"But that only adds to the mystery of the mental process," objected Miller. "That supposes it to have come out of your mind."
"I can"t believe that I had any hand in the musical part of it, and I can"t persuade myself that my dead friend was present."
"Suppose you had been able to find that musical fragment, would it have converted you?" This was Miller"s challenge.
"No, for even then some living person might have known of it--must have known of it; and if a knowledge of it lay in some other mind, no matter where and no matter how deeply buried in the subconscious, that knowledge, according to Myers and Hudson, would have been accessible to the supernormal perception of the psychic."
Fowler interrogated me: "But suppose a phantom form resembling "E. A."
had _spoken_ these things to you face to face--what then?"
"I would not have believed, even then."
"Why?"
"Well, for one reason, belief is not a matter of the will; it is not even dependent upon evidence."
Miller interrupted me. "I am interested in the writing. How do you account for the writing? As I understand it, the psychic did not, in some instances, touch the slate while the writing was going on. Are you sure of Blake?"
"Blake is as much to be trusted as I am. No, I am forced to a practical acceptance of the theory of the fluidic arm, and yet this is a most astounding admission. We must suppose that the psychic was able to read our minds and write down our mingled and confused musical conceptions by means of a supernumerary hand. It happens that I have since seen these etheric hands in action, which makes it easier for me to conceive of such a process. I have seen them dart forth from another medium precisely as described by Scarpa. I have seen them lift a gla.s.s of water, and I have had them touch my knees beneath a table while slate-writing was going on--so that, given the power to read my mind, there is nothing impossible (having regard to Bottazzi"s definite experiments) in the idea of the etheric hand"s setting down the music and reproducing the signature of "E. A." In fact, at a recent sitting in a private house with a young male psychic, we had this precise feat performed. Said the psychic to our host, Dr. Towne, "Think hard of a signature that is very familiar to you," and Dr. Towne fixed his mind upon the signature of his brother, and immediately, while the young man"s material hands were controlled, his etheric hand seized a pencil in the middle of the table and reproduced the signature."
"Could you see this hand?" Miller asked.
"Not in this case; but at a sitting which followed this, during such time as I sat beside the psychic and controlled one hand, I plainly saw the supernumerary arm and hand dart forth and seize a pencil. I saw a hand very plainly cross my knee and grasp me by the forearm. All of this has its bearing upon this very curious phenomenon of the reproduction of "E. A"s." youthful signature, which remained very puzzling to us all."
"But did you not say that "E. A." at times represented an opposing will?" questioned Fowler--"that he disputed certain pa.s.sages with Blake, and that he finally carried his point in opposition to every mind in the circle?"
"Yes, that happened several times, and was all very convincing at the time. And yet this opposition may have been more apparent than real. It may have concerned our conscious wills only; our subconscious selves may have been in accord, working together as one."
Fowler was a bit irritated. "If you are disposed to make the subconscious will all-powerful and omniscient, nothing can be proved. It seems to me an evasion. However, let me ask how you would explain away a spirit form carrying the voice, the features, and the musical genius of "E. A."?"
"Well, there is the teleplastic theory of Albert de Rochas. He claims to have been able not merely to cause a hypnotized subject to exteriorize her astral self, but to mould this vapory substance as a sculptor models wax. So I can imagine that a momentary radiant apparition might have been created in the image of my sister or "David" or "E. A.""
"To my thinking, that is more complicated and incredible than the spirit hypothesis," objected Fowler.
"Nothing can be more incredible to me than the spirit hypothesis," I replied. "But, then, everything is incredible in the last a.n.a.lysis. I am the more disposed to believe in the teleplastic theory, for the reason that I have recently had an opportunity to witness a particularly incredible thing: the materialization of a complete human form outside the cabinet and beside the psychic--a phenomenon which has a special bearing upon the matter of ident.i.ty which we are discussing. The sitting took place in a small private house here in the city. The psychic in the case was a young business man who is careful not to advertise his power.
For four years he has been holding secret developing circles whereto a few of his friends only are invited. I was present last Sunday, and shared in the marvels. The place of the seance was the parlor of his apartment, his young wife and little daughter being present. There was, in addition, an elderly lady, mother-in-law of the psychic, and a Polish student whom I will call Jacob. I am quite sure that no one else entered or left the room during the evening. Mrs. Pratt, the mother-in-law, occupied a seat between me and Jacob. The little girl sat at the window, and was under my eye all the time. The wife spent most of the evening at the piano on my right. The room was fairly dark, though the light of a far-away street lamp shone in at the window.
"The psychic retired into a little alcove bedroom, which served as cabinet, and the curtain had hardly fallen between him and our group when the spirit voices began. The first one to speak was "Evan," the "guide," and I remarked that his voice was precisely like a falsetto disguise of the psychic"s own.
"Soon "Evan" and other spirits appeared at the opening of the curtain.
The wife called them each by name, but I could see only certain curious fluctuating, cloud-like forms, like puffs of fire-lit steam. The effect was not that of illuminated gauze, but more like illuminated vapor. At length came one that spoke in a deep voice, using a foreign language.
Jacob, the young Pole, sprang up in joyous excitement, saying that he had sat many times in this little circle, but that this was the first time a spirit had spoken to him in his own tongue. As they conversed together, I detected a close similarity of accent and of tone in their speech. It certainly sounded like the Polish language, but I could not rid myself of the impression that the Pole was talking to himself."
"What do you mean by that?"
"I mean that the accent, inflection, and quality of the ghost"s voice were identical with that of the living man, and this became still more striking when, a little later, Jacob returned to his seat, and the "Count," his visitor, called for the Polish national hymn. Jacob then sang, and the phantom sang with him. Now this seemed like a clear case of identification, and was perfectly satisfactory to Jacob, but I had observed this fact: the Pole was an indifferent singer--having hard work to keep the key--and the "Count" was troubled in the same way. His deep, almost toneless, singing struck me as a dead, flat, wooden echo of Jacob"s voice. In short, it was as if the psychic had built up a personality partly out of himself, but mainly out of his Polish sitter, and as if this etheric duplication were singing in unison with its progenitor."
"What nonsense!" exclaimed Fowler.
"Did he manufacture a double out of you?" queried Miller.
"No one spoke to me from the shadow, except the "guide," although I was hoping for some new word from "Ernest," and kept him uppermost in my mind. A form came out into the centre of the room, which the wife said was "Evan," and requested me to shake his hand. This I did. The hand felt as if it were covered with some gauzy veiling. My belief is that it was the psychic himself who stood before me, probably in trance. I could see nothing, however. I do not remember that I could detect any shadow even; but the hand was real, and the voice and manner of speech were precisely those of the psychic himself."
"I repeat that this does not necessarily imply fraud, for the mind and vocal organs of the psychic are often used in that way," Fowler argued.
"I grant that. Up to this point I had been able to see nothing but dim outlines. But toward the end of the evening the psychic advanced from the cabinet and in a dazed way ordered the lamp to be lit. This was done. He then asked that it be turned low. This was also done.
Thereupon, directing his gaze toward the curtain, he called twice in a tone of command, "_Come out!_"
"I could place every one in the room at the moment. I could see the psychic distinctly. I could discern the color of his coat and the expression of his face. He stood at least six feet from the opening in the curtain. At his second cry, in which I detected a note of entreaty, I saw a luminous form, taller than himself, suddenly appear before the curtain and stand bowing in silence. I could perceive neither face, eyes, nor feet, but I could make out the arms under the shining robe, the shape of the head and the shoulders, and as he bowed I could see the bending of his neck. It certainly was not a clothes-horse. The covering was not so much a robe as a swathing, and we had time to discuss it briefly.
"However, my eyes were mainly busy with the psychic, whose actions impressed me deeply. He had the air of an anxious man undergoing a dangerous ordeal. His right hand was stretched stiffly toward the phantom, his left was held near his heart; his knees seemed to tremble, and his body appeared to be irresistibly drawn toward the cabinet.
Slowly, watchfully, fearfully, he approached the phantom. The figure turned toward him, and a moment later they met--they clung together, they appeared to coalesce, and the psychic fell through the curtain to the floor of the cabinet, like a man smitten with death."
"What do you wish to imply?" asked Miller. "Do you mean that the man and the ghost were united in some way?"
"Precisely so. The "spirit" seemed drawn by some magnetic force toward the psychic, and the psychic seemed under an immense strain to keep the apparition exterior to himself. When they met the spectre vanished, and the psychic"s fall seemed inevitable--a collapse from utter exhaustion.
I was at the moment convinced that I had seen a vaporous ent.i.ty born of the medium. It seemed a clear case of projection of the astral body. In the pause which followed the psychic"s fall the young wife turned to me and said: "Sometimes, if my husband does not reach the spirit form in time, he falls _outside_ the curtain." She did not seem especially alarmed.
"The young psychic himself, however, told me afterward that he was undergoing a tremendous strain as he stood there commanding the spirit to appear. "I had a fierce pain in the centre of my forehead," he said.
"I couldn"t get my breath. I felt as if all my substance, my strength, was being drawn out of me. My legs seemed about to give way. It is always hard to produce a form so far away from me when I am on the outside of the cabinet in the light. The greater the distance, the greater the strain." I asked him what happened when he and the form rushed together, and he answered: "As soon as I touched it, it re-entered my body.""[2]
"I wonder why the spirits are always clothed in that luminous gauze?"
queried Miller.
"They are not," replied Fowler. "More often they come in the clothing which was their habitual wear."
"I asked this young psychic if drapery were used out of respect to us mortals, and he replied: "No; the forms are swathed not from sense of propriety so much as to protect the body, which is often incomplete at the extremities." The wife and Jacob told me that at one of their meetings a naked Hercules suddenly appeared before the curtain. The Pole declared: "He was of giant size and strength. I felt of his muscles (he was clothed only in a loincloth), and I closely studied his tremendous arms and shoulders. The medium, as you know, is a small, thin man. We called this figure "the man from Mars." He was at least six feet high, and strong as a lion. He rushed back into the cabinet, and came out holding the medium above his head on his upraised palms. It was very wonderful.""
"You didn"t see anything like that, did you?" asked Miller.
"No," I replied; "but I did see the development of a figure apparently from the floor between me and the curtain of the cabinet. My attention was called to something wavering, shimmering, and fluctuating about a foot above the carpet. It was neither steam nor flame. It seemed compounded of both luminous vapor and puffing clouds of drapery. It rose and fell in quivering impulses, expanding and contracting, but continuing to grow until at last it towered to the height of a tall man, and I could dimly discern, through dark draperies edged with light, a man"s figure.
""This," the young wife said, "is Judge White, the grandfather of the psychic," and she conversed with him, but only for a few moments. He soon dwindled and faded and melted away in the same fashion as he had come, recalling to my mind Richet"s description of the birth and disappearance of "B. B.," in Algiers. I know this sounds like the veriest dreaming, but you must remember that materializations much more wonderful have been seen and a.n.a.lyzed in the clinical laboratories of Turin and Naples. Morselli, Bottazzi, Lombroso, Porro, and Foa have been confronted by similar apparitions. They saw "sinister" faces, and were repelled by "Satanic hands agile and prompt" in cabinets of their own construction, surrounded by their own registering machinery, and Richet photographed just such figures as this I have described.
"The question with me is not, Do these forms exist? but, What produces them? I am describing this sitting to explain what I mean by the ideoplastic or teleplastic theory. If, for example, this psychic had known me well enough to have had a very definite picture of "E. A.," he might have been able to model from the mind-stuff that he or the circle had thrown off, a luminous image of my friend, and, aided by my subconscious self, might have united the presence and the musical thought of Ernest Alexander."
"It won"t do!" exclaimed Miller. "It"s all too destructive, too preposterous!"
"I insist that the spirit hypothesis is simpler," repeated Fowler.
"It isn"t a question of simplicity," I retorted. "It"s a question of fact. If the observations of scientific experimentalists are of any value, the teleplastic theory is on the point of winning acceptance."
"I will not admit that," rejoined Fowler. "For, even if you throw out all the enormous ma.s.s of evidence acc.u.mulated by spiritistic investigators, you still have the conversion of Wallace, Lodge, and Lombroso, not to speak of De Vesme, Venzano, and other well-known men of science, to account for. Even Crookes himself admits that nothing but some form of spirit hypothesis is capable of explaining _all_ the phenomena; and in a recent issue of the _Annals of Psychic Science_ Lombroso writes a paper making several very strong points against the biologic theory. One of these is the simultaneous occurrence of phenomena. "Can the subconscious self act in several places at once?" he asks. A second objection lies in the fact that movements occur in opposition to the will of the psychic--as, for example, when Eusapia was transported in her chair. "Can a man lift himself by his boot-straps?"
is the question. "The centre of gravity of a body cannot be altered in s.p.a.ce unless acted upon by an external force. Therefore, the phenomena of levitation cannot be considered to be produced by energy emanating from the medium.""
"I don"t think that follows," I argued. "Force may be exerted unconsciously and invisibly. Because the psychic does not _consciously_ will to do a certain thing is no proof that the action does not originate in the deeps of her personality. We know very little of this obscure region of our minds."
Fowler was ready with his answer: "But let us take the case that Lombroso cites of the beautiful woman spirit whose hand twice dashed the photographic plates from the grasp of those who wished to secure her picture. Here was plainly an opposing will, for the psychic was lending herself to the experiment, and the spectators were eager for its success. Notwithstanding which co-operation this phantom bitterly opposed the wishes of every one present, and it was _afterward_ learned that there was a special reason why she did not wish to leave positive proofs of her ident.i.ty. "It is evident, therefore," concludes Lombroso, "that a third will can intervene in spiritistic phenomena."