"I have no doubt of its correctness, for such is frequently the case in cities like these, where the woman is the six-loom weaver, and by her deftness is the better wage-earner.
"Very truly yours, "Arthur G. Staples, "Managing Ed. "Lewiston Journal.""
Though success was not complete, the letter of the managing editor of the "Lewiston Journal" is a corroboration of the substance of the pa.s.sage quoted.--THE TRANSLATOR.
[127] "Die gewerbliche Thatigkeit der Frauen."
[128] Statistisches Jahrbuch fur das Konigreich Sachsen auf das Jahr, 1894.
[129] Factory Inspector A. Redgrave delivered in the end of December, 1871 an address in Bradford, in the course of which he said: "I have been struck for some time past by the altered appearance of the wool factories. Formerly they were filled with women and children, now machinery seems to be doing all the work. On Inquiry a manufacturer gave me the following information; "Under the old system I employed 63 persons; after the introduction of improved machinery I reduced my hands to 33, and, later, in consequence of new and extensive alterations, I was able to reduce them from 33 to 13." Thus, within a few years, a reduction of labor, amounting to almost 80 per cent. took place, with an output at least as large as before." Many interesting items of information on this subject are found in Marx"s "Capital."
[130] "Original Property," chap. 20.
[131] "Bau und Leben des sozialen Korpers," Tubingen, 1878.
[132] "Husband and Wife," Dr. Havelock Ellis.
[133] Possibly the opposite is the case. We repeat what we explained above more extensively, that it is a widely diffused fact that women and girls nourish themselves worse and are worse nourished than men and boys. There was a time when the fashion prevailed for woman to eat as little as possible; she was to have as "etherial" an appearance as possible; the conception of beauty in our upper cla.s.s, even to-day, is to the effect that it is "vulgar" if a young girl or young woman have a blooming complexion, red cheeks and a vigorous frame. It is also known, that with numberless women, under otherwise equal social conditions with men, the food is greatly inferior. Out of ignorance and acquired prejudices, women expect incredible things of themselves, and the men encourage them therein. Such neglect and maltreatment of physical nutrition must have the very worst consequences, if carried on through many generations by the very s.e.x that, by reason of the heavy monthly losses of blood and of the expenditure of energies, required by pregnancy, child-birth and nursing, has its physique heavily taxed.
[134] "Men of genius are, as a rule, of inferior size and ma.s.sive brain.
These are also the leading features of the child, and the general facial expression as well as the temperament of such men recall the child."--Dr. Havelock Ellis, "Husband and Wife."
[135] The corporal weights are taken from Taupinard"s "Anthropologie."
[136] If, with the authority quoted by Delaunay, we a.s.sume 11 kilograms as the difference in weight between men and women, we would have found 35 to 70 grams.
[137] L. Manouvrier, "Revue Scientifique," No. 23, June 3, 1882.
[138] Quatref.a.ges found the proportion to be slightly larger with woman than with men. Thurman found the reverse, just as L. Manouvrier.
[139] "Die neuere Schopfungsgeschichte."
[140] Dr. Havelock Ellis furnishes a number of proofs of this fact in his frequently quoted book. According thereto, woman, among wild and half-wild people, is not only equal to man in physical strength and size of body, but she is partly superior. On the other side, Ellis agrees with others that, in consequence of our progress in civilization, the difference in the capacity of the skull of the two s.e.xes has steadily become more marked.
[141] This is a discovery, first made by Karl Marx, and cla.s.sically demonstrated by him in his works, especially in "Capital." The Communistic Manifesto, that appeared in 1848, and was composed by K.
Marx and Frederick Engels, is grounded upon this fundamental principle, and must be considered, to this day, as the norm for all agitational work, and the most excellent of all.
[142] "The Hall of science is the Temple of democracy," Buckle, "History of Civilization in England."
[143] Ziegler, quoted above, denies that such is the meaning of Virchow"s argument. His own quotation of Virchow"s argument, however, confirms the interpretation. Virchow said: "Now, only picture to yourselves _how the theory of the descent of man presents itself in the head of a Socialist_! (Laughter.) Yes, gentlemen, that may seem funny to some; it is, however, a serious matter, and I hope that the theory of the descent of man _may not bring upon us all the horrors that similar theories have actually brought upon our neighboring country. At any rate, this theory, if consistently carried out, has a side of extraordinary gravity; and that Socialism has shown its sympathy therewith, will, it is to be hoped, not have escaped you. We must be perfectly clear upon that._" Now, then, we have simply done what Virchow feared: we have drawn the conclusions from the Darwinian theories, conclusions that Darwin himself and a large portion of his followers either did not draw at all, or drew falsely. And Virchow warned against the gravity of these theories, just because he foresaw that Socialism would _and was bound to draw the conclusions that are involved in them_.
[144] Dubois-Reymond repeated this sentence in February, 1883, to the attacks directed upon him, on the occasion of the anniversary celebration of Frederick the Great.
[145] "Socialism and Modern Science (Darwin-Spencer-Marx)."
[146] According to the census of 1900, the figures for these respective occupations were: 7,387 female physicians and surgeons, 1,041 female architects, designers and draftsmen, 2,193 female journalists, 5,984 female literary and scientific persons, 3,373 female ministers, 2,193 female lawyers.--THE TRANSLATOR.
[147] "Aerztinnen fur Frauenkrankheiten, eine ethische und sanitare Nothwendigkeit," Berlin, 1893.
[148] "An Address upon the Co-education of the s.e.xes."
[149] Neue Zelt, 1884, "Das Frauenstudium In Russland."
[150] The census of 1900 gives 327,614 female teachers and professors in colleges, out of a total force of 446,133, leaving, accordingly, only 118,519 men on this field.--THE TRANSLATOR.
CHAPTER V.
WOMAN"S CIVIC AND POLITICAL STATUS.
The social dependence of a rank or a cla.s.s ever finds its expression in the laws and political inst.i.tutions of a country. Laws are the mirror in which is reflected a country"s social condition, to the extent that the same has been brought within definite rules. _Woman, as a subject and oppressed s.e.x, const.i.tutes no exception to the principle._ Laws are negative or positive. Negative in so far as they ignore the oppressed in the distribution of privileges and rights, as though he did not exist; positive, in so far as they expressly a.s.sign his dependent position to the oppressed, and specify possible exceptions in his favor.
Our common law rests upon the Roman law, which, recognized persons only as property-holding beings. The old German law, which treated woman more worthily, has preserved its force only partially. In the French language, the human being and the man are designated by the same word, "_l"homme_"; likewise in the English language,--"_man_." French law knows the human being only as _man_; and so was it also until recently in England, where woman found herself in slavish dependence upon man. It was similarly in Rome. There were Roman citizens, and wives of Roman citizens, but no female citizens.
Impossible were it to enumerate the numberless laws found on the motley map of German common rights. Let a few instances suffice.
According to the common law of Germany, the wife is a minor towards her husband; the husband is her master, to whom she owes obedience. If the woman is "disobedient," then, according to the law of Prussia, the husband of "low" estate has the right of "moderate castigation." Men of "high" estate also there are said to be who arrogate such a right to themselves. Seeing that nowhere is the force or number of the blows prescribed, the husband is the sovereign judge. The old city law of Hamburg declares: "For the rest, the right of _moderate castigation of the wife by her husband_, of children by their parents, of pupils by their teachers, or servants by their masters and mistresses, is hereby adjudged just and permissible."
Similar provisions are numerous in Germany. According to the law of Prussia, the husband may prescribe to the wife _how long she shall suckle her child_. In cases of disposing of the children, the father alone decides. If he dies, the wife is in most German States compelled to accept a guardian for her children: she herself is considered a minor, and is held unfit to attend to their education herself, even when she supports her children by her property or labor. As a rule, her husband administers her property, and, in cases of bankruptcy, the same is considered and disposed of as his own, unless a pre-marital contract secures the property to her. Wherever the right of primogeniture attaches to landed property, a woman, even if she be the first born, can not enter into possession if there be younger brothers. She can step in only when she has no brothers. In most German States, a married woman can contract only with the consent of her husband, unless she owns a business in her own name, such as, according to more recent law, she is allowed to start. She is shut off from all public function. The Prussian law on a.s.sociations forbids pupils and apprentices under 18 years of age and women to join political organizations. Until a few decades ago, the attendance of women among the public at open trials was forbidden by several German codes of criminal procedure. If a woman gives birth to an illegitimate child, it has no claim to support from its father if its mother accepted any presents from him during her pregnancy. If a woman is divorced from her husband, she continues to carry his name as a lasting memento, unless she marry again.
In Germany, hundreds of frequently contradictory laws are met with.
According to the bill for the new civil laws of Germany, the administration of the wife"s property falls to the husband, unless the wife has secured her property to herself by special contract. This is a reactionary att.i.tude, long since discarded by many other countries. On the other hand, the wife is allowed to retain what she has earned by her own personal labor, and without a.s.sistance of her husband, or by the independent conduct of a business enterprise.
In England, and down to 1870, the common law of the land gave to the husband all the personal property of the wife. Only with regard to real estate were her proprietary rights safeguarded; the husband, nevertheless, had the right of administration and of use. At the bar of law, the English woman was a zero: she could perform no legal act, not even execute a valid testament; she was a veritable serf of her husband.
A crime committed by her in his presence, he was answerable for: she was at all points a minor. If she injured any one, damage was a.s.sessed as if done by a domestic animal: the husband was held. According to an address delivered in 1888 by Bishop J. N. Wood in the chapel of Westminster, as recently as a hundred years ago the wife was not allowed to eat at table or to speak before she was spoken to: above the bed hung a stout whip, that the husband was free to use when the wife displayed ill temper: only her daughters were subject to her orders: her sons saw in her merely a female servant. Since 1870 and 1882, the wife is not merely secured in the sole possession of the property that she brings with her, she is also the proprietor of all she earns, or receives by inheritance or gift. These rights can be altered only by special contract between the husband and wife. English legislation followed the example of the United States.
Particularly backward is the civil law of France, of most of the Swiss cantons, of Belgium, etc., in the matter of woman"s civic rights.
According to the _Code Civil_, the husband could sue for divorce upon the adultery of the wife; she, however, could inst.i.tute such an action only if the husband kept his concubine at his own home (Article 230).
This provision has been repealed by the divorce law of July 27, 1884, but the difference continues in force in the French criminal code,--a characteristic manoeuvre on the part of the French legislator. If the wife is convicted of adultery, _she is punished with imprisonment for not less than two months nor more than three years. The husband is punished only when, according to the spirit of the former Article 230 of the Code Civil, he keeps a concubine under the domestic roof against the wish of his wife. If found guilty, he is merely fined not less than 100 and not more than 1,000 francs._ (Arts. 337 and 339 _Code Penal_.) Such inequality before the law were impossible if but one woman sat in the French Parliament. A similar law exists in Belgium. The punishment for adultery by the wife is the same as in France; the husband is liable only if the act of adultery is committed at the home of the married couple: he may then suffer imprisonment for not less than one month, or more than one year. Slightly juster is, accordingly, the law in Belgium than in France; nevertheless, in the one place as in the other, there are two different standards of right, one for the husband, another for the wife. Similar provisions exist, under the influence of French law, in Spain and Portugal. The civil law of Italy of 1865 enables the wife to obtain a divorce from her husband only if the husband keeps his concubine at his own home, or at such other place where the concubine"s presence must be considered in the light of a grave insult to the wife.
In France, Belgium and Switzerland, woman falls, as in Germany, under the guardianship of her husband, the moment she marries. According to section 215 of the _Code Civil_, she is not allowed to appear in Court without the consent of her husband and of two of her nearest male relations, not even if she conducts a public business. According to section 213 the husband must protect the wife, and she must yield obedience to him. There is a saying of Napoleon I. that typifies his idea concerning the status of woman: "One thing is utterly un-French--a woman that can do what she pleases."[151] In these countries, furthermore, woman may not appear as a witness in the execution of contracts, testaments or any notarial act. On the other hand--odd contradiction--she is allowed to act as a witness in all criminal trials, where her testimony may lead to the execution of a person.
_Within the purview of the criminal code, she is on all hands considered of equal value, and she is measured for every crime or offense with the same yard-stick as man._ The contradiction, however, does not penetrate the wool of our legislators. As a widow, she may dispose of her property by testament; as witness to a testament, however, she is not admissible in a number of countries; all the same, according to Art.
1029 of the _Code Civil_, she may be appointed the executor of a will.
In Italy, since 1877, woman is qualified to appear as a witness in civil actions also.
According to the law of the canton of Zurich, the husband is the guardian of his wife; he administers her property; and he represents her before third parties. According to the _Code Civil_, the husband administers the property that the wife brings with her, he can sell her property, alienate it, load it with mortgages without requiring her consent, or signature. Similar provisions exist in several other cantons of Switzerland besides Zurich, in France, Belgium, Luxemburg, the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, Sweden, Denmark and also in a large part of Germany. Countries in which community of property may be excluded in marriage are, besides parts of Germany, and a large part of Switzerland, Austria, Poland and the Baltic provinces. Countries in which the absolute independence of married women exist with respect to their property are: Italy, Russia, Great Britain and Ireland. In Norway, a law of the year 1888, on the administration of the property of married persons, provides that a married woman has the same power to dispose of her property as unmarried women, only the law specifies a few exceptions. In this law the expression is used that _woman becomes un-free in marriage_. Who could blame her if, there also, as happens frequently in France, women are seen to waive formal matrimonial contracts?
According to the law of Berne, what the married woman earns belongs to her husband. Similarly with most cantons of Switzerland, also in France and Belgium. The consequence is that the wife often finds herself in a state of virtual slavery: the husband squanders with lewd women or in the grog-shop what his wife makes: he incurs debts: gambles away his wife"s earnings: leaves her and her children in want. He even has the right to demand from her employer the wages due her.
By the law of December 11, 1874, Sweden secures to the married woman the right to dispose freely of that which she earns by her personal effort.
Denmark has raised the same principle to the force of a law; nor can, according to Danish law, the property of the wife be seized to cover the debts of the husband. Similarly runs the law of Norway of 1888.[152] The right of educating the children and of deciding thereupon is, according to the legislation of most countries, the attribute of the father: here and there a subordinate co-operation is granted the mother. The old Roman maxim, that stood in sharp contradiction to the principles prevalent during the mother-right, and that clothed the father alone with rights and powers over the child, is to this day the key-note of legislation on the subject.
Among the continental countries, woman holds the freest position in Russia,--due to the communistic inst.i.tutions there still in existence, or to reminiscences of the same. In Russia, woman is the administrator of her property: she enjoys equal rights in the administration of the community. Communism is the most favorable social condition to woman.
The fact transpired from the sketch of the age of the mother-right, given on previous pages.[153] In the United States women have conquered full civil equality; they have also prevented the introduction of the English and similar laws regulating prost.i.tution.