"It is my boast, probably vain," he wrote to M. Andre Chevrillon in 1909, "to have invented the Mountains of the Moors. Sizeranne had been staying there for six weeks before he came into the British Hyeres, but, _he_, only on the coast. When I first showed that coast to emile Ollivier, Noel Blache, then President of the Conseil-General of the Var, and Felix Martin, the latter advised the narrow-gauge railway which ruined the politicians of the Var, and became "le Panama du Midi." My journey this time was to a.s.sure myself that the road and railway along the coast had not spoilt the _interior_. They have improved indeed, and I was glad, a road from the entrance to the forest on the main road from Hyeres to Cogolin, turning to the north over two cols to Collobrieres.
The T.C.F. has made a road from Collobrieres up the hill to the south-east, whence the walk to La Chartreuse de la Verne is easy. I used to have to reach that spot from Campo, the police post on the stream, called Campeaux upon the maps. The whole forest is unharmed. It is unknown to the British inhabitants of Hyeres. Not one had been there, or, I think, heard of it; and I met no human creature upon some twelve miles of the finest parts of the improved road. Grimaud, at the other end, I have no doubt you know. It was the Moorish capital. I went there the day that I lunched with emile Ollivier this time. There was a foot of ice on the top, at La Garde-Freinet, and one looked back, down on to Grimaud, standing baked by an African sun, and could make out the ripe oranges and the heads of the great cactus."
"Why does not someone "discover" France?" he writes to M. Joseph Reinach. "How few Frenchmen know the sunset view _north_ from St. Tropez in January!" And again to M. Chevrillon in 1909: "I adore the solitude of Sainte Baume, and believe in Marie Madeleine--except her head and tomb at St. Maxime, where Brutus Bonaparte helped keep the inn.
[Footnote: The eldest of the Bonapartes was not the only person of the Napoleonic days as to whom stories were told in the neighbourhood.
Desiree Clary was said to have lived at the inn of St. Maxime, and Sir Charles wrote to Mr. Morley concerning La Sainte Campagne: "My old cottage is supposed to be that where Murat was concealed after the 100 days."] Intellect is represented here by Robert de la Sizeranne, _but_ it is only two and a half hours in motor or two and a half by rail to La Moutte, where I make e. Ollivier read his fourteenth volume!"
All the little hill towns were known to him, and their history; he could show the spot at Cavalaire where the Moorish lords of Provence trained their famous horses; he knew the path at Le Lavandou, worn into the solid rock by the bare feet of countless generations. It irked him that the plain of Frejus was spoilt by the intrusion of white villas on what had once been called "a better Campagna." But these changes were of the surface only. Provence was still Provence, its people still unchanged from the days when Gambetta said to Sir Charles of one who projected a watercourse at Nice: "Jamais il ne coulera par cette riviere au tant d"eau qu"il n"en depensera de salive a en parler." There was still the local vintage in every inn, still the _beurre du berger_, the cheese and the conserves of fruit which every housewife in Provence sets out with pride in her own making; still the thin breeze of the mistral through the tree-tops, still the long white roads running between fields of violets and narcissi, and still white farmhouses among the terraced oliveyards and vines. All these things were an abiding joy, but a greater joy than all, and still more unchangeable, was the daily oncoming of light, the subtle flush and gradations of colour before the sun rose from that beloved sea.
II.
In the year 1908 Sir Charles"s health had been very bad, and he risked his life in attending the annual miners" meeting at the Speech House, leaving Dockett Eddy, as his custom was, at six in the morning, and returning home the same night. But by the following year he had regained his physical condition and his cheerfulness. The aspect of politics, too, had been transfigured. Speaking to his const.i.tuents in September, 1909, he reminded them how a year earlier the Liberal party had been despondent.
"This year all of them felt that the Government, with the country behind it--for the country was thoroughly behind the Government in the matter of the Budget--had taken, not only a new lease of life, but had adopted an att.i.tude which on the whole, apart from any little doubts in reference to particular details, commanded a confident and an enthusiastic support on the part of a wider majority of people than any other movement of modern times."
He told them of his own objections to the famous Budget--one in regard to the cider duty, upon which he had carried his point, the other to the increased tax on tobacco, which he had unsuccessfully resisted. So long as tea and tobacco were taxed as they were, the working cla.s.ses, in his judgment, paid more than their just proportion. Still, a great stride forward had been taken. As for the House of Lords throwing out the Budget, "those who did not like that Chamber wanted that fight, but it did not seem to him natural that the House of Lords would desire it, because it appeared to him to be a fight in which the Peers were perfectly certain to be beaten." Nevertheless it came to pa.s.s, a General Election followed, and the huge independent Liberal majority disappeared. Sir Charles was active to keep together the various sections which most desired to limit the power of the House of Lords, and on February 22nd, 1910, he, on behalf of the Radicals, held an interview with the Labour and Irish leaders together, to ascertain and discuss the line of action contemplated. Also, since there was a proposal that Government should, as a matter of urgency, oust private members and take all the time of the House, he saw Mr. J. S. Sandars, Mr. Balfour"s chief private secretary, and in Sir Charles"s phrase "factotum," to find out what the Opposition was going to do.
In the debates upon the Government"s Resolutions which laid the foundation for the Parliament Act, Sir Charles took no part. The matter had gone as he desired.
By April the Resolutions were adopted; but before action by Bill could be begun, the Parliamentary struggle was suspended by the death of King Edward. In that national loss Sir Charles Dilke felt special sorrow.
Whether as Prince of Wales or as King, the dead Sovereign had consistently shown him, not merely consideration, but friendship. It was among the satisfactions of Sir Charles"s last years of life that the principle, for which he had incurred odium by contending forty years earlier, now came to be fully recognized as that most respectful to the Crown. Lord Knollys writes that on the accession of King Edward VII., Sir Charles had called and "offered to support any reasonable Civil List which might be proposed." A Civil List Committee was appointed, on which Sir Charles served, and the result of its deliberations was to recommend a discontinuance of occasional grants from Parliament to members of the Royal Family. It did not, indeed, go to the length of making adequate provision for the family and leaving its distribution to the King, which was what Sir Charles always recommended; but it moved far in that direction, and to that extent carried out his views.
The royal funeral brought to London another Sovereign with whom Sir Charles had friendly personal relations, and the last page in his Memoir tells of a "long talk with King George of Greece at Buckingham Palace."
The King was inclined to deprecate the summoning of a National a.s.sembly for that autumn. He called it "stupid," whereat, says Sir Charles, "blank look on my part." Then, after a pause ("whereas till then we had talked in a perpetual duet"), the King went on to admit that the National a.s.sembly was his own creation.
"Well, I was against it at first because we can do by law already everything that is to be done by the National a.s.sembly. But I saw that it was the only way out."
"I am glad, Sir," Sir Charles quickly rejoined, "that I was not "stupid," for I attributed the invention to" (and he pointed) "its author."
The King, however, was afraid that some might "blame him," and when Sir Charles answered, "No one," he quoted the phrase once applied to him: "Bon pet.i.t roi, manque d"energie." The reply was: "I don"t know who said that, Sir! Your prestige is exactly opposite to the German Emperor"s prestige, but equally important to your country and to peace. It may have been a fool who said it, but it was probably chaff."
"... My family?"
"Oh, well, that is chaff--that is what I meant by chaff."
But Sir Charles took occasion to tell a very important member of the "family" that "Berlin and Athens were different."
When autumn came, the sitting of the Const.i.tutional Conference silenced Sir Charles and all men who desired a fair field for that great experiment. Its failure precipitated a new General Election.
By this time there was no doubt in Sir Charles"s mind as to the gravity of his physical condition. To a friend, who in October was setting out for extended travel in West Africa, he wrote these words in a letter wishing him G.o.d-speed:
"You are much more likely to come back alive than I am to be alive to welcome you. Yet I _hope_ that the less likely survival _may_ be, and of the other I feel pretty sure."
Knowing what he did of his own health, knowing the loyalty of his const.i.tuents, who had within a few months returned him by a majority of over two thousand, he might well have consented, as his friends wished, to fight the new election by deputy. It was not his way. Haggard and physically oppressed, he spent a fortnight in that bitter December going the round of meetings, addressing his supporters as best his bodily weakness allowed that strong will and fine courage to have their way.
The result was foregone: his majority was triumphant; but the exertion killed him. None the less, he came out of the fray jubilant; his side had won, the victory had been decisive. In Paris, where he went with Mr.
Hudson, the journalists came to him for his accustomed review of the total situation. "Depuis que je suis au Parlement, je n"ai pas connu un Ministere aussi solide que le Ministere preside par M. Asquith," was his emphatic word to M. Leudet in the _Figaro_.
The strain had in no way impaired his intellectual vitality. Those of his old friends who saw him, such as M. Reinach, had never known him more animated. To M. Andre Chevrillon, a newer friend by whom he had been greatly attracted, he wrote:
"I see in the _Times_ that you are writing on Russian literature and _music_. Please, then, include _Bell_ music: a saint"s eve at Troitsa Sergeifski! The silver notes floating in the dusty--or the frozen--air. I"ve been there in September, and I"ve been there in December.
"Any chance of seeing you--without moving, for I"m suffering from weak heart, after two winter-contested elections in one year? I"m extraordinarily better to-day, but am apt to "blow" in other than the Australian sense."
M. Chevrillon has written his impression of the gravity which lay behind that cheery tone.
"J"allai le voir a l"Hotel St. James. Je n"oublierai jamais l"impression que m"a laissee cette visite. II etait d"une paleur de marbre; il m"a dit brievement qu"il se savait en danger immediat, que le medecin l"avait averti; et tout de suite, quittant ce sujet, il m"a parle avec son animation, sa verve et sa precision habituelle de la situation politique en Angleterre. II y avait ce jour--la sur cette n.o.ble figure toute bleme, une dignite, j"ose dire une majeste, extraordinaire; il etait deja marque par la mort; il la regardait venir avec une tranquillite et un courage absolu; j"emportai de cette visite le douloureux sentiment que je ne le reverrais pas, et une admiration qui me restera toujours pour ce que je venais d"entrevoir de son caractere."
From Paris he insisted on moving South once more. He travelled now as an invalid; but when morning light came into the compartment where he lay, he made his way to the window and beheld again cypress and olive, sun-baked swarthy soil, little hills with rocky crests fantastically chiselled, all bathed in the dazzling sunshine of the South. Leaning his face against the window, he said: "Provence always plays up."
At Hyeres he was kept in bed. But he still read the books that came to him by post, still dictated his reviews for the _Athenaeum_, and still enjoyed the reading aloud of French plays, which had become a habit of holiday time. And, above all, from his window as he lay he watched with delight unjaded the spectacle of sea and sky. "Am I not a fortunate invalid," he said, "to have the most beautiful view in the world to look at?"
Now and then his shout of laughter would be heard and the old spirit of fun would a.s.sert itself. When the journey home in January, 1911, had to be faced, he rallied for it, came to the restaurant on the train, and during the crossing sat on deck with Miss Constance Smith, who writes:
"At that time his thoughts seemed to stray from this last journey back to that which we had taken in the autumn. "It is worth while,"
he said, "to have seen Aosta. I am glad to have done it. It is not often at my age that one can get so much pleasure out of a new thing." I think he had a double motive in mentioning Aosta. He put it forward partly to obliterate for me the sadness of the past three weeks by raising the memory of the pleasant times that lay behind."
When he reached London he was happy to be again at home and he felt better. Those with him had no fear for the immediate future, and he himself fully expected to take his place in Parliament when it met.
Friends would have induced him to consider what part of his work could be abandoned, but his answer was peremptory: "I won"t be kept alive to do nothing." Confined to bed as he was, work still went on; he received and answered letters, read and annotated Blue-books. Curiously and almost dramatically, the occupations of these last days sifted themselves out in such fashion that the very latest things he handled became, in some sort, an epitome of his life"s work. M. Michelidakis, President of the Cretan Executive Committee, had written to complain, on behalf of the Cretan people, that the last note of the Powers seemed to reverse their policy of slowly transferring Crete to a local government.
On January 24th Sir Charles answered this appeal for his help. It was the last letter that he signed with his own hand--fit close to a lifelong championship.
Other clients were knocking at his door that same day, other voices from that strange retinue of pet.i.tioners who brought from all quarters of the world to this one man their cry for protection and redress. What they asked was no romantic action, nothing stirring or picturesque, but simply the weight of his authority exhibited on their side, and the wisdom of his long practice in public life for their guidance. He was to fix a date for introducing a deputation concerning certain grievances of the coloured people in Jamaica, and was to advise upon the best way to raise a number of minor West African questions in the new Parliament.
His answer was sent from 76, Sloane Street:
_January 24th_, 1911.
"I am still lying up, but I think that I could answer any ordinary call to duty, and I am trying a small private meeting to-morrow afternoon, though I shall return to bed here.
"I will note Thursday, 2nd, at noon, on the chance of being well enough.
"The questions which personally interest me the most are those affecting the concessionary companies, and I should be glad if you would ask Wedgwood to keep very close touch with me on these. He likes me, and is quite willing to show me things; but he does too much and, like myself, is always tired, and the result is that he has to be reminded as to consultation in advance, though he does not mind this being done.
"I doubt there being much danger about the Gambia. As for the Southern Nigerian ordinances, I am not competent, and have a general impression that as a rule we do best on more general lines, though some of the concessionary companies make such "cases" as to form exceptions."
His strength was far spent. This letter, says Mr. Hudson, writing two days later to the President of the Aborigines" Protection Society, "he asked me to sign, after wishing to sign himself."
Yet the brain was clear and the will unshaken. The "small private meeting" of which he wrote was a committee of directors of the _Gardeners" Chronicle_, and on the 25th he was preparing to rise and dress to attend this, but was persuaded to go back to bed. In bed, he was still busy reading and marking Blue-books which bore upon the case of the unorganized workers. The papers so prepared were, by his direction, set aside for the service of the Women"s Trade-Union League.
They were delivered next morning, but the messenger who took them carried with them the tidings of Sir Charles Dilke"s death. He had slipped suddenly out of life, his heart failing, soon after four o"clock on the morning of Thursday, January 26th, 1911.
To the funeral service at Holy Trinity, Sloane Street, on January 30th, there came from the House of Commons members of the Cabinet and of the Ministry, representatives of Liberalism and Labour, the Irish leader with several of his colleagues, while from the Unionist benches also men paid this tribute to an honoured opponent. But the Parliamentary figure of most interest was Mr. Austen Chamberlain, who carried from a sick-room to the graveside the farewell of old comrade to old comrade.
Among the congregation were men who had been official representatives of great dominions of the Empire or of foreign Governments. These came in their private capacity, but one nation as a nation was represented there. The King of the h.e.l.lenes sent his Minister in London to be his deputy, and the Greek Government ordered a wreath, the token of their sorrow and grat.i.tude, to be laid upon the bier.
Tributes poured in from the great ma.s.s of his fellow-countrymen; from philanthropic societies; from those who, in or out of Parliament, had worked with his help and guidance. But above all there were messages from every trade union and organization of wage-earners, letters from men and from women in every kind of employ, testifying of service done, of infinitely varied knowledge, of devotion that knew no limit, and that had not gone without the one reward acceptable to the man they honoured, their responsive love and grat.i.tude.
So closed a life across which many commentators of the moment wrote, some lightly, some in sincere regret, the word Failure. It was ill-chosen. They should have written Loss. His career had not fulfilled the promise of its opening; his abilities had never found the full scope which once seemed a.s.sured to them; he had done for his country only what his country permitted him to do. Over this it was natural, it was reasonable, to speak words of sorrow. Those who said--and there were not a few who said it--that he had accomplished more out of office than he could ever have achieved in office, paid a tribute to the greatness of his work, but they did not understand the force which had been wasted.
He combined two gifts rarely found in combination--the gift of Parliamentary leadership and a profound knowledge of foreign affairs.