136. The Appointment of Bishops settled.
King Henry also recalled Anselm (S132) and reinstated him in his office. But the peace was of short duration. The Archbishop insisted, as did the Pope, that the power of appointment of bishops should be vested wholly in Rome. The King was equally determined that such appointments should spring from himself. Like William the Conqueror (S118), he declared: "No one shall remain in my land who will not do me homage" (S86).
The quarrel was eventually settled by compromise. The Pope was to invest the bishop with ring and crosier, or pastoral staff of office, as emblems of the spiritual power; the King, on the other hand, was to grant the lands from which he bishop drew his revenues, and in return was to receive his homage or oath of allegiance.
This acknowledgement of royal authority by the Church was of great importance, since it gave the King power as feudal lord to demand from each bishop his quota of fully equipped knights or cavalry soldiers (SS150, 152). This armed force would usually be commanded by the bishop in person (S140).
137. Henry"s Quarrel with Robert; the "Lion of Justice."
While this Church question was in dispute, Henry had still more pressing matters to attend to. His elder brother Robert (SS124, 127) had invaded England and demanded the crown. The greater part of the Norman n.o.bles supported this claim, but the English people held to Henry. Finally, in consideration of a heavy money payment, Robert agreed to return to Normandy and leave his brother in full possession of the realm. On his departure, Henry resolved to drive out the prominent n.o.bles who had aided Robert. Of these, the Earl of Shrewsbury, called "Robert the Devil," was the leader. With the aid of the English, who hated him for his cruelty, the earl was at last compelled to leave the country.
He fled to Normandy, and, in violation of a previous agreement, was received by Henry"s brother Robert. Upon that, Henry declared war, and, crossing the Channel, fought (1106) the battle of Tinchebrai,[1]
by which he conquered and held Normandy as completely as William, Duke of Normandy, had conquered England forty years before. The King carried his brother captive to Wales, and kept him in prison during his life in Cardiff Castle. This ended the contest with the n.o.bles.
[1] Tinchebrai, Normandy, in the region west of Caen and Avranches.
(See map facing p. 54.)
By his uprightness, his decision, his courage, and by his organization of better courts of law (S147), Henry fairly won the honorable t.i.tle of the "Lion of Justice"; for the "Anglo-Saxon Chronicle" says, "No man durst misdo against another in his time."[2]
[2] See, too, the Summary of Const.i.tutional History in the Appendix, p. vi, S7.
138. Summary.
The three leading points of Henry I"s reign are: (1) the self-limitation of the royal power embodied in his Charter of Liberties; (2) the settlement of old disputes between the King and the Church; (3) the banishment of the chief of the mutinous barons, and the victory of Tinchebrai, with its important results.
Stephen--1135-1154
139. The Rival Candidates.
With Henry I"s death two candidates presented themselves for the throne,--Henry"s daughter, Matilda (for he left no lawful son), and his nephew, Stephen. In France the custom of centuries had determined that the crown should never descend to a female. It was an age when the sovereign was expected to lead his army in person, and it certainly was not expedient that a woman should hold a position one of whose chief duties she could not discharge. This French custom had, of course, no force in England; but the Norman n.o.bles must have recognized its reasonableness; or if not, the people did.[1]
[1] Before Henry"s death, the baronage had generally sworn to support Matilda (commonly called the Empress Matilda, or Maud, from her marriage to the Emperor Henry V of Germany; later, she married Geoffrey of Anjou). But Stephen, with the help of London and the Church, declared himself "elected King by the a.s.sent of the clergy and the people." Many of the barons now gave Stephen their support.
Four years after Stephen"s accession Matilda landed in England and claimed the crown. The east of England stood by Stephen, the west by Matilda. For the sake of promoting discord, and through discord their own private ends, part of the barons gave their support to Matilda, while the rest refused, as they said, to "hold their estates under a distaff." In the absence of the Witan or National Council (S80), London unanimously chose Stephen King (1135).
The fatal defect in the new King was the absence of executive ability.
Following the example of Henry (S135), he issued two charters or pledges of good government; but without power to carry them out, they proved simply waste paper.
140. The Battle of the Standard (1135).
David I of Scotland, Matilda"s uncle, espoused her cause and invaded England with a powerful force. He was met at North Allerton, in Yorkshire, by the party of Stephen, and the battle of the Standard was fought.
The leaders of the English were both churchmen, who showed that they could fight as vigorously as they could pray (S136). The standard consisted of four consecrated banners, surmounted by a cross. This was set up on a wagon, on which one of the bishops stood. The sight of this sacred standard made the English invincible. (See map facing page 436.)
After a fierce contest the Scots were driven from the field. It is said that this was the first battle in which the English peasants used the long bow; they had taken the hist, perhaps, from the Norman archers at the battle of Hastings (SS73, 74). Many years later, their skill in foreign war made that weapon as famous as it was effective (S238).
141. Civil War (1138-1153).
For fifteen years following, the country was torn by civil war. While it raged, fortified castles, which, under William the Conqueror, had been built and occupied by the King only, or by those whom he could trust, now arose on every side. These strongholds became, as the "Anglo-Saxon Chronicle" (S99) declares, "very nests of devils and dens of thieves." More than a thousand of these castles, it is said, were built. The armed bands who inhavited them levied tribute on the whole country around.
Not satisfied with that, these miscreants seized those who were suspected of having property, and, in the words of the "Chronicle,"
"tortured them with pains unspeakable; for some they hung up by the feet and smoked with foul smoke; others they crushed in a narrow chest with sharp stones. About the heads of others they bound knotted cords until they went into the brain." "Thousands died of hunger, the towns were burned, and the soil left untilled. By such deeds the land was ruined, and men said openly that Christ and his saints were asleep."
The sleep, however, was not always to last; for in the next reign, Justice, in the person of Henry II, effectually vindicated her power.
The strife for the crown continued till the last year of Stephen"s reign. Then the Church came to the rescue, and through its powerful influence the Treaty of Wallingford (in Berkshire) was made. By that treaty it was agreed that Matilda"s son Henry should succeed Stephen.
142. Summary.
Stephen was the last of the Norman kings. Their reign had covered nearly a century. The period began in conquest and usurpation; it ended in gloom. We are not, however, to judge it by Stephen"s reign alone, but as a whole.
This considered, it shows at least one point of advance over the preceding period,--the triumph of the moral power of the Church over feudal discord. But Stephen"s reign was not all loss in other respects, for out of the "war, wickedness, and waste" of his misgovernment came a universal desire for peace through law. Thus indirectly this weak King"s inefficiency prepared the way for future reforms.
GENERAL REFERENCE SUMMARY OF THE NORMAN PERIOD (1066-1154)
I. Government. II. Religion. III. Military Affairs. IV. Literature, Learning, and Art. V. General Industry and Commerce. VI. Mode of Life, Manners, and Customs
I. Goverment
143. The King.
We have seen that the Saxons, or Early English rulers, in the case of Egbert and his successors, styled themselves Kings of the West Saxons or of some other division of that race, and that finally they a.s.sumed the broader t.i.tle of "Kings of the English," or leaders of the entire race or people (S49). The Norman sovereigns made no immediate change in this t.i.tle, but as a matter of fact William, toward the close of his reign, claimed the whole of the country as his own by right of conquest.
For this reason he and his Norman successors might properly have called themselves "Kings of England," that is, supreme owners of the soil and rulers over it; but this t.i.tle of territorial sovereignty was not formally a.s.sumed until about fifty years later, in John"s reign.
144. The Great Council.
a.s.sociated with the King in government was the Great or Central Council, made up of, first, the earls and barons; and secondly, of the archbishops, bishops, and abbots; that is, of all the great landholders holding directly from the Crown. The Great Council usually met three times a year,--at Christmas, Easter, and Whitsuntide. All laws were held to be made by the King, acting with the advice and consent of this Council,--which in the next century first came to be known as Parliament (1246, 1265, 1295),--but practically the King alone often enacted such laws as he saw fit (SS213, 217).
When a new sovereign came to the throne, it was with the consent or by the election of the Great Council, but their choice was generally limited to some one of the late King"s sons, and unless therer was good reason for making a different selection, the oldest was chosen.
Finally the right of imposing taxes rested, theoretically at least, in the King and Council, but, in fact, the King himself frequently levied them. This action of the King was a cause of constant irritation and of frequent insurrection.
145. The Private or King"s Council.
There was also a second and permanent council, called the King"s Council. The three leading officers of this were: first, the Chief Justice, who superintended the execution of the laws, represented the King, and ruled for him during his absence from the country; secondly, the Lord Chancellor (so called from cancelli, the screen behind which he sat with his clerks), who acted as the King"s adviser and confidential secretary, and as keeper of the Great Seal, with which he stamped all important papers;[1] thirdly, the Lord High Treasurer, who took charge of the King"s revenue, received all moneys due the Crown, and kept the King"s treasure in the vaults at Winchester or Westminster.
[1] The Lord Chancellor was also the "Keeper of the King"s Conscience," because intrusted with the duty of redressing those grievances of the King"s subjects which required royal interference.
The Court of Chancery (mentioned on page 73, note 1) grew out of this office.
146. Tallies.
All accounts were kept by the Treasurer on tallies or small sticks, notched on the opposite sides to represent different sums. These were split lengthwise. One was given as a receipt to the sheriff, or other person paying in money to the treasury, while the duplicate of this tally was held by the Treasurer. This primitive method of keeping royal accounts remained legally in force until 1785, in the reign of George III.
147. The Curia Regis,[2] or the King"s Court of Justice.
The Chief Justice and Chancellor were generally chosen by the King from among the clergy; first, because the clergy were men of education, while the barons were not; and next, because it was not expedient to intrust too much power to the barons. These officials, with the other members of the Private Council, const.i.tuted the King"s High Court of Justice.
[2] Curia Regis: This name was given, at different times, first, to the Great or National Council; secondly, to the King"s Private Council; and lastly, to the High Court of Justice, consisting of members of the Private Council.