Being badly received at court he now lived in the country; sometimes at Buxton, where his father drank the waters, where he had his recreations, when not persecuted by two young brothers. Sir William Stanhope and John Stanhope, one of whom performed "tolerably ill upon a broken hautboy, and the other something worse upon a cracked flute." There he won three half-crowns from the curate of the place, and a shilling from "Gaffer Foxeley" at a c.o.c.k-match. Sometimes he sought relaxation in Scarborough, where fashionable beaux "danced with the pretty ladies all night," and hundreds of Yorkshire country b.u.mpkins "played the inferior parts; and, as it were, only tumble, whilst the others dance upon the high ropes of gallantry." Scarborough was full of Jacobites: the popular feeling was then all rife against Sir Robert Walpole"s excise scheme. Lord Chesterfield thus wittily satirized that famous measure:--
"The people of this town are, at present, in great consternation upon a report they have heard from London, which, if true, they think will ruin them. They are informed, that considering the vast consumption of these waters, there is a design laid of _excising_ them next session; and, moreover, that as bathing in the sea is become the general practice of both s.e.xes, and as the kings of England have always been allowed to be masters of the seas, every person so bathing shall be gauged, and pay so much per foot square, as their cubical bulk amounts to."
In 1733, Lord Chesterfield married Melusina, the supposed niece, but, in fact, the daughter of the d.u.c.h.ess of Kendal, the mistress of George I.
This lady was presumed to be a great heiress, from the dominion which her mother had over the king. Melusina had been created (for life) Baroness of Aldborough, county Suffolk, and Countess of Walsingham, county Norfolk, nine years previous to her marriage.
Her father being George I., as Horace Walpole terms him, "rather a good sort of man than a shining king," and her mother "being no genius,"
there was probably no great attraction about Lady Walsingham, except her expected dowry.
During her girlhood Melusina resided in the apartments at St.
James"s--opening into the garden; and here Horace Walpole describes his seeing George I., in the rooms appropriated to the d.u.c.h.ess of Kendal, next to those of Melusina Schulemberg, or, as she was then called, the Countess of Walsingham. The d.u.c.h.ess of Kendal was then very "lean and ill-favoured." "Just before her," says Horace, "stood a tall, elderly man, rather pale, of an aspect rather good-natured than august: in a dark tie-wig, a plain coat, waistcoat, and breeches of snuff-coloured cloth, with stockings of the same colour, and a blue riband over all.
That was George I."
[Ill.u.s.tration: A ROYAL ROBBER.]
The d.u.c.h.ess of Kendal had been maid of honour to the Electress Sophia, the mother of George I. and the daughter of Elizabeth of Bohemia. The d.u.c.h.ess was always frightful; so much so that one night the electress, who had acquired a little English, said to Mrs. Howard, afterwards Lady Suffolk,--glancing at Mademoiselle Schulemberg--"Look at that _mawkin_, and think of her being my son"s pa.s.sion!"
The d.u.c.h.ess, however, like all the Hanoverians, knew how to profit by royal preference. She took bribes:--she had a settlement of 3,000 a year. But her daughter was eventually disappointed of the expected bequest from her father, the king.[24]
In the apartments at St. James"s Lord Chesterfield for some time lived, when he was not engaged in office abroad; and there he dissipated large sums in play. It was here, too, that Queen Caroline, the wife of George II., detected the intimacy that existed between Chesterfield and Lady Suffolk. There was an obscure window in Queen Caroline"s apartments, which looked into a dark pa.s.sage, lighted only by a single lamp at night. One Twelfth Night Lord Chesterfield, having won a large sum at cards, deposited it with Lady Suffolk, thinking it not safe to carry it home at night. He was watched, and his intimacy with the mistress of George II. thereupon inferred. Thenceforth he could obtain no court influence; and, in desperation, he went into the opposition.
On the death of George I., a singular scene, with which Lord Chesterfield"s interests were connected, occurred in the Privy Council.
Dr Wake, Archbishop of Canterbury, produced the king"s will, and delivered it to his successor, expecting that it would be opened and read in the council; what was his consternation, when his Majesty, without saying a word, put it into his pocket, and stalked out of the room with real German imperturbability! Neither the astounded prelate nor the subservient council ventured to utter a word. The will was never more heard of: and rumour declared that it was burnt. The contents, of course, never transpired; and the legacy of 40,000, said to have been left to the d.u.c.h.ess of Kendal, was never more spoken of, until Lord Chesterfield, in 1733, married the Countess of Walsingham. In 1743, it is said, he claimed the legacy--in right of his wife--the d.u.c.h.ess of Kendal being then dead: and was "quieted" with 20,000, and got, as Horace Walpole observes, nothing from the d.u.c.h.ess--"except his wife."
The only excuse that was urged to extenuate this act on the part of George II., was that his royal father had burned two wills which had been made in his favour. These were supposed to be the wills of the Duke and d.u.c.h.ess of Zell and of the Electress Sophia. There was not even common honesty in the house of Hanover at that period.
Disappointed in his wife"s fortune, Lord Chesterfield seems to have cared very little for the disappointed heiress. Their union was childless. His opinion of marriage appears very much to have coincided with that of the world of malcontents who rush, in the present day, to the court of Judge Cresswell, with "dissolving views." On one occasion he writes thus: "I have at last done the best office that can be done to most married people; that is, I have fixed the separation between my brother and his wife, and the definitive treaty of peace will be proclaimed in about a fortnight."
Horace Walpole related the following anecdote of Sir William Stanhope (Chesterfield"s brother) and his lady, whom he calls "a fond couple."
After their return from Paris, when they arrived at Lord Chesterfield"s house at Blackheath, Sir William, who had, like his brother, a cutting, polite wit, that was probably expressed with the "allowed simper" of Lord Chesterfield, got out of the chaise and said, with a low bow, "Madame, I hope I shall never see your face again." She replied, "Sir, I will take care that you never shall;" and so they parted.
There was little probability of Lord Chesterfield"s partic.i.p.ating in domestic felicity, when neither his heart nor his fancy were engaged in the union which he had formed. The lady to whom he was really attached, and by whom he had a son, resided in the Netherlands: she pa.s.sed by the name of Madame du Bouchet, and survived both Lord Chesterfield and her son. A permanent provision was made for her, and a sum of five hundred pounds bequeathed to her, with these words: "as a small reparation for the injury I did her." "Certainly," adds Lord Mahon, in his Memoir of his ill.u.s.trious ancestor, "a small one."
For some time Lord Chesterfield remained in England, and his letters are dated from Bath, from Tonbridge, from Blackheath. He had, in 1726, been elevated to the House of Lords upon the death of his father. In that a.s.sembly his great eloquence is thus well described by his biographer:--[25]
"Lord Chesterfield"s eloquence, the fruit of much study, was less characterized by force and compa.s.s than by elegance and perspicuity, and especially by good taste and urbanity, and a vein of delicate irony which, while it sometimes inflicted severe strokes, never pa.s.sed the limits of decency and propriety. It was that of a man who, in the union of wit and good sense with politeness, had not a compet.i.tor. These qualities were matured by the advantage which he a.s.siduously sought and obtained, of a familiar acquaintance with almost all the eminent wits and writers of his time, many of whom had been the ornaments of a preceding age of literature, while others were destined to become those of a later period."
The accession of George II., to whose court Lord Chesterfield had been attached for many years, brought him no political preferment. The court had, however, its attractions even for one who owed his polish to the belles of Paris, and who was almost always, in taste and manners, more foreign than English. Henrietta, Lady Pomfret, the daughter and heiress of John, Lord Jeffreys, the son of Judge Jeffreys, was at that time the leader of fashion.
Six daughters, one of them, Lady Sophia, surpa.s.singly lovely recalled the perfections of that ancestress, Arabella Fermor whose charms Pope has so exquisitely touched in the "Rape of the Lock." Lady Sophia became eventually the wife of Lord Carteret, the minister, whose talents and the charms of whose eloquence const.i.tuted him a sort of rival to Chesterfield. With all his abilities, Lord Chesterfield may be said to have failed both as a courtier and as a political character, as far as permanent influence in any ministry was concerned, until in 1744, when what was called the "Broad-bottomed administration" was formed, when he was admitted into the cabinet. In the following year, however, he went, for the last time, to Holland, as amba.s.sador, and succeeded beyond the expectations of his party in the purposes of his emba.s.sy. He took leave of the States-General just before the battle of Fontenoy, and hastened to Ireland, where he had been nominated Lord-Lieutenant previous to his journey to Holland. He remained in that country only a year; but long enough to prove how liberal were his views--how kindly the dispositions of his heart.
Only a few years before Lord Chesterfield"s arrival in Dublin, the Duke of Shrewsbury had given as a reason for accepting the vice-regency of that country, (of which King James I. had said, there was "more ado"
than with any of his dominions,) "that it was a place where a man had business enough to keep him from falling asleep, and not enough to keep him awake."
Chesterfield, however, was not of that opinion. He did more in one year than the duke would have accomplished in five. He began by inst.i.tuting a principle of impartial justice. Formerly, Protestants had alone been employed as "managers;" the Lieutenant was to see with Protestant eyes, to hear with Protestant ears.
"I have determined to proscribe no set of persons whatever," says Chesterfield, "and determined to be governed by none. Had the Papists made any attempt to put themselves above the law, I should have taken good care to have quelled them again. It was said my lenity to the Papists had wrought no alteration either in their religious or their political sentiments. I did not expect that it would: but surely that was no reason for cruelty towards them."
Often by a timely jest Chesterfield conveyed a hint, or even shrouded a reproof. One of the ultra-zealous informed him that his coachman was a Papist, and went every Sunday to ma.s.s. "Does he indeed? I will take care he never drives me there," was Chesterfield"s cool reply.
It was at this critical period, when the Hanoverian dynasty was shaken almost to its downfall by the insurrection in Scotland of 1745, that Ireland was imperilled: "With a weak or wavering, or a fierce and headlong Lord-Lieutenant--with a Grafton or a Strafford," remarks Lord Mahon, "there would soon have been a simultaneous rising in the Emerald Isle." But Chesterfield"s energy, his lenity, his wise and just administration saved the Irish from being excited into rebellion by the emissaries of Charles Edward, or slaughtered, when conquered, by the "Butcher," and his tiger-like dragoons. When all was over, and that sad page of history in which the deaths of so many faithful adherents of the exiled family are recorded, had been held up to the gaze of bleeding Caledonia, Chesterfield recommended mild measures, and advised the establishment of schools in the Highlands; but the age was too narrow-minded to adopt his views. In January, 1748, Chesterfield retired from public life. "Could I do any good," he wrote to a friend, "I would sacrifice some more quiet to it; but convinced as I am that I can do none, I will indulge my ease, and preserve my character. I have gone through pleasures while my const.i.tution and my spirits would allow me.
Business succeeded them; and I have now gone through every part of it without liking it at all the better for being acquainted with it. Like many other things, it is most admired by those who know it least.... I have been behind the scenes both of pleasure and business; I have seen all the coa.r.s.e pulleys and dirty ropes which exhibit and move all the gaudy machines; and I have seen and smelt the tallow candles which illuminate the whole decoration, to the astonishment and admiration of the ignorant mult.i.tude.... My horse, my books, and my friends will divide my time pretty equally."
He still interested himself in what was useful; and carried a Bill in the House of Lords for the Reformation of the Calendar, in 1751. It seems a small matter for so great a mind as his to accomplish, but it was an achievement of infinite difficulty. Many statesmen had shrunk from the undertaking; and even Chesterfield found it essential to prepare the public, by writing in some periodical papers on the subject.
Nevertheless the vulgar outcry was vehement: "Give us back the eleven days we have been robbed of!" cried the mob at a general election. When Bradley was dying, the common people ascribed his sufferings to a judgment for the part he had taken in that "impious transaction," the alteration of the calendar. But they were not less _bornes_ in their notions than the Duke of Newcastle, then prime minister. Upon Lord Chesterfield giving him notice of his Bill, that bustling premier, who had been in a hurry for forty years, who never "walked but always ran,"
greatly alarmed, begged Chesterfield not to stir matters that had been long quiet; adding, that he did not like "new-fangled things." He was, as we have seen, overruled, and henceforth the New Style was adopted; and no special calamity has fallen on the nation, as was expected, in consequence. Nevertheless, after Chesterfield had made his speech in the House of Lords, and when every one had complimented him on the clearness of his explanation--"G.o.d knows," he wrote to his son, "I had not even attempted to explain the Bill to them; I might as soon have talked Celtic or Sclavonic to them as astronomy. They would have understood it full as well." So much for the "Lords" in those days!
After his _furore_ for politics had subsided, Chesterfield returned to his ancient pa.s.sion for play. We must linger a little over the still brilliant period of his middle life, whilst his hearing was spared; whilst his wit remained, and the charming manners on which he had formed a science, continued; and before we see him in the mournful decline of a life wholly given to the world.
He had now established himself in Chesterfield House. Hitherto his progenitors had been satisfied with Bloomsbury Square, in which the Lord Chesterfield mentioned by De Grammont resided; but the accomplished Chesterfield chose a site near Audley Street, which had been built on what was called Mr. Audley"s land, lying between Great Brook Field and the "Shoulder of Mutton Field." And near this locality with the elegant name, Chesterfield chose his spot, for which he had to wrangle and fight with the Dean and Chapter of Westminster, who asked an exorbitant sum for the ground. Isaac Ware, the editor of "Palladio," was the architect to whom the erection of this handsome residence was intrusted. Happily it is still untouched by any _renovating_ hand. Chesterfield"s favourite apartments, looking on the most s.p.a.cious private garden in London, are just as they were in his time; one especially, which he termed the "finest room in London," was furnished and decorated by him. "The walls," says a writer in the "Quarterly Review," "are covered half way up with rich and cla.s.sical stores of literature; above the cases are in close series the portraits of eminent authors, French and English, with most of whom he had conversed; over these, and immediately under the ma.s.sive cornice, extend all round in foot-long capitals the Horatian lines:--
"Nunc . veterum . libris . Nunc . somno . et . inertibus . Horis.
Lucen . solicter . jucunda . oblivia . vitea.
"On the mantel-pieces and cabinets stand busts of old orators, interspersed with voluptuous vases and bronzes, antique or Italian, and airy statuettes in marble or alabaster of nude or semi-nude opera nymphs."
What Chesterfield called the "cannonical pillars" of the house were columns brought from Cannons, near Edgeware, the seat of the Duke of Chandos. The antechamber of Chesterfield House has been erroneously stated as the room in which Johnson waited the great lord"s pleasure.
That state of endurance was probably pa.s.sed by "Old Samuel" in Bloomsbury.
In this stately abode--one of the few, the very few, that seem to hold _n.o.blesse_ apart in our levelling metropolis--Chesterfield held his a.s.semblies of all that London, or indeed England, Paris, the Hague, or Vienna, could furnish of what was polite and charming. Those were days when the stream of society did not, as now, flow freely, mingling with the grace of aristocracy the acquirements of hard-working professors; there was then a strong line of demarcation; it had not been broken down in the same way as now, when people of rank and wealth live in rows, instead of inhabiting hotels set apart. Paris has sustained a similar revolution, since her gardens were built over, and their green shades, delicious, in the centre of that hot city, are seen no more. In the very Faubourg St. Germain, the grand old hotels are rapidly disappearing, and with them something of the exclusiveness of the higher orders. Lord Chesterfield, however, triumphantly pointing to the fruits of his taste and distribution of his wealth, witnessed, in his library at Chesterfield House, the events which time produced. He heard of the death of Sarah, d.u.c.h.ess of Marlborough, and of her bequest to him of twenty thousand pounds, and her best and largest brilliant diamond ring, "out of the great regard she had for his merit, and the infinite obligations she had received from him." He witnessed the change of society and of politics which occurred when George II. expired, and the Earl of Bute, calling himself a descendant of the house of Stuart, "and humble enough to be proud of it," having quitted the isle of Bute, which Lord Chesterfield calls "but a little south of Nova Zembla," took possession, not only of the affections, but even of the senses of the young king, George III., who, a.s.sisted by the widowed Princess of Wales (supposed to be attached to Lord Bute), was "lugged out of the seraglio," and "placed upon the throne."
Chesterfield lived to have the honour of having the plan of "Johnson"s Dictionary" inscribed to him, and the dishonour of neglecting the great author. Johnson, indeed, denied the truth of the story which gained general belief, in which it was a.s.serted that he had taken a disgust at being kept waiting in the earl"s antechamber, the reason being a.s.signed that his lordship "had company with him;" when at last the door opened, and forth came Colley Cibber. Then Johnson--so report said--indignant, not only for having been kept waiting but also for _whom_, went away, it was affirmed, in disgust; but this was solemnly denied by the doctor, who a.s.sured Boswell that his wrath proceeded from continual neglect on the part of Chesterfield.
Whilst the Dictionary was in progress, Chesterfield seemed to forget the existence of him, whom, together with the other literary men, he affected to patronize.
He once sent him ten pounds, after which he forgot Johnson"s address, and said "the great author had changed his lodgings." People who really wish to benefit others can always discover where they lodge. The days of patronage were then expiring, but they had not quite ceased, and a dedication was always to be in some way paid for.
When the publication of the Dictionary drew near, Lord Chesterfield flattered himself that, in spite of all his neglect, the great compliment of having so vast an undertaking dedicated to him would still be paid, and wrote some papers in the "World," recommending the work, more especially referring to the "plan," and terming Johnson the "dictator," in respect to language: "I will not only obey him," he said, "as my dictator, like an old Roman, but like a modern Roman, will implicitly believe in him as my pope."
Johnson, however, was not to be propitiated by those "honeyed words." He wrote a letter couched in what he called "civil terms," to Chesterfield, from which we extract the following pa.s.sages:
"When, upon some slight encouragement, I first visited your lordship, I was overpowered, like the rest of mankind, by the enchantment of your address; and could not forbear to wish that I might boast myself _vainqueur du vainqueur de la terre_--that I might obtain that regard for which I saw the world contending; but I found my attendance so little encouraged, that neither pride nor modesty would suffer me to continue it. When I had once addressed your lordship in publick, I had exhausted all the art of pleasing which a retired and uncourtly scholar can possess. I had done all that I could; and no man is well pleased to have his all neglected, be it ever so little.
"Seven years, my lord, have now past, since I waited in your outward room, or was repulsed from your door, during which time I have been pushing on my work through difficulties, of which it is useless to complain, and have brought it, at last, to the verge of publication without one act of a.s.sistance, one word of encouragement, or one smile of favour: such treatment I did not expect, for I never had a patron before.... Is not a patron, my lord, one who looks with unconcern on a man who is struggling for life in the water, and, when he has reached ground, enc.u.mbers him with help? The notice which you have been pleased to take of my labours, had it been early, had been kind; but it has been delayed till I am indifferent and cannot enjoy it; till I am solitary and cannot impart it; till I am known and do not want it. I hope it is no very cynical asperity not to confess obligations where no benefit has been received, or to be unwilling that the publick should consider me as owing that to a patron which Providence has enabled me to do for myself."
The conduct of Johnson, on this occasion, was approved by most manly minds, except that of his publisher, Mr. Robert Dodsley; Dr. Adams, a friend of Dodsley, said he was sorry that Johnson had written that celebrated letter (a very model of polite contempt). Dodsley said he was sorry too, for he had a property in the Dictionary, to which his lordship"s patronage might be useful. He then said that Lord Chesterfield had shown him the letter. "I should have thought," said Adams, "that Lord Chesterfield would have concealed it." "Pooh!" cried Dodsley, "do you think a letter from Johnson could hurt Lord Chesterfield? not at all, sir. It lay on his table, where any one might see it. He read it to me; said, "this man has great powers," pointed out the severest pa.s.sages, and said, "how well they were expressed."" The art of dissimulation, in which Chesterfield was perfect, imposed on Mr.
Dodsley.
Dr. Adams expostulated with the doctor, and said Lord Chesterfield declared he would part with the best servant he had, if he had known that he had turned away a man who was "_always_ welcome." Then Adams insisted on Lord Chesterfield"s affability, and easiness of access to literary men. But the st.u.r.dy Johnson replied, "Sir, that is not Lord Chesterfield; he is the proudest man existing." "I think," Adams rejoined, "I know one that is prouder; you, by your own account, are the prouder of the two." "But mine," Johnson answered, with one of his happy turns, "was defensive pride." "This man," he afterwards said, referring to Chesterfield, "I thought had been a lord among wits, but I find he is only a wit among lords."
In revenge, Chesterfield in his Letters depicted Johnson, it is said, in the character of the "respectable Hottentot." Amongst other things, he observed of the Hottentot, "he throws his meat anywhere but down his throat." This being remarked to Johnson, who was by no means pleased at being immortalized as the Hottentot--"Sir," he answered, "Lord Chesterfield never saw me eat in his life."
[Ill.u.s.tration: DR. JOHNSON AT LORD CHESTERFIELD"S.]
Such are the leading points of this famous and lasting controversy. It is amusing to know that Lord Chesterfield was not always precise as to directions to his letters. He once directed to Lord Pembroke, who was always swimming "To the Earl of Pembroke, in the Thames, over against Whitehall. This, as Horace Walpole remarks, was sure of finding him within a certain fathom."
Lord Chesterfield was now admitted to be the very "gla.s.s of fashion,"
though age, and, according to Lord Hervey, a hideous person, impeded his being the "mould of form." "I don"t know why," writes Horace Walpole, in the dog-days, from Strawberry Hill, "but people are always more anxious about their hay than their corn, or twenty other things that cost them more: I suppose my Lord Chesterfield, or some such dictator, made it fashionable to care about one"s hay. n.o.body betrays solicitude about getting in his rents." "The prince of wits," as the same authority calls him--"his entrance into the world was announced by his bon-mots, and his closing lips dropped repartees that sparkled with his juvenile fire."