To Dorothy
There"s a sleepy look in your violet eyes, So the sails of our ship we"ll unfurl, And turn the prow to the Land of Rest, My dear little Dorothy girl.
Twilight is coming soon, little one, The sheep have gone to the fold; See! where our white sails bend and dip In the sunset glow of gold.
The roses nod to the sound of the waves, And the bluebells sweet are ringing; Do you hear the music, Dorothy dear?
The song that the angels are singing?
The fairies shall weave their drowsy spell On the shadowy sh.o.r.e of the stream; Dear little voyager say "good-night,"
For the birds are beginning to dream.
O white little craft, with sails full spread, My heart goes out with thee; G.o.d keep thee strong with thy precious freight, My Dorothy--out at sea.
Writing a Book
Having written a few small books which have been published by a reputable house, and which have been pleasantly received by both the press and the public, and having just completed another which I devoutly pray may meet the same fate, I feel that I may henceforth deem myself an author.
I have been considered such for some time among my numerous acquaintances ever since I made my literary bow with a short story in a literary magazine, years and years ago. Being of the feminine persuasion, I am usually presented to strangers as "an auth.o.r.ess." It is at these times that I wish I were a man.
The social side of authorship is extremely interesting. At least once a week, I am asked how I "came to write."
This is difficult, for I do not know. When I so reply, my questioner ascertains by further inquiries where I was educated and how I have been trained. Never having been through a "School of Journalism," my answer is not satisfactory.
"You must read a great deal in order to get all those ideas," is frequently said to me. I reply that I do read a great deal, being naturally bookish, but that it is the great object of my life to avoid getting ideas from books. To an author, "Plagiarist" is like the old cry of "Wolf," and when an idea is once a.s.similated it is difficult indeed to distinguish it from one"s own.
I am often asked how long it takes me to write a book. I am ashamed to tell, but sometimes the secret escapes, since I am naturally truthful, and find it hard to parry a direct question. The actual time of composition is always greeted with astonishment, and I can read the questioner"s inference, that if I can do so much in so short a time, how much could I do if I actually worked!
This is always distasteful, so I hasten to add that the composition is really a very small part of the real writing of a book, and that authors" methods differ. My own practice is not to begin to write until my material is fully arranged in my mind, and I often use notes which I have been making for a period of months. Such a report is seldom convincing, however, to my questioners. I am gradually learning, when this inquiry comes, to smile inscrutably.
It seems strange to many people that I do not work all the time. If I can write a short story in two hours and be paid thirty dollars for it, I am an idiot indeed if I do not write at least three in a day!
Ninety dollars a day might easily mount up into a very comfortable income.
Still, there are some who understand that an author cannot write continuously any more than a spider or a silkworm can spin all the time. These people ask me when, and where, and how, I get my material.
"Getting material" is supposed to be a secret process, and I am thought a gay deceiver when I say I make no particular effort to get it--that it comes in the daily living--like the morning cream! I am then asked if I rely wholly upon "inspiration." I answer that "inspiration" doubtless has its value as well as hard work, and that the author who would derive all possible benefit from the rare flashes of it must have the same command of technique that a good workman has of his tools.
The majority learn with surprise that there is more to a book than is self-evident. It was once my happy lot to put this fact into the understanding of a lady from the country.
With infinite pains I told her of the constant study of words, ill.u.s.trated the fine shades of distinction between synonyms, spoke of the different ways in which characters and events might be introduced, and of the subordinate repet.i.tion of contrasting themes. She listened in breathless wonder, and then turned to her daughter: "There, Mame,"
she said, "I told you there was something in it!"
There is nothing so pathetic as the widespread literary ambition among people whose future is utterly hopeless. It is sad enough for one who has attained a small success to see the heights which are ever beyond, and it makes one gentle indeed to those who come seeking aid.
One ambitious soul once asked me if I would teach her to write. I replied that I did not know of any way in which it could be taught, but that I would gladly help her if I could. She said she had absolutely no imagination, and asked me if that would make any difference. I told her it was certainly an unfortunate circ.u.mstance and advised her to cultivate that quality before she attempted extensive writing. I suppose she is still doing it, for I have not been asked for further a.s.sistance.
People often inquire what qualities I deem essential to literary success. Imagination is, of course, the first, observation, the second, and ambition, perseverance and executive ability are indispensable. Besides these I would place the sense of humour, of proportion, sympathy, insight,--indeed, there is nothing admirable in human nature which would come amiss in the equipment of a writer.
The necessity for the humourous sense was recently brought home to me most forcibly. A woman brought me the ma.n.u.script of a novel which she asked me to read. She felt that something was wrong with it, but she did not know just what it was. She said it needed "a few little touches," she thought, such as my experience would have fitted me to give, and she would be grateful, indeed, if I would revise it. She added that, owing to the connection which I had formed with my publishing house, it would be an easy matter for me to get it published, and she generously offered to divide the royalties with me if I would consummate the arrangement!
I began to read the ma.n.u.script, and had not gone far when I discovered that it was indeed rare. The entire family read it, or portions of it, with screams of laughter, and with tears in their eyes, although it was not intended to be a funny book at all. To this day, certain phrases from that novel will upset any one of us, even at a solemn time.
Of course it was badly written. Characters appeared, talked for a few pages, and were never seen or heard from again.
Long conversations were intruded which had no connection with such plot as there was. Commonplace descriptions of scenery, also useless, were frequent. Many a time the thread of the story was lost. There were no distinguishing traits in any one of the characters--they all talked very much alike. But the supreme defect was the author"s lack of humour. With all seriousness, she made her people say and do things which were absolutely ridiculous and not by any means true to life.
I think I must have an unsuspected bit of tact somewhere for I extricated myself from the situation, and the woman is still my friend. I did not hurt her feelings about her book, nor did I send it to my publishers with a letter of recommendation. I remarked that her central idea was all right, which was true, since it was a love story, but that it had not been properly developed and that she needed to study. She thanked me for my counsel and said she would rewrite it. I wish it might be printed just as it was, however, for it is indeed a sodden and mirthless world in which we live and move.
As the editors say on the refusal blanks, "I am always glad to read ma.n.u.scripts," although, as a rule, it makes an enemy for me if I try to help the author by criticism, when only praise was expected or desired.
Having written some verse which has landed in respectable places, I am also asked about poetry. Poems written in trochaic metre with the good old rhymes, "trees and breeze," "light and night," soldered on at the end of the lines, are continually brought to me for revision and improvement.
Once, for the benefit of the literary aspirant, I brought out my rhyming dictionary, but I shall never do it again. He looked it over carefully, while I explained the advantage for the writer in having before him all the available rhymes, so that the least common might be quickly chosen and the verse made to run smoothly.
"Humph!" he said; "it"s just the book. Anybody can write poetry with one of these books!"
My invaluable thesaurus is chained to my desk in order that it may not escape, and I frequently have to justify its existence when aliens penetrate my den. "It"s no wonder you can write," was said to me once.
"Here"s all the English language right on your desk, and all you"ve got to do is to put it together."
"Yes," I answered wickedly, "but it"s all in the dictionary too."
Last week I had a rare treat. I met a woman who had "never seen a literary person before," and who said "it was quite a novelty!" I beamed upon her, for it is very nice to be a "novelty," and after a while we became quite confidential.
"I want you to tell me just how you write," she said, "so"s I can tell the folks at home. I"m going to buy some of your books to give away."
Mindful of "royalty to author," I immediately became willing to tell anything I could.
"Well, I want to know how you write. Do you just sit down and do it?"
"Yes, I just sit down and do it."
"Do you write any special time?"
"No, mornings, usually; but any time will do."
"What do you write with--a pen or a pencil?"
"Neither, I always use a typewriter."
"Why, can you write on a typewriter?"
"Yes, it"s much easier than a pen, and it keeps the ink off your hands. You can write with both hands at once, you know."
"You have to write it all out with a pencil, first, don"t you?"