911: DESCENT INTO TYRANNY.
by Alex Jones.
INTRODUCTION.
The New World Order system of world conquest has always been visible, but it is so hulking and ma.s.sive that it has remained hidden in plain sight.
One of the most common pre-conditioned responses I hear from the average compartmentalized individual is that there couldn"t be a society of people working for world government. Those in denial proclaim, "It"s too big...it would unravel...they couldn"t keep it hidden..."
The average person judges the world according to their moral compa.s.s. Because most individuals are not ruthless, sociopathic control-freaks, they cannot even begin to fathom the dark gulfs that are the souls of the servants of the global elite.
The New World Order is a synthesis of the survivors of empires, of super-merchant families, of barbarian kings, of banking families established in the middle-ages, and of the royal families of Europe. Over time, they have learned that if they can simply conceal the true magnitude of their power and install puppet rulers from the cultures they dominate, the people will accept greater forms of tyranny.
In the late 20th Century, as the formation of a true world government entered its final stages, the globalists began to do what was unthinkable just a few years before. They began to admit that there really was a move towards a New World Order, complete with a World Court, World Taxes and a World Army to enforce its despotic laws.
Just a few years ago, the average man on the street refused to even admit the possibility of a world government. Now that same individual will bellow, "Yes, there"s a world government and we need it to protect ourselves from terrorism!"
The globalists" plan is so far along that now they must admit that world government is a reality. Their propagandists are hailing the New World Order as the only system that will keep us safe and secure.
In reality, it is the world government itself which is conducting the terrorist acts.
I can think of no better way to introduce this book than with a collection of quotes by members of the global elite touting this dehumanizing system.
THE NEW WORLD ORDER, IN ITS OWN WORDS.
"National Socialism will use its own revolution for establishing a new world order." Adolph Hitler during World War II "Out of these troubled times, a New World Order can emerge under a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders." President George Bush, September 11, 1990 State of the Union "When the struggle seems to be drifting defiantly towards a world social democracy there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficient world system. Countless people will hate the New World Order and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people."
H.G. Wells, in his book ent.i.tled, "The New World Order" (1939) "We are not going to achieve a New World Order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money."Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in "Foreign Affairs," July/August Issue 1995 "Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government." Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991 "If this were a dictatorship, it"d be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I"m the dictator." George W. Bush, 12/18/00, CNN "In short, the "house of world order" will have to be built from the bottom up, rather than from the top down. It will look like a great "booming, buzzing confusion" to use William James" famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal a.s.sault." Richard N. Gardner in "Foreign Affairs," April 1974 "No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation." David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations "A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal." Ted Turner, in an interview with Audubon magazine.
"In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation." Prince Philip Reported by Deutsche Press Agentur (DPA), August, 1988.
"I must confess that I am tempted to ask for reincarnation as a particularly deadly virus." Prince Philip, in his Foreward to If I Were an Animal; United Kingdom, Robin Clark Ltd., 1986.
"I don"t claim to have any special interest in natural history, but as a boy I was made aware of the annual fluctuations in the number of game animals and the need to adjust the "cull" to the size of the surplus population." Preface to Down to Earth by HRH Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, 1988, p.8.
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." David Rockefeller "It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegance." President George Herbert Walker Bush Addressing the General a.s.sembly of the United Nations, February 1, 1992 "But this present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful an interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for long. Already there are powerful forces at work that threaten to destroy all our hopes and efforts to erect an enduring structure of global interdependence." David Rockefeller Speaking at the Business Council for the United Nations, September 14, 1994 "In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn"t such a great idea after all." StrobeTalbot, President Clinton"s Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.
"We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquestor consent." Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, l950 "Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed"
Sarah Brady, Chairman of Handgun Control to Senator Howard Metzanbaum, "The National Educator," January 1994 Page 3 "When we got organized as a country, and we wrote a fairly radical Const.i.tution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans...and so a lot of people say there"s too much personal freedom. When personal freedom"s being abused, you have to move to limit it. That"s what we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the public housing projects, about how we"re going to have weapon sweeps and more things like that to try to make people safer in their communities." President Bill Clinton, 3-22-94, MTV"s "Enough is Enough"
"We can"t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans." President Bill Clinton, "USA Today," March 11, 1993, Page 2A "Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The SOCIAL EXPERIMENT in China under Chairman Mao"s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history." David Rockefeller Statement in 1973 about Mao Tse-Tung, New York Times, August 10, 1973 "The truth of the matter is that you do have those standby provisions, and the statutory emergency plans are there whereby you could, in the name of stopping terrorism, apprehend, invoke the military, and arrest Americans and hold them in detention camps." -- U.S. Representative Henry Gonzalez, August 29, 1994 "We are moving toward a new world order, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road." Mikhail Gorbachev 1987 "There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international . . . network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies . . . but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known." Professor Carroll Quigley, in his book Tragedy and Hope, 1966.
"Even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable." Sir Julian Huxley, first Director General of UNESCO, 1946-1948 "Since March 9, 1933, the United states has been in a state of national emergency. A majority of the people of the United States have their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years freedoms and governmental procedures, guaranteed by the Const.i.tution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought forth by states of national emergency." Senate Report 93-549 (1973).
"Under Socialism you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not. If it were discovered that you had not the character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner. . . ." [This is compa.s.sionate liberalism.] Fabian Socialist Bernard Shaw in his Intelligent Woman"s Guide to Socialism and Capitalism, 1928.
"Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar." -- Julius Caesar "The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth becomes the greatest enemy of the State." -- Dr. Joseph M. Goebbels in His Diary 911: Decent into Tyranny The House of World Government For many years I have been exposing the criminal activities of the global elite, also known as the New World Order. This collection of power-mad megalomaniacs has been engineering a successive string of terrorist events to usher in a corrupt world government-a world government where, public doc.u.ments show, populations will be herded into compact cities, issued national ID cards, and even given implantable microchips.
In this book we are first going to look at some historical examples of tyrants and governments-oligarchies alike-using disasters (in many cases terrorist events that these tyrants themselves perpetrate against their populations and bureaucracies) to create a crisis in order to convince the people to exchange liberty for so-called security.
We will start our a.n.a.lysis of the use of the Hegelian dialectic of problem-reactionsolution by looking at some historical examples, going back to Nero, who burned Rome, then blamed the fire on the Christians. We will then fast-forward to Adolph Hitler, who burned the Reichstag (the German Capitol Building Complex) shortly after being elected so that he could blame its destruction on the n.a.z.is" political enemies. He did this in order to destroy the German bill of rights and const.i.tution, using the crisis to declare martial law in the Reich. Turning next to the Northwoods doc.u.ment from 1962, we will examine how the Joint Chiefs of Staff and many other sectors of the federal government, up to the highest levels, were planning to blow up airliners full of American citizens as a pretext for war.
We will also cover how the federal government trained and controlled the men who cooked the bomb and drove the truck in the horrible first attack on the World Trade Center in 1993. The FBI was caught on video and audiotape by their informants admitting to helping arrange the bombing of the World Trade Center complex in order to get their Police State agenda through. Then, of course, in 1995 there was the Oklahoma City bombing. There are staggering amounts of evidence which we will cover in this book proving the fact that the government had prior knowledge and was instrumental in engineering the attacks on the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.
Of course, none of you have to be reminded of the tragic events in 2001 on September 11. My friends, the government didn"t just have prior knowledge of the September 11 Al-Qaeda attacks. They actually funded, trained, protected, coddled, and shepherded Al- Qaeda into this country. The shadow government trained many of the terrorists at the Pensacola Naval Air Station in Florida. The White House threatened FBI and defense intelligence officers who tried to stop Al-Qaeda with arrest and imprisonment.
President Bush signed secret doc.u.ment W199-eye two months before the attack of September 11, threatening US agents and obstructing their investigations of Al-Qaeda (BBC Newsnight Transcript, November 6, 2001: "Has Someone Been Sitting on the FBI?"; Times of India, November 7, 2001: "Bush Took FBI Agents off Bin Laden"s Trail"; AFP, November 7, 2001 "Bush Thwarted Probe Against bin Ladens"; Ananova, November 7, 2001: "US Agents Told to Back off bin Ladens"; The Guardian, November 7, 2001: "FBI and US Spy Agents Say Bush Spiked bin Laden Probes Before 11 September").
NOTE TO PUBLISHER INSERT IMAGES 1-3.
IMAGE: AFP_Bush_Thwarted CAPTION: AFP, November 7, 2001 "Bush Thwarted Probe Against bin Ladens"
IMAGE: Times of India_Bush_Took_Agents_off-CAPTION: Times of India, November 7, 2001: "Bush Took FBI Agents off Bin Laden"s Trail"
IMAGE: 199eye CAPTION: Top-secret Washington FBI Headquarters Doc.u.ment W1991-eye Ordering FBI Agents Not to Investigate Al-Qaeda Operatives in the US
Why would the globalists in control of our intelligence community orchestrate such terror? Right after the attacks, Bush"s approval rating went from forty-five percent to ninety-plus percent. The U.S.A. Patriot Act, which effectively eviscerated the Bill of Rights and the Const.i.tution, was pa.s.sed, radically expanding the scope of the already colossal police state complex. Their cashless society, compact city, control grid is accelerating into place as Americans scramble for "security."
The people were pre-conditioned before all of these attacks to give up their liberties so that the government could protect them from terrorists. However, we must look at who really stands to gain from these acts and at who has the motive. Take the case of the Oklahoma City Bombing. The government tripled the FBI"s anti-terrorism funding in 1996 after the attack, but, of course, more funding and police powers in the hands of the Feds only insured that the next attack would be worse. Now the government is demanding even more power and funding. They didn"t protect us in 2001 from Al-Qaeda, did they? No, instead they funded and protected the terrorists.
The US government has consistently created or exacerbated problems so the social engineers can call for more control. For example, the government has been orchestrating the phony drug war for decades. Now there is triple the heroin and double the cocaine on our streets (Justice Department crime statistics) than there was eight years ago. Our prison population has gone from 1.3 million to 6.5 million in the last two years, with the numbers of Americans who are incarcerated ever increasing. Similarly, the globalists held a war on poverty, and now poverty and personal and corporate debt have only increased. The government had a fifty year program supposedly fighting illiteracy. Drops in children"s test scores can be tracked to uniformly follow the level of government involvement -- the more government involvement, the lower the test scores.
Now the government is stepping up their "war against terrorism." As this "war" progresses, you are only going to see escalations in terrorist acts, because after each horrible event the government gets more power, more control over our lives, and more funding. A dozen people died at the first World Trade Center attack; one hundred sixtyeight died in Oklahoma City; three thousand died in the second World Trade Center attack by the government. Now they are telling us to get ready for more attacks, and if we don"t take the implanted microchips, if we don"t accept the microchipped population, then we are going to get attacked again. Already the states admit that they are implementing a national ID card scheme.
And then there is the total goal, the reason the New World Order elites are pushing all of this. We know they want tyranny. We know this global government is behind it. (They are now publicly talking about a New World Order.) How did they get all this power? And what is their final goal?
Their goal is a world population reduction of eighty percent with everyone crammed into compact cities. The United Nations is preparing to release ma.s.s plagues on the earth because the elite forces want to extend their lives with life extension technology while culling the "human herd" down to a "manageable level." They know that technology is a double-edged sword. It can be used to empower humanity, but it can also be used to totally enslave humanity. They know they are in a race against time and their window of opportunity is closing. They must dehumanize us now -- they"ve got to enslave us here on the global plantation, or they are going to lose control.
The New World Order is run by absolutely ruthless individuals who are h.e.l.l-bent on dehumanizing the entire populace. They are obsessed with total control. These megalomaniacal s.a.d.i.s.ts are absolutely sworn to the creation of a worldwide tyranny called the New World Order. This is the evidence, and it is conclusive.
Terror in History War.
Empires are built and maintained by it. Populations rally during times of war. Nothing on earth centralizes power like war. Throughout history, leaders have used this unifying force to control populations. Humans instinctively shift into mindless "group think" when faced by an outside threat-whether real or manufactured. Now, in the twenty-first century the system of control continues, but with more sophistication. If there isn"t an enemy to fight, one has to be manufactured.
Here are some examples from history of dictators using terrorism to get what they want:
Nero and Rome In A.D. 64, on the tenth of August, Nero, the emperor of Rome, set the city ablaze while he fiddled. You see, he had a problem: the Christians were getting too popular. So Nero torched Rome and blamed it on the Christians. After this manufactured crisis, the people were more than happy to put the Christians into the arena and to cheer as they were torn them limb from limb. This persecution of the Christians is only one of many ancient examples of governments persecuting groups of people after creating crises.
The Maine and the Lusitania On February 15, 1898, William McKinley"s navy committed treason when it blew up its own ship in Havana Harbor to create a pretext for war with the Spanish government. Simply by blowing up this ship, the Maine, the United States was able to finally dominate the Western Hemisphere and take control of dozens of islands in the Pacific. Then in World War I, when the American population was reluctant to enter the European conflict, the British sailed one of their largest naval auxiliary ships, the Lusitania, through waters known to be heavily patrolled by German U-boats. The Germans ran multiple full-page warnings in the New York Times, telling Americans not to travel on this ship which they knew to be heavily laden with armaments destined for the trenches. When German torpedoes sunk the Lusitania, Americans were faced with casualty lists of their dead countrymen and finally succ.u.mbed to war-fever.
Hitler"s Reichstag And then, of course, we have the notorious n.a.z.i regime"s use of the Hegelian dialectic. Adolph Hitler had already been elected president, but he wanted to abolish the chancellery and to make himself Fuhrer. To do that, he had to create enough of a crisis to create ma.s.sive levels of fear in the population so that they would willingly lay down their republic and give it into the hands of his monstrous system.
Historical doc.u.ments from n.a.z.i archives show that on the night of February 27, 1933, Adolph Hitler"s Stormtroopers burned the Reichstag government building to the ground. A wave of arrests then took place across the Reich as the Fuhrer told the people that he would protect them and that they would have a Utopian world. Everything would be given to them by the state, as long as they offered total fealty and support of their Fuhrer. The people bought Hitler"s promise of a Utopia . . . and were totally enslaved.
Hitler had used the alchemy of dictators: the Hegelian dialectic of problem-reactionsolution. Attack yourself, blame your enemies, and tell the public you can protect them if they give up their freedoms.
FDR and Pearl Harbor On December 8, 1941, after the j.a.panese attack on Pearl Harbor, the following words were broadcast across the United States by US President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
"Yesterday, December 7, 1941-a date which will live in infamy-the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the empire of j.a.pan."
It may have been a surprise attack to the American people, but it wasn"t to the federal government and the military. Months before the attack, they knew the j.a.panese were preparing for an all-out a.s.sault in the Pacific. The History Channel and many historical records have reported that twelve days prior to the attack, Roosevelt knew the actual date of the strike. The government had in its possession Admiral Yamamoto"s communique reading, "On the morning of December 7 we will attack the Pacific fleet at Pearl Harbor and deal a death blow."
On November 25, 1941 the Secretary of the War Department, Henry Stimsom, wrote in his diary, "President Roosevelt brought up the event that we are likely to be attacked perhaps as soon as next Monday, for the j.a.panese are notorious for making an attack without warning, and the question was how we should maneuver them into the position of firing the first shot."
The Honolulu Advertiser front page headline on November 30, 1941 read: "j.a.pan May Strike over Weekend." Still, the military was told to go to the lowest level of readiness, the ships in the harbor were lined up in tight rows, and the aircraft on the airfields were put into circles, nose tip to nose tip.
Roosevelt had campaigned to keep America out of the war, but his backers had been funding the j.a.panese war machine for years. They had also been financing and encouraging Hitler"s blitzkrieg.
The Anglo-American establishment based in New York and London needed a global crisis to bring in a global government and the birth of the United Nations. That"s why six months before the attack on Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt had the naval command remove the code-breaking machines from Pearl Harbor, as well as dismantle the radar. They had to have the crisis to justify the creation of this global system of tyranny.
Think of the dastardly deed the White House had committed, leaving our troops, our sailors, our boys to die. The global elite had attempted to create a League of Nations at the end of World War I. When it failed, World War II had to be bigger, on a larger scale, so the people would say, "Give us a global government to protect us from these horrible wars."
The Cuban Missile Crisis and the Operation Northwoods Doc.u.ment Concerning the Cuban Missile Crisis, President John F. Kennedy broadcast these words on October 22, 1962: "Good evening, my fellow citizens. This government, as promised, has maintained the closest surveillance of the Soviet military buildup on the island of Cuba. Within the past week, unmistakable evidence has established the fact that a series of offensive missile sites is now in preparation on that imprisoned island. The purpose of these bases can be none other than to provide a nuclear strike capability against the Western Hemisphere."
In the early 1960s, the federal government needed an excuse, a pretext, to invade Cuba. The government actually put the plan to paper in the notorious Operation Northwoods doc.u.ment. The story was first reported in James Bamford"s Book, Body of Secrets and carried in published media reports on ABC News (ABC News, May 1, 2001: "Friendly Fire: U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War with Cuba") as well as in the Baltimore Sun (Baltimore Sun, April 24, 2001: "New book on NSA sheds light on secrets: U.S. terror plan called Cuba invasion pretext").
In the Operation Northwoods doc.u.ment, the federal government proposed blowing up airliners full of Americans, saying: "Casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of indignation." The madman, the architect of this plan, was General L. L. Lemnitzer, Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff. He got his Faustian plan approved all the way up to the Secretary of Defense. President Kennedy was not amused.
NOTE TO PUBLISHER INSERT IMAGES 4-6.
4. IMAGE: Friendly_fire CAPTION: ABC News, May 1, 2001: "Friendly Fire: U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War with Cuba"
IMAGE: Northwoods-CAPTION: Joint Chiefs of Staff Northwoods Doc.u.ment Now Decla.s.sified Advocated the US Government Engaging in Terrorist Attacks against the American People as a Pretext for War
IMAGE: Balt_sun CAPTION: Baltimore Sun, April 24, 2001: "New book on NSA sheds light on secrets: U.S. terror plan called Cuba invasion pretext"
In this plan, they elaborated on how Washington, D.C. could be bombed and then Cuba could be blamed; or how they could dress U.S. Army soldiers as Cubans, then have them attack Marines at Guantanamo Bay. In another part of the plan, just as the U.S.S. Maine was sunk as a pretext for entry into the Spanish-American War, it was suggested that the Navy could blow up one of its own ships. The whole doc.u.ment is an insane testament to the effectiveness of the cold-blooded use of problem/reaction/solution. The doc.u.ment details how the Hegelian dialectic could be made to work in order to motivate the American people to get behind the government"s push for a war, in this case a nuclear war with Cuba and the Soviet Union.
It"s hard for any decent person to be able to wrap their mind around the thought processes that the controllers are/were using. You must understand that they are after raw power and that history has shown that there is no better way to seize power, expand power and maintain power than through controlled crises that harness the militant tribal enthusiasm of the howling mob.
President Kennedy had always been a servant of the elite, but he was so shocked by the Operation Northwoods doc.u.ment that he signed Executive Order 11110 shortly before his death announcing that he would abolish the Federal Reserve System. He also began to pull American soldiers out of Vietnam, and signed an order to abolish the CIA. For taking these decisive actions on behalf of our Const.i.tutional Republic, Kennedy was a.s.sa.s.sinated. He had decided to be a leader of the people and to defend their interests. The New World Order could not allow that to happen.
The 1993 World Trade Center Bombing The Federal government had their eye on the World Trade Center complex as a target for a manufactured crisis since at least the early 1990"s. This time the problem-reactionsolution system was to be activated not against some foreign enemy, but against the American population"s sense of security as a pretext to expand the powers of the security and intelligence agencies inside the US.
The October 28, 1993, edition of the New York Times ran an article headlined, "Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast" (see also October 31, 1993, New York Times; Chicago Tribune, December 15, 1993: "Informants" Recordings Show FBI Had Prior Knowledge of the Bombing"). The federal government was caught on tape by their informants ordering them to let the bombing go forward, to cook the bomb, to give the terrorists the detonators, to create yet another crisis . . . this time to usher in a police state and a war upon the American people.
Unlike the Operation Northwoods plan, the FBI actually carried out the attack on the World Trade Center in 1993. They hired a retired 43-year-old former Egyptian army officer, Emad Salem, paid him $1,000,000 and gave him real explosives and a detonator. They told him to build the bomb and to give it to the foolish people that he was controlling in order to allow them to attack the World Trade Center complex.
There was a major problem with their plan: Mr. Salem was not as ruthless and sociopathic as the FBI and its globalist controllers. He began to get very concerned right before the attack, asking himself why he was being giving real explosives if this were to be just a "sting operation." When he was told to let the attack go forward, Mr. Salem secretly recorded John Anticev, head of the New York office of the FBI, ordering him to let the bombing take place.
The World Trade Center bombing of 1993 is just one of many stories consisting of government-sponsored terrorism that has been swept under the rug. One of the spin masters" favorite tools is to underreport stories of earth-shattering importance while magnifying stories of little or no significance to mammoth proportions.
Unlike Pearl Harbor where the government allowed the j.a.panese to attack as a pretext for war, the federal government financed and controlled the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center to bolster a system of anti-terrorism and to sic a homeland security system on the American people. One main problem with their plan: the drivers of the truck didn"t park it against the main support column as they had been ordered to do by Mr. Salem and the FBI. Instead they parked it about a dozen feet away, and so it didn"t bring down the building. Consequently, the Federal Government didn"t get the ma.s.sive death toll it needed to create the martial law system it was h.e.l.l-bent on implementing against our Const.i.tutional Republic.
To the horror of the American people, the Feds finished the job on September 11, 2001.
Oklahoma City Bombing April 19, 1995. Multiple bombs ripped through the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in downtown Oklahoma City. As usual, Federal fingerprints were all over this tragic event.
President Bill Clinton, taking his orders from the New World Order chieftains, needed a crisis to get his plans for a socialized America and gun control agenda through. Taking a page out of history"s handbook, Bill Clinton knew that a crisis of this magnitude, including endless images of mangled children would pull on the heartstrings of Americans. They would beg for the Ant.i.terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (S.735) that he had failed to pa.s.s just a year before. The bill absolutely eviscerated ma.s.sive sections of the Const.i.tution and the Bill of Rights.
We have been investigating the Oklahoma City tragedy for over six years and the amount of evidence is staggering. Let"s just hit some of the key points: Oklahoma City"s NBC affiliate, KFOR, in a live broadcast immediately after the bombing, reported: ". . . devastation that that one explosion caused, because here is now what we are starting to learn about the succession, or what someone obviously hoped would be a succession of explosions. The first bomb that was in the Federal Building did go off. It did the damage that you see right there. The second explosive was found and defused. The third explosive that was found-and they are working on right now as we speak, I understand- both the second and third explosives-if you can imagine this-were larger than the first. So try to imagine two or threefold happening what we"ve already seen there. It is just incredible to think that there was that much heavy artillery that was somehow moved into the downtown Oklahoma City Federal Building."
A few minutes later, Oklahoma City CBS affiliate KWTV"s Jennifer Reynolds had the following to add: "We just saw, if you were watching, there was a white pickup truck backing a trailer into the scene. They are trying to move people out of the way so they can get it in. It appears to be the Oklahoma City bomb squad-their bomb disposal unit essentially is what it is-and it is what they would use if the report that we gave you just a few moments ago turns out to be correct, that they have found a second explosive device of some kind inside that building. They will back that trailer down there, and the bomb squad folks will go in and they will use that trailer. . . . This is how they would transport the explosive device away from this populated area to try to do something with it."
At the same time, CNN reported: "The Justice Department is reporting that a second explosive device has been found in the A.P. Murrah Building in downtown Oklahoma City. Mike, you"re still with us aren"t you?"
[Mike Arnett, an attorney in downtown Oklahoma City, on phone with CNN] "Yes, and in addition to that, what we were told at the scene a few minutes ago was that in fact two different explosive devices were found in addition to the one that went off, for a total of three."
Another reporter for KWTV stated: "It has now been confirmed through federal authorities that a second bomb has been found inside that federal building in Oklahoma City. It was an explosion at 9:00 this morning that did that damage you"re look at right there-blowing off the entire north face of that building. Again, you"re looking at the north face. A second bomb was found on the east side of that building. A bomb squad is on the scene. That second bomb has not exploded. We don"t know quite the status yet-if they have managed to defuse it-but it has been confirmed that a second bomb has been found on the east side."
Oklahoma governor Frank Keating, on the telephone with reporters, said: "The report that I have is that one device was deactivated. Apparently there is another device, and obviously whatever did the damage to the Murrah Building was a tremendous, very sophisticated explosive device."
KFOR also reported: "President Clinton just called Governor Frank Keating. He says that three FBI anti-terrorist teams are en route to Oklahoma City right now. They are saying that this is the work of a sophisticated group. This is a very sophisticated device and it has to have been done by an explosives expert, obviously with this type of explosion."
A doctor on the street outside the carnage told reporters: "The medical teams downtown are unable to get into the wreckage to retrieve more of the injured because of the presence of other bombs in the area."
KWTV reported: "I just took a look down the street at the Murrah Building again. I see another bomb truck going, so apparently they are going to try to get out that third bomb that"s been talked about. Still a lot of activity around the Murrah Building . . . security concerns that another one could go off."
KFOR also reported: "Fortunately, it didn"t, because the second device that they found, we understand, was even more powerful than the first. They then found a third device. You can see the look on this woman"s face-the fear that she might have to go through the same thing again. They then found a third device, which was also larger than the first. Hard to feel lucky at this point, but certainly through some good work by some munitions experts and the explosive sniffing dogs, further tragedy has certainly been averted here."