[Footnote 114: This decree, of 10 Brumaire, an V, is printed in full, and commented on by Lumbroso, _op. cit._, p. 49. See too Sorel, "L"Europe et la Rev. Fr.," vol. iii., p. 389; and my article, "Napoleon and English Commerce," in the "Eng. Hist. Rev." of October, 1893.]
[Footnote 115: This phrase occurs, I believe, first in the conversation of Napoleon on May 1st, 1803: "We will form a more complete coast-system, and England shall end by shedding tears of blood" (Miot de Melito, "Mems.," vol. i., chap. xiv.).]
[Footnote 116: _E.g._, Fauchille, "Du Blocus maritime," pp. 93 _et seq._]
[Footnote 117: See especially the pamphlet "War in Disguise, or the Frauds of the Neutral Flags" (1805), by J. Stephen. It has been said that this pamphlet was a cause of the Orders in Council. The whole question is discussed by Manning, "Commentaries on the Law of Nations"
(1875); Lawrence, "International Law"; Mahan, "Infl. of Sea Power,"
vol. ii., pp. 274-277; Mollien, vol. iii., p. 289 (first edit.); and Chaptal, p. 275.]
[Footnote 118: Hausser, vol. iii., p. 61 (4th edit.). The Saxon federal contingent was fixed at 20,000 men.]
[Footnote 119: Papers presented to Parliament, December 22nd, 1806.]
[Footnote 120: After the interview of November 28th, 1801, Cornwallis reports that Napoleon "expressed a wish that we could agree to remove disaffected persons from either country ... and declared his willingness to send away United Irishmen" ("F.O. Records," No. 615).]
[Footnote 121: Czartoryski, "Mems.," vol. ii., ch. xv.]
[Footnote 122: In our "F.O. Records," Prussia, No. 74, is a report of Napoleon"s reply to a deputation at Warsaw (January, 1807): "I warn you that neither I nor any French prince cares for your Polish throne: I have crowns to give and don"t know what to do with them. You must first of all think of giving bread to my soldiers--"Bread, bread, bread." ... I cannot support my troops in this country, where there is no one besides n.o.bles and miserable peasants. Where are your great families? They are all sold to Russia. It is Czartoryski who wrote to Kosciusko not to come back to Poland." And when a Galician deputy asked him of the fate of his province, he turned on him: "Do you think that I will draw on myself new foes for one province." Nevertheless, the enthusiasm of the Poles was not wholly chilled. Their contingents did good service for him. Somewhat later, female devotion brought a beautiful young Polish lady to act as his mistress, primarily with the hope of helping on the liberation of her land, and then as a willing captive to the charm which he exerted on all who approached him. Their son was Count Walewska]
[Footnote 123: Marbot, ch. xxviii.]
[Footnote 124: Lettow-Vorbeck estimates the French loss at more than 24,000; that of the Russians as still heavier, but largely owing to the bad commissariat and wholesale straggling. On this see Sir R.
Wilson"s "Campaign in Poland," ch. i.]
[Footnote 125: Napoleon on February 13th charged Bertrand to offer _verbally, but not in writing_, to the King of Prussia a separate peace, without respect to the Czar. Frederick William was to be restored to his States east of the Elbe. He rejected the offer, which would have broken his engagements to the Czar. Napoleon repeated the offer on February 20th, which shows that, at this crisis, he did wish for peace with Prussia. See "Nap. Corresp.," No. 11810; and Hausser, vol. iii., p. 74.]
[Footnote 126: "I have been repeatedly pressed by the Prussian and Russian Governments," wrote Lord Hutchinson, our envoy at Memel, March 9th, 1807, "on the subject of a diversion to be made by British troops against Mortier.... Stettin is a large place with a small garrison and in a bad state of defence" ("F.O.," Prussia, No. 74). in 1805 Pitt promised to send a British force to Stralsund (see p. 17).]
[Footnote 127: Lord Cathcart"s secret report to the War Office, dated April 22nd, 1807, dealt with the appeal made by Lord Hutchinson, and with a _Projet_ of Dumouriez, both of whom strongly urged the expedition to Stralsund. On May 30th Castlereagh received a report from a Hanoverian officer, Kuckuck, stating that Hanover and Hesse were ripe for revolt, and that Hameln might easily be seized if the North Germans were encouraged by an English force ("Castlereagh Letters," vol. vi., pp. 169 and 211).]
[Footnote 128: "F.O.," Russia, No. 69.]
[Footnote 129: "Correspond.," No. 12563; also "La Mission du Gen.
Gardane en Perse," par le comte de Gardane. Napoleon in his proclamation of December 2nd, 1806, told the troops that their victories had won for France her Indian possessions and the Cape of Good Hope.]
[Footnote 130: Wilson, "Campaign in Poland"; "Operations du 3"me Corps [Davoust"s], 1806-1807," p. 199.]
[Footnote 131: "Corresp.," Nos. 12749 and 12751. Lejeune, in his "Memoirs," also shows that Napoleon"s chief aim was to seize Konigsberg.]
[Footnote 132: "Memoirs of Oudinot," ch. i]
[Footnote 133: The report is dated Memel, June 21st, 1807, in "F.O.,"
Prussia, No. 74. Hutchinson thinks the Russians had not more than 45,000 men engaged at Friedland, and that their losses did not exceed 15,000: but there were "mult.i.tudes of stragglers." Lettow-Vorbeck gives about the same estimates. Those given in the French bulletin are grossly exaggerated.]
[Footnote 134: On June 17th, 1807, Queen Louisa wrote to her father:"
... we fall with honour. The King has proved that he prefers honour to shameful submission." On June 23rd Bennigsen professed a wish to fight, while secretly advising surrender (Hardenberg, "Mems.," vol.
iii., p. 469).]
[Footnote 135: "F.O.," Russia, No. 69. Soult told Lord Holland ("Foreign Reminiscences," p. 185) that Bennigsen was plotting to murder the Czar, and he (S.) warned him of it.]
[Footnote 136: "Lettres inedites de Talleyrand," p. 468; also Garden, vol. x., pp. 205-210; and "Ann. Reg." (1807), pp. 710-724, for the British replies to Austria.]
[Footnote 137: Canning to Paget ("Paget Papers," vol. ii., p. 324). So too Canning"s despatch of July 21st to Gower (Russia, No. 69).]
[Footnote 138: Stadion saw through it. See Beer, p. 243.]
[Footnote 139: "Nap. Corresp.," No. 11918.]
[Footnote 140: _Ib._, No. 12028. This very important letter seems to me to refute M. Vandal"s theory ("Nap. et Alexandre," ch. i.), that Napoleon was throughout seeking for an alliance with _Austria_, or Prussia, or Russia.]
[Footnote 141: Canning to Paget, May 16th, 1807 ("Paget Papers," vol.
ii., p. 290).]
[Footnote 142: Garden, vol. x., pp. 214-218; and Gower"s despatch of June 17th. 1807 (Russia, No. 69).]
[Footnote 143: All references to the story rest ultimately on Bignon, "Hist. de France" (vol. vi., p. 316), who gives no voucher for it. For the reasons given above I must regard the story as suspect. Among a witty, phrase-loving people like the French, a good _mot_ is almost certain to gain credence and so pa.s.s into history.]
[Footnote 144: Tatischeff, "Alexandre I et Napoleon" (pp. 144-148).]
[Footnote 145: Reports of Savary and Lesseps, quoted by Vandal, _op.
cit._, p. 61; "Corresp.," No. 12825.]
[Footnote 146: Vandal, p. 73, says that the news reached Napoleon at a review when Alexander was by his side. If so, the occasion was carefully selected with a view to effect; for the news reached him on, or before, June 24th (see "Corresp.," No. 12819). Gower states that the news reached Tilsit as early as the 15th; and Hardenberg secretly proposed a policy of part.i.tion of Turkey on June 23rd ("Mems.," vol.
iii., p. 463). Hardenberg resigned office on July 4th, as Napoleon refused to treat through him.]
[Footnote 147: "Corresp.," No. 12862, letter of July 6th.]
[Footnote 148: Tatischeff (pp. 146-148 and 163-168) proves from the Russian archives that these schemes were Alexander"s, and were in the main opposed by Napoleon. This disproves Vandal"s a.s.sertion (p. 101) that Napoleon pressed Alexander to take the Memel and Polish districts.]
[Footnote 149: "Erinnerungen der Grafin von Voss."]
[Footnote 150: Probably this refers not to the rest.i.tution of Silesia, which he politely offered to her (though he had previously granted it on the Czar"s request), but to Madgeburg and its environs west of the Elbe. On July 7th he said to Goltz, the Prussian negotiator, "I am sorry if the Queen took as positive a.s.surances the _phrases de_ _politesse_ that one speaks to ladies" (Hardenberg"s "Mems.," vol.
iii., p. 512).]
[Footnote 151: See the new facts published by Bailleu in the "Hohenzollern Jahrbuch" (1899). The "rose" story is not in any German source.]
[Footnote 152: In his "Memoirs" (vol. i., pt. iii.) Talleyrand says that he repeated this story several times at the Tuileries, until Napoleon rebuked him for it.]
[Footnote 153: Before Tilsit Prussia had 9,744,000 subjects; afterwards only 4,938,000. See her frontiers in map on p. 215.]
[Footnote 154: The exact terms of the secret articles and of the secret treaty have only been known since 1890, when, owing to the labours of MM. Fournier, Tatischeff, and Vandal, they saw the light.]
[Footnote 155: Gower"s despatch of July 12th. "F.O.," Russia, No. 69.]
[Footnote 156: De Clercq, "Traites," vol. ii., pp. 223-225; Garden, vol. x., p. 233 and 277-290. Our envoy, Jackson, reported from Memel on July 28th: "Nothing can exceed the insolence and extortions of the French. No sooner is one demand complied with than a fresh one is brought forward."]
[Footnote 157: That he seriously thought in November, 1807, of leaving to Prussia less than half of her already cramped territories, is clear from his instructions to Caulaincourt, his amba.s.sador to the Czar: "Is it not to Prussia"s interest for her to place herself, at once, and with entire resignation, among the inferior Powers?" A new treaty was to be framed, under the guise of _interpreting_ that of Tilsit, Russia keeping the Danubian Provinces, and Napoleon more than half of Prussia (Vandal, vol. i., p. 509).]