I reached the appointed rendezvous, but could not gain the slightest intelligence of my people at the kraal.
"After waiting some time, and becoming very uneasy about them, one of my servants recommended me to go to the doctor, and at last, out of curiosity and _pour pa.s.ser le temps_, I did go.
"I stated what I wanted--information about my hunters--and I was met by a stern refusal. "I cannot tell anything about white men," said he, "and I know nothing of their ways." However, after some persuasion and promise of liberal payment, impressing upon him the fact that it was not white men but Kaffirs I wanted to know about, he at last consented, saying "he would _open the Gate of Distance_, and would travel through it, even although his body should lie before me."
"His first proceeding was to ask me the number and names of my hunters.
To this I demurred, telling him that if he obtained that information from me he might easily subst.i.tute some news which he may have heard from others, instead of the "spiritual telegraphic news" which I expected him to get from his "familiar."
"To this he answered: "I told you I did not understand white men"s ways; but if I am to do anything for you it must be done in my way--not yours." On receiving this fillip I felt inclined to give it up, as I thought I might receive some rambling statement with a considerable dash of truth, it being easy for anyone who knew anything of hunting to give a tolerably correct idea of their motions.
"However, I conceded this point also, and otherwise satisfied him.
"The doctor then made eight little fires--that being the number of my hunters; on each he cast some roots,[9] which emitted a curious sickly odour and thick smoke; into each he cast a small stone, shouting, as he did so, the name to which the stone was dedicated; then he ate some "medicine," and fell over in what appeared to be a trance for about ten minutes, during all which time his limbs kept moving. Then he seemed to wake, went to one of the fires, raked the ashes about, looked at the stone attentively, described the man faithfully, and said: "This man has died of the fever, and your gun is lost."
"To the next fire as before: "This man" (correctly described) "has killed four elephants," and then he described the tusks. The next: "This man" (again describing him) "has been killed by an elephant, but your gun is coming home," and so on through the whole, the men being minutely and correctly described; their success or non-success being equally so.
I was told where the survivors were, and what they were doing, and that in three months they would come out, but as they would not expect to find me waiting on them there so long after the time appointed, they would not pa.s.s that way.
"I took a particular note of all this information at the time, and to my utter amazement _it turned out correct in every particular_.
"It was scarcely within the bounds of possibility that this man could have had ordinary intelligence of the hunters; they were scattered about in a country two hundred miles away."
Mr. Leslie could discover no explanation, nor was any suggested by friends familiar with the country and the natives whom he consulted. He gives another example, which may be explained by "suggestion." A parallel case from Central Africa will be found in the "Journal of the Anthropological Inst.i.tute," November 1897, p. 320, where "private information," as usual, would explain the singular facts.
The Zulus themselves lay claim to a kind of clairvoyance which looks like the result of intense visualising power, combined with the awakening of the subconscious memory.[10]
"There is among black men a something which is divination within them.
When anything valuable is lost, they look for it at once; when they cannot find it, each one begins to practise this inner divination, trying to feel where the thing is; for, not being able to see it, he feels internally a pointing, which tells him if he will go down to such a place it is there, and he will find it. At length it says he will find it; at length he sees it, and himself approaching it; before he begins to move from where he is, he sees it very clearly indeed, and there is an end of doubt. That sight is so clear that it is as though it was not an inner sight, but as if he saw the very thing itself, and the place where it is; so he quickly arises and goes to the place. If it is a hidden place he throws himself into it, as though there was something that impelled him to go as swiftly as the wind; and, in fact, he finds the thing, if he has not acted by mere head-guessing. If it has been done by real inner divination, he really sees it. But if it is done by mere head-guessing and knowledge that he has not gone to such a place and such a place, and that therefore it must be in such another place, he generally misses the mark."
Other Zulu instances will be given under the heads "Possession" and "Fetishism."
To take a Northern people: In his "History of the Lapps"[11] Scheffer describes mechanical modes of divination practised by that race, who use a drum and other objects for the purpose. These modes depend on more traditional rules for interpreting the accidental combinations of lots.
But a Lapp confessed to Scheffer, with tears, that he could not help seeing visions, as he proved by giving Scheffer a minute relation "of whatever particulars had happened to me in my journey to Lapland. And he further complained that he know not how to make use of his eyes, since things altogether distant were presented to them." This Lapp was anxious to become a Christian, hence his regret at being a "rare and valuable"
example of clairvoyance. Torfaeus also was posed by the clairvoyance of a Samoyed, as was Regnard by a Lapp seer.[12]
The next case is of old date, and, like the other savage examples, is merely given for purposes of ill.u.s.tration.
"_25e Lettre_.[13]
""_Suite des Traditions des Sauvages._"
"Au Fort de la Riviere de St. Joseph, ce 14 Septembre 1721.
""_Des Jongleurs_"-- ... Vous ayez vu a Paris Madame de Marson, & elle y est encore; voici ce que M. le Marquis de Vaudreuil son Gendre, actuellement notre Gouverneur General, me raconta cet Hyver, & qu"il a scu de cette Dame, qui n"est rien moins qu"un esprit foible. Elle etoit un jour fort inquiette an sujet de M. de Marson, son Mari, lequel commandoit dans un Poste, que nous avions en Accadie; et etoit absent, & le tems qu"il avoit marque pour son retour, etoit pa.s.se.
"Une Femme Sauvage, qui vit Madame de Marson en peine, lui en demanda la cause, & l"ayant apprise, lui dit, apres y avoir un peu reve, de ne plus se chagriner, que son Epoux reviendroit tel jour et a telle heure, qu"elle lui marqua, avec un chapeau gris sur la tete. Comme elle s"appercut que la Dame n"ajoutoit point foi a sa prediction, au jour & a l"heure, qu"elle avoit a.s.signee, elle rotourna chez elle, lui demanda si elle ne vouloit pas venir voir arriver son Mari, & la pressa de telle sorte de la suivre, qu"elle l"entraina au bord de la Riviere.
"A peine y etoient-elles arrivees, que M. de Marson parut dans un Canot, un chapeau gris sur la tete; & ayant appris ce qui s"etoit pa.s.se, a.s.sura qu"il ne pouvoit pas comprendre comment la Sauvagesse avoit pu scavoir l"heure & le jour de son arrivee."
It is unusual for European travellers and missionaries to give anecdotes which might seem to "confirm the delusions of benighted savages." Such anecdotes, again, are among the _arcana_ of these wild philosophers, and are not readily communicated to strangers. When successful cases are reported, it is natural to a.s.sert that they come through Europeans who have sunk into barbarous superst.i.tion, or that they may be explained by fraud and collusion. It is certain, however, that savage proficients believe in their own powers, though no less certainly they will eke them out by imposture. Seers are chosen in Zululand, as among Eskimos and Samoyeds, from the cla.s.s which in Europe supplies the persons who used to be, but are no longer the most favourite hypnotic subjects, "abnormal children," epileptic and hysterical. These are subjected to "a long and methodical course of training."[14] Stoll, speaking of Guatemala, says that "certainly most of the induced and spontaneous phenomena with which we are familiar occur among savages," and appeals to travellers for observations.[15] Information is likely to come in, as educated travellers devote attention to the topic.
Dr. Callaway translates some Zulu communications which indicate the amount of belief in this very practical and sceptical people. Amusing ill.u.s.trations of their scepticism will be quoted later, under "Possession," but they do accept as seers certain hysterical patients.
These are tested by their skill in finding objects which have been hidden without their knowledge. They then behave much like Mr. Stuart c.u.mberland, but have not the advantage of muscular contact with the person who knows where the hidden objects are concealed. The neighbours even deny that they have hidden anything at all. "When they persist in their denial ... he finds all the things that they have hidden. They see that he is a great _inyanga_ (seer) when he has found all the things they have concealed." No doubt he is guided, perhaps in a super-sensitive condition, by the unconscious indications of the excited spectators.
The point is that, while the savage conjurer will doubtless use fraud wherever he can, still the experience of low races is in favour of employing as seers the cla.s.s of people who in Europe were, till recently, supposed to make the best hypnotic subjects. Thus, in West Africa, "the presiding elders, during your initiation to the secret society of your tribe, discover this gift [of Eb.u.mtupism, or second sight], and so select you as "a witch doctor.""[15] Among the Karens, the "Wees," or prophets, "are nervous excitable men, such as would become mediums,"[16] as mediums are diagnosed by Mr. Tylor.
In short, not to multiply examples, there is an element of actual observation and of _bona fides_ entangled in the trickery of savage practice. Though the subjects may be selected partly because of the physical phenomena of convulsions which they exhibit, and which favourably impress their clients, they are also such subjects as occasionally yield that evidence of supernormal faculty which is investigated by modern psychologists, like Richet, Janet, and William James.
The following example, by no means unique, shows the view taken by savages of their own magic, after they have become Christians. Catherine Wabose, a converted Red Indian seeress, described her preliminary fast, at the age of p.u.b.erty. After six days of abstention from food she was rapt away to an unknown place, where a radiant being welcomed her. Later a dark round object promised her the gift of prophecy. She found her natural senses greatly sharpened by lack of food. She first exercised her powers when her kinsfolk in large numbers were starving, a medicine-lodge, or "tabernacle"
as Lufitau calls it, was built for her, and she crawled in. As is well known, these lodges are violently shaken during the magician"s stay within them, which the early Jesuits at first attributed to muscular efforts by the seers. In 1637 Pere Lejeune was astonished by the violent motions of a large lodge, tenanted by a small man. One sorcerer, with an appearance of candour, vowed that "a great wind entered boisterously," and the Father was a.s.sured that, if he went in himself, he would become clairvoyant. He did not make the experiment. The Methodist convert, Catherine, gave the same description of her own experience: "The lodge began shaking violently by supernatural means. I knew this by the compressed current of air above, and the noise of motion." She had been beating a small drum and singing, now she lay quiet. The radiant "orbicular" spirit then informed her that they "must go westwards for game; how short-sighted you are!" "The advice was taken and crowned by instant success." This established her reputation.[17] Catherine"s conversion was led up to by a dream of her dying son, who beheld a Sacred Figure, and received from Him white raiment. Her magical songs tell how unseen hands shake the magic lodge.
They invoke the Great Spirit that
"Illumines earth Illumines heaven!
Ah, say what Spirit, or Body, is this Body, That fills the world around, Speak, man, ah say What Spirit, or Body, is this Body?"
It is like a savage hymn to Hegel"s _fuhlende Seele_: the all-pervading Sensitive Soul. We are reminded, too, of "the doctrine of the Sanscrit Upanishads: There is no limit to the knowing of the Self that knows."[18]
Unluckily Catherine was not asked to give other examples of what she considered her successes.
Acosta, who has not the best possible repute as an authority, informs us that Peruvian clairvoyants "tell what hath pa.s.sed in the furthest parts before news can come. In the distance of two or three hundred leagues they would tell what the Spaniards did or suffered in their civil wars." To Du Pont, in 1606, a sorcerer "rendered a true oracle of the coming of Poutrincourt, saying his Devil had told him so."[19]
We now give a modern case, from a scientific laboratory, of knowledge apparently acquired in no normal way, by a person of the sort usually chosen to be a prophet, or wizard, by savages.
Professor Richet writes:[20]
"On Monday, July 2, 1888, after having pa.s.sed all the day in my laboratory, I hypnotised Leonie at 8 P.M., and while she tried to make out a diagram concealed in an envelope I said to her quite suddenly: "What has happened to M. Langlois?" Leonie knows M. Langlois from having seen him two or three times some time ago in my physiological laboratory, where he acts as my a.s.sistant.--"He has burnt himself,"
Leonie replied,--"Good," I said, "and where has he burnt himself?"--"On the left hand. It is not fire: it is--I don"t know its name. Why does he not take care when he pours it out?"--"Of what colour," I asked, "is the stuff which he pours out?"--"It is not red, it is brown; he has hurt himself very much--the skin puffed up directly."
"Now, this description is admirably exact. At 4 P.M. that day M.
Langlois had wished to pour some bromine into a bottle. He had done this clumsily, so that some of the bromine flowed on to his left hand, which held the funnel, and at once burnt him severely. Although he at once put his hand into water, wherever the bromine had touched it a blister was formed in a few seconds--a blister which one could not better describe than by saying, "the skin puffed up." I need not say that Leonie had not left my house, nor seen anyone from my laboratory. Of this I am _absolutely certain,_ and I am certain that I had not mentioned the incident of the burn to anyone. Moreover, this was the first time for nearly a year that M. Langlois had handled bromine, and when Leonie saw him six months before at the laboratory he was engaged in experiments of quite another kind."
Here the savage reasoner would infer that Leonie"s spirit had visited M.
Langlois. The modern inquirer will probably say that Leonie became aware of what was pa.s.sing in the mind of M. Richet. This supranormal way of acquiring knowledge was observed in the last century by M. de Puysegur in one of his earliest cases of somnambulism. MM. Binet and Fere say: "It is not yet admitted that the subject is able to divine the thoughts of the magnetiser without any material communication;" while they grant, as a minimum, that "research should be continued in this direction."[21] They appear to think that Leonie may have read "involuntary signs" in the aspect of M. Richet. This is a difficult hypothesis.
Here follows a case recorded in his diary by Mr. Dobbie, of Adelaide, Australia, who has practised hypnotism for curative purposes. He explains (June 10, 1884) that he had mesmerised Miss ---- on several occasions to relieve rheumatic pain and sore throat. He found her to be clairvoyant.
"The following is a verbatim account of the second time I tested her powers in this respect, April 12, 1884. There were four persons present during the _seance_. One of the company wrote down the replies as they were spoken.
"Her father was at the time over fifty miles away, but we did not know exactly where, so I questioned her as follows: "Can you find your father at the present moment?" At first she replied that she could not see him, but in a minute or two she said, "Oh, yes; now I can see him, Mr.
Dobbie." "Where is he?" "Sitting at a large table in a large room, and there are a lot of people going in and out." "What is he doing?"
"Writing a letter, and there is a book in front of him." "Whom is he writing to?" "To the newspaper." Here she paused and laughingly said, "Well, I declare, he is writing to the A B" (naming a newspaper). "You said there was a book there. Can you tell me what book it is?" "It has gilt letters on it." "Can you read them, or tell me the name of the author?" She read, or p.r.o.nounced slowly, "W.L.W." (giving the full surname of the author). She answered several minor questions _re_ the furniture in the room, and I then said to her, "Is it any effort or trouble to you to travel in this way?" "Yes, a little; I have to think."
"I now stood behind her, holding a half-crown in my hand, and asked her if she could tell me what I had in my hand, to which she replied, "It is a shilling." It seemed as though she could see what was happening miles away easier than she could see what was going on in the room.
"Her father returned home nearly a week afterwards, and was perfectly astounded when told by his wife and family what he had been doing on that particular evening; and, although previous to that date he was a thorough sceptic as to clairvoyance, he frankly admitted that my clairvoyant was perfectly correct in every particular. He also informed us that the book referred to was a new one, which he had purchased after he had left his home, so that there was no possibility of his daughter guessing that he had the book before him. I may add that the letter in due course appeared in the paper; and I saw and handled the book."
A number of cases of so-called "clairvoyance" will be found in the "Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research."[22] As the authors of these essays remark, even after discounting, in each case, fraud, malobservation, and misreporting, the residue of cases can seldom justify either the savage theory of the wandering soul (which is not here seriously proposed) or Hegel"s theory that the _fuhlende Seele_ is unconditioned by s.p.a.ce. For, if thought transference be a fact, the apparent clairvoyant may only be reading the mind of a person at a distance. The results, however, when successful, would naturally suggest to the savage thinker the belief in the wandering soul, or corroborate it if it had already been suggested by the common phenomena of dreaming.
To these instances of knowledge acquired otherwise than by the recognised channels of sense we might add the Scottish tales of "second sight." That phrase is merely a local term covering examples of what is called "clairvoyance"--views of things remote in s.p.a.ce, hallucinations of sight that coincide with some notable event, premonitions of things future, and so on. The belief and hallucinatory experiences are still very common in the Highlands, where I have myself collected many recent instances. Mr.
Tylor observes that the examples "prove a little too much; they vouch not only for human apparitions, but for such phantoms as demon dogs, and for still more fanciful symbolic omens." This is perfectly true. I have found no cases of demon dogs; but wandering lights, probably of meteoric or miasmatic origin, are certainly regarded as tokens of death. This is obviously a superst.i.tious hypothesis, the lights being real phenomena misconstrued. Again, funerals are not uncommonly seen where no funeral is taking place; it is then alleged that a real funeral, similar and similarly situated, soon afterwards occurred. On the hypothesis of believers, the percipients somehow behold