_Question_. There has been a good deal said lately about your suicide theology, Colonel. Do you still believe that suicide is justifiable?
_Answer_. Certainly. When a man is useless to himself and to others he has a right to determine what he will do about living.
The only thing to be considered is a man"s obligation to his fellow- beings and to himself. I don"t take into consideration any supernatural nonsense. If G.o.d wants a man to stay here he ought to make it more comfortable for him.
_Question_. Since you expounded your justification of suicide, Colonel, I believe you have had some cases of suicide laid at your door?
_Answer_. Oh, yes. Every suicide that has happened since that time has been charged to me. I don"t know how the people account for the suicides before my time. I have not yet heard of my being charged with the death of Cato, but that may yet come to pa.s.s. I was reading the other day that the rate of suicide in Germany is increasing. I suppose my article has been translated into German.
_Question_. How about lying, Colonel? Is it ever right to lie?
_Answer_. Of course, sometimes. In war when a man is captured by the enemy he ought to lie to them to mislead them. What we call strategy is nothing more than lies. For the accomplishment of a good end, for instance, the saving of a woman"s reputation, it is many times perfectly right to lie. As a rule, people ought to tell the truth. If it is right to kill a man to save your own life it certainly ought to be right to fool him for the same purpose. I would rather be deceived than killed, wouldn"t you?
--_The Inter-Ocean_, Chicago, Illinois, March, 1897.
A VISIT TO SHAW"S GARDEN.
_Question_. I was told that you came to St. Louis on your wedding trip some thirty years ago and went to Shaw"s Garden?
_Answer_. Yes; we were married on the 13th of February, 1862. We were here in St. Louis, and we did visit Shaw"s Garden, and we thought it perfectly beautiful. Afterward we visited the Kew Gardens in London, but our remembrance of Shaw"s left Kew in the shade.
Of course, I have been in St. Louis many times, my first visit being, I think, in 1854. I have always liked the town. I was acquainted at one time with a great many of your old citizens.
Most of them have died, and I know but few of the present generation.
I used to stop at the old Planter"s House, and I was there quite often during the war. In those days I saw Hackett as Falstaff, the best Falstaff that ever lived. Ben de Bar was here then, and the Maddern sisters, and now the daughter of one of the sisters, Minnie Maddern Fiske, is one of the greatest actresses in the world.
She has made a wonderful hit in New York this season. And so the ebb and flow of life goes on--the old pa.s.s and the young arrive.
"Death and progress!" It may be that death is, after all, a great blessing. Maybe it gives zest and flavor to life, ardor and flame to love. At the same time I say, "long life" to all my friends.
I want to live--I get great happiness out of life. I enjoy the company of my friends. I enjoy seeing the faces of the ones I love. I enjoy art and music. I love Shakespeare and Burns; love to hear the music of Wagner; love to see a good play. I take pleasure in eating and sleeping. The fact is, I like to breathe.
I want to get all the happiness out of life that I can. I want to suck the orange dry, so that when death comes nothing but the peelings will be left, and so I say: "Long life!"
--_The Republic_, St. Louis, April 11, 1897.
THE VENEZUELAN BOUNDARY DISCUSSION AND THE WHIPPING-POST.
_Question_. What is your opinion as to the action of the President on the Venezuelan matter?
_Answer_. In my judgment, the President acted in haste and without thought. It may be said that it would have been well enough for him to have laid the correspondence before Congress and asked for an appropriation for a commission to ascertain the facts, to the end that our Government might intelligently act. There was no propriety in going further than that. To almost declare war before the facts were known was a blunder--almost a crime. For my part, I do not think the Monroe doctrine has anything to do with the case. Mr. Olney reasons badly, and it is only by a perversion of facts, and an exaggeration of facts, and by calling in question the motives of England that it is possible to conclude that the Monroe doctrine has or can have anything to do with the controversy.
The President went out of his way to find a cause of quarrel.
n.o.body doubts the courage of the American people, and we for that reason can afford to be sensible and prudent. Valor and discretion should go together. n.o.body doubts the courage of England.
America and England are the leading nations, and in their keeping, to a great extent, is the glory of the future. They should be at peace. Should a difference arise it should be settled without recourse to war.
Fighting settles nothing but the relative strength. No light is thrown on the cause of the conflict--on the question or fact that caused the war.
_Question_. Do you think that there is any danger of war?
_Answer_. If the members of Congress really represent the people, then there is danger. But I do not believe the people will really want to fight about a few square miles of malarial territory in Venezuela--something in which they have no earthly or heavenly interest. The people do not wish to fight for fight"s sake. When they understand the question they will regard the administration as almost insane.
The message has already cost us more than the War of 1812 or the Mexican war, or both. Stocks and bonds have decreased in value several hundred millions, and the end is not yet. It may be that it will, on account of the panic, be impossible for the Government to maintain the gold standard--the reserve. Then gold would command a premium, the Government would be unable to redeem the greenbacks, and the result would be financial chaos, and all this the result of Mr. Cleveland"s curiosity about a boundary line between two countries, in neither of which we have any interest, and this curiosity has already cost us more than both countries, including the boundary line, are worth.
The President made a great mistake. So did the House and Senate, and the poor people have paid a part of the cost.
_Question_. What is your opinion of the Gerry Whipping Post bill?
_Answer_. I see that it has pa.s.sed the Senate, and yet I think it is a disgrace to the State. How the Senators can go back to torture, to the Dark Ages, to the custom of savagery, is beyond belief. I hope that the House is nearer civilized, and that the infamous bill will be defeated. If, however, the bill should pa.s.s, then I hope Governor Morton will veto it.
Nothing is more disgusting, more degrading, than the whipping-post.
It degrades the whipped and the whipper. It degrades all who witness the flogging. What kind of a person will do the whipping?
Men who would apply the lash to the naked backs of criminals would have to be as low as the criminals, and probably a little lower.
The shadow of the whipping-post does not fall on any civilized country, and never will. The next thing we know Mr. Gerry will probably introduce some bill to brand criminals on the forehead or cut off their ears and slit their noses. This is in the same line, and is born of the same h.e.l.lish spirit. There is no reforming power in torture, in bruising and mangling the flesh.
If the bill becomes a law, I hope it will provide that the lash shall be applied by Mr. Gerry and his successors in office. Let these pretended enemies of cruelty enjoy themselves. If the bill pa.s.ses, I presume Mr. Gerry could get a supply of knouts from Russia, as that country has just abolished the whipping-post.
--_The Journal_, New York, December 24, 1895.
COLONEL SHEPARD"S STAGE HORSES.*
[* One of Colonel Shepard"s equine wrecks was picked up on Fifth avenue yesterday by the Prevention of Cruelty Society, and was laid up for repairs. The horse was about twenty- eight years old, badly foundered, and its leg was cut and bleeding. It was the leader of three that had been hauling a Fifth avenue stage, and, according to the Society"s agents, was in about as bad a condition as a horse could be and keep on his feet. The other two horses were little better, neither of them being fit to drive.
Colonel Shepard"s scrawny nags have long been an eyesore to Colonel Robert G. Ingersoll, who is compelled to see them from his windows at number 400 Fifth avenue. He said last night:]
It might not be in good taste for me to say anything about Colonel Shepard"s horses. He might think me prejudiced. But I am satisfied horses cannot live on faith or on the substance of things hoped for. It is far better for the horse, to feed him without praying, than to pray without feeding him. It is better to be kind even to animals, than to quote Scripture in small capitals. Now, I am not saying anything against Colonel Shepard. I do not know how he feeds his horses. If he is as good and kind as he is pious, then I have nothing to say. Maybe he does not allow the horses to break the Sabbath by eating. They are so slow that they make one think of a fast. They put me in mind of the Garden of Eden--the rib story. When I watch them on the avenue I, too, fall to quoting Scripture, and say, "Can these dry bones live?" Still, I have a delicacy on this subject; I hate to think about it, and I think the horses feel the same way.
--_Morning Advertiser_, New York, January 21, 1892.
A REPLY TO THE REV. L. A. BANKS.
_Question_. Have you read the remarks made about you by the Rev.
Mr. Banks, and what do you think of what he said?
_Answer_. The reverend gentleman pays me a great compliment by comparing me to a circus. Everybody enjoys the circus. They love to see the acrobats, the walkers on the tight rope, the beautiful girls on the horses, and they laugh at the wit of the clowns. They are delighted with the jugglers, with the music of the band. They drink the lemonade, eat the colored popcorn and laugh until they nearly roll off their seats. Now the circus has a few animals so that Christians can have an excuse for going. Think of the joy the circus gives to the boys and girls. They look at the show bills, see the men and women flying through the air, bursting through paper hoops, the elephants standing on their heads, and the clowns, in curious clothes, with hands on their knees and open mouths, supposed to be filled with laughter.
All the boys and girls for many miles around know the blessed day.
They save their money, obey their parents, and when the circus comes they are on hand. They see the procession and then they see the show. They are all happy. No sermon ever pleased them as much, and in comparison even the Sunday school is tame and dull.