[Footnote 158: Lucchesini to Gentz in October, 1806, in Gentz"s "Ausgewahlte Schriften," vol. v., p. 257.]
[Footnote 159: See Canning"s reply to Stahremberg"s Note, on April 25th, 1807, in the "Ann. Reg.," p. 724.]
[Footnote 160: For Mackenzie"s report and other details gleaned from our archives, see my article "A British Agent at Tilsit," in the "Eng.
Hist. Rev." of October, 1901.]
[Footnote 161: James, "Naval History," vol. iv., p. 408.]
[Footnote 162: "F.O.," Denmark, No. 53.]
[Footnote 163: Garden, vol. x., p. 408.]
[Footnote 164: "Corresp.," No. 12962; see too No. 12936, ordering the 15,000 Spanish troops now serving him near Hamburg to form the nucleus of Bernadotte"s army of observation, which, "in case of events," was to be strengthened by as many Dutch.]
[Footnote 165: "F.O.," Denmark, No. 53. I published this Memorandum of Canning and other unpublished papers in an article, "Canning and Denmark," in the "Eng. Hist. Rev." of January, 1896. The terms of the capitulation were, it seems, mainly decided on by Sir Arthur Wellesley, who wrote to Canning (September 8th): "I might have carried our terms higher ... had not our troops been needed at home" ("Well.
Despatches," vol. iii., p. 7).]
[Footnote 166: Castlereagh"s "Corresp.," vol. vi. So too Gower reported from St. Petersburg on October 1st that public opinion was "decidedly averse to war with England, ... and it appears to me that the English name was scarcely ever more popular in Russia than at the present time."]
[Footnote 167: Letters of July 19th and 29th.]
[Footnote 168: The phrase is that of Viscount Strangford, our amba.s.sador at Lisbon ("F.O.," Portugal, No. 55). So Baumgarten, "Geschichte Spaniens," vol. i., p. 136.]
[Footnote 169: Report of the Portuguese amba.s.sador, Lourenco de Lima, dated August 7th, 1807, inclosed by Viscount Strangford ("F.O.,"
Portugal, No. 55).]
[Footnote 170: This statement as to the date of the summons to Portugal is false: it was July 19th when he ordered it to be sent, that is, long before the Copenhagen news reached him.]
[Footnote 171: "Corresp.," No. 12839.]
[Footnote 172: See Lady Blennerha.s.set"s "Talleyrand," vol. ii., ch.
xvi., for a discussion of Talleyrand"s share in the new policy. This question, together with many others, cannot be solved, owing to Talleyrand"s destruction of most of his papers. In June, 1806, he advised a part.i.tion of Portugal; and in the autumn he is said to have favoured the overthrow of the Spanish Bourbons. But there must surely be some connection between Napoleon"s letter to him of July 19th, 1807, on Portuguese affairs and the resignation which he persistently offered on their return to Paris. On August 10th he wrote to the Emperor that that letter would be the last act of his Ministry ("Lettres inedites de Tall.," p. 476). He was succeeded by Champagny.]
[Footnote 173: "Corresp.," Nos. 13235, 37, 43.]
[Footnote 174: "Corresp.," Nos. 13314 and 13327. So too, to General Clarke, his new Minister of War, he wrote: "Junot may say anything he pleases, so long as he gets hold of the fleet" ("New Letters of Nap.,"
October 28th, 1807).]
[Footnote 175: Strangford"s despatches quite refute Thiers" confident statement that the Portuguese answers to Napoleon were planned in concert with us. I cannot find in our archives a copy of the Anglo-Portuguese Convention signed by Canning on October 22nd, 1807; but there are many references to it in his despatches. It empowered us to occupy Madeira; and our fleet did so at the close of the year. In April next we exchanged it for the Azores and Goa.]
[Footnote 176: "Corresp.," July 22nd, 1807.]
[Footnote 177: Between September 1st, 1807, and November 23rd, 1807, he wrote eighteen letters on the subject of Corfu, which he designed to be his base of operations as soon as the Eastern Question could be advantageously reopened. On February 8th, 1808, he wrote to Joseph that Corfu was more important than Sicily, and that "_in the present state of Europe, the loss of Corfu would be the greatest of disasters_." This points to his proposed part.i.tion of Turkey.]
[Footnote 178: Letter of October 13th, 1807.]
[Footnote 179: "Ann. Register" for 1807, pp. 227, 747.]
[Footnote 180: _Ibid._, pp. 749-750. Another Order in Council (November 25th) allowed neutral ships a few more facilities for colonial trade, and Prussian merchantmen were set free (_ibid._, pp.
755-759). In April, 1809, we further favoured the carrying of British goods on neutral ships, especially to or from the United States.]
[Footnote 181: Bourrienne, "Memoirs." The case against the Orders in Council is fairly stated by Lumbroso, and by Alison, ch. 50.]
[Footnote 182: Gower reported (on September 22nd) that the Spanish amba.s.sador at St. Petersburg had been pleading for help there, so as to avenge this insult.]
[Footnote 183: Baumgarten, "Geschichte Spaniens," vol. i., p. 138.]
[Footnote 184: "Nap. Corresp." of October 17th and 31st, November 13th, December 23rd, 1807, and February 20th, 1808; also Napier, "Peninsular War," bk. i., ch. ii.]
[Footnote 185: Letter of January 10th, 1808.]
[Footnote 186: Letter of Charles IV. to Napoleon of October 29th, 1807, published in "Murat, Lieutenant de l"Empereur en Espagne,"
Appendix viii.]
[Footnote 187: "New Letters of Napoleon."]
[Footnote 188: "Corresp.," letter of February 25th.]
[Footnote 189: Murat in 1814 told Lord Holland ("Foreign Reminiscences," p. 131) he had had no instructions from Napoleon.]
[Footnote 190: Thiers, notes to bk. xxix.]
[Footnote 191: "Memoires pour servir a l"histoire de la Revolution d"Espagne, par Nellerto"; also "The Journey of Ferdinand VII. to Bayonne," by Escoiquiz.]
[Footnote 192: "Corresp.," No. 13696. A careful comparison of this laboured, halting effusion, with the curt military syle*style of the genuine letters--and especially with Nos. 93, 94, and 100 of the "New Letters"--must demonstrate its non-authenticity. Thiers" argument to the contrary effect is rambling and weak. Count Murat in his recent monograph on his father p.r.o.nounces the letter a fabrication of St.
Helena or later. It was first published in the "Memorial de St.
Helene," an untrustworthy compilation made by Las Cases after Napoleon"s death from notes taken at St. Helena.]
[Footnote 193: Napoleon had at first intended the Spanish crown for Louis, to whom he wrote on March 27th: "The climate of Holland does not suit you. Besides, Holland can never rise from her ruins." Louis declined, on the ground that his call to Holland had been from heaven, and not from Napoleon!]
[Footnote 194: Memoirs of Thiebault and De Broglie; so, too, De Rocca, "La Guerre en Espagne."]
[Footnote 195: See the letter of an Englishman from Buenos Ayres of September 27th, 1809, in "Cobbett"s Register" for 1810 (p. 256), stating that the new popular Government there was driven by want of funds, "not from their good wishes to England," to open their ports to all foreign commerce on moderate duties.]
[Footnote 196: Vandal, "Napoleon et Alexandre," ch. vii. It is not published in the "Correspondence" or in the "New Letters."]
[Footnote 197: Vandal, "Napoleon et Alexandre," vol. i., ch. iv., and App. II.]
[Footnote 198: In the conversations which Metternich had with Napoleon and Talleyrand on and after January 22nd, 1808, he was convinced that the French Emperor intended to part.i.tion Turkey as soon as it suited him to do so, which would be after he had subjected Spain. Napoleon said to him: "When the Russians are at Constantinople you will need France to help you against them."--"Metternich Memoirs," vol. ii., p.
188.]
[Footnote 199: So Soult told Lord Holland ("Foreign Reminiscences," p.
171).]
[Footnote 200: Vandal, vol. i., p. 384.]
[Footnote 201: Metternich, "Mems.," vol. ii. p. 298 (Eng. edit.).]
[Footnote 202: I think that Beer (pp. 330-340) errs somewhat in ranking Talleyrand"s work at Erfurt at that statesman"s own very high valuation, which he enhanced in later years: see Greville"s "Mems.,"