"In this connection I beg to draw your attention to the fact that Mr. Smith did not confine his work of agitation, public lecturing, etc., to the County of Brome, or that section of the country in which the majority of the population had voted in favor of the prohibition of liquor, but that his operations extended beyond these limits. After the fullest investigation, and consideration of this whole matter, I feel constrained to say that the Company"s course was, under the circ.u.mstances, not only justified, but, having regard to its business interests, unavoidable.
"In yours of the 21st ult., you refer again to the correspondence between Mr. Brady and Mr. Smith. Inasmuch as the Company has stated that the expressions complained of do not meet with its approval or express correctly its policy, I submit that it is now clearly improper and unfair to endeavor to make them appear as a reason for the continuation of the complaint against the Company.
"I note from your letter of the 28th ult., that a meeting is suggested between the officials of the Company and a committee representing the Alliance. I shall be glad, as I a long time ago offered to meet this committee, and as you have kindly left the appointment of the time and place of meeting with me, I suggest, if it is convenient to the committee, my office on Monday next, at eleven A. M.
"The delay in replying to your letters was due to the uncertainty of my movements and consequent difficulty in naming a time for the proposed meeting.
"Yours truly, "(Signed), THOS. TAIT, "a.s.sistant General Manager."
According to the spirit of this letter, no man having an interest in any reform, or a desire to aid in any work for the good of his fellow-men, can conscientiously hold a position in the employ of this great Company, which is so influential in our beloved country. Must every self-supporting man be a slave?
Mr. Tait says, "After the fullest investigation, and consideration of this whole matter, I feel constrained to say that the Company"s course was, under the circ.u.mstances, not only justifiable, but, having regard to its business interests, unavoidable."
Mr. Tait does not say "Mr. Brady"s course," but "the Company"s course," thus showing that Mr. Brady had not acted independently of his superior officers in dismissing Mr. Smith.
Mr. Tait also expresses the Company"s disapproval of Mr. Brady"s "expressions," while he, himself, makes statements which seem quite as objectionable as those of Mr. Brady. Moreover, as Mr. Tait sanctions the dismissal of an employee for active temperance work, and mentions in this letter no other cause as having led to Mr. Smith"s discharge, we do not see why he should object to an a.s.sistant Superintendent naming the same reason to an under official, whom he is dismissing from the Company"s service.
The conference arranged between Mr. Tait and the representatives of the Alliance was held in the office of the former on January 7th, 1895. The meeting began at half-past eleven, and continued until nearly two o"clock, when, as no definite decision was reached, it was decided to adjourn until the following morning. The resolutions adopted by the various temperance bodies in Montreal, and elsewhere, were presented to Mr. Tait. The following circular, issued by the Quebec Provincial Branch of the Dominion Alliance, shows the result of the conference on January 8th.
"Dominion Alliance, "Quebec Provincial Branch, "MONTREAL, Jan. 30th, 1895.
"DEAR SIR,--On November 28th last, by circular letter, we called the attention of the executives of the various grand bodies of the temperance organizations of the Dominion to the action of the Canadian Pacific Railway Company, in dismissing from their employ the President of one of our county alliances, Mr. W. W. Smith.
Enclosed in this circular was a copy of the correspondence which led up to the dismissal. In response to this circular, resolutions were received from every Province of the Dominion, as well as from the executives of Dominion organizations.
"These resolutions were very emphatic in their condemnation of the position taken by a.s.sistant Superintendent Brady, in the published correspondence, to wit, that an employee "must quit temperance work or quit the Company."
"These resolutions were carefully considered at the conference of temperance representatives, held in this city on December 27th, and it was decided to ask the Canadian Pacific Railway to repudiate the position taken by a.s.sistant Superintendent Brady, and that it take such action in regard to Mr. Brady, whose course has given so much offence to the temperance people, as will convince its employees and the public that its policy is not that represented by his act. It was also decided that before any further action be taken, the Canadian Pacific Railway should be notified that if it so desired, a deputation from this meeting would be prepared to meet the representatives of the Company in conference.
"The Company concurred in the suggestion, and as a result of two lengthy conferences, the following agreement was arrived at:
""The Canadian Pacific Railway distinctly repudiate, as they have done from the commencement of the discussion, the expressions used by a.s.sistant Superintendent Brady, when demanding Mr.
Smith"s resignation, which expressions have been taken exception to by the temperance people.
""The Canadian Pacific Railway admit the right of employees to identify themselves with the temperance movement, and work for the same, provided such work is done outside official hours, always with due consideration to the interests of the Company.
The committee accept such declaration as satisfactory.
""The committee claims that the hasty and ill-advised language used in a.s.sistant Superintendent Brady"s correspondence, and otherwise, has caused grave dissatisfaction on the part of the temperance people of Canada. The committee disclaim any attempt to coerce or dictate to the Canadian Pacific in the management of the Company"s affairs, but under the circ.u.mstances look to the Canadian Pacific Railway to place on record some substantial mark of their disapproval of the expressions of one of their staff, same having been the means of causing offence to a large portion of the community.
""The Canadian Pacific Railway claims that, if for no other reason, Mr. Smith"s discharge was justifiable on the ground of neglect of duty."
"This was signed by Mr. Thomas Tait, a.s.sistant General Manager, on the part of the Canadian Pacific Railway, and by the following delegation as representing the temperance people of Canada: Major E. L. Bond, Mr. E. A. Dyer, M. P., Rev. A. M. Phillips, Mr. A. M.
Featherston, Mr. S. J. Carter, and Mr. J. H. Carson.
"This agreement and the delegation"s report was received and approved as satisfactory, by the executive of this provincial Alliance, and a committee appointed to communicate the result to the temperance bodies.
"It will thus be seen that the Company has entirely repudiated the offensive language used by Mr. Brady, and declares that it does not express the att.i.tude of the Company towards the temperance cause.
"The Company also admits the right of its employees to engage in temperance work; and as regards Mr. Brady, it acknowledges that cause for dissatisfaction has existed, and promises that action will be taken to remove this cause.
"In placing these facts before you, we have to congratulate our friends throughout the Dominion upon the satisfactory conclusion of this matter, which has given us all so much anxious concern.
"Another cause for congratulation is the intense interest manifested in this case in every part of the Dominion. From Vancouver to Prince Edward Island have come expressions of hearty cooperation, which have been exceedingly gratifying, clearly demonstrating the fact that there is a temperance force throughout the country which, if only concentrated, and directed unitedly against the legalized liquor traffic of our land, would be positively irresistible. In the present instance a vital principle of temperance reform was attacked and almost immediately the whole Dominion resounds with the protests of the temperance people, and forthwith the injustice is removed.
"With regard to Mr. Smith, we have this to add, that having since accepted the position of organizer and lecturer for the Independent Order of Good Templars of this Province, he had no desire to return to the Company"s employ, preferring to devote himself entirely to the temperance work.
"On behalf of the executive,
"E. L. BOND, } "S. J. CARTER, } "A. M. FEATHERSTON, } _Committee_."
"A. M. PHILLIPS, } "J. H. CARSON, }
It will be noticed that in this letter the committee congratulate their friends upon "the satisfactory conclusion of this matter." Also at a meeting of the Executive of the Alliance before the above circular was issued the following resolution was adopted:
"That this executive having heard the agreement and the report of the committee thereon, is satisfied with the same, and congratulate the temperance people of Canada on the result."
It is often well for us to look at the bright side, and this was what the Alliance Committee determined on doing, and there surely were some encouraging features connected with this case.
Nevertheless, as there are generally two sides which may be seen in such an affair, there were many of "the temperance people of Canada"
who did not consider this conclusion satisfactory, and exchanged no congratulations, and it may do us no harm now to look briefly at some of the disappointing features in this settlement.
First, it is said, "that the Company has entirely repudiated the offensive language used by Mr. Brady, and declares that it does not express the att.i.tude of the Company towards the temperance cause."
Now, Mr. Tait had taken precisely this same position in his letters to the Alliance Secretary, previous to the meeting with the committee, and even in the minutes of the meeting, as above given, it is said, "The Canadian Pacific Railway distinctly repudiate--_as they have done from the commencement of the discussion_--the expressions used by a.s.sistant Superintendent Brady." In view of this it would seem that not much was gained by the meeting on this point.
Secondly, we are told that "the Company also admits the right of its employees to engage in temperance work." It certainly was encouraging that this great Company should try to appear pleasing to the Alliance, and seemed to show that the Canadian Pacific Railway considered the temperance party a powerful factor in the land, but when we come to consider the manner in which the admission mentioned above was made, we can but see that it has a very doubtful side. The sentence in which the Company makes this announcement is as follows:
"The Canadian Pacific Railway admit the right of employees to identify themselves with the temperance movement, and work for the same, provided such work is done outside official hours, _always with due consideration to the interests of the Company_."
As we are not told that Mr. Tait, at the meeting, repudiated any of his own former statements, we will look at the above in the light of the following, from his letter of December 6th, to Mr. Carson:
"As far as I am able to judge, no official of our Company, of whose duties one is to solicit and secure traffic for the Company, could take sides on any of these questions," referring to matters about which the public disagree, "at public meetings and lectures without impairing its usefulness to the Company....
..... The Company is carrying on the business of a railway company, and its objects do not extend beyond the promotion of that business.
Its success depends upon the favor and patronage of the community at large, and if one of its officers or employees so conducts himself as to antagonize a section of the community, or even in a manner which is likely to bring about that result, the Company"s interests are injuriously affected."
The admission made to the Alliance seems to be robbed of most of its virtue by the above statements, and it would seem that even yet the employees of the Company may have but little liberty of conscience.
It is also said in the aforementioned circular that, "as regards Mr.
Brady, the Company acknowledges that cause for dissatisfaction has existed, and promises that action will be taken to remove this cause."
This acknowledgment was certainly a good one, but we have no knowledge of the promise having been fulfilled. Mr. Brady has been moved from one division to another of the Canadian Pacific Railway, but as this change did not take place until long after this meeting was held, and then only in connection with many others among the officials and employees of the Canadian Pacific Railway, and as Mr. Brady still holds an honorable position in the Company"s employ, we see no reason for supposing that this had any connection with the promise made to the committee.
Some of the temperance people feeling dissatisfied with the results of the Canadian Pacific Railway-Alliance Conference sent communications regarding it to the papers, but the press, from some cause, seemed very loath to publish these protests. However, the following, addressed to the Editor of the _Witness_, did find its way to the public, and may have expressed the opinions of many besides the writer:
"SIR,--That the temperance people of Canada were moved, as never before, by the dismissal of its Sutton Junction agent, Mr. W. W.
Smith, by the Canadian Pacific Railway Company, because he had rendered himself obnoxious to the lawbreakers of the County of Brome, who had tried but failed to kill him, there is no doubt, as may be clearly seen from your columns, to say nothing of the thousand hearts, which, like mine, said nothing, but felt no less all the while that by its action the Canadian Pacific Railway had placed a premium upon lawlessness and immorality at the expense of those whom I had been taught to regard as the "salt of the earth."
"The immediate consequence of this was that that line of railway was being shunned, and its services neglected by many of its old patrons, and by this loss its magnates were being taught a lesson, and put on the "repentent stool," and it seemed almost certain that never more would the Bradys, Taits, and Van Hornes of this Canadian made and pampered corporation forget that temperance people of Canada had both the will and the power to retaliate upon their persecutors. And that if another such dismissal was ever again attempted, they would "more darkly sin,"
and hide the "cloven foot," which was so openly shown by Brady and Tait.
"At this juncture of its affairs, and at the moment when a persistence in the agitation would probably have resulted in reparation of the wrong done to Mr. Smith, and an open repudiation of its immoral att.i.tude, Mr. Tait managed to get a hold of some gentlemen, who like the seven Tooley Street tailors, who called themselves "We, the people of England," arrogated to themselves the right to speak for the temperance people of Canada, and he played them off on the "Come into my parlor, said the spider to a fly," and the upshot of the matter is the most disappointing and sickening, I think, I have ever seen.