some of them who had learnt the Pharisee"s way in prayer, and some who stuck to the simpler way they had been taught in childhood. In each case the old ways were outgrown.
We can put together what he taught them. In the first place, the thing must be real and individual--the first requirement always with Jesus. The public prayer of ostentation is out of the reckoning; it is nothing. Jesus chooses the quiet and solitary place for his intercourse with his Father. The real prayer is to the Father in secret--His affair. And it will be earnest beyond what most of us think. We are so familiar with Gospel and parable that we do not take in the strenuousness of Jesus" way in prayer. The importunate widow (Luke 18:2) and the friend at midnight (Luke 11:5) are his types of insistent and incessant earnestness. Do you, he asks, pray with anything like their determination to be heard? The knock at the door and the pleading voice continue till the request is granted--in each case by a reluctant giver. But G.o.d is not reluctant, Jesus says, though G.o.d, too, will choose his own time to answer (Luke 18:7). It does not mean the mechanical reiteration of the heathen (Matt. 6:7)--not at all, that is not the business of praying; but the steady earnest concentration on the purpose, with the deeper and deeper clarification of the thought as we press home into G.o.d"s presence till we get there. It was so that he prayed, we may be sure. It is not idly that prayer has been called "the greatest task of the Christian man"; it will not be an easy thing, but a strenuous.
One part of the difficulty of prayer is recognized by Jesus over and over again. Men do not really quite believe that they will be answered--they are "of little faith." But he tells them with emphasis, in one form of words and another, driving it home into them, that "all things are possible with G.o.d" (Mark 10:27)--"have faith in G.o.d" (Mark 11:22). One can imagine how he fixes them with the familiar steady gaze, pauses, and then with the full weight of his personality in his words, and meaning them to give to his words the full value he intends, says: "Have faith in G.o.d." To see him and to hear him must have given that faith of itself. If the friend in the house to your knowledge has the loaves, you will knock till you get them; and has not G.o.d the gifts for you that you need? Is he short of the power to help, or is it the will to help that is wanting in G.o.d?