201.
[203] Sir C. Wyke to Earl Russell, Nov. 25, 1861. Brit. and For. St.
Pap., Vol. LII, p. 398.
[204] Thirty-Seventh Cong., Second Sess., House Exec. Doc. No. 100, pp.
186-7.
[205] House Exec. Doc. No. 100, pp. 187-190, Thirty-seventh Cong., Second Sess. Brit. and For. St. Pap., Vol. LII. p. 394.
[206] House Exec. Doc. No. 100, p. 174, Thirty-seventh Cong., Second Sess.
[207] Brit. and For. St. Pap., Vol. LII, p. 381.
[208] Adams to Seward, January 24, 1862. House Ex. Doc. No. 100 p. 206, Thirty-seventh Cong., Second Sess.
[209] Brit. and For. St. Pap., Vol. LII, p. 418.
[210] H. Ex. Doc. No. 100, p. 209, Thirty-seventh Cong., Second Sess.
[211] H. Ex. Doc No. 54, p. 46, Thirty-seventh Cong., Third Sess.
[212] _Ibid._, p. 48.
[213] Dayton to Seward, April 22, 1862.
[214] Earl Cowley to Earl Russell, May 15, 1862, H. Ex. Doc. No. 54, p.
746, Thirty-seventh Cong., Third Sess.
[215] Earl Russell to Sir C. Wyke, May 22, 1862.
[216] Earl Cowley to Earl Russell, April 25, 1862, H. Ex. Doc. No. 54, p. 694, Thirty-seventh Cong., Third Sess.
[217] H. Ex. Doc. No. 54, p. 530, Thirty-seventh Cong., Third Sess.
[218] Sen. Ex. Doc. No. 11, pp. 254-268, Thirty-eighth Cong., First Sess.
[219] Seward to Motley, Sept. 11, 1863, Dipl. Corr., 1863; Sen. Ex. Doc.
No. 11, p. 479, Thirty-eighth Cong., First Sess.
[220] Sen. Ex. Doc. No. 11, p. 464, Thirty-eighth Cong., First Sess.
[221] Dayton to Seward, Oct. 9, 1863, Sen. Ex. Doc. No. 11, p. 471, Thirty-eighth Cong., First Sess.
[222] Seward to Dayton, Oct. 23, 1863. _Ibid._
[223] Dip. Corr., 1864.
[224] Adams to Seward, March 24, 1864.
[225] Dipl. Corr., 1865, Part III, pp. 356-849.
[226] Dipl. Corr., 1864; also Sen. Ex. Doc. No. 11, Thirty-eighth Cong., First Sess.
[227] Dipl. Corr., 1865, Part III, pp. 380-385.
[228] Dipl. Corr. 1865, Part III.
[229] Tucker, p. 104; Dipl. Corr., 1865, Part III.
[230] Sen. Ex. Doc. No. 5, p. 3. Thirty-ninth Cong., First Sess.
[231] Mr. Bigelow to Mr. Seward, Nov. 30, 1865, Sen. Ex. Doc. No. 5, Thirty-ninth Cong., First Sess.
[232] Bigelow, "Retrospections of an Active Life," Vol. IV, p. 42; Bancroft, "Life of Seward," Vol. II, p. 435.
[233] Sen. Ex. Doc. No. 6, p. 98, Thirty-ninth Cong., First Sess.
[234] House Ex. Doc. No. 93, Thirty-ninth Cong., First Sess.
[235] Dipl. Corr., 1865, Part III; also H. Ex. Doc. No. 93, Thirty-ninth Cong., First Sess.
[236] H. Ex. Doc. No. 93, p. 42, Thirty-ninth Cong., First Sess.
[237] _Ibid._
[238] Wharton"s Digest, Sec. 58, Vol. I, p. 328.
[239] Dipl. Corr., 1866, Part I, p. 387.
[240] H. Ex. Doc. No. 30, Fortieth Cong., First Sess.
[241] Dipl. Corr., 1866, Part III.
[242] Dipl. Corr., 1866, Part III.
[243] Sen. Ex. Doc. No. 20, Fortieth Cong., First Sess.
CHAPTER VI
THE TWO VENEZUELAN EPISODES
As a result of Blaine"s unsuccessful attempt to force Great Britain to relinquish her rights under the Clayton-Bulwer treaty the Monroe Doctrine had fallen somewhat into disrepute when in 1895 it was suddenly revived in a striking and sensational way by President Cleveland"s intervention in the Venezuelan boundary controversy. The dispute between Great Britain and Venezuela in regard to the boundary line between the latter and British Guiana was of long standing. In 1814, by treaty with the Netherlands, Great Britain acquired "the establishments of Demerara, Essequibo, and Berbice," now known as British Guiana. From that time on the boundary line between British Guiana and Venezuela was a matter of dispute. Venezuela always claimed the line of the Essequibo river.
In 1840, Sir Robert Schomburgk, acting under the instructions of the British government, established a line some distance to the west of the Essequibo river and marked it by monuments on the face of the country.
Venezuela at once protested. The British government explained that the line was only tentative and the monuments set up by Schomburgk were removed.