Mr. Murray was of course very much concerned at this decision, and remonstrated. Three days later Lord Byron revoked his determination. To Mr. Murray he wrote (May 1, 1814):
"If your present note is serious, and it really would be inconvenient, there is an end of the matter; tear my draft, and go on as usual: in that case, we will recur to our former basis."
Before the end of the month Lord Byron began the composition of his next poem, "Lara," usually considered a continuation of "The Corsair." It was published conjointly with Mr. Rogers"s "Jacqueline." "Rogers and I,"
said Lord Byron to Moore, "have almost coalesced into a joint invasion of the public. Whether it will take place or not, I do not yet know, and I am afraid "Jacqueline" (which is very beautiful) will be in bad company. But in this case, the lady will not be the sufferer."
The two poems were published anonymously in the following August (1814): Murray allowed 500 guineas for the copyright of each.
CHAPTER X
MR. MURRAY"S REMOVAL TO 50, ALBEMARLE STREET
We must now revert to the beginning of 1812, at which time Mr. William Miller, who commenced business in Bond Street in 1791, and had in 1804 removed to 50, Albemarle Street, desired to retire from "the Trade." He communicated his resolve to Mr. Murray, who had some time held the intention of moving westward from Fleet Street, and had been on the point of settling in Pall Mall. Murray at once entered into an arrangement with Miller, and in a letter to Mr. Constable of Edinburgh he observed:
_John Murray to Mr. A. Constable_.
_May_ 1, 1812.
"You will probably have heard that Miller is about to retire, and that I have ventured to undertake to succeed him. I had for some time determined upon moving, and I did not very long hesitate about accepting his offer. I am to take no part of his stock but such as I may deem expedient, and for it and the rest I shall have very long credit. How far it may answer, I know not; but if I can judge of my own views, I think it may prove an advantageous opening. Miller"s retirement is very extraordinary, for no one in the trade will believe that he has made a fortune; but from what he has laid open to me, it is clear that he has succeeded. In this arrangement, I propose of course to dispose of my present house, and my medical works, with other parts of my business. I have two offers for it, waiting my decision as to terms.... I am to enter at Miller"s on September 29th next." [Footnote: The Fleet Street business was eventually purchased by Thomas and George Underwood. It appears from the "Memoirs of Adam Black" that Black was for a short time a partner with the Underwoods. Adam Black quitted the business in 1813.
Upon the failure of the Underwoods in 1831, Mr. Samuel Highley, son of Mr. Murray"s former partner, took possession, and the name of Highley again appeared over the door.]
The terms arranged with Mr. Miller were as follows: The lease of the house, No. 50, Albemarle Street, was purchased by Mr. Murray, together with the copyrights, stock, etc., for the sum of 3,822 12_s_. 6_d_.; Mr. Miller receiving as surety, during the time the purchase money remained unpaid, the copyright of "Domestic Cookery," of the _Quarterly Review_, and the one-fourth share in "Marmion." The debt was not finally paid off until the year 1821.
Amongst the miscellaneous works which Mr. Murray published shortly after his removal to Albemarle Street were William Sotheby"s translation of the "Georgies of Virgil"--the most perfect translation, according to Lord Jeffrey, of a Latin cla.s.sic which exists in our language; Robert Bland"s "Collection from the Greek Anthology"; Prince h.o.a.re"s "Epochs of the Arts"; Lord Glenbervie"s work on the "Cultivation of Timber"; Granville Penn"s "Bioscope, or Dial of Life explained"; John Herman Merivale"s "Orlando in Roncesvalles"; and Sir James Hall"s splendid work on "Gothic Architecture." Besides these, there was a very important contribution to our literature--in the "Miscellaneous Works of Gibbon"
in 5 volumes, for the copyright of which Mr. Murray paid Lord Sheffield the sum of 1,000.
In 1812 he published Sir John Malcolm"s "Sketch of the Sikhs," and in the following year Mr. Macdonald Kinneir"s "Persia." Mr. D"Israeli"s "Calamities of Authors" appeared in 1812, and Murray forwarded copies of the work to Scott and Southey.
_Mr. Scott to John Murray_.
_July_ 2,1812.
I owe you best thanks for the "Calamities of Authors," which has all the entertaining and lively features of the "Amenities of Literature." I am just packing them up with a few other books for my hermitage at Abbotsford, where my present parlour is only 12 feet square, and my book-press in Lilliputian proportion. Poor Andrew Macdonald I knew in days of yore, and could have supplied some curious anecdotes respecting him. He died of a poet"s consumption, viz. want of food.
"The present volume of "Somers" [Footnote: Lord Somers" "Tracts," a new edition in 12 volumes.] will be out immediately; with whom am I to correspond on this subject since the secession of Will. Miller? I shall be happy to hear you have succeeded to him in this department, as well as in Albemarle Street. What has moved Miller to retire? He is surely too young to have made a fortune, and it is uncommon to quit a thriving trade. I have had a packet half finished for Gifford this many a day."
Southey expressed himself as greatly interested in the "Calamities of Authors," and proposed to make it the subject of an article for the _Quarterly_.
_Mr. Southey to John Murray_.
_August_ 14, 1812.
"I should like to enlarge a little upon the subject of literary property, on which he has touched, in my opinion, with proper feeling.
Certainly I am a party concerned. I should like to say something upon the absurd purposes of the Literary Fund, with its despicable ostentation of patronage, and to build a sort of National Academy in the air, in the hope that Canning might one day lay its foundation in a more solid manner. [Footnote: Canning had his own opinion on the subject.
When the Royal Society of Literature was about to be established, an application was made to him to join the committee. He refused, for reasons "partly general, partly personal." He added, "I am really of opinion, with Dr. Johnson, that the mult.i.tudinous personage, called The Public, is after all, the best patron of literature and learned men."]
And I could say something on the other side of the picture, showing that although literature in almost all cases is the worst trade to which a man can possibly betake himself, it is the best and wisest of all pursuits for those whose provision is already made, and of all amus.e.m.e.nts for those who have leisure to amuse themselves. It has long been my intention to leave behind me my own Memoirs, as a post-obit for my family--a wise intention no doubt, and one which it is not very prudent to procrastinate. Should this ever be completed, it would exhibit a case directly in contrast to D"Israeli"s view of the subject.
I chose literature for my own profession, with every advantage of education it is true, but under more disadvantages perhaps of any other kind than any of the persons in his catalogue. I have never repented the choice. The usual censure, ridicule, and even calumnies, which it has drawn on me never gave me a moment"s pain; but on the other hand, literature has given me friends; among the best and wisest and most celebrated of my contemporaries it has given me distinction. If I live twenty years longer, I do not doubt that it will give me fortune, and if it pleases G.o.d to take me before my family are provided for, I doubt as little that in my name and in my works they will find a provision. I want to give you a "Life of Wesley." The history of the Dissenters must be finished by that time, and it will afford me opportunity."
During the year 1813 the recklessness of the younger Ballantyne, combined with the formation of the incipient estate at Abbotsford, were weighing heavily on Walter Scott. This led to a fresh alliance with Constable, "in which," wrote Scott, "I am sensible he has gained a great advantage"; but in accordance with the agreement Constable, in return for a share in Scott"s new works, was to relieve the Ballantynes of some of their heavy stock, and in May Scott was enabled "for the first time these many weeks to lay my head on a quiet pillow." But nothing could check John Ballantyne. "I sometimes fear," wrote Scott to him, "that between the long dates of your bills and the tardy settlements of the Edinburgh trade, some difficulties will occur even in June; and July I always regard with deep anxiety." How true this forecast proved to be is shown by the following letter:
_Mr. Scott to John Murray_,
EDINBURGH, _July 5_, 1813.
I delayed answering your favour, thinking I could have overtaken the "Daemonology" for the _Review_, but I had no books in the country where it found me, and since that Swift, who is now nearly finished, has kept me incessantly labouring. When that is off my hand I will have plenty of leisure for reviewing, though you really have no need of my a.s.sistance.
The volume of "Somers" being now out of my hands I take the liberty to draw at this date as usual for 105. Now I have a favour to ask which I do with the more confidence because, if it is convenient and agreeable to you to oblige me in the matter, it will be the means of putting our connection as author and publisher upon its former footing, which I trust will not be disagreeable to you. I am making up a large sum of money to pay for a late purchase, and as part of my funds is secured on an heritable bond which cannot be exacted till Martinmas, I find myself some hundreds short, which the circ.u.mstances of the money market here renders it not so easy to supply as formerly. Now if you will oblige me by giving me a lift with your credit and accepting the enclosed bills, [Footnote: Three bills for 300 each at three, four, and six months respectively.] it will accommodate me particularly at this moment, and as I shall have ample means of putting you in cash to replace them as they fall due, will not, I should hope, occasion you any inconvenience.
Longmans" house on a former occasion obliged me in this way, and I hope found their account in it. But I entreat you will not stand on the least ceremony should you think you could not oblige me without inconveniencing yourself. The property I have purchased cost about 6,000, so it is no wonder I am a little out for the moment. Will you have the goodness to return an answer in course of post, as, failing your benevolent aid, I must look about elsewhere?
You will understand distinctly that I do not propose that you should advance any part of the money by way of loan or otherwise, but only the a.s.sistance of your credit, the bills being to be retired by cash remitted by me before they fall due.
Believe me, very truly,
Your obedient Servant,
WALTER SCOTT.
Mr. Murray at once replied:
_John Murray to Mr. Scott_.
_July_ 8, 1813.
DEAR SIR,
I have the pleasure of returning accepted the bills which I received from you this morning. In thus availing myself of your confidential application, I trust that you will do me the justice to believe that it is done for kindness already received, and not with the remotest view towards prospective advantages. I shall at all times feel proud of being one of your publishers, but this must be allowed to arise solely out of your own feelings and convenience when the occasions shall present themselves. I am sufficiently content in the belief that even negative obstacles to our perfect confidence have now subsided.
When weightier concerns permit we hope that you will again appear in our _Review_. In confidence I may tell you that your long silence led us to avail ourselves of your friend Mr. Rose"s offer to review Ferriar, [Footnote: Dr. Ferriar on "Apparitions."] and his article is already printing.
I will send you a new edition of the "Giaour," in which there are one or two stanzas added of peculiar beauty.
I trust that your family are well, and remain, dear Sir,
Your obliged and faithful Servant,
JOHN MURRAY.
Within a few months of this correspondence, Scott was looking into an old writing-desk in search of some fishing-tackle, when his eye chanced to light upon the Ashestiel fragment of "Waverley," begun several years before. He read over the introductory chapters, and then determined to finish the story. It is said that he first offered it anonymously to Sir R. Phillips, London, who refused to publish it. "Waverley" was afterwards accepted by Constable & Co., and published on half profits, on July 7, 1814. When it came out, Murray got an early copy of the novel; he read it, and sent it to Mr. Canning, and wrote upon the t.i.tle-page, "By Walter Scott." The reason why he fixed upon Scott as the author was as follows. When he met Ballantyne at Boroughbridge, in 1809, to settle some arrangements as to the works which Walter Scott proposed to place in his hands for publication, he remembered that among those works were three--1st, an edition of "Beaumont and Fletcher"; 2nd, a poem; and 3rd, a novel. Now, both the edition of "Beaumont and Fletcher"
(though edited by Weber) and the poem, the "Lady of the Lake," had been published; and now, at last, appeared _the novel_. [Footnote: Indeed, in Ballantyne & Co."s printed list of "New Works and Publications for 1809-10," issued August 1810 (now before us), we find the following entry: "Waverley; or, "Tis Sixty Years Since; a novel in 3 vols. 12mo."
The work was not, however, published until July 1814.] He was confirmed in his idea that Walter Scott was the author after carefully reading the book. Canning called on Murray next day; said he had begun it, found it very dull, and concluded: "You are quite mistaken; it cannot be by Walter Scott." But a few days later he wrote to Murray: "Yes, it is so; you are right: Walter Scott, and no one else."
In the autumn of 1814 Mrs. Murray went to Leith by sailing-ship from the Thames, to visit her mother and friends in Edinburgh. She was accompanied by her son John and her two daughters. During her absence, Mr. Murray wrote to her two or three times a week, and kept her _au courant_ with the news of the day. In his letter of August 9 he intimated that he had been dining with D"Israeli, and that he afterwards went with him to Sadler"s Wells Theatre to see the "Corsair," at which he was "woefully disappointed and enraged.... They have actually omitted his wife altogether, and made him a mere ruffian, ultimately overcome by the Sultan, and drowned in the New River!"