To the reverend doctor Bentley, on the opening of Trinity-College Chapel, Cambridge.
On a Lady, who is the most beautiful and witty when she is angry.
This poem begins with these lines.
Long had I known the soft, inchanting wiles, Which Cupid practised in Aurelia"s smiles.
"Till by degrees, like the fam"d Asian taught, Safely I drank the sweet, tho" pois"nous draught.
Love vex"d to see his favours vainly shown, The peevish Urchin murthered with a frown.
Verses at the last public commencement at Cambridge, spoken by the author.
The Court of Venus, from Claudian.
The Speech of Pluto to Proserpine.
Hero and Leander, translated from the Greek of Musaeus.
This Piece begins thus,
Sing Muse, the conscious torch, whose mighty flame, (The shining signal of a brighter dame) Thro" trackless waves, the bold Leander led, To taste the dang"rous joys of Hero"s bed: Sing the stol"n bliss, in gloomy shades conceal"d, And never to the blushing morn reveal"d.
A Poem on the Marriage of his grace the duke of Newcastle to the right honourable Henrietta G.o.dolphin, which procured him, as we have observed already, the place of laureat. The lord Roscommon"s Essay on translated verse, rendered into Latin.
An Epistle to Sir Robert Walpole.
Three Poems; I. On the death of the late king; II. On the Accession of his present majesty. III. On the Queen.
On the arrival of Prince Frederic.
The origin of the Knights of the Bath, inscribed to the Duke of c.u.mberland.
An Ode for the Birth-Day, in Latin and English, printed at Cambridge.
He died at his rectory at Conesby in Lincolnshire, the 27th of September, 1730.
The Revd. MR. LAWRENCE EACHARD,
This Gentleman, who has been more distinguished as an historian than a poet, was the son of a clergyman, who by the death of his elder brother, became master of a good estate in Suffolk.
He received his education at the university of Cambridge, entered into holy-orders, and was presented to the living of Welton and Elkington in Lincolnshire, where he spent above twenty years of his life; and acquired a name by his writings, especially the History of England.
This history was attacked by Dr. Edmund Calamy, in a letter to the author; in which, according to the Dr. the true principles of the Revolution, the Whigs and the Dissenters are vindicated; and many persons of distinction cleared from Mr. Eachard"s aspersions.
Mr. John Oldmixon, who was of very opposite principles to Eachard, severely animadverted upon him in his Critical History of England, during the reigns of the Stuarts; but as Oldmixon was a hireling, and a man strongly bia.s.sed by party prejudices, little credit is due to his testimony: Which is moreover accompanied with a perpetual torrent of abuse. Mr. Eachard"s general Ecclesiastical History, from the nativity of Christ to the first establishment of Christianity by human laws, under the emperor Constantine the Great, has been much esteemed.
Our author was in the year 1712 installed archdeacon of Stowe, and prebend of Lincoln. He published a translation of Terence"s Comedies, translated by himself and others; but all revised and corrected by him and Sir Roger L"Estrange: To which is prefixed the life of Terence.
Besides these, Mr. Eachard has translated three Comedies from Plautus, viz.
AMPHITRYON, EPIDICUS.
RUDENS.
With critical remarks upon each play. To which he has prefixed a judicious parallel between Terence and Plautus; and for a clearer decision of the point, that Terence was the more polite writer of Comedy, he produces the first act of Plautus"s Aulularia, and the first act of his Miles Gloriosus, against the third act of Terence"s Eunuch. It ought to be observed (says Mr. Eachard) "That Plautus was somewhat poor, and made it his princ.i.p.al aim to please, and tickle the common people; and since they were almost always delighted with something new, strange, and unusual, the better to humour them, he was not only frequently extravagant in his expressions, but likewise in his characters too, and drew them often more vicious, more covetous, and more foolish than they really were, and this so set the people a gazing and wondering. With these sort of characters many of our modern Comedies abound, which makes them too much degenerate into farce, which seldom fails of pleasing the mob."
Mr. Eachard has, in justice to Mr. Dryden, given us some instances of his improvement of Amphitryon, and concludes them with this just remark in compliment to our nation; "We find that many fine things of the ancients, are like seeds, that when planted on English ground, by a poet"s skilful hand, thrive and produce excellent fruit."
These three plays are printed in a pocket-volume, dedicated to Sir Charles Sedley; to which is prefixed a recommendatory copy of verses, by Mr. Tate.
Mr. Eachard died in the year 1730.
Mr. JOHN OLDMIXON,
Was descended from the ancient family of the Oldmixons, of Oldmixon near Bridgewater in Somersetshire[A]. We have no account of the education of this gentleman, nor the year in which he was born. The first production we meet with of his was Amyntas, a pastoral, acted at the Theatre-Royal, taken from the Amynta of Ta.s.so. The preface informs us, that it met with but ill success, for pastoral, though never so well written, is not fit for a long entertainment on the English Theatre: But the original pleased in Italy, where the performance of the musical composer is generally more regarded than that of the poet.
The Prologue was written by Mr. Dennis. Mr. Oldmixon"s next piece was ent.i.tled the Grave, or Love"s Paradise; an Opera represented at the Theatre-Royal in Drury-Lane, 1700. In the preface, the author acquaints the critics, "That this play is neither translation, nor parody; that the story is intirely new; that "twas at first intended for a pastoral, tho" in the three last acts the dignity of the character raised it into the form of a tragedy." The scene a Province of Italy, near the Gulph of Venice. The Epilogue was written by Mr.
Farquhar.
Our author"s next dramatic piece is ent.i.tled: The Governor of Cyprus, a Tragedy, acted at the Theatre-Royal in Lincoln"s-Inn-Fields, dedicated to her grace the d.u.c.h.ess of Bolton.
Mr. Oldmixon, in a Prose Essay on Criticism, unjustly censures Mr.
Addison, whom also, in his imitation of Bouhour"s Arts of Logic and Rhetoric, he misrepresents in plain matter of fact: For in page 45 he cites the Spectator, as abusing Dr. Swift by name, where there is not the least hint of it; and in page 304 is so injurious as to suggest, that Mr. Addison himself wrote that Tatler, Numb. XLIII. which says of his own simile, "That it is as great as ever entered into the mind of man." This simile is in Addison"s poem, ent.i.tled the Campaign. Where, says the author of the Letter, "The simile of a ministering Angel, sets forth the most sedate and the most active courage, engaged in an uproar of nature, a confusion of elements, and a scene of divine vengeance."
"Twas then great Marlbro"s mighty soul was prov"d, That, in the shock of charging hosts unmov"d, Amidst confusion, horror, and despair, Examin"d all the dreadful scenes of war; In peaceful thought, the field of death survey"d To fainting squadrons sent the timely aid, Inspir"d repuls"d battalions to engage, And taught the doubtful battle where to rage.
So when an Angel by divine command, With rising tempests shakes a guilty hand, Such as of late o"er pale Britannia past, Calm and serene, he drives the furious blast, And, pleas"d th" Almighty"s orders to perform, Rides in the whirlwind, and directs the storm.
That this letter could not be written by Mr. Addison, there is all the evidence the nature of the thing will admit, to believe; for first, Sir Richard Steele avow"d it to be his, and in the next place, it is not probable that Mr. Addison himself had so high an opinion of this simile, as to call it as great as ever entered into the thought of man; for it has in reality no uncommon greatness in it. The image occurs a thousand times in the book of Psalms; so that it has not novelty to recommend it, and the manner of its being expressed, is no way extraordinary. The high terms in which it is celebrated, is the language of friendship, not of judgment. It is very probable Sir Richard Steele, warm"d with a favourite subject, and zealous for the fame of Addison, might express himself thus hyperbolically concerning it; but Mr. Addison was too judicious a critic, to think or speak of it in these terms, and was besides too cautious to run the risk of doing it himself in so public a manner. In a word, Mr. Oldmixon was an envious man, and we have seen with how little ground of resentment he railed against Eusden, because that gentleman was preferred to the Laurel.
Mr. Oldmixon joined the general cry of the underling writers against Mr. Pope; and wrote many letters in the Flying Post, with an intention to reduce his reputation, with as little success as his other antagonists had done. In his prose Essay on Criticism, and in the Arts of Logic and Rhetoric, he frequently reflects on Pope, for which he has received a place in his Dunciad.
When that eminent satyrist in his second Book, line 270, represents the Dunces diving for the Prize of Dulness, he in a particular manner dignifies Oldmixon, for he makes him climb a lighter, that by leaping from it, he may sink the deeper in the mud.
In naked majesty Oldmixon stands, And, Milo-like, surveys his arms and hands, Then sighing thus: "And am I now threescore?
"Ah why, ye G.o.ds! should two and two make "four?
He said and climb"d a stranded lighter"s height, Shot to the black abyss, and plung"d down-right.
The Senior"s judgment all the crowd admire, Who but to sink the deeper, rose the higher.
Mr. Oldmixon wrote a history of the Stuarts in folio, and a Critical History of England, in two volumes octavo. The former of these pieces was undertaken to blacken the family of the Stuarts. The most impartial writers and candid critics, on both sides, have held this work in contempt, for in every page there breathes a malevolent spirit, a disposition to rail and calumniate: So far from observing that neutrality and dispa.s.sionate evenness of temper, which should be carefully attended to by every historian, he suffers himself to be transported with anger: He reviles, wrests particular pa.s.sages and frequently draws forced conclusions. A history written in this spirit has no great claim to a reader"s faith. The reigns of the Stuarts in England were no doubt chequer"d with many evils; and yet it is certainly true, that a man who can fit deliberately down to search for errors only, must have a strong propension to calumny, or at least take delight in triumphing over the weakness of his fellow creatures, which is surely no indication of a good heart.
Mr. Oldmixon, being employ"d by bishop Kennet, in publishing the Historians in his collection, he perverted Daniel"s Chronicle in numberless places. Yet this very man, in the preface to the first of these, advanced a particular fact, to charge three eminent persons of interpolating the lord Clarendon"s History, which fact has been disproved by the bishop of Rochester, Dr. Atterbury, then the only survivor of them; and the particular part he pretended to be falsifed produced since, after almost ninety years, in that n.o.ble author"s own hand.