"The religion of the negro may be considered by some as a particularly rude form of polytheism and may be branded with the special name of fetishism. It would follow, from a minute examination of it, that--apart from the extravagant and fantastic traits, which are rooted in the character of the negro, and which radiate therefrom over all his creations--in comparison with the religions of other savages it is neither very specially differentiated nor very specially crude in form.
"But this opinion can be held to be quite true only while we look at the _outside_ of the negro"s religion, or estimate its significance from arbitrary pre-suppositions, as is specially the case with Ad. Wuttke.
"By a deeper insight, which of late several scientific investigators have succeeded in attaining, we reach, rather, the surprising conclusion that several of the negro races--on whom we cannot as yet prove, and can hardly conjecture, the influence of a more civilised people--in the embodying of their religious conceptions are further advanced than almost all other savages, so far that, even if we do not call them monotheists, we may still think of them as standing on the boundary of monotheism, seeing that their religion is also mixed with a great ma.s.s of rude superst.i.tion which, in turn, among other peoples, seems to overrun completely the purer religious conceptions."
This conclusion as to an element of pure faith in negro religion would not have surprised Waitz, had recent evidence as to the same creed among lower savages lain before him as he worked.
This volume of his book was composed in 1860. In 1872 he had become well aware of the belief in a good Maker among the Australian natives, and of the absence among them of ancestor worship.[16]
Waitz"s remarks on the Supreme Being of the Negro are well worth noting, from his unconcealed astonishment at the discovery.
Wilson"s observations on North and South Guinea religion were published in 1856. After commenting on the delicate task of finding out what a savage religion really is, he writes: "The belief in one great Supreme Being, who made and upholds all things, is universal."[17] The names of the being are translated "Maker," "Preserver," "Benefactor," "Great Friend." Though compact of all good qualities, the being has allowed the world to "come under the control of evil spirits," who, alone, receive religious worship.
Though he leaves things uncontrolled, yet the chief being (as in Homer) ratifies the Oath, at a treaty, and is invoked to punish criminals when ordeal water is to be drunk. So far, then, he has an ethical influence.
"Grossly wicked people" are buried outside of the regular place. Fetishism prevails, with spiritualism, and Wilson thinks that mediums might pick up some good tricks in Guinea. He gives no examples. Their inspired men do things "that cannot be accounted for," by the use of narcotics.
The South Guinea Creator, Anyambia (= good spirit?), is good, but capricious. He has a good deputy, Ombwiri (spelled "Mbuiri" by Miss Kingsley); _he alone has no priests_, but communicates directly with men.
The neighbouring Shekuni have mysteries of the Great Spirit. No details are given. This great being, Mwetyi, witnesses covenants and punishes perjury. This people are ancestor-worshippers, but their Supreme Being is not said to receive sacrifice, as ghosts do, while he is so far from being powerless, like Unkulunkulu, that, but for fear of his wrath, "their national treaties would have little or no force."[18] Having no information about the mysteries, of course, we know nothing of other moral influences which are, or may be exercised by these great, powerful, and not wholly otiose beings.
The celebrated traveller, Mungo Park, who visited Africa in 1805, had good opportunities of understanding the natives. He did not hurry through the land with a large armed force, but alone, or almost alone, paid his way with his bra.s.s b.u.t.tons. "I have conversed with all ranks and conditions upon the subject of their faith," he says, "and can p.r.o.nounce, without the smallest shadow of doubt, that the belief in one G.o.d and in a future state of reward and punishment is entire and universal among them." This cannot strictly be called monotheism, as there are many subordinate spirits who may be influenced by "magical ceremonies." But if monotheism means belief in One Spirit alone, or religious regard paid to One Spirit alone, it exists nowhere--no, not in Islam.
Park thinks it remarkable that "the Almighty" only receives prayers at the new moon (of sacrifice to the Almighty he says nothing), and that, being the creator and preserver of all things, he is "of so exalted a nature that it is idle to imagine the feeble supplications of wretched mortals can reverse the decrees and change the purpose of unerring Wisdom." The new moon prayers are mere matters of tradition; "our fathers did it before us." "Such is the blindness of una.s.sisted nature," says Park, who is not satirising, in Swift"s manner, the prayers of Presbyterians at home on Yarrow.
Thus, the African Supreme Being is unpropitiated, while inferior spirits are constrained by magic or propitiated with food.
We meet our old problem: How has this G.o.d, in the conception of whom there is so much philosophy, developed out of these hungry ghosts? The influence of Islam can scarcely be suspected, Allah being addressed, of course, in endless prayers, while the African G.o.d receives none. Indeed, it would be more plausible to say that Mahomet borrowed Allah from the widespread belief which we are studying, than that the negro"s Supreme Being was borrowed from Allah.
Park had, as we saw, many opportunities of familiar discussion with the people on whose mercies he threw himself.
"But it is not often that the negroes make their religious opinions the subject of conversation; when interrogated, in particular, concerning their ideas of a future state, they express themselves with great reverence, but endeavour to shorten the discussion by saying, _"Mo o mo inta allo_" ("No man knows anything about it")."[19]
Park himself, in extreme distress, and almost in despair, chanced to observe the delicate beauty of a small moss-plant, and, reflecting that the Creator of so frail a thing could not be indifferent to any of His creatures, plucked up courage and reached safety.[20] He was not of the negro philosophy, and is the less likely to have invented it. The new moon prayer, said in a whisper, was reported to Park, "by many different people," to contain "thanks to G.o.d for his kindness during the existence of the past moon, and to solicit a continuation of his favour during the new one." This, of course, may prove Islamite influence, and is at variance with the general tendency of the religious philosophy as described.
We now arrive at a theory of the Supreme Being among a certain African race which would be entirely fatal to my whole hypothesis on this topic, if it could be demonstrated correct in fact, and if it could be stretched so as to apply to the Australians, Fuegians, Andamanese, and other very backward peoples. It is the hypothesis that the Supreme Being is a "loan-G.o.d," borrowed from Europeans.
The theory is very lucidly set forth in Major Ellis"s "Tshi-speaking Peoples of the Gold Coast."[21] Major Ellis"s opinion coincides with that of Waitz in his "Introduction to Anthropology" (an opinion to which Waitz does not seem bigoted)--namely, that "the original form of all religion is a raw, unsystematic polytheism," nature being peopled by inimical powers or spirits, and everyone worshipping what he thinks most dangerous or most serviceable. There are few general, many local or personal, objects of veneration.[22] Major Ellis only met this pa.s.sage when he had formed his own ideas by observation of the Tshi race. We do not pretend to guess what "the original form of all religion" may have been; but we have given, and shall give, abundant evidence for the existence of a loftier faith than this, among peoples much lower in material culture than the Tshi races, who have metals and an organised priesthood. They occupy, in small villages (except Cooma.s.sie and Djuabin), the forests of the Gold Coast. The mere mention of Cooma.s.sie shows how vastly superior in civilisation the Tshis (Ashantis and Fantis) are to the naked, houseless Australians. Their inland communities, however, are "mere specks in a vast tract of impenetrable forest." The coast people have for centuries been in touch with Europeans, but the "Tshi-speaking races are now much in the same condition, both socially and morally, as they were at the time of the Portuguese discovery."[23]
Nevertheless, Major Ellis explains their Supreme Being as the result of European influence! _A priori_ this appears highly improbable. That a belief should sweep over all these specks in impenetrable forest, from the coast-tribes in contact with Europeans, and that this belief should, though the most recent, be infinitely the least powerful, cannot be regarded as a plausible hypothesis. Moreover, on Major Ellis"s theory the Supreme Beings of races which but recently came for the first time in contact with Europeans, Supreme Beings kept jealously apart from European ken, and revered in the secrecy of ancient mysteries, must also, by parity of reason, be the result of European influence. Unfortunately, Major Ellis gives no evidence for his statements about the past history of Tshi religion. Authorities he must have, and references would be welcome.
"With people in the condition in which the natives of the Gold Coast now are, religion is not in any way allied with moral ideas."[24] We have given abundant evidence that among much more backward tribes morals rest on a religious sanction. If this be not so on the Gold Coast we cannot accept these relatively advanced Fantis and Ashantis as representing the "original" state of ethics and religion, any more than those people with cities, a king, a priesthood, iron, and gold, represent the "original"
material condition of society. Major Ellis also shows that the G.o.ds exact chast.i.ty from aspirants to the priesthood.[25] The present beliefs of the Gold Coast are kept up by organised priesthoods as "lucrative business."[26] Where there is no lucre and no priesthood, as among more backward races, this kind of business cannot be done. On the Gold Coast men can only approach G.o.ds through priests.[27] This is degeneration.
Obviously, if religion began in a form relatively pure and moral, it _must_ degenerate, as civilisation advances, under priests who "exploit"
the lucrative, and can see no money in the pure elements of belief and practice. That the lucrative elements in Christianity were exploited by the clergy, to the neglect of ethics, was precisely the complaint of the Reformers. From these lucrative elements the creed of the Apostles was free, and a similar freedom marks the religion of Australia or of the p.a.w.nees. We cannot possibly, then, expect to find the "original" state of religion among a people subdued to a money-grubbing priesthood, like the Tshi races. Let religion begin as pure as snow, it would be corrupted by priestly trafficking in its lucrative animistic aspect. And priests are developed relatively late.
Major Ellis discriminates Tshi G.o.ds as--
1. General, worshipped by an entire tribe or more tribes.
2. Local deities of river, hill, forest, or sea.
3. Deities of families or corporations.
4. Tutelary deities of individuals.
The second cla.s.s, according to the natives, were appointed by the first cla.s.s, who are "too distant or indifferent to interfere ordinarily in human affairs." Thus, the Huron G.o.d, Ahone, punishes n.o.body. He is all sweetness and light, but has a deputy G.o.d, called Okeus. On our hypothesis this indifference of high G.o.ds suggests the crowding out of the great disinterested G.o.d by venal animistic compet.i.tion. All of cla.s.s II. "appear to have been originally malignant." Though, in native belief, cla.s.s I.
was prior to, and "appointed" cla.s.s II., Major Ellis thinks that malignant spirits of cla.s.s II. were raised to cla.s.s I. as if to the peerage, while cla.s.ses III. and IV. "are clearly the product of priesthood"--therefore late.
Major Ellis then avers that when Europeans reached the Gold Coast, in the fifteenth century, they "appear to have found" a Northern G.o.d, Tando, and a Southern G.o.d, Bobowissi, still adored. Bobowissi makes thunder and rain, lives on a hill, and receives, or received, human sacrifices. But, "after an intercourse of some years with Europeans," the villagers near European forts "added to their system a new deity, whom they termed Nana Nyankupon.
This was the G.o.d of the Christians, borrowed from them, and adapted under a new designation, meaning "Lord of the sky." (This is conjectural.
_Nyank.u.m_ = rain. _Nyansa_ has "a later meaning, "craft."")[28]
Now Major Ellis, later, has to contrast Bosman"s account of fetishism (1700) with his own observations. According to Bosman"s native source of information, men then selected their own fetishes. These are _now_ selected by priests. Bosman"s authority was wrong--or priesthood has extended its field of business. Major Ellis argues that the revolution from amateur to priestly selection of fetishes could not occur in 190 years, "over a vast tract of country, amongst peoples living in semi-isolated communities, in the midst of pathless forests, where there is but little opportunity for the exchange of ideas, _and where we know they have been uninfluenced by any higher race_."
Yet Major Ellis"s theory is that this isolated people _were_ influenced by a higher race, to the extent of adopting a totally new Supreme Being, from Europeans, a being whom they in no way sought to propitiate, and who was of no practical use. And this they did, he says, not under priestly influence, but in the face of priestly opposition.[29]
Major Ellis"s logic does not appear to be consistent. In any case we ask for evidence how, in the "impenetrable forests" did a new Supreme Deity become universally known? Are we certain that travellers (unquoted) did not discover a deity with no priests, or ritual, or "money in the concern," later than they discovered the blood-stained, conspicuous, lucrative Bobowissi? Why was Nyankupon, the supposed new G.o.d of a new powerful set of strangers, left wholly unpropitiated? The reverse was to be expected.
Major Ellis writes: "Almost certainly the addition of one more to an already numerous family" of G.o.ds, "was strenuously resisted by the priesthood," who, confessedly, are adding now lower G.o.ds every day! Yet Nyankupon is universally known, in spite of priestly resistance.
Nyankupon, I presume = Anzambi, Anyambi, Nyambi, Nzambi, Anzam, Nyam, the Nzam of the Fans, "and of all Bantu coast races, the creator of man, plants, animals, and the earth; he takes no further interest in the affair."[30] The crowd of _spirits_ take only too much interest; and, therefore, are the lucrative element in religion.
It is not very easy to believe that Nyam, under all his names, was picked up from the Portuguese, and pa.s.sed apparently from negroes to Bantu all over West Africa, despite the isolation of the groups, and the resistance of the priesthood among tribes "uninfluenced by any higher race."
Nyam, like Major Ellis"s cla.s.s I., appoints a subordinate G.o.d to do his work: he is truly good, and governs the malevolent spirits.[31]
The spread of Nyankupon, as described by Major Ellis, is the more remarkable, since "five or six miles from the sea, or even less, the country was a _terra incognita_ to Europeans,"[32] Nyankupon was, it is alleged, adopted, because our superiority proved Europeans to be "protected by a deity of greater power than any of those to which they themselves" (the Tshi races) "offered sacrifices."
Then, of course, Nyankupon would receive the best sacrifices of all, as the most powerful deity? Far from that, Nyankupon received no sacrifice, and had no priests. No priest would have a traditional way of serving him.
As the unlucky man in Voltaire says to his guardian angel, "It is well worth while to have a presiding genius," so the Tshis and Bantu might ironically remark, "A useful thing, a new Supreme Being!" A quarter of a continent or so adopts a new foreign G.o.d, and leaves him _plante la_; unserved, unhonoured, and unsung. He therefore came to be thought too remote, or too indifferent, "to interfere directly in the affairs of the world." "This idea was probably caused by the fact that the natives had not experienced any material improvement in their condition ... although they also had become followers of the G.o.d of the whites."[33]
But that was just what they had not done! Even at Magellan"s Straits, the Fuegians picked up from a casual Spanish sea-captain and adored an image of Cristo. Name and effigy they accepted. The Tshi people took neither effigy nor name of a deity from the Portuguese settled among them. They neither imitated Catholic rites nor adapted their own; they prayed not, nor sacrificed to the "new" Nyankupon. Only his name and the idea of his nature are universally diffused in West African belief. He lives in no definite home, or hill, but "in Nyankupon"s country." Nyankupon, at the present day, is "ignored rather than worshipped," while Bobowissi has priests and offerings.
It is clear that Major Ellis is endeavouring to explain, by a singular solution (namely, the borrowing of a G.o.d from Europeans), and that a solution improbable and inadequate, a phenomenon of very wide distribution. Nyankupon cannot be explained apart from Taaroa, Puluga, Ahone, Ndengei, Dendid, and Ta-li-y-Tochoo, G.o.ds to be later described, who cannot, by any stretch of probabilities, be regarded as of European origin. All of these represent the primeval Supreme Being, more or less or altogether stripped, under advancing conditions of culture, of his ethical influence, and crowded out by the horde of useful greedy ghosts or ghost G.o.ds, whose business is lucrative. Nyankupon has no pretensions to be, or to have been a "spirit."[34]
Major Ellis"s theory is a natural result of his belief in a tangle of polytheism as "the original state of religion." If so, there was not much room for the natural development of Nyankupon, in whom "the missionaries find a parallel to the Jahveh of the Jews."[35] On our theory Nyankupon takes his place in the regular process of the corruption of theism by animism.
The parallel case of Nzambi Mpungu, the Creator among the Fiorts (a Bantu stock), is thus stated by Miss Kingsley:
"I have no hesitation in saying I fully believe Nzambi Mpungu to be a purely native G.o.d, and that he is a great G.o.d over all things, but the study of him is even more difficult than the study of Nzambi, because the Jesuit missionaries who gained so great an influence over the Fiorts in the sixteenth century identified him with Jehovah, and worked on the native mind from that stand-point. Consequently semi-mythical traces of Jesuit teaching linger, even now, in the religious ideas of the Fiorts."[36]
Nzambi Mpungu lives "behind the firmament." "He takes next to no interest in human affairs;" which is not a Jesuit idea of G.o.d.
In all missionary accounts of savage religion, we have to guard against two kinds of bias. One is the bias which makes the observer deny any religion to the native race, except devil-worship. The other is the bias which lends him to look for traces of a pure primitive religious tradition. Yet we cannot but observe this reciprocal phenomenon: missionaries often find a native name and idea which answer so nearly to their conception of G.o.d that they adopt the idea and the name, in teaching. Again, on the other side, the savages, when first they hear the missionaries" account of G.o.d, recognise it, as do the Hurons and Bakwain, for what has always been familiar to them. This is recorded in very early pre-missionary travels, as in the book of William Strachey on Virginia (1612), to which we now turn. The G.o.d found by Strachey in Virginia cannot, by any lat.i.tude of conjecture, be regarded as the result of contact with Europeans. Yet he almost exactly answers to the African Nyankupon, who is explained away as a "loan-G.o.d." For the belief in relatively pure creative beings, whether they are morally adored, without sacrifice, or merely neglected, is so widely diffused, that Anthropology must ignore them, or account for them as "loan-G.o.ds"--or give up her theory!
[Footnote 1: Lejean, _Rev. des Deux Mondes_, April 1862, p. 760. Citing for the chant, Beltrame, _Dictionario della lingua denka_, MS.]
[Footnote 2: Waitz, ii. 74.]
[Footnote 3: 1882.]
[Footnote 4: _Ecclesiastical Inst.i.tutions_, 681.]
[Footnote 5: _Africana_, i. 66.]