[20] _Frankenstein_ was published in 1818.
[21] House of Commons, April 27, 1866.
[22] _Letter to Dundas, with a sketch of a Negro Code_, 1792. But see _Life of W. Wilberforce_, v. p. 157.
CHAPTER II
ETON
(_1821-1827_)
It is in her public schools and universities that the youth of England are, by a discipline which shallow judgments have sometimes attempted to undervalue, prepared for the duties of public life.
There are rare and splendid exceptions, to be sure, but in my conscience I believe, that England would not be what she is without her system of public education, and that no other country can become what England is, without the advantages of such a system.--CANNING.
It is difficult to discern the true dimensions of objects in that mirage which covers the studies of one"s youth.--GLADSTONE.
In September 1821, the young Gladstone was sent to Eton. Life at Eton lasted over six years, until the Christmas of 1827. It impressed images that never faded, and left traces in heart and mind that the waves of time never effaced,--so profound is the early writing on our opening page. Canning"s words at the head of our present chapter set forth a superst.i.tion that had a powerful hold on the English governing cla.s.s of that day, and the new Etonian never shook it off. His attachment to Eton grew with the lapse of years; to him it was ever "the queen of all schools."
"I went," he says, "under the wing of my eldest brother, then in the upper division, and this helped my start and much mitigated the sense of isolation that attends the first launch at a public school." The door of his dame"s house looked down the Long Walk, while the windows looked into the very crowded churchyard: from this he never received the smallest inconvenience, though it was his custom (when master of the room) to sleep with his window open both summer and winter. The school, said the new scholar, has only about four hundred and ninety fellows in it, which was considered uncommonly small. He likes his tutor so much that he would not exchange him for any ten. He has various rows with Mrs. Shurey, his dame, and it is really a great shame the way they are fed. He and his brother have far the best room in the dame"s house. His captain is very good-natured. Fighting is a favourite diversion, hardly a day pa.s.sing without one, two, three, or even four more or less mortal combats.
MANNERS AT ETON
You will be glad to hear, he writes to his Highland aunt Johanna (November 13, 1821), of an instance of the highest and most honourable spirit in a highlander labouring under great disadvantages. His name is Macdonald (he once had a brother here remarkably clever, and a capital fighter). He is tough as iron, and about the strongest fellow in the school of his size. Being pushed out of his seat in school by a fellow of the name of Arthur, he airily asked him to give it him again, which being refused, with the additional insult that he might try what he could do to take it from him, Macdonald very properly took him at his word, and began to push him out of his seat. Arthur struck at him with all his might, and gave him so violent a blow that Macdonald was almost knocked backwards, but disdaining to take a blow from even a fellow much bigger than himself, he returned Arthur"s blow with interest; they began to fight; after Macdonald had made him bleed at both his nose and his mouth, he finished the affair very triumphantly by knocking the arrogant Arthur backwards over the form without receiving a single blow of any consequence. He also labours under the additional disadvantage of being a new fellow, and of not knowing any one here. Arthur in a former battle put his finger out of joint, and as soon as it is recovered they are to have a regular battle in the playing fields.
Other encounters are described with equal zest, especially one where "the honour of Liverpool was bravely sustained," superior weight and size having such an advantage over toughness and strength, that the foe of Liverpool was too badly bruised and knocked about to appear in school. On another occasion, "to the great joy" of the narrator, an oppidan vanquished a colleger, though the colleger fought so furiously that he put his fingers out of joint, and went back to the cla.s.sic studies that soften manners, with a face broken and quite black. The Windsor and Slough coaches used to stop under the wall of the playing fields to watch these desperate affrays, and once at least in these times a boy was killed. With plenty of fighting went on plenty of flogging; for the headmaster was the redoubtable Dr. Keate, with whom the appointed instrument of moral regeneration in the childish soul was the birch rod; who on heroic occasions was known to have flogged over eighty boys on a single summer day; and whose one mellow regret in the evening of his life was that he had not flogged far more. Religious instruction, as we may suppose, was under these circ.u.mstances reduced to zero; there was no trace of the influence of the evangelical party, at that moment the most active of all the religious sections; and the ancient and pious munificence of Henry VI. now inspired a scene that was essentially little better than pagan, modified by an official church of England varnish. At Eton, Mr. Gladstone wrote of this period forty years after, "the actual teaching of Christianity was all but dead, though happily none of its forms had been surrendered."[23]
Science even in its rudiments fared as ill as its eternal rival, theology. There was a mathematical master, but n.o.body learned anything from him, or took any notice of him. In his anxiety for position the unfortunate man asked Keate if he might wear a cap and gown. "That"s as you please," said Keate. "Must the boys touch their hats to me?" "That"s as they please," replied the genial doctor.[24] Gladstone first picked up a little mathematics, not at Eton, but during the holidays, going to Liverpool for the purpose, first in 1824 and more seriously in 1827. He seems to have paid much attention to French, and even then to have attained considerable proficiency. "When I was at Eton," Mr. Gladstone said, "we knew very little indeed, but we knew it accurately." "There were many shades of distinction," he observed, "among the fellows who received what was supposed to be, and was in many respects, their education. Some of those shades of distinction were extremely questionable, and the comparative measures of honour allotted to talent, industry, and idleness were undoubtedly such as philosophy would not justify. But no boy was ever estimated either more or less because he had much money to spend. It added nothing to him if he had much, it took nothing from him if he had little." A sharp fellow who worked, and a stupid fellow who was idle, were both of them in good odour enough, but a stupid boy who presumed to work was held to be an insufferable solecism.[25]
KNOWLEDGE AT ETON
My tutor was the Rev. H. H. Knapp (practically all tutors were clergymen in those days). He was a reputed whig, an easy and kind-tempered man with a sense of scholarship, but no power of discipline, and no energy of desire to impress himself upon his pupils. I recollect but one piece of advice received later from him. It was that I should form my poetical taste upon Darwin, whose poems (the "Botanic Garden" and "Loves of the Plants") I obediently read through in consequence. I was placed in the middle remove fourth form, a place slightly better than the common run, but inferior to what a boy of good preparation or real excellence would have taken. My nearest friend of the first period was W. W. Parr, a boy of intelligence, something over my age, next above me in the school.
At this time there was not in me any desire to know or to excel. My first pursuits were football and then cricket; the first I did not long pursue, and in the second I never managed to rise above mediocrity and what was termed "the twenty-two." There was a barrister named Henry Hall Joy, a connection of my father through his first wife, and a man who had taken a first-cla.s.s at Oxford. He was very kind to me, and had made some efforts to inspire me with a love of books, if not of knowledge. Indeed I had read Froissart, and Hume with Smollett, but only for the battles, and always skipping when I came to the sections headed "A Parliament." Joy had a taste for cla.s.sics, and made visions for me of honours at Oxford.
But the subject only danced before my eyes as a will-of-the-wisp, and without attracting me. I remained stagnant without heart or hope. A change however arrived about Easter 1822. My "remove" was then under Hawtrey (afterwards head-master and provost), who was always on the lookout for any bud which he could warm with a little sunshine.
He always described Hawtrey as the life of the school, the man to whom Eton owed more than to any of her sons during the century. Though not his pupil, it was from him that Gladstone, when in the fourth form, received for the first time incentives to exertion. "It was entirely due to Hawtrey," he records in a fragment, "that I first owed the reception of a spark, the _divinae particulam aurae_, and conceived a dim idea, that in some time, manner, and degree, I might come to know. Even then, as I had really no instructor, my efforts at Eton, down to 1827, were perhaps of the purest plodding ever known."
Evidently he was not a boy of special mark during the first three years at Eaton. In the evening he played chess and cards, and usually lost. He claimed in after life that he had once taken a drive in a hired tandem, but Etonians who knew him as a schoolboy decided that an aspiring memory here made him boast of crimes that were not his. He was a.s.siduous in the Eton practice of working a small boat, whether skiff, funny, or wherry, single-handed. In the masquerade of Montem he figured complacently in all the glories of the costume of a Greek patriot, for he was a faithful Canningite; the heroic struggle against the Turk was at its fiercest, and it was the year when Byron died at Missolonghi. Of Montem as an inst.i.tution he thought extremely ill, "the whole thing a wretched waste of time and money, a most ingenious contrivance to exhibit us as baboons, a bore in the full sense of the word." He did not stand aside from the harmless gaieties of boyish life, but he rigidly refused any part in boyish indecorums. He was, in short, just the diligent, cheerful, healthy-minded schoolboy that any good father would have his son to be. He enjoys himself with his brother at the Christopher, and is glad to record that "Keate did not make any jaw about being so late."
Half a dozen of them met every whole holiday or half, and went up Salt Hill to bully the fat waiter, eat toasted cheese, and drink egg-wine.
SCHOOL DAYS
He started, as we have already seen, in middle fourth form. In the spring of 1822 Hawtrey said to him: "Continue to do as well as this, and I will send you up for good again before the fourth of June." Before the end of June, he tells his sailor brother of his success: "It far exceeds the most sanguine expectations I ever entertained. I have got into the remove between the fourth and fifth forms. I have been sent up for good a second time, and have taken seven places." In the summer of 1823 he announces that he has got into the fifth form after taking sixteen places, and here instead of f.a.gging he acquires the blessed power himself to f.a.g. In pa.s.sing he launches, for the first recorded time, against the master of the remove from which he has just been promoted, an invective that in volume and intensity antic.i.p.ates the wrath of later attacks on Neapolitan kings and Turkish sultans.
His letters written from Eton breathe in every line the warm breath of family affection, and of all those natural pieties that had so firm a root in him from the beginning to the end. Of the later store of genius and force that the touch of time was so soon to kindle into full glow, they gave but little indication. We smile at the precocious _copia fandi_ that at thirteen describes the language of an admonishing acquaintance as "so friendly, manly, sound, and disinterested that notwithstanding his faults I must always think well of him." He sends contributions to his brother"s sc.r.a.p-book, and one of the first of them, oddly enough, in view of one of the great preoccupations of his later life, is a copy of Lord Edward Fitzgerald"s stanzas on the night of his arrest:--
"O Ireland, my country, the hour Of thy pride and thy splendour has pa.s.sed.
And the chain which was spurned in thy moment of power, Hangs heavy around thee at last."
The temper and dialect of evangelical religion are always there. A friend of the family dies, and the boy pours out his regret, but after all what is the merely natural death of Dr. N. compared with the awful state of a certain clergyman, also an intimate friend, who has not only been guilty of attending a fancy ball, but has followed that vicious prelude by even worse enormities, unnamed, that surely cannot escape the vigilance and the reproof of his bishop?
His father is the steady centre of his life. "My father," he writes to his brother, "is as active in mind and projects as ever; he has two princ.i.p.al plans now in embryo. One of these is a railroad between Liverpool and Manchester for the conveyance of goods by locomotive-steam-engine. The other is for building a bridge over the Mersey at Runcorn." In May 1827, the Gloucester and Berkeley ca.n.a.l is opened: "a great and enterprising undertaking, but still there is no fear of it beating Liverpool." Meanwhile, "what prodigiously quick travelling to leave Eton at twelve on Monday, and reach home at eight on Tuesday!" "I have," he says in 1826, "lately been writing several letters in the _Liverpool Courier_." His father had been attacked in the local prints for sundry economic inconsistencies, and the controversial pen that was to know no rest for more than seventy years to come, was now first employed, like the pious aeneas bearing off Anchises, in the filial duty of repelling his sire"s a.s.sailants. Ignorant of his nameless champion, John Gladstone was much amused and interested by the anonymous "Friend to Fair Dealing," while the son was equally diverted by the criticisms and conjectures of the parent.
YOUTHFUL READING
With the formidable Keate the boy seems to have fared remarkably well, and there are stories that he was even one of the tyrant"s favourites.[26] His school work was diligently supplemented. His daily reading in 1826 covers a good deal of miscellaneous ground, including Moliere and Racine, Blair"s _Sermons_ ("not very substantial"), _Tom Jones_, Tomline"s _Life of Pitt_, Waterland"s _Commentaries_, Leslie _on Deism_, Locke"s _Defence of The Reasonableness of Christianity_, which he finds excellent; _Paradise Lost_, Milton"s _Latin Poems_ and _Epitaphium Damonis_ ("exquisite"), Ma.s.singer"s _Fatal Dowry_ ("most excellent"), Ben Jonson"s _Alchemist_; Scott, including the _Bride of Lammermoor_ ("a beautiful tale, indeed," and in after life his favourite of them all), Burke, Clarendon, and others of the shining host whose very names are music to a scholar"s ear. In the same year he reads "a most violent article on Milton by Macaulay, fair and unfair, clever and silly, allegorical and bombastic, republican and anti-episcopal--a strange composition, indeed." In 1827 he went steadily through the second half of Gibbon, whom he p.r.o.nounces, "elegant and acute as he is, not so clear, so able, so attractive as Hume; does not impress my mind so much." In the same year he reads c.o.xe"s _Walpole_, _Don Quixote_, Hallam"s _Const.i.tutional History_, _Measure for Measure_ and _Much Ado_, Ma.s.singer"s _Grand Duke of Florence_, Ford"s _Love"s Melancholy_ ("much of it good, the end remarkably beautiful") and _Broken Heart_ (which he liked better than either the other or _"Tis Pity_), Locke _on Toleration_ ("much repet.i.tion").
There is, of course, a steady refrain of Greek iambics, Greek anapaests, "an easy and nice metre," "a hodge-podge lot of hendecasyllables," and thirty alcaic stanzas for a holiday task. Mention is made of many sermons on "Redeeming the time," "Weighed in the balance and found wanting," "Cease to do evil, learn to do well," and the other ever unexhausted texts. One constant entry, we may be sure, is "Read Bible,"
with Mant"s notes. In a mood of deep piety he is prepared for confirmation. His appearance at this time was recalled by one who had been his f.a.g, "as a good-looking, rather delicate youth, with a pale face and brown curling hair, always tidy and well dressed."[27]
He became captain of the fifth at the end of October 1826, and on February 20, 1827, Keate put him into the sixth. "Was very civil, indeed; told me to take pains, etc.: to be careful in using my authority, etc." He finds the sixth very preferable to all other parts of the school, both as regards pleasure and opportunity for improvement.
They are more directly under the eye of Keate; he treats them with more civility and speaks to them differently. So the days follow one another very much alike--studious, cheerful, sociable, sedulous. The debates in parliament take up a good deal of his time, and he is overwhelmed by the horrible news of the defeat of the catholics in the House of Commons (March 8,1827). On a summer"s day in 1826, "Mr. Canning here; inquired after me and missed me." He was not at Eton but at home when he heard of Mr. Canning"s death. "Personally I must remember his kindness and condescension, especially when he spoke to me of some verses which H.
Joy had injudiciously mentioned to him."
II
DEBATING SOCIETY
Youthful intellect is imitative, and in a great school so impregnated as Eton with the spirit of public life and political a.s.sociation, the few boys with active minds mimicked the strife of parliament in their debating society, and copied the arts of journalism in the _Eton Miscellany_. In both fields the young Gladstone took a leading part. The debating society was afflicted with "the premonitory lethargy of death,"
but the a.s.siduous energy of Gaskell, seconded by the gifts of Gladstone, Hallam, and Doyle, soon sent a new pulse beating through it. The politics of the hour, that is to say everything not fifty years off, were forbidden ground; but the execution of Strafford or of his royal master, the deposition of Richard II., the last four years of the reign of Queen Anne, the Peerage bill of 1719, the characters of Harley and Bolingbroke, were themes that could be made by ingenious youth to admit a hundred cunning sidelights upon the catholic question, the struggle of the Greeks for independence, the hard case of Queen Caroline, and the unlawfulness of swamping the tories in the House of Lords. On duller afternoons they argued on the relative claims of mathematics and metaphysics to be the better discipline of the human mind; whether duelling is or is not inconsistent with the character that we ought to seek; or whether the education of the poor is on the whole beneficial.
It was on this last question (October 29, 1825) that the orator who made his last speech seventy years later, now made his first. "Made my first or maiden speech at the society," he enters in his diary, "on education of the poor; funked less than I thought I should, by much." It is a curious but a characteristic circ.u.mstance not that so many of his Eton speeches were written out, but that the ma.n.u.script should have been thriftily preserved by him all through the long s.p.a.ce of intervening years. "Mr. President," it begins, "in this land of liberty, in this age of increased and gradually increasing civilization, we shall hope to find few, if indeed any, among the higher cla.s.ses who are eager or willing to obstruct the moral instruction and mental improvement of their fellow creatures in the humbler walks of life. If such there are, let them at length remember that the poor are endowed with the same reason, though not blessed with the same temporal advantages. Let them but admit, what I think no one can deny, that they are placed in an elevated situation princ.i.p.ally for the purpose of doing good to their fellow creatures. Then by what argument can they repel, by what pretence can they evade the duty?" And so forth and so forth. Already we seem to hear the born speaker in the amplitude of rhetorical form in which, juvenile though it may be, a commonplace is cast. "Is human grandeur so stable that they may deny to others that which they would in an humble situation desire themselves? Or has human pride reached such a pitch of arrogance that they have learned to defy both right and reason, to reject the laws of natural kindness that ought to reign in the breast of all, and to look on their fellow countrymen as the refuse of mankind?...
Is it morally just or politically expedient to keep down the industry and genius of the artisan, to blast his rising hopes, to quell his spirit? A thirst for knowledge has arisen in the minds of the poor; let them satisfy it with wholesome nutriment and beware lest driven to despair," et cetera. Crude enough, if we please; but the year was 1826, and we may feel that the boyish speaker is already on the generous side and has the gift of fruitful sympathies.
In the s.p.a.cious tournaments of old history, we may smile to hear debating forms and ceremony applied to everlasting controversies. "Sir,"
he opens on one occasion, "I declare that as far as regards myself, I shall have very little difficulty in stating my grounds on which I give my vote for James Graham [the Marquis of Montrose]. It is because I look upon him as a hero, not merely endowed with that animal ferocity which has often been the sole qualification which has obtained men that appellation from the mult.i.tude--I should be sorry indeed if he had no testimonials of his merits, save such as arise from the mad and thoughtless exclamations of popular applause." In the same gallant style (Jan. 26, 1826) he votes for Marcus Aurelius, in answer to the question whether Trajan has any equal among the Roman emperors from Augustus onwards. Another time the question was between John Hampden and Clarendon. "Sir, I look back with pleasure to the time when we unanimously declared our disapprobation of the impeachment of the Earl of Strafford. I wish I could hope for the same unanimity now, but I will endeavour to regulate myself by the same principles as directed me then.... Now, sir, with regard to the impeachment of the five members, it is really a little extraordinary to hear the honourable opener talking of the violence offered by the king, and the terror of the parliament. Sir, do we not all know that the king at that time had neither friends nor wealth?... Did the return of these members with a triumphant mob accompanying them indicate terror? Did the demands of the parliament or the insolence of their language show it?" So he proceeds through all the well-worn arguments; and "therefore it is," he concludes, "that I give my vote to the Earl of Clarendon, because he gave his support to the falling cause of monarchy; because he stood by his church and his king; because he adopted the part which loyalty, reason, and moderation combined to dictate.... Poverty, banishment, and disgrace he endured without a murmur; he still adhered to the cause of justice, he still denounced the advocates of rebellion, and if he failed in his reward in life, oh, sir, let us not deny it to him after death.
In him, sir, I admire the sound philosopher, the rigid moralist, the upright statesman, the candid historian.... In Hampden I see the splendour of patriotic bravery obscured by the darkness of rebellion, and the faculties by which he might have been a real hero and real martyr, prost.i.tuted in the cause," and so on, with all the promise of the _os magna soniturum_, of which time was to prove the resources so inexhaustible. On one great man he pa.s.sed a final judgment that years did not change:--"Debate on Sir R. Walpole: Hallam, Gaskell, Pickering, and Doyle spoke. Voted for him. Last time, when I was almost entirely ignorant of the subject, against him. There were sundry considerable blots, but nothing to overbalance or to spoil the great merit of being the bulwark of the protestant succession, his commercial measures, and in general his pacific policy."[28]
ETON MISCELLANY
As for the _Eton Miscellany_, which was meant to follow earlier attempts in the same line, the best-natured critic cannot honestly count it dazzling. Such things rarely are; for youth, though the most adorable of our human stages, cannot yet have knowledge or practice enough, whether in life or books, to make either good prose or stirring verse, unless by a miracle of genius, and even that inspiration is but occasional. The _Microcosm_ (1786-87) and the _Etonian_ (1818), with such hands as Canning and Frere, Moultrie and Praed, were well enough. The newcomer was a long way behind these in the freshness, brilliance, daring, by which only such juvenile performances can either please or interest.
George Selwyn and Gladstone were joint editors, and each provided pretty copious effusions. "I cannot keep my temper," he wrote afterwards in his diary in 1835, on turning over the _Miscellany_, "in perusing my own (with few exceptions) execrable productions." Certainly his contributions have no particular promise or savour, no hint of the strong pinions into which the half-fledged wings were in time to expand.
Their motion, such as it is, must be p.r.o.nounced mechanical; their phrase and cadence conventional. Even when sincere feelings were deeply stirred, the flight cannot be called high. The most moving public event in his schooldays was undoubtedly the death of Canning, and to Gladstone the stroke was almost personal. In September 1827 he tells his mother that he has for the first time visited Westminster Abbey,--his object, an eager pilgrimage to the newly tenanted grave of his hero, and in the _Miscellany_ he pays a double tribute. In the prose we hear sonorous things about meridian splendour, premature extinction, and inscrutable wisdom; about falling, like his great master Pitt, a victim to his proud and exalted station; about being firm in principle and conciliatory in action, the friend of improvement and the enemy of innovation. Nor are the versified reflections in Westminster Abbey much more striking:--
Oft in the sculptured aisle and swelling dome, The yawning grave hath given the proud a home; Yet never welcomed from his bright career A mightier victim than it welcomed here: Again the tomb may yawn--again may death Claim the last forfeit of departing breath; Yet ne"er enshrine in slumber dark and deep A n.o.bler, loftier prey than where thine ashes sleep.
Excellent in feeling, to be sure; but as a trial of poetic delicacy or power, wanting the true note, and only worth recalling for an instant as we go.
III
FRIENDS
As nearly always happens, it was less by school work or spoken addresses in juvenile debate, or early attempts in the great and difficult art of written composition, than by blithe and congenial comradeship that the mind of the young Gladstone was stimulated, opened, strengthened. In after days he commemorated among his friends George Selwyn, afterwards bishop of New Zealand and of Lichfield, "a man whose character is summed up, from alpha to omega, in the single word, n.o.ble, and whose high office, in a large measure, it was to reintroduce among the anglican clergy the pure heroic type." Another was Francis Doyle, "whose genial character supplied a most pleasant introduction for his unquestionable poetic genius." A third was James Milnes Gaskell, a youth endowed with precocious ripeness of political faculty, an enthusiast, and with a vivacious humour that enthusiasts often miss. Doyle said of him that his nurse must have lulled him to sleep by parliamentary reports, and his first cries on awaking in his cradle must have been "hear, hear"!
Proximity of rooms "gave occasion or aid to the formation of another very valuable friendship, that with Gerald Wellesley, afterwards dean of Windsor, which lasted, to my great profit, for some sixty years, until that light was put out." In Gaskell"s room four or five of them would meet, and discuss without restraint the questions of politics that were too modern to be tolerated in public debate. Most of them were friendly to catholic emanc.i.p.ation, and to the steps by which Huskisson, supported by Canning, was cautiously treading in the path towards free trade. The brightest star in this cheerful constellation was the rare youth who, though his shining course was run in two-and-twenty years, yet in that scanty span was able to impress with his vigorous understanding and graceful imagination more than one of the loftiest minds of his time.[29] Arthur Hallam was a couple of years younger than Gladstone, no narrow gulf at that age; but such was the sympathy of genius, such the affinities of intellectual interest and aspiration spoken and unspoken, such the charm and the power of the younger with the elder, that rapid instinct made them close comrades. They clubbed together their rolls and b.u.t.ter, and breakfasted in one another"s rooms. Hallam was not strong enough for boating, so the more sinewy Gladstone used to scull him up to the Shallows, and he regarded this toilsome carrying of an idle pa.s.senger up stream as proof positive of no common value set upon his pa.s.senger"s company. They took walks together, often to the monument of Gray, close by the churchyard of the elegy; arguing about the articles and the creeds; about Wordsworth, Byron, Sh.e.l.ley; about free will, for Hallam was precociously full of Jonathan Edwards; about politics, old and new, living and dead; about Pitt and Fox, and Canning and Peel, for Gladstone was a tory and Hallam pure whig. Hallam was described by Mr.