"I"m afraid of ever expecting anything good again," her mistress says to her in a moment of depression.
""That"s weakness, madam. Things don"t happen because they are bad or good, else all eggs would be addled or none at all, and at the most it is but six to the dozen. There"s good chances and bad chances, and n.o.body"s luck is pulled only by one string.... There"s a good deal of pleasure in life for you yet."
""Nonsense! There"s no pleasure for old women.... What are your pleasures, Denner, besides being a slave to me?"
"O, there"s pleasure in knowing one is not a fool, like half the people one sees about. And managing one"s husband is some pleasure, and doing one"s business well. Why, if I"ve only got some orange-flowers to candy, I shouldn"t like to die till I see them all right. Then there"s the sunshine now and then; I like that, as the cats do.
I look upon it life is like our game at whist, when Banks and his wife come to the still-room of an evening. I don"t enjoy the game much, but I like to play my cards well, and see what will be the end of it; and I want to see you make the best of your hand, madam, for your luck has been mine these forty years now."
And, on another occasion, when her mistress exclaims, in a fit of distress, that "G.o.d was cruel when he made women," the author says:--
"The waiting-woman had none of that awe which could be turned into defiance; the sacred grove was a common thicket to her.
""It mayn"t be good luck to be a woman," she said. "But one begins with it from a baby; one gets used to it. And I shouldn"t like to be a man,--to cough so loud, and stand straddling about on a wet day, and be so wasteful with meat and drink. _They"re a coa.r.s.e lot, I think._""
I should think they were, beside Mrs. Denner.
This glimpse of her is made up of what I have called the author"s _touches_. She excels in the portrayal of homely stationary figures for which her well-stored memory furnishes her with types. Here is another touch, in which satire predominates.
Harold Transome makes a speech to the electors at Treby.
"Harold"s only interruption came from his own party. The oratorical clerk at the Factory, acting as the tribune of the dissenting interest, and feeling bound to put questions, might have been troublesome; _but his voice being unpleasantly sharp, while Harold"s was full and penetrating, the questioning was cried down_."
Of the four English stories, _The Mill on the Floss_ seems to me to have most dramatic continuity, in distinction from that descriptive, discursive method of narration which I have attempted to indicate. After Hetty Sorrel, I think Maggie Tulliver the most successful of the author"s young women, and after t.i.to Melema, Tom Tulliver the best of her young men. English novels abound in pictures of childhood; but I know of none more truthful and touching than the early pages of this work. Poor erratic Maggie is worth a hundred of her positive brother, and yet on the very threshold of life she is compelled to accept him as her master. He falls naturally into the man"s privilege of always being in the right. The following scene is more than a reminiscence; it is a real retrospect. Tom and Maggie are sitting upon the bough of an elder-tree, eating jam-puffs.
At last only one remains, and Tom undertakes to divide it.
"The knife descended on the puff, and it was in two; but the result was not satisfactory to Tom, for he still eyed the halves doubtfully. At last he said, "Shut your eyes, Maggie."
""What for?"
""You never mind what for,--shut "em when I tell you."
"Maggie obeyed.
""Now, which"ll you have, Maggie, right hand or left?"
""I"ll have that one with the jam run out," said Maggie, keeping her eyes shut to please Tom.
""Why, you don"t like that, you silly. You may have it if it comes to you fair, but I sha"n"t give it to you without. Right or left,--you choose now. Ha-a-a!" said Tom, in a tone of exasperation, as Maggie peeped. "You keep your eyes shut now, else you sha"n"t have any."
"Maggie"s power of sacrifice did not extend so far; indeed, I fear she cared less that Tom should enjoy the utmost possible amount of puff, than that he should be pleased with her for giving him the best bit. So she shut her eyes quite close until Tom told her to "say which," and then she said, "Left hand."
""You"ve got it," said Tom, in rather a bitter tone.
""What! the bit with the jam run out?"
""No; here, take it," said Tom, firmly, handing decidedly the best piece to Maggie.
""O, please, Tom, have it; I don"t mind,--I like the other; please take this."
""No, I sha"n"t," said Tom, almost crossly, beginning on his own inferior piece.
"Maggie, thinking it was of no use to contend further, began too, and ate up her half puff with considerable relish as well as rapidity. But Tom had finished first, and had to look on while Maggie ate her last morsel or two, feeling in himself a capacity for more. _Maggie didn"t know Tom was looking at her: she was see-sawing on the elder-bough, lost to everything but a vague sense of jam and idleness._
""O, you greedy thing!" said Tom, when she had swallowed the last morsel."
The portions of the story which bear upon the Dodson family are in their way not unworthy of Balzac; only that, while our author has treated its peculiarities humourously, Balzac would have treated them seriously, almost solemnly. We are reminded of him by the attempt to cla.s.sify the Dodsons socially in a scientific manner, and to acc.u.mulate small examples of their idiosyncrasies, I do not mean to say that the resemblance is very deep.
The chief defect--indeed, the only serious one--in _The Mill on the Floss_ is its conclusion. Such a conclusion is in itself a.s.suredly not illegitimate, and there is nothing in the fact of the flood, to my knowledge, essentially unnatural: what I object to is its relation to the preceding part of the story.
The story is told as if it were destined to have, if not a strictly happy termination, at least one within ordinary probabilities. As it stands, the _denouement_ shocks the reader most painfully. Nothing has prepared him for it; the story does not move towards it; it casts no shadow before it. Did such a _denouement_ lie within the author"s intentions from the first, or was it a tardy expedient for the solution of Maggie"s difficulties? This question the reader asks himself, but of course he asks it in vain.
For my part, although, as long as humanity is subject to floods and earthquakes, I have no objection to see them made use of in novels, I would in this particular case have infinitely preferred that Maggie should have been left to her own devices.
I understand the author"s scruples, and to a certain degree I respect them. A lonely spinsterhood seemed but a dismal consummation of her generous life; and yet, as the author conceives, it was unlikely that she would return to Stephen Guest. I respect Maggie profoundly; but nevertheless I ask, Was this after all so unlikely? I will not try to answer the question. I have shown enough courage in asking it. But one thing is certain: a _denouement_ by which Maggie should have called Stephen back would have been extremely interesting, and would have had far more in its favour than can be put to confusion by a mere exclamation of horror.
I have come to the end of my s.p.a.ce without speaking of _Romola_, which, as the most important of George Eliot"s works, I had kept in reserve. I have only room to say that on the whole I think it _is_ decidedly the most important,--not the most entertaining nor the most readable, but the one in which the largest things are attempted and grasped. The figure of Savonarola, subordinate though it is, is a figure on a larger scale than any which George Eliot has elsewhere undertaken; and in the career of t.i.to Melema there is a fuller representation of the development of a character.
Considerable as are our author"s qualities as an artist, and largely as they are displayed in "Romola," the book strikes me less as a work of art than as a work of morals. Like all of George Eliot"s works, its dramatic construction is feeble; the story drags and halts,--the setting is too large for the picture; but I remember that, the first time I read it, I declared to myself that much should be forgiven it for the sake of its generous feeling and its elevated morality. I still recognize this latter fact, but I think I find it more on a level than I at first found it with the artistic conditions of the book.
"Our deeds determine us," George Eliot says somewhere in _Adam Bede_, "as much as we determine our deeds." This is the moral lesson of _Romola_.
A man has no a.s.sociate so intimate as his own character, his own career,--his present and his past; and if he builds up his career of timid and base actions, they cling to him like evil companions, to sophisticate, to corrupt, and to d.a.m.n him. As in Maggie Tulliver we had a picture of the elevation of the moral tone by honesty and generosity, so that when the mind found itself face to face with the need for a strong muscular effort, it was competent to perform it; so in t.i.to we have a picture of that depression of the moral tone by falsity and self-indulgence, which gradually evokes on every side of the subject some implacable claim, to be avoided or propitiated. At last all his unpaid debts join issue before him, and he finds the path of life a hideous blind alley.
Can any argument be more plain? Can any lesson be more salutary? "Under every guilty secret," writes the author, with her usual felicity, "there is a hidden brood of guilty wishes, whose unwholesome, infecting life is cherished by the darkness. The contaminating effect of deeds often lies less in the commission than in the consequent adjustment of our desires,--the enlistment of self-interest on the side of falsity; as, on the other hand, the purifying influence of public confession springs from the fact, that by it the hope in lies is forever swept away, _and the soul recovers the n.o.ble att.i.tude of simplicity_." And again: "t.i.to was experiencing that inexorable law of human souls, that we prepare ourselves for sudden deeds by the reiterated choice of good or evil that gradually determines character." Somewhere else I think she says, in purport, that our deeds are like our children; we beget them, and rear them and cherish them, and they grow up and turn against us and misuse us.
The fact that has led me to a belief in the fundamental equality between the worth of _Romola_ as a moral argument and its value as a work of art, is the fact that in each character it seems to me essentially prosaic. The excellence both of the spirit and of the execution of the book is emphatically an obvious excellence. They make no demand upon the imagination of the reader. It is true of both of them that he who runs may read them. It may excite surprise that I should intimate that George Eliot is deficient in imagination; but I believe that I am right in so doing. Very readable novels have been written without imagination; and as compared with writers who, like Mr.
Trollope, are totally dest.i.tute of the faculty, George Eliot may be said to be richly endowed with it. But as compared with writers whom we are tempted to call decidedly imaginative, she must, in my opinion, content herself with the very solid distinction of being exclusively an observer.
In confirmation of this I would suggest a comparison of those chapters in _Adam Bede_ which treat of Hetty"s flight and wanderings, and those of Miss Bronte"s _Jane Eyre_ which describe the heroine"s escape from Rochester"s house and subsequent perambulations. The former are throughout admirable prose; the latter are in portions very good poetry.
One word more. Of all the impressions--and they are numerous--which a reperusal of George Eliot"s writings has given me, I find the strongest to be this: that (with all deference to _Felix Holt, the Radical_) the author is in morals and aesthetics essentially a conservative. In morals her problems are still the old, pa.s.sive problems. I use the word "old" with all respect. What moves her most is the idea of a conscience hara.s.sed by the memory of slighted obligations. Unless in the case of Savonarola, she has made no attempt to depict a conscience taking upon itself great and novel responsibilities. In her last work, a.s.suredly such an attempt was--considering the t.i.tle--conspicuous by its absence.
Of a corresponding tendency in the second department of her literary character,--or perhaps I should say in a certain middle field where morals and aesthetics move in concert,--it is very difficult to give an example. A tolerably good one is furnished by her inclination to compromise with the old tradition--and here I use the word "old"
_without_ respect--which exacts that a serious story of manners shall close with the fact.i.tious happiness of a fairy-tale. I know few things more irritating in a literary way than each of her final chapters,--for even in _The Mill on the Floss_ there is a fatal "Conclusion." Both as an artist and a thinker, in other words, our author is an optimist; and although a conservative is not necessarily an optimist, I think an optimist is pretty likely to be a conservative.
ON A DRAMA OF MR. BROWNING
A review of _The Inn Alb.u.m_, by Robert Browning, London, Smith & Elder; Boston, J. R. Osgood & Co. 1875. Originally published in _The Nation_, January 20, 1876.
ON A DRAMA OF MR. BROWNING
This is a decidedly irritating and displeasing performance. It is growing more difficult every year for Mr. Browning"s old friends to fight his battles for him, and many of them will feel that on this occasion the cause is really too hopeless, and the great poet must himself be answerable for his indiscretions.
Nothing that Mr. Browning writes, of course, can be vapid; if this were possible, it would be a much simpler affair. If it were a case of a writer "running thin," as the phrase is, there would be no need for criticism; there would be nothing in the way of matter to criticise, and old readers would have no heart to reproach. But it may be said of Mr. Browning that he runs thick rather than thin, and he need claim none of the tenderness granted to those who have used themselves up in the service of their admirers. He is robust and vigorous; more so now, even, than heretofore, and he is more prolific than in the earlier part of his career. But his wantonness, his wilfulness, his crudity, his inexplicable want of secondary thought, as we may call it, of the stage of reflection that follows upon the first outburst of the idea, and smooths, shapes, and adjusts it--all this alloy of his great genius is more sensible now than ever.
_The Inn Alb.u.m_ reads like a series of rough notes for a poem--of hasty hieroglyphics and symbols, decipherable only to the author himself. A great poem might perhaps have been made of it, but a.s.suredly it is not a great poem, nor any poem whatsoever. It is hard to say very coherently what it is. Up to a certain point, like everything of Mr. Browning"s, it is highly dramatic and vivid and beyond that point, like all its companions, it is as little dramatic as possible. It is not narrative, for there is not a line of comprehensible, consecutive statement in the two hundred and eleven pages of the volume. It is not lyrical, for there is not a phrase which in any degree does the office of the poetry that comes lawfully into the world--chants itself, images itself, or lingers in the memory.